Saleh, Mostafa

ABSTRACT Cutaneous manifestations of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are heterogeneous and may result from leukemic infiltration, secondary malignancies, infectious complications, or reactive inflammatory processes. Reactive angioendotheliomatosis (RAE) is a rare vascular proliferation that has only infrequently been reported in association with hematologic malignancies. We describe a 58‐year‐old man with high‐risk relapsed/refractory CLL harboring TP53 mutation and del(17p) who developed rapidly enlarging, fungating cutaneous lesions involving the right thumb, upper arm, and additional sites despite multiple prior therapies, including fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax. Histopathologic evaluation demonstrated dermal vascular proliferation with endothelial marker positivity (CD31, CD34, ERG, and vimentin), consistent with RAE and without evidence of leukemic infiltration. The lesions were refractory to local supportive measures but showed marked regression following treatment with CD19‐directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy using lisocabtagene maraleucel. Notably, cutaneous remission despite persistent measurable residual disease and eventual systemic relapse requiring allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. This discordance suggests that regression of RAE may be mediated through immune modulation and alteration of inflammatory or angiogenic pathways rather than direct elimination of cutaneous leukemia. To our knowledge, this is among the first reports describing resolution of paraneoplastic RAE following CAR T‐cell therapy in CLL, and it highlights the broader immunomodulatory effects of cellular immunotherapy beyond direct antitumor activity. Trial Registration The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission

Background: Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a main cause of morbidity and mortality in patients having undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). About 30-40% of patients have steroid‐refractory GVHD (SR‐GVHD) after the first‐line use of high doses of corticosteroids with a poor prognosis .Ruxolitinib is a promising treatment for SR-GVHD. However, data regarding optimum dosing, response rates and associated adverse events are scarce. Herein, we provide the first systemic review of literature for the use ruxolutinib in GVHD. Methods: A Medline (PubMed), google scholar, OVID and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews search using key words "Ruxolutinib and GVHD", "Ruxolutinib and SR-GVHD" was undertaken in June 2019. Only peer reviewed databases were searched and search was restricted to human studies of acute and chronic GVHD only. Results: 16 publications, as listed in Table 1. Only one was a prospective trial, all others were retrospective studies, case series (5), and case reports (2). Overall response, ranged 45% - 100%, complete response was noted in 5.2% -80% patients. Time to response was variable from 1-12 weeks. Cytopenias and infectious complications were frequently reported with dose reduction or interruptions needed in most studies. Maintained responses were reported in a small proportion after ruxolutinib discontinuation. Conclusion Ruxolutinib has promising efficacy in SR-GVHD , however cytopenias and infectious complications reported frequently mandate close monitoring. Results of ongoing prospective trials could provide answers for optimum dosing and response assessment, and management of related adverse events. Table Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.