Yaghi, Shadi

Introduction: The safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in cervical artery dissection-related acute ischemic stroke (CeAD-AIS) remains unclear. We performed a retrospective study of data from the National Inpatient Sample investigating outcomes in CeAD-AIS patients treated with and without IVT. Methods: We included adult patients with CeAD-AIS hospitalized between 2016 to 2019. CeAD-AIS was defined by concurrent CeAD and AIS diagnoses, identified with ICD-10 codes. The primary outcome was home discharge. The safety outcomes were inpatient death and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We used survey-weighted multivariable adjusted logistic regressions comparing the groups (IVT versus no IVT), followed by interaction analyses to examine for effect modifications based on age, medical history, stroke severity, and endovascular treatment. Results: Between 2016-2019, 1,360 (12.1%) of 11,285 CeAD-AIS patients received IVT. Patients treated with IVT- had higher NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (median 8 [4-17] versus 3 [1-11]; p < 0.001). In adjusted analyses, treatment with IVT was associated with a greater odds of home discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-2.05, p = 0.014), but not ICH (aOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.43-1.86, p = 0.773) or inpatient death (aOR 1.22, 95% CI 0.72-2.06, p = 0.454). In interaction analyses, stroke severity significantly interacted with IVT ( p for interaction = 0.001), where IVT was significantly associated with increased likelihood of home discharge in patients with moderate to severe strokes (NIHSS > 4) (aOR 2.28, 95% CI 1.59-3.26, p < 0.001) but not in those with mild stroke (NIHSS 0-4) (aOR 1.03 95% CI 0.62-1.70, p = 0.922). Conclusion: IVT improved the likelihood of home discharge in patients with CeAD-AIS without increasing the risk of inpatient death or ICH.

Background: Left ventricular (LV) injury is a cardioembolic etiology of ischemic stroke. We aimed to 1) evaluate recurrent stroke risk among patients with cryptogenic stroke and LV injury, and 2) determine if there is a treatment effect with anticoagulation in this population. Methods: We analyzed the multicenter, retrospective Cardiac Abnormalities in Stroke Prevention and Recurrence cohort of patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke. The exposure was LV injury defined by 1) LV ejection fraction (EF) 20-40% and/or 2) LV wall motion abnormality (hypokinesis or akinesis). The primary composite outcome included recurrent stroke, major bleeding, or death. Cox proportional hazard models were built and sequentially adjusted for 1) age and sex (Model 1), and 2) age, sex, race, ethnicity, anti-thrombotic use, and vascular risk factors (Model 2). We then assessed if there was heterogeneity in treatment effect by LV injury status with an interaction term of LV injury and oral anticoagulation use in Model 2. Results: Of 2,641 patients in CASPR, the analytic cohort included 2,191 patients with complete exposure and outcome data (median age 65 years, 49.8% female, median follow-up 1.55 years). There were 113 (5.2%) patients with LV injury (median LVEF 30%, interquartile range 25-34%). There were 559 incident events (321 recurrent strokes [288 ischemic], 71 major hemorrhages, 250 deaths). Among patients with LV injury, 15.9% were prescribed an anticoagulant within 7 days of index stroke (vs 9.6% without LV injury, p=0.03). The unadjusted risk of the primary outcome was non-significantly higher among patients with LV injury vs without (HR 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-2.00), but became significant in Model 1 (HR 1.50; 95% CI, 1.21-1.85) and in Model 2 (HR 1.35, 95% CI, 1.11-1.64). In the LV injury subgroup, anticoagulation vs antiplatelet therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the primary outcome (HR 0.63, 95% CI, 0.43-0.94). In patients without LV injury, anticoagulation was associated with a higher risk of the composite outcome (HR 4.35, 95% CI, 1.69-11.16, p[interaction]=0.002). Conclusion: In this observational study, there was an increased risk of the primary outcome which included recurrent stroke among patients with cryptogenic stroke and LV injury. Anticoagulation use in LV injury is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of the primary outcome. These findings warrant confirmation in a dedicated randomized controlled trial.

Introduction: Cervical artery dissection (CAD) is a well-recognized cause of acute ischemic stroke, especially in young adults, accounting for up to 20-25% of all cases. Several studies reported an incidence between 2.5-5 per 100,000 in the general population. However, the actual incidence may be higher as many patients remain asymptomatic. Even though CAD is one of the leading causes of ischemic stroke, there is a lack of consensus in management. Our study surveyed practicing clinicians involved in the management of CAD to characterize current practice trends and provide a foundation for future research. Methods: An online case-based questionnaire with 11 questions regarding the management of cervical artery dissection was developed and piloted internally with 12 Mayo Clinic cerebrovascular neurologist/neurosurgeons. The survey was finalized, and initially sent to the STOP-CAD study group. We then sent the survey to practicing vascular neurologists across different academic institutions. Surveys were sent to 126 unique individuals. Results: A total of 42 clinicians completed the questionnaires. The response rate was 33% (42/126). Aspirin antiplatelet monotherapy was seen as the most appropriate therapy for asymptomatic CAD (81% [34/42]). Anticoagulation was the treatment of choice for cases with CAD and concomitant intraluminal thrombus (74% [31/42]). Most (74% [31/42]) of the participants recommended repeat imaging at three months. However, no consistent response regarding the type of antithrombotic agent for symptomatic CAD without intramural thrombus or cases with pseudoaneurysm. There was marked variability regarding the duration of antithrombotic therapy, ranging from three months to life-long treatment. Conclusion: Marked variability was seen in the management of CAD, especially regarding the choice of antithrombotic agent in symptomatic and complicated (stenosis or pseudoaneurysm) cases and the duration of such therapy, which reflects the lack of definitive clinical trial data. Ongoing research is needed to better guide the optimal management of these patients.

Background: Poor collateral circulation and hypoperfusion may lead to recurrent stroke in intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). The role of perfusion in silent strokes and potentially insidious cognitive impairment in ICAD is unknown. We used evidence of impaired perfusion at angiography in SAMMPRIS to predict subsequent cognitive changes. Methods: Angiography at enrollment in the SAMMPRIS trial was independently evaluated, blind to clinical data and cognitive testing. Antegrade flow in the symptomatic arterial territory and corresponding collateral flow were scored. Impaired perfusion was defined by poor antegrade and poor collateral flow. Serial testing with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was done in subjects without aphasia or neglect at baseline, 4 mo, 12 mo and closeout, or until subjects had a clinical stroke endpoint. Results: 207 subjects (median age 61, range 33-81 years; 37% women) had baseline MoCA scores with angiography data on territorial perfusion. Baseline MoCA scores (mean 24.2±4.1) were similar between categories of antegrade flow and collateral circulation. Impaired perfusion was noted in 33/207 (16%). Serial MoCA revealed that changes in cognition over time were different at 4 mo, 12 mo and closeout based on the presence of impaired perfusion at baseline (p<0.001). After more modest (mean MoCA change = 0.5 increase from baseline, p=0.80) early improved cognitive function at 4 mo, those with impaired perfusion had cognitive decline at 12 mo (mean MoCA change, p<0.01) unlike the continued improvement in other subjects. Cognitive changes in those with impaired perfusion were associated with a higher frequency of subsequent stroke in the territory. Conclusions: Impaired perfusion in the symptomatic arterial territory of ICAD predicts cognitive outcomes that may precede recurrent ischemia. Future studies may define the role of noninvasive perfusion imaging in ICAD to predict cognitive trajectories and recurrent stroke.