Back to Authors

Khan, Farhan

Mayo Clinic

Brown University

Citations 2

Abstract WP15: Intravenous Thrombolysis in Cervical Artery Dissection-Related Stroke: A Nationwide Study
Shu, Liqi , Field, Thalia S. , Henninger, Nils , Khan, Muhib , Strelecky, Lukas , Khan, Farhan, Furie, Karen L. , Yaghi, Shadi , Field, Thalia S , Keser, Zafer , Henninger, Nils , Lee, Elizabeth , Guo, Xiaofan , Keser, Zafer , Mistry, Eva , Nguyen, Thanh N. , Siegler, James E. , Mandel, Daniel , Stretz, Christoph , Khan, Farhan

Stroke | January 30, 2025 | Volume: 56 | Issue: Suppl_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/str.56.suppl_1.wp15 Get It

Introduction: The safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in cervical artery dissection-related acute ischemic stroke (CeAD-AIS) remains unclear. We performed a retrospective study of data from the National Inpatient Sample investigating outcomes in CeAD-AIS patients treated with and without IVT. Methods: We included adult patients with CeAD-AIS hospitalized between 2016 to 2019. CeAD-AIS was defined by concurrent CeAD and AIS diagnoses, identified with ICD-10 codes. The primary outcome was home discharge. The safety outcomes were inpatient death and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We used survey-weighted multivariable adjusted logistic regressions comparing the groups (IVT versus no IVT), followed by interaction analyses to examine for effect modifications based on age, medical history, stroke severity, and endovascular treatment. Results: Between 2016-2019, 1,360 (12.1%) of 11,285 CeAD-AIS patients received IVT. Patients treated with IVT- had higher NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (median 8 [4-17] versus 3 [1-11]; p < 0.001). In adjusted analyses, treatment with IVT was associated with a greater odds of home discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-2.05, p = 0.014), but not ICH (aOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.43-1.86, p = 0.773) or inpatient death (aOR 1.22, 95% CI 0.72-2.06, p = 0.454). In interaction analyses, stroke severity significantly interacted with IVT ( p for interaction = 0.001), where IVT was significantly associated with increased likelihood of home discharge in patients with moderate to severe strokes (NIHSS > 4) (aOR 2.28, 95% CI 1.59-3.26, p < 0.001) but not in those with mild stroke (NIHSS 0-4) (aOR 1.03 95% CI 0.62-1.70, p = 0.922). Conclusion: IVT improved the likelihood of home discharge in patients with CeAD-AIS without increasing the risk of inpatient death or ICH.
Abstract DP55: Recurrent Stroke in Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke and Left Ventricular Injury: The Cardiac Abnormalities in Stroke Prevention and Recurrence (CASPR) study
Bowman, Anna, Coevering, Russell Van, Penckofer, Mary , Singh, Eesha , Kerrigan, Deborah , Nour, Hassan Aboul , Krishnaiah, Balaji , Yaghi, Shadi , Sathya, Anvitha , Thompson, Sean, Alvi, Muhammad , Herpich, Franziska , Shahrivari, Mahan, Kang, Jieun, Zha, Alicia , Rothstein, Aaron , Khan, Farhan, Smith, Matthew , Sarkar, Monica , Qdais, Ahmad Abu, Abburi, Nandini , Rozental, Stefano, Nedelcu, Simona, Thon, Jesse , Thottempudi, Neeharika, Omran, Setareh Salehi , Brown, Samantha , Brown, Samantha J , Aboul-Nour, Hassan , Sharma, Richa , Siegler, James E. , Chen, Lucia , Nahab, Fadi B , Khasiyev, Farid , Lineback, Christina , Culbertson, Collin J , Jillella, Dinesh , Ro, Jennifer, Aziz, Yasmin , Elangovan, Cheran , Farooqui, Mudassir , Brown, Samantha, Liebeskind, David S. , Rozental, Stefano Freitas Andrade, Nedelcu, Simona , Nguyen, Thanh N. , Ali, Farman, Stretz, Christoph , Thottempudi, Neeharika , Havenon, Adam de

Stroke | January 30, 2025 | Volume: 56 | Issue: Suppl_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/str.56.suppl_1.dp55 Get It

Background: Left ventricular (LV) injury is a cardioembolic etiology of ischemic stroke. We aimed to 1) evaluate recurrent stroke risk among patients with cryptogenic stroke and LV injury, and 2) determine if there is a treatment effect with anticoagulation in this population. Methods: We analyzed the multicenter, retrospective Cardiac Abnormalities in Stroke Prevention and Recurrence cohort of patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke. The exposure was LV injury defined by 1) LV ejection fraction (EF) 20-40% and/or 2) LV wall motion abnormality (hypokinesis or akinesis). The primary composite outcome included recurrent stroke, major bleeding, or death. Cox proportional hazard models were built and sequentially adjusted for 1) age and sex (Model 1), and 2) age, sex, race, ethnicity, anti-thrombotic use, and vascular risk factors (Model 2). We then assessed if there was heterogeneity in treatment effect by LV injury status with an interaction term of LV injury and oral anticoagulation use in Model 2. Results: Of 2,641 patients in CASPR, the analytic cohort included 2,191 patients with complete exposure and outcome data (median age 65 years, 49.8% female, median follow-up 1.55 years). There were 113 (5.2%) patients with LV injury (median LVEF 30%, interquartile range 25-34%). There were 559 incident events (321 recurrent strokes [288 ischemic], 71 major hemorrhages, 250 deaths). Among patients with LV injury, 15.9% were prescribed an anticoagulant within 7 days of index stroke (vs 9.6% without LV injury, p=0.03). The unadjusted risk of the primary outcome was non-significantly higher among patients with LV injury vs without (HR 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-2.00), but became significant in Model 1 (HR 1.50; 95% CI, 1.21-1.85) and in Model 2 (HR 1.35, 95% CI, 1.11-1.64). In the LV injury subgroup, anticoagulation vs antiplatelet therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the primary outcome (HR 0.63, 95% CI, 0.43-0.94). In patients without LV injury, anticoagulation was associated with a higher risk of the composite outcome (HR 4.35, 95% CI, 1.69-11.16, p[interaction]=0.002). Conclusion: In this observational study, there was an increased risk of the primary outcome which included recurrent stroke among patients with cryptogenic stroke and LV injury. Anticoagulation use in LV injury is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of the primary outcome. These findings warrant confirmation in a dedicated randomized controlled trial.