Back to Authors

Malik, Aaqib H.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4865-8114

Mayo Clinic

Westchester Medical Center

Citations 3

Pharmacotherapies in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb , Lloji, Amanda, Hooda, Urvashi , Aronow, Wilbert S. , Pan, Stephen , Greene, Stephen J. , Cooper, Howard A., Gass, Alan, Mentz, Robert J. , Frishman, William H. , Panza, Julio A. , Mentz, Robert J , Sreenivasan, Jayakumar , Malik, Aaqib H. , Lanier, Gregg M. , Murad, M. Hassan , Michos, Erin D. , Gupta, Rahul , Desai, Nihar R.

Cardiology in Review | December 28, 2022 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 114-123

10.1097/crd.0000000000000484 Get It

Various pharmacotherapies exist for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but with unclear comparative efficacy. We searched EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Library from inception through August 2021 for all randomized clinical trials in HFpEF (EF >40%) that evaluated beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Outcomes assessed were cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model. We included 22 randomized clinical trials (30,673 participants; mean age = 71.7 ± 4.2 years; females = 49.3 ± 7.7%; median follow-up = 24.4 ± 11.1 months). Compared with placebo, there was no statistically significant difference in cardiovascular mortality [beta-blockers; odds ratio (OR) 0.79 (0.46–1.34), MRA; OR 0.90 (0.70–1.14), ACE OR 0.95 (0.59–1.53), ARB; OR 1.02 (0.87–1.19), ARNI; OR 0.97 (0.74–1.26) and SGLT2i; OR 1.00 (0.84–1.18)] or all-cause mortality [beta blockers; OR 0.75 (0.54–1.04), MRA; OR 0.90 (0.75–1.08) ACE; OR 1.05 (0.71–1.54), ARB; OR 1.03 (0.91–1.15), ARNI; OR 0.99 (0.82–1.20) and SGLT2i; OR 1.00 (0.89–1.13)]. The certainty in these estimates was low or very low. There was a significantly reduction in HF hospitalization with the use of SGLT2i [OR 0.71 (0.62–0.82), moderate certainty], ARNI [OR 0.77 (0.63–0.94), low certainty], and MRA [OR 0.81 (0.66–0.98), moderate certainty]; with corresponding P scores of 0.84, 0.68, and 0.58, respectively. In HFpEF, the use of beta-blockers, MRA, ACE/ARB/ARNI, or SGLT2i was not associated with improved cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. SGLT2i, ARNI, and MRA reduced the risk of HF hospitalizations.
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients With COVID-19
Abu‐Haniyeh, Ahmed , Li, Heyi , Kaul, Risheek , Aronow, Wilbert S. , Frishman, William H. , Lansman, Steven , Sreenivasan, Jayakumar , Ranka, Sagar , Lahan, Shubham , Malik, Aaqib H.

Cardiology in Review | July 22, 2021 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 129-133

10.1097/crd.0000000000000410 Get It

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by a clinical spectrum of diseases ranging from asymptomatic or mild cases to severe pneumonia with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring mechanical ventilation. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used as rescue therapy in appropriate patients with COVID-19 complicated by ARDS refractory to mechanical ventilation. In this study, we review the indications, challenges, complications, and clinical outcomes of ECMO utilization in critically ill patients with COVID-19-related ARDS. Most of these patients required venovenous ECMO. Although the risk of mortality and complications is very high among patients with COVID-19 requiring ECMO, it is similar to that of non-COVID-19 patients with ARDS requiring ECMO. ECMO is a resource-intensive therapy, with an inherent risk of complications, which makes its availability limited and its use challenging in the midst of a pandemic. Well-maintained data registries, with timely reporting of outcomes and evidence-based clinical guidelines, are necessary for the careful allocation of resources and for the development of standardized utilization protocols.
Surgical and Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Mitral Annular Calcification: A Systematic Review
Alexis, Sophia L. , Malik, Aaqib H. , El‐Eshmawi, Ahmed, George, Isaac , Sengupta, Aditya , Kodali, Susheel , Hahn, Rebecca T. , Khalique, Omar , Zaid, Syed , Bapat, Vinayak , Leon, Martin B. , Tang, Gilbert H.L. , Hahn, Rebecca T , Guerrero, Mayra , Adams, David

Journal of the American Heart Association | March 17, 2021 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.120.018514 Get It

Abstract Mitral annular calcification with mitral valve disease is a challenging problem that could necessitate surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR). Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is emerging as a feasible alternative in high‐risk patients with appropriate anatomy. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to December 25, 2019 for studies discussing SMVR or TMVR in patients with mitral annular calcification; 27 of 1539 articles were selected for final review. TMVR was used in 15 studies. Relevant data were available on 82 patients who underwent hybrid transatrial TMVR, and 354 patients who underwent transapical or transseptal TMVR. Outcomes on SMVR were generally reported as small case series (447 patients from 11 studies); however, 1 large study recently reported outcomes in 9551 patients. Patients who underwent TMVR had a shorter median follow‐up of 9 to 12 months (range, in‐hospital‒19 months) compared with patients with SMVR (54 months; range, in‐hospital‒120 months). Overall, those undergoing TMVR were older and had higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk scores. SMVR showed a wide range of early (0%–27%; median 6.3%) and long‐term mortality (0%–65%; median at 1 year, 15.8%; 5 years, 38.8%, 10 years, 62.4%). The median in‐hospital, 30‐day, and 1‐year mortality rates were 16.7%, 22.7%, and 43%, respectively, for transseptal/transapical TMVR, and 9.5%, 20.0%, and 40%, respectively, for transatrial TMVR. Mitral annular calcification is a complex disease and TMVR, with a versatile option of transatrial approach in patients with challenging anatomy, offers a promising alternative to SMVR in high‐risk patients. However, further studies are needed to improve technology, patient selection, operative expertise, and long‐term outcomes.