ABSTRACT Cutaneous manifestations of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are heterogeneous and may result from leukemic infiltration, secondary malignancies, infectious complications, or reactive inflammatory processes. Reactive angioendotheliomatosis (RAE) is a rare vascular proliferation that has only infrequently been reported in association with hematologic malignancies. We describe a 58‐year‐old man with high‐risk relapsed/refractory CLL harboring TP53 mutation and del(17p) who developed rapidly enlarging, fungating cutaneous lesions involving the right thumb, upper arm, and additional sites despite multiple prior therapies, including fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax. Histopathologic evaluation demonstrated dermal vascular proliferation with endothelial marker positivity (CD31, CD34, ERG, and vimentin), consistent with RAE and without evidence of leukemic infiltration. The lesions were refractory to local supportive measures but showed marked regression following treatment with CD19‐directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy using lisocabtagene maraleucel. Notably, cutaneous remission despite persistent measurable residual disease and eventual systemic relapse requiring allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. This discordance suggests that regression of RAE may be mediated through immune modulation and alteration of inflammatory or angiogenic pathways rather than direct elimination of cutaneous leukemia. To our knowledge, this is among the first reports describing resolution of paraneoplastic RAE following CAR T‐cell therapy in CLL, and it highlights the broader immunomodulatory effects of cellular immunotherapy beyond direct antitumor activity. Trial Registration The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission
The outcomes of secondary AML post allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation significantly depend on the presence of poor‐risk cytogenetic abnormalities
AbstractSecondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) includes AML as a complication of an antecedent hematological disorder or a therapy‐related AML. Large registry‐based data identified sAML as an independent poor‐outcome type of AML post allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo‐HCT). In our study, we tried to define factors affecting outcomes of sAML post allo‐HCT, and identify patients with sAML who may truly benefit from allo‐HCT. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 64 patients aged (14‐61 years) with sAML who received allo‐HCT between September 2010 and February 2018 at our institute. Most of the patients were transplanted from matched related donors (MRD; 54, 84.4%). Our results showed that poor‐risk cytogenetics were identified in 31 patients (48.4%), and their presence was an indicator of poor overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS; P‐value = .009, and .004, respectively). The cumulative incidence of chronic graft‐versus‐host disease (cGVHD) was significantly lower in sAML patients with poor‐risk cytogenetics (P‐value = .003) resulting in a high risk of death without cGVHD in this group of patients (P‐value = .02). Besides, GVHD relapse‐free survival (GRFS) analysis showed that most of our studied patients experienced either relapse or debilitating grade II‐IV cGVHD in the first 2 years post allo‐HCT. We conclude that sAML patients with poor‐risk cytogenetics have a significantly lower DFS post allo‐HCT with a high risk of death without active cGVHD.