Chokesuwattanaskul, Ronpichai

ABSTRACT Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is prevalent in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Catheter ablation is increasingly used for rhythm control in this population, yet its clinical outcomes remain uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate arrhythmia recurrence and clinical outcomes following catheter ablation compared with medical therapy in patients with CA. Methods We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus from inception through December 2025 for studies evaluating catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias in CA. Cohort studies reporting arrhythmia recurrence and/or clinical outcomes were included. The primary outcome was freedom from atrial arrhythmia (AA) following ablation. Secondary outcomes included all‐cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and stroke. Random‐effects models were used to pool event rates and odds ratios (ORs). Results Thirteen observational studies comprising 797 patients with CA and AF were included. The pooled rate of freedom from AA following catheter ablation was approximately 50% (95% CI 37%–63%; I 2 = 71.7%). The all‐cause mortality analysis included 4 observational studies comprising 616 patients. Catheter ablation was associated with lower odds of all‐cause mortality (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11–0.60; I 2 = 18.4%); however, this association should be interpreted with caution given the retrospective design and risk of bias. No statistically significant differences were observed for heart failure hospitalization or stroke. Conclusions In patients with CA, catheter ablation was associated with modest arrhythmia‐free survival and lower odds of all‐cause mortality. However, all contributing studies were observational cohorts. Randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Abstract Background Right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing often leads to interventricular dyssynchrony and pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Conduction system pacing (CSP), particularly Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing, provides a physiologic alternative. In Limited Resource Countries (LRCs) like Thailand, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) under-penetration persists due to high costs and a shortage of operators skilled in coronary venous anatomy. Objective To share the experience and provide clinical update of CSP as a sustainable, cost-effective physiological pacing strategy to improve access to advanced arrhythmia management in resource-constrained environments. Methods This review explores the implementation of minimalist protocols and CSP-based CRT. Scalability strategies include specialized training programs, device reprocessing, and the establishment of regional longitudinal registries to bridge infrastructure gaps. Results CSP-based CRT can reduce device costs by nearly 50% compared with traditional triple-lead systems. This modality effectively mitigates the hemodynamic risks of RVA pacing while bypassing the technical and financial barriers of conventional CRT. Discussion Despite its advantages, CSP adoption requires overcoming infrastructure challenges, specifically the lack of automated remote monitoring. Optimizing clinical outcomes in LRCs necessitates standardized training, robust data collection, and innovative resource management to ensure equitable access to life-saving technology.

ABSTRACT Background Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the mainstay treatment for rhythm control in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF). However, due to the complex mechanisms of PsAF, the efficacy of PVI alone remains modest. Spatiotemporal electrogram dispersion (STED) ablation is a promising strategy to enhance outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of STED ablation plus PVI versus PVI alone in PsAF ablation. Methods A systematic search was conducted to identify studies published up to November 2024 comparing PVI plus STED ablation (PVI‐STED group) versus PVI alone (PVI group) in patients with PsAF. The primary outcomes were AF recurrence and sinus rhythm (SR) conversion. Results Eleven studies (three randomized controlled trials, three prospective cohorts, five retrospective cohorts) involving 1607 patients (mean age of 63.9 ± 9.3 years) were included. The PVI‐STED group was significantly associated with a lower risk of AF recurrence (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.27–0.59, I ² = 25%) and a higher likelihood of SR conversion (OR: 7.04, 95% CI: 1.62–30.62, I 2 = 79%). No significant differences were observed in procedural time (MD: 27.61 min, 95% CI: −29.12 to 84.33, I ² = 97%), ablation time (MD: 4.4 min, 95% CI: −11.3 to 20.0, I 2 = 98%), or fluoroscopy time (0.25 min, 95% CI: −3.4 to 3.9, I 2 = 95%). The overall rate of AEs in the PVI‐STED group was 1% (95% CI: 1%–3%, I 2 = 0%). Conclusion The PVI‐STED approach demonstrated both efficacy and safety in treating PsAF, as evidenced by reduced AF recurrence and improved SR conversion rates.

Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) and high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation (HPSD) are emerging techniques for treating atrial fibrillation (AF), offering promising results compared to cryoballoon ablation (CBA). This network meta-analysis aims to evaluates the efficacy and safety of PFA, HPSD, and CBA. Method: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EBSCO Information Services were systematically searched for relevant studies until April 2024. The primary outcome is freedom from atrial arrhythmia. A random-effects model was used for data synthesis, and P-scores were employed for outcome ranking. Point estimation (odd ratios) was calculated for comparisons. Results: Fifteen studies were included in our network meta-analysis, involving 5,093 atrial fibrillation patients: 812 (16%), 2,659 (52%), and 1,622 (32%) patients underwent PFA, CBA, and HPSD, respectively. PFA demonstrated the highest efficacy (P-scores 99.3%). Point estimation between PFA and HPSD, and PFA and CBA, were 1.394 (95% CI: 1.047-1.858) and 1.479 (95% CI: 1.134–1.929), respectively. PFA had higher complications compared to HPSD (OR=4.44, 95% CI: 1.405-14.031) and CBA (OR=2.581, 95% CI: 0.992–6.720). HPSD had the shortest fluoroscopic time (P-scores 100%), while CBA had the longest (P-scores 0%). PFA had the shortest procedural time compared to CBA and HPSD with P-scores of 100% 50% and 0%, respectively. Conclusion: PFA showed higher efficacy but higher complication risk than HPSD and CBA. HPSD and CBA demonstrated similar efficacy and safety.

AbstractIntroductionDirect oral anticoagulants (DOACs) become the recommended treatment over vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with non‐valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, their effectiveness in reducing cognitive impairment and dementia compared to VKA remains unclear.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database. Randomized controlled trials, cohort, or case–control study that assessed incident dementia between AF patients who received DOAC compared to VKA were selected. Relevant study characteristics and the number of incident dementia diagnosis or hazard ratios (HRs) for incident dementia and each dementia subtypes were extracted. Random‐effects model was used to perform meta‐analysis. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were used to estimate effect sizes for continuous data.ResultsTwelve cohort studies comprising 1 451 069 individuals were included. The incidence of dementia was lower in AF patients prescribed DOACs compared to VKA (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83–0.93, I 2 = 61.2%). A lower incident dementia in DOACs group relative to VKA was significantly observed in those less than 75 years of age (< 65 years, HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.72–0.97, I 2 = 0%); 65–74 years, HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.81–0.92, I 2 = 55.4%); and ≥ 75 years, HR 1.07 (95% CI 0.74–1.55, I 2 = 92.5%)) and for the subgroup of patients with vascular dementia (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.824–0.997, I 2 = 0%).ConclusionsThis meta‐analysis reveals a reduction in incidence of dementia in AF patients prescribed DOACs compared to VKA, particularly in those less than 75 years old and in the vascular dementia subtype.

Abstract Background: The relationships between exercise timing and health outcomes including anthropometric indices, metabolic markers, and sleep health have not been clearly established. To gain better insights, we performed the meta-analysis to determine the effects of morning versus evening exercise on various health outcomes. Methods: We collected studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from inception to March 2023 to perform a meta-analysis. Exercise is defined as performing activity at least moderate intensity. For the outcomes of interest, the mean differences (MD) were employed using a random-effects model, the generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird. Results: A total of 716 patients were analyzed from 14 studies including randomized controlled trial and observational studies. We found no significant associations between exercise timing and several health-related parameters. Specifically, the data showed no notable differences in body weight (MD: -0.12 kg [95% CI −0.81 to 0.58]) and BMI (MD: -0.07 kg/m2 [95% CI −0.46 to 0.32]) when comparing morning and evening exercise sessions. Similarly, sleep latency was not significantly affected by exercise timing (MD: -2.24 minutes [95% CI −5.83 to 1.35]). Furthermore, changes in metabolic biomarkers, including LDL (MD: -6.64 mg/dL [95% CI −20.08 to 6.79]) and HDL (MD: 0.09 mg/dL [95% CI 0 to 0.17]), were not significantly associated with the timing of exercise. Conclusion: This meta-analysis found no significant relationship between exercise timing and health outcomes including anthropometric indices, metabolic markers, and sleep health. While considered as hypothesis generating, timing of exercise should equally prune patients’ health outcomes.

