Lowry, Natalia

Background: Aesthetic soft-tissue filler injections for lip enhancement are popular and performed throughout the world. When injecting lips with a cannula, as the cannula is advanced, resistance is perceived in consistent locations, potentially indicating boundaries between intralabial compartments. Objective: We aimed to investigate whether intralabial compartments exist and, if so, to describe their volumes, location, boundaries, and dimensions. Methods: This cadaveric study investigated a total of 20 human body donors (13 male, seven female) with a mean (SD) age at death of 61.9 years (23.9) and body mass index of 24.3 kg/m2 (3.7). The investigated cohort included 11 White donors, eight Asian donors, and one Black donor. Dye injections simulating minimally invasive lip treatments were conducted. Results: Independent of sex or race, six anterior and six posterior compartments in the upper and lower lip were identified, for a total of 24 lip compartments. Compartment boundaries were formed by vertically oriented septations that were found in consistent locations. The anterior compartments had volumes ranging from 0.30 to 0.39 cc; the posterior compartment volume ranged from 0.44 to 0.52 cc. The compartment volumes were larger centrally and decreased gradually toward the oral commissure. Conclusions: The volume and size of each of 24 compartments contribute to the overall appearance and shape of the lips. To achieve a natural lip shape preserving aesthetic outcome it may be preferable to administer the volumizing product using a compartment-respecting injection approach.

Background: Soft-tissue filler injections performed with a cannula are perceived to be less precise because of the length of the instrument and the blunt tip, which can deviate in any direction. Midfacial needle injections are favored despite the increased risk for intraarterial product placement. The objective of this study was to demonstrate that ultrasound-assisted cannula injections of the midface result in precise, safe, and effective volumization procedures. Methods: Midfacial injections with a 22-G cannula were performed in 188 midfaces of 94 healthy volunteers [86 women; age, 53.05 (9.9) years; 23.63 (2.1) kg/m2] under ultrasound-assisted guidance. Precision (ie, administration of product in the same plane as the location of the cannula tip), safety (ie, rate of adverse events), and aesthetic outcome (rated by the patient and the treating physician) were assessed. Results: In 100% of cases, the product was applied into the desired deep midfacial fat compartment, and the product did not migrate into more superficial layers during the injection process or at any follow-up visit. There was a statistically significant (P < 0.001) improvement in midfacial volume loss and the aesthetic outcome was rated as very much improved. No adverse events were reported throughout follow-up. Conclusions: Real-time imaging allows for visual feedback during cannula advancement and injection procedures in the midface and can help practitioners achieve safer aesthetic outcomes. It is hoped that practitioners decide to use a cannula more frequently for midfacial volumization, given the results presented in this article. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

AbstractBackgroundUnderstanding the mobility of the midface and the separate contributions of the superficial and deep fat compartments is essential for natural esthetic outcomes following soft tissue filler or fat grafting procedures. A study was designed that used ultrasound imaging to demonstrate in vivo visualization and quantification of distances and movements in the midface.MethodsA total of 48 midfaces of 24 healthy Caucasian volunteers, all naïve of esthetic procedures, (22 females; 46.85 (9.8) years; 22.83 (3.1) kg/m2) were scanned using 18 MHz ultrasound imaging. Distances between bony landmarks (inferior orbital rim, infraorbital foramen) were used as markers to measure the cranial movement of the superficial (superficial nasolabial and superficial medial cheek fat compartment) and the deep (deep pyriform space, deep medial check fat compartment, deep lateral cheek fat compartment) midfacial fat compartments between resting and smiling facial position.ResultsThe superficial midfacial fat compartment moved, on average, 3.7 mm (p < 0.001) cranially, whereas the deep midfacial fat compartments moved, on average, 0.1 mm (p > 0.05) during smiling. No gender differences in mobility were identified (p > 0.05).ConclusionThe results obtained are in line with previous cadaveric investigations and revealed, in a highly statistically significant fashion, that the superficial midfacial fat compartments move in cranial direction whereas the deep fat compartment did not display similar positional changes. These results help to guide facial injectable treatments and to understand why, in the midface, a deep supraperiosteal approach should be favored when augmenting the deep midfacial fat compartments.