Cariou, Alain

ImportanceUnderstanding the relationship between patients’ clinical characteristics and outcomes is fundamental to medicine. When critically ill patients die after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST), the inability to observe the potential for recovery with continued aggressive care could bias future clinical decisions and research.ObjectiveTo quantify the frequency with which experts consider patients who died after WLST following resuscitated cardiac arrest to have had recovery potential if life-sustaining therapy had been continued.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis prospective cohort study included comatose adult patients (aged ≥18 years) treated following resuscitation from cardiac arrest at a single academic medical center between January 1, 2010, and July 31, 2022. Patients with advanced directives limiting critical care or who experienced cardiac arrest of traumatic or neurologic etiology were excluded. An international cohort of experts in post-arrest care based on clinical experience and academic productivity was identified. Experts reviewed the cases between August 24, 2022, and February 11, 2024.ExposurePatients who died after WLST.Main Outcome and MeasuresThree or more experts independently estimated recovery potential for each patient had life-sustaining treatment been continued, using a 7-point numerical ordinal scale. In the primary analysis, which involved the patient cases with death after WLST, a 1% or greater estimated recovery potential was considered to be clinically meaningful. In secondary analyses, thresholds of 5% and 10% estimated recovery probability were explored.ResultsA total of 2391 patients (median [IQR] age, 59 [48-69] years; 1455 men [60.9%]) were included, of whom 714 (29.9%) survived to discharge. Cases of uncertain outcome (1431 patients [59.8%]) in which WLST preceded death were reviewed by 38 experts who rendered 4381 estimates of recovery potential. In 518 cases (36.2%; 95% CI, 33.7%-38.7%), all experts believed that recovery potential was less than 1% if life-sustaining therapies had been continued. In the remaining 913 cases (63.8%; 95% CI, 61.3%-66.3%), at least 1 expert believed that recovery potential was at least 1%. In 227 cases (15.9%; 95% CI, 14.0%-17.9%), all experts agreed that recovery potential was at least 1%, and in 686 cases (47.9%; 95% CI, 45.3%-50.6%), expert estimates differed at this threshold.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study of comatose patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest, most who died after WLST were considered by experts to have had recovery potential. These findings suggest that novel solutions to avoiding deaths based on biased prognostication or incomplete information are needed.

Abstract Aims To evaluate the association of basic life support with survival after sports-related sudden cardiac arrest (SR-SCA). Methods and results In this systematic review and meta-analysis, a search of several databases from each database inception to 31 July 2021 without language restrictions was conducted. Studies were considered eligible if they evaluated one of three scenarios in patients with SR-SCA: (i) bystander presence, (ii) bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), or (iii) bystander automated external defibrillator (AED) use and provided information on survival. Risk of bias was evaluated using Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions. The primary outcome was survival at the longest follow up. The meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was used to rate certainty in the evidence. In total, 28 non-randomized studies were included. The meta-analysis showed significant benefit on survival in all three groups: bystander presence [odds ratio (OR) 2.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48–4.37; I2 = 25%; 9 studies—988 patients], bystander CPR (OR 3.84, 95% CI 2.36–6.25; I2 = 54%; 23 studies—2523 patients), and bystander AED use (OR 5.25, 95% CI 3.58–7.70; I2 = 16%; 19 studies—1227 patients). The GRADE certainty of evidence was judged to be moderate. Conclusion In patients with SR-SCA, bystander presence, bystander CPR, and bystander AED use were significantly associated with survival. These results highlight the importance of witness intervention and encourage countries to develop their first aid training policy and AED installation in sport settings.

Introduction: Conflicting results exist regarding the impact of gender on survival after Sudden Cardiac Arrest (SCA). Hypothesis: Assess association between female gender and survival after SCA Methods: An electronic search of Embase, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Non-Indexed Citations and EBM Reviews - Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, EBM Reviews - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Google was conducted (January 1948 to January 2014) for studies of any study design and language, examining the gender effect on survival at hospital discharge after a SCA. Two independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data. The inter-rater agreements kappa were measured at the first and second selection steps. Moreover, the pooled OR and 95% CI, concerning women vs. men survival at hospital discharge after an OHCA were calculated with a random effect model. Subgroups analyses were performed, according to the cardiac origin of OHCAs and according to the study quality. Study quality criteria were based on the New Castle Ottawa Scale. Results: After a detailed screening of 556 citations, 12 studies were identified involving 404 621 patients. The inter-rater agreements kappa was high for the 2 study selection steps (0.91 and 1). In most studies, women were older and had less favorable baseline characteristics including a lower prevalence of witnessed-OHCA, OHCA in a public location, bystander cardio-pulmonary resuscitation and shockable rhythms compared to men. However and after adjustment for these differences, women were more likely to survive at hospital discharge (N=12; OR: 1.11 [1.02-1.21]; p=0.013). This result remains in studies analyzing OHCA of presumed cardiac origin (N=7; OR: 1.17 [1.03-1.34]; p=0.017) and in studies of high quality (N=7; OR: 1.11 [1.02-1.21]; p=0.017). Conclusion: Despite less favorable baseline characteristics, women are more likely to survive at hospital discharge after an OHCA. Further studies are needed to explain this paradox.