Buchanan, Donna M.

Background: An obesity paradox, with better long-term survival in obese patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), has been well described. The association between obesity and health status outcomes after PCI is unknown. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 3,281 PCI patients in a 10-center observational cohort study and categorized their body mass index (BMI) into normal (18.5 to <25), overweight (25 to <30), obese (30 to <35) and morbidly obese (≥ 35).Generalized linear models were used to describe the association between BMI and health status measures at 6 & 12 months, after adjusting for baseline characteristics and health status scores. Health status outcomes included; Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ] Angina Frequency (AF), and Quality of Life (QL) scores, as well as the EQ-5D visual analogue scale (EQ-5D VAS). Interaction with time was not significant, so an estimate of the average benefit over time was generated. Results: The distribution of patients’ BMI revealed that 17% were normal, 35% overweight, 28% obese and 20% morbidly obese. Compared with normal weight patients, morbidly obese individuals were younger (mean 60.8 yr vs. 67.9 yr) and had a higher prevalence of diabetes, hypertension and heart failure. They underwent radial artery access (12.0% vs. 7.0%) and drug eluting stent implantation (80.4% vs. 76.0%) more frequently. Unadjusted changes in scores were lower (worse) among morbidly obese as compared with normal weight patients for SAQ AF (mean difference [MD] -1.52; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] -3.05, -0.02), SAQ QL (MD -2.51; CI -4.48, -0.54), and EQ-5D VAS (MD -5.74;CI -7.52, -3.96). After adjustment, these differences were no longer significantly different for SAQ AF and SAQ QL (figure), although EQ-5D VAS scores remained lower among obese and morbidly obese patients. Conclusion: The overall health status was mildly worse among obese and morbidly obese individuals after PCI, but the benefits of PCI on patients’ disease-specific health status were similar across weight categories. This suggests that PCI is equally effective in improving angina and disease-specific quality of life, independent of patients’ weight.

Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a class Ia recommendation and endorsed performance measure for the quality of care in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) survivors. While participation in CR after AMI is associated with reduced mortality, conflicting data exists on its association with health status outcomes. Methods: Using data from 2 prospective AMI registries (TRIUMPH and PREMIER), we identified patients for whom baseline and follow-up health status scores and documentation of CR participation (attendance of 1 or more sessions within 6 months post-AMI) were available. Health status was assessed by four Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) domain scores (quality of life [QoL], angina frequency [AF], treatment satisfaction [TS], and physical limitation [PL]), as well as SF-12 physical and mental health composite scores ( PCS & MCS ). We created propensity matched cohorts of CR participants and non-participants to examine the association between CR participation with health status (6 and 12 months) and all-cause mortality (up to 7 years), using conditional repeated measures and proportional hazards models, respectively. Results: Among 3,957 AMI patients from 31 sites, 2,015 patients (51%) participated in CR after discharge. Compared to non-participants, CR participants were more often Caucasian (83.6% vs. 65.4%), had higher rates of health insurance (90.6% vs. 79.3%), but clinically similar baseline SAQ and SF-12 scores in all domains. After propensity matching, all covariates were well-balanced (Standardized Difference <10 for all patient characteristics) between CR participants and non-participants. In the repeated measures analysis, the mean SAQ and SF-12 domain scores were clinically similar for both groups at 6 and 12 months after hospital discharge (Table). Using a conditional proportional hazards model, a decrease in all-cause mortality was noted in the CR participant group (HR 0.59, 95% CI [0.46, 0.75]). Conclusion: In a large, multi-center AMI cohort, we found that although CR participation seemed to improve survival, CR participants had similar health status improvements after AMI as non-participants. Further investigation is required to identify how CR programs can further maximize the health status benefits to post-AMI participants.