Mongkonsritragoon, Wimwipa

AbstractIntroductionCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a standard treatment for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. However, there is still a gap of evidence in congenital heart disease (CHD) patients regarding resynchronization therapy.MethodsWe performed a meta‐analysis and systematic review of CHD patients who received CRT implantation. We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane database from inception to June 2023. Studies that reported response rate to CRT, total mortality rate, change in QRS duration, change in left ventricular ejection fraction, and change in New York Heart Association functional class were included.ResultsA total of 14 studies were included in the study. There were 10 studies that reported response rates after implantation. The overall response rate to CRT in CHD patients was 68% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61%–75%, I2 32%). The response rates in patients with systemic right ventricle (RV), systemic left ventricle (LV), and single ventricle were 58% (95% CI 46%–70%, I2 0%), 80% (95% CI 74%–86% I2 14%), and 67% (95% CI 49%–80% I2 0%). Response to CRT in systemic RV was inferior to systemic LV with an odds ratio of 0.38 (95% CI 0.15–0.95, I2 38%). The total mortality rate from seven studies was 12% (95% CI 8%–18%, I2 55%). The parameters which represented ventricular dyssynchrony improved after CRT implantation.ConclusionThe overall response rate to CRT in CHD was 68%. Patients with systemic RV had a lower response rate to CRT when compared to patients with systemic LV. The total mortality rate after CRT implantation was 12%.

Introduction Premature birth has a causal relationship with hypertension and diabetes, which are significant risk factors for major cardiovascular disease. Nonetheless, little is known whether premature birth portends future risks of acquired heart diseases, for example, ischemic heart disease (IHD), heart failure (HF), and valvular heart disease (VHD). Methods We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane database from inception to December 2021. Studies with prospective and retrospective cohort designs that reported the association between premature birth and acquired heart disease, including IHD, HF, and VHD, were included. Data from each study were combined with a random-effects model. The results were reported in the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals. Results The selected studies were comprised of 7 studies, with 5 studies involving premature birth and the development of IHD in adulthood and 2 studies involving premature birth and HF. No studies reporting the relationship between premature birth and VHD met our initial inclusion criteria. Our study did not find any association between premature birth and IHD in the adulthood (HR 1.14 95% CI 0.91-1.19, P = .16, I 2 = 51%). We found the association between premature birth and acquired HF (HR 1.53 95% CI 1.08-2.16, P = .01, I 2 = 0) Conclusion Premature birth was not statistically associated with IHD in adulthood, but there was a significant association between preterm and HF.

AbstractBackgroundQRS area, a three‐dimensional QRS complex, is a novel vectorcardiography method of measuring the magnitude of electrical forces in the heart. Hypothetically, a greater QRS area denotes higher dyssynchrony and indicates potential benefits from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Previous studies suggest a positive correlation between QRS area and the degree of response to CRT, but its clinical use remains unclear. We performed a meta‐analysis of the relationship between QRS area and survival benefit following CRT.MethodsWe comprehensively searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from inception to August 2021. We included studies with prospective and retrospective cohort designs that reported QRS area before CRT and total mortality. Data from each study were analyzed using a random‐effects model. The results were reported as a hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals.ResultsFive observational studies including 4931 patients were identified. The cut‐off values between large and small QRS areas ranged from 102 to 116 μVs. Our analysis showed a larger QRS area was statistically associated with increased 5‐year survival in patients implanted with CRT (HR pooled 0.48, 95% CI 0.46–0.51, I2 = 54%, p < .0001). Greater QRS area reduction (pre‐ and post‐implantation) were associated with a lower total mortality rate (HR pooled 0.45, 95% CI 0.38–0.52, I2 = 0%, p < .0001).ConclusionLarger pre‐implantation QRS area was associated with increased survival after CRT. QRS area reduction following CRT implantation was also associated with lower mortality. QRS area may potentially become an additional selection criterion for CRT implantations.

Abstract Background QRS area, three-dimensional QRS complex, is among novel vectorcardiographical methods of measuring the magnitude of electrical forces generated by the heart. Hypothetically, greater QRS area portrayed higher dyssynchronous electrical activation, possibly deriving significant cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) benefit. Previous studies suggested a positive correlation between QRS areas and the degree of CRT responses. Nevertheless, its clinical use has remained premature. We hence performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of QRS area in predicting survival benefit following CRT. Method We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane database from inception to March 2021. Included studies with prospective and retrospective cohort design. Studies those report QRS area before implantation of CRT and outcome of total mortality. Data of each study were combined with random effects model. The results were reported in hazard ration (HR) with 95% confidence intervals. Result Four observational studies, including 4,931 patients, were identified. The cut-off values between large and small QRS areas ranged from 102–116 μVs. Our analysis showed larger QRS area was statistically associated with survival benefit in patients implanted with CRT with follow up time up to 5 years (Pooled hazard ratio 0.46, 95% confident interval 0.38–0.55, I2=42%). More QRS areas changes (pre and post implantation) were associated with lower total mortality rate (Pooled hazard ratio 0.45, 95% confident interval 0.38–0.52, I2=0%). Conclusion Patients with pre-implantation larger QRS area were strongly associated with survival benefit after CRT implantation. QRS area may potentially become additional selection criteria for CRT implantation. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1. Forest plot of pooled hazard ratioTable 1. Study characteristics

Abstract Background: Cardiac dyssynchronization is the proposed mechanism for pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy. The standard of treatment is biventricular pacing. Left bundle branch pacing and His bundle pacing are novel interventions that imitate the natural conductionof the heart with, theoretically, less interventricular dysynchrony. One of the surrogate markers of interventricular synchrony is QRS duration. Our study aimed to compare the change of QRS duration before and after implantation between types of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED): left bundle branch pacing versus His bundle pacing versus biventricular pacing and conventional right ventricular pacing. Methods: A literature search for studies that reported an interval change of QRS duration after CIED implantation was conducted utilizing the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. All relevant work through September 2020 from these databases was included in this analysis. A random-effects model network meta-analysis was used to analyze QRS duration changes (i.e., electrical cardiac synchronization) across different CIED implantations. Results: The mean study sample size, from 16 included studies, was 185 subjects. According to SUCRA analysis for the studies analyzed, the His bundle pacing intervention resulted in the most dramatic decline in QRS duration (mean difference -53 ms, 95% CI -67, -39), followed by left bundle branch pacing (mean difference -46 ms, 95% CI -60, -33) and biventricular pacing (mean difference -19 ms, 95% CI -37, -1.8), when compared to conventional right ventricle apical lead placement. Conclusion: Our network meta-analysis found that His bundle branch pacing devices have the greatest effect on QRS duration reduction after implantation, followed by left bundle branch pacing. Physiologic pacing interventions result in improved electrocardiography markers of cardiac synchronicity, narrower QRS duration, and might lower electromechanical dyssynchrony.