McKenna, William J.

Once considered rare and essentially untreatable with a grim prognosis and reduced life expectancy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has evolved substantially over 6 decades. Ultimately, HCM has become a contemporary global disease with pharmacologic and interventional options offering effective personalized treatment for all adverse disease pathways. Striking reduction in HCM‐related mortality to ≤0.5%/year in optimally treated cohorts is now comparable to that expected in the US general population, lower than most other disease risks to living, and 10‐fold less than the earliest estimates. The few deaths directly related to HCM are now largely attributable to advanced (end‐stage) heart failure in patients with nonobstructive HCM. Determinants of this transformation to a lower risk disease are evident in hallmark clinical inflection points and breakthroughs, including dedicated HCM programs assembling large clinical databases in which focused (and unfunded) physician‐investigators have derived data directly from patients in clinical practice. Evidence‐based observational studies report emergence of contemporary treatment strategies enhancing survival: implantable defibrillators prevent arrhythmic sudden death globally with 95% sensitive patient selection using an American Heart Association/American College Cardiology risk stratification algorithm; low‐risk, high‐benefit surgical myectomy reverses outflow obstruction and heart failure in >90% with a long‐term survival benefit; and aggressive anticoagulation has reduced embolic strokes. Recent novel pharmacologic alternatives (cardiac myosin inhibitors) are proving effective in relieving obstruction/symptom burden and changing disease management. These principles and time‐tested patient‐centered research strategies uniquely tailored to the heterogeneous HCM clinical spectrum are pivotal in providing practice insights, offering a vulnerable population more optimistic prognosis including opportunity to achieve normal longevity not available to prior generations of patients.

Importance Whether vigorous intensity exercise is associated with an increase in risk of ventricular arrhythmias in individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is unknown. Objective To determine whether engagement in vigorous exercise is associated with increased risk for ventricular arrhythmias and/or mortality in individuals with HCM. The a priori hypothesis was that participants engaging in vigorous activity were not more likely to have an arrhythmic event or die than those who reported nonvigorous activity. Design, Setting, and Participants This was an investigator-initiated, prospective cohort study. Participants were enrolled from May 18, 2015, to April 25, 2019, with completion in February 28, 2022. Participants were categorized according to self-reported levels of physical activity: sedentary, moderate, or vigorous-intensity exercise. This was a multicenter, observational registry with recruitment at 42 high-volume HCM centers in the US and internationally; patients could also self-enroll through the central site. Individuals aged 8 to 60 years diagnosed with HCM or genotype positive without left ventricular hypertrophy (phenotype negative) without conditions precluding exercise were enrolled. Exposures Amount and intensity of physical activity. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary prespecified composite end point included death, resuscitated sudden cardiac arrest, arrhythmic syncope, and appropriate shock from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. All outcome events were adjudicated by an events committee blinded to the patient’s exercise category. Results Among the 1660 total participants (mean [SD] age, 39 [15] years; 996 male [60%]), 252 (15%) were classified as sedentary, and 709 (43%) participated in moderate exercise. Among the 699 individuals (42%) who participated in vigorous-intensity exercise, 259 (37%) participated competitively. A total of 77 individuals (4.6%) reached the composite end point. These individuals included 44 (4.6%) of those classified as nonvigorous and 33 (4.7%) of those classified as vigorous, with corresponding rates of 15.3 and 15.9 per 1000 person-years, respectively. In multivariate Cox regression analysis of the primary composite end point, individuals engaging in vigorous exercise did not experience a higher rate of events compared with the nonvigorous group with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.01. The upper 95% 1-sided confidence level was 1.48, which was below the prespecified boundary of 1.5 for noninferiority. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this cohort study suggest that among individuals with HCM or those who are genotype positive/phenotype negative and are treated in experienced centers, those exercising vigorously did not experience a higher rate of death or life-threatening arrhythmias than those exercising moderately or those who were sedentary. These data may inform discussion between the patient and their expert clinician around exercise participation.

Background —Dual-chamber pacing (DDD) has been proposed as a treatment alternative to surgery for severely symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), based largely on uncontrolled studies. Methods and Results —This prospective, multicenter trial assessed pacing in 48 symptomatic HCM patients with ≥50 mm Hg basal gradient, refractory to drug therapy. Patients were randomized to 3 months each of DDD pacing and pacing backup (AAI-30) in a double-blind, crossover study design, followed by an uncontrolled and unblinded 6-month pacing trial. With randomization, no significant differences were evident between pacing and no pacing for subjective or objective measures of symptoms or exercise capacity, including NYHA functional class, quality of life score, treadmill exercise time or peak oxygen consumption. After 6 additional months of unblinded pacing, functional class and quality of life score were improved compared with baseline ( P <0.01), but peak oxygen consumption was unchanged. Outflow gradient decreased 40%, 82±32 mm Hg to 48±32 mm Hg ( P <0.001), and was reduced in 57% of patients but showed no change or an increase in 43%. At 12 months, 6 individual patients (12%) showed improved functional capacity; each was 65 to 75 years of age. Left ventricular wall thicknesses in the overall study group showed no remodeling between baseline (22±5 mm) and 12 months (21±5 mm; P= NS). Conclusions —(1) Pacing cannot be regarded as a primary treatment for obstructive HCM; (2) with randomization, perceived symptomatic improvement was most consistent with a substantial placebo effect; (3) longer, uncontrolled pacing periods were associated with some subjective benefit but unaccompanied by objective improvement in cardiovascular performance and should be interpreted cautiously; (4) modest reduction in outflow gradient was achieved in most patients; and (5) a small subset (12%) ≥ 65 years of age showed a clinical response, suggesting that DDD pacing could be a therapeutic option for some elderly patients.

Summary To determine the relationship of left ventricular function and ventricular tachycardia, 48 hour ECG monitoring and technetium-99m gated equilibrium radionuclide angiography were performed in 84 consecutive patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and sinus rhythm. Measurements of ejection fraction (EF), peak ejection rate (PER, edv/s), peak filling rate (PFR, edv/s) and time to peak filling rate (PFR, ms) were derived from radionuclide activity time curves generated from data acquired in list-mode. Left ventricular function was compared in patients with and without ventricular tachycardia. Left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly lower in 16 patients with ventricular tachycardia compared to 68 patients without (67 ± 17 vs 78 ± 10, P &lt; 0.05) and time to peak filling rate was significantly prolonged (152 ± 32 vs 120 ± 36, P &lt; 0.05). Thus patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy at greatest risk of sudden death had significant impairment of systolic and diastolic left ventricular function.