Grodzinsky, Anna

Introduction: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a nonatherosclerotic cause of myocardial infarction. Migraine headache has been reported to be common among patients with SCAD, but the degree of migraine-related disability has not been quantified. Methods: Clinical data and headache variables were obtained from the baseline assessment of the prospective, multicenter iSCAD Registry. Migraine-related disability was quantified using the self-reported Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS). Demographic, clinical, psychosocial, and medical characteristics from data entry forms were compared between patients with and without migraine. Results: Of the 773 patients with available data, 46% reported previous or current migraines. Those with migraines were more likely to be women (96.9% vs 90.3%, p = 0.0003). The presence of underlying carotid fibromuscular dysplasia was associated with migraine (35% vs 27%, p = 0.0175). There was not a significant association with carotid artery dissection and migraine. Current migraine frequency was less than monthly (58%), monthly (24%), weekly (16%), and daily (3%). Triptan use was reported in 32.5% of patients, and 17.5% used daily migraine prophylactic medications. Using the MIDAS to quantify disability related to migraine, 60.2% reported little or no disability, 14.4% mild, 12.7% moderate, and 12.7% severe. The mean MIDAS score was 9.9 (mild to moderate disability). Patients with SCAD had higher rates of depression and anxiety (28.2% vs 17.7% [ p = 0.0004] and 35.3% vs 26.7% [ p = 0.0099], respectively). Conclusions: Migraines are common, frequent, and a source of disability in patients with SCAD. The association between female sex, anxiety, and depression may provide some insight for potential treatment modalities.

Background: An obesity paradox, with better long-term survival in obese patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), has been well described. The association between obesity and health status outcomes after PCI is unknown. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 3,281 PCI patients in a 10-center observational cohort study and categorized their body mass index (BMI) into normal (18.5 to <25), overweight (25 to <30), obese (30 to <35) and morbidly obese (≥ 35).Generalized linear models were used to describe the association between BMI and health status measures at 6 & 12 months, after adjusting for baseline characteristics and health status scores. Health status outcomes included; Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ] Angina Frequency (AF), and Quality of Life (QL) scores, as well as the EQ-5D visual analogue scale (EQ-5D VAS). Interaction with time was not significant, so an estimate of the average benefit over time was generated. Results: The distribution of patients’ BMI revealed that 17% were normal, 35% overweight, 28% obese and 20% morbidly obese. Compared with normal weight patients, morbidly obese individuals were younger (mean 60.8 yr vs. 67.9 yr) and had a higher prevalence of diabetes, hypertension and heart failure. They underwent radial artery access (12.0% vs. 7.0%) and drug eluting stent implantation (80.4% vs. 76.0%) more frequently. Unadjusted changes in scores were lower (worse) among morbidly obese as compared with normal weight patients for SAQ AF (mean difference [MD] -1.52; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] -3.05, -0.02), SAQ QL (MD -2.51; CI -4.48, -0.54), and EQ-5D VAS (MD -5.74;CI -7.52, -3.96). After adjustment, these differences were no longer significantly different for SAQ AF and SAQ QL (figure), although EQ-5D VAS scores remained lower among obese and morbidly obese patients. Conclusion: The overall health status was mildly worse among obese and morbidly obese individuals after PCI, but the benefits of PCI on patients’ disease-specific health status were similar across weight categories. This suggests that PCI is equally effective in improving angina and disease-specific quality of life, independent of patients’ weight.

Following decades of decline, maternal mortality began to rise in the United States around 1990—a significant departure from the world’s other affluent countries. By 2018, the same could be seen with the maternal mortality rate in the United States at 17.4 maternal deaths per 100 000 live births. When factoring in race/ethnicity, this number was more than double among non-Hispanic Black women who experienced 37.1 maternal deaths per 100 000 live births. More than half of these deaths and near deaths were from preventable causes, with cardiovascular disease being the leading one. In an effort to amplify the magnitude of this epidemic in the United States that disproportionately plagues Black women, on June 13, 2020, the Association of Black Cardiologists hosted the Black Maternal Heart Health Roundtable—a collaborative task force to tackle the maternal health crisis in the Black community. The roundtable brought together diverse stakeholders and champions of maternal health equity to discuss how innovative ideas, solutions and opportunities could be implemented, while exploring additional ways attendees could address maternal health concerns within the health care system. The discussions were intended to lead the charge in reducing maternal morbidity and mortality through advocacy, education, research, and collaborative efforts. The goal of this roundtable was to identify current barriers at the community, patient, and clinician level and expand on the efforts required to coordinate an effective approach to reducing these statistics in the highest risk populations. Collectively, preventable maternal mortality can result from or reflect violations of a variety of human rights—the right to life, the right to freedom from discrimination, and the right to the highest attainable standard of health. This is the first comprehensive statement on this important topic. This position paper will generate further research in disparities of care and promote the interest of others to pursue strategies to mitigate maternal mortality.