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) as well as the recurrence of AF after rhythm control strategy. However, the data on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and recurrent AF after catheter ablation with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remain unclear. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of CPAP treatment in OSA patients after atrial fibrillation ablation. Methods: We searched MEDLINE and Embase databases from inception to September 2023 to identify studies that assess the effect of CPAP in OSA patients on the recurrence of AF after PVI. Data from each study were combined using the random effects model. Results: Eight studies (one randomized controlled trial and seven cohort studies) with 1487 OSA patients (660 in the CPAP group and 827 in the control group) were included. The use of CPAP in OSA patients was associated with significantly lower AF recurrence after PVI (odds ratio (OR) = 0.36, 95% conference interval (CI) 0.25–0.53, p < 0.001). The results of sensitivity analysis remain the same as the main analysis. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that CPAP treatment was associated with lower rates of AF recurrence after PVI.

AbstractIntroductionAtrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common supraventricular tachycardia referred for ablation. Periprocedural conduction system damage was a primary concern during AVNRT ablation. This study aimed to assess the incidence of permanent atrioventricular (AV) block and the success rate associated with different types of catheters in slow pathway ablation.MethodA literature search was performed to identify studies that compared various techniques, including types of radiofrequency ablation (irrigated and nonirrigated) and different sizes of catheter tip cryoablation (4, 6, and 8‐mm), in terms of their outcomes related to permanent atrioventricular block and success rate. To assess and rank the treatments for the different outcomes, a random‐effects model of network meta‐analysis, along with p‐scores, was employed.ResultsA total of 27 studies with 5110 patients were included in the analysis. Overall success rates ranged from 89.78% to 100%. Point estimation showed 4‐mm cryoablation exhibited an odds ratio of 0.649 (95%CI: 0.202–2.087) when compared to nonirrigated RFA. Similarly, 6‐mm cryoablation had an odds ratio of 0.944 (95%CI: 0.307–2.905), 8‐mm cryoablation had an odds ratio of 0.848 (95%CI: 0.089–8.107), and irrigated RFA had an odds ratio of 0.424 (95%CI: 0.058–3.121) compared to nonirrigated RFA.ConclusionOur study found no significant difference in the incidence of permanent AV block between the types of catheters. The success rates were consistently high across all groups. These findings emphasize the potential of both RF ablation (irrigated and nonirrigated catheter) and cryoablation as viable options for the treatment of AVNRT, with similar safety and efficacy profile.

The current recommendation for bioprosthetic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis (AS) is either surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We evaluated the performance of a machine learning-based predictive model using existing periprocedural variables for valve replacement modality selection. We analyzed 415 patients in a retrospective longitudinal cohort of adult patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. A total of 72 clinical variables including demographic data, patient comorbidities, and preoperative investigation characteristics were collected on each patient. We fit models using LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) and decision tree techniques. The accuracy of the prediction on confusion matrix was used to assess model performance. The most predictive independent variable for valve selection by LASSO regression was frailty score. Variables that predict SAVR consisted of low frailty score (value at or below 2) and complex coronary artery diseases (DVD/TVD). Variables that predicted TAVR consisted of high frailty score (at or greater than 6), history of coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), calcified aorta, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). The LASSO-generated predictive model achieved 98% accuracy on valve replacement modality selection from testing data. The decision tree model consisted of fewer important parameters, namely frailty score, CKD, STS score, age, and history of PCI. The most predictive factor for valve replacement selection was frailty score. The predictive models using different statistical learning methods achieved an excellent concordance predictive accuracy rate of between 93% and 98%.