Michelena, Héctor I.

Abstract This International evidence-based nomenclature and classification consensus on the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy recognizes 3 types of bicuspid aortic valve: 1. Fused type, with 3 phenotypes: right-left cusp fusion, right-non cusp fusion and left-non cusp fusion; 2. 2-sinus type with 2 phenotypes: Latero-lateral and antero-posterior; and 3. Partial-fusion or forme fruste. This consensus recognizes 3 bicuspid-aortopathy types: 1. Ascending phenotype; root phenotype; and 3. extended phenotypes.

Background The prognosis of left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) remains elusive despite its recognition as a clinical entity for >30 years. We sought to identify clinical and imaging characteristics and risk factors for mortality in patients with LVNC. Methods and Results 339 adults with LVNC seen between 2000 and 2016 were identified. LVNC was defined as end‐systolic noncompacted to compacted myocardial ratio >2 (Jenni criteria) and end‐diastolic trough of trabeculation‐to‐epicardium (X):peak of trabeculation‐to‐epicardium (Y) ratio <0.5 (Chin criteria) by echocardiography; and end‐diastolic noncompacted:compacted ratio >2.3 (Petersen criteria) by magnetic resonance imaging. Median age was 47.4 years, and 46% of patients were female. Left ventricular ejection fraction <50% was present in 57% of patients and isolated apical noncompaction in 48%. During a median follow‐up of 6.3 years, 59 patients died. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02–1.06), left ventricular ejection fraction <50% (HR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.17–4.80), and noncompaction extending from the apex to the mid or basal segments (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.21–3.68) were associated with all‐cause mortality. Compared with the expected survival for age‐ and sex‐matched US population, patients with LVNC had reduced overall survival ( P <0.001). However, patients with LVNC with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and patients with isolated apical noncompaction had similar survival to the general population. Conclusions Overall survival is reduced in patients with LVNC compared with the expected survival of age‐ and sex‐matched US population. However, survival rate in those with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and isolated apical noncompaction was comparable with that of the general population.

Abstract Background Mitral-annulus-disjunction (MAD), often described in mitral-valve-prolapse (MVP) patients, remains incompletely defined and its clinical outcome consequences are unknown. Objectives To assess MAD prevalence, clinical and echocardiographic characteristics, and independent impact on outcome in patients with isolated-MVP. Methods A cohort of 595 (65±16 years, 278 female) consecutive patients with MVP and comprehensive clinical, rhythmic and Doppler-echocardiographic characterization, was identified. Primary-endpoint was overall-survival, or occurrence of ventricular-arrhythmia. To eliminate clinical differences, we matched MAD-patients 1:1 with no-MAD based on propensity score for overall survival analysis using a greedy 5-to-1 digit-matching algorithm. Results MAD was frequent, present in 186 (31%) of MVP-patients and independently associated to bileaflet-MVP, leaflet-redundancy, younger-age, female-sex, enlarged left-ventricle-endsystolic-diameter and higher left-ventricle-ejection-fraction (all P≤0.04). Outcome primary-endpoint of survival after MVP diagnosis in matched-cohort (10-year 95±1%) was not associated with MAD presence (10-year 93±2% for no-MAD and 97±1% for MAD, P=0.4). Mortality was comparable for MAD (univariate-hazard-ratio 0.64 [0.25–1.65], P=0.4 vs. no-MAD), even adjusted-comprehensively including for MVP-characteristics (adjusted-hazard-ratio 1.17 [0.39–3.50], P=0.8). However, 220 (51%) MVP-patients were diagnosed ventricular-arrhythmia (161 with ventricular-tachycardia only) and long-term, MAD was associated with lower arrhythmia- and ventricular-tachycardia- overall freedom (adjusted-hazard-ratio for MAD 2.35 [1.75–3.15], P&lt;0.0001 vs. no-MAD and 2.71 [1.93–3.82], P&lt;0.0001 respectively). Hence, 10-year freedom of significant ventricular-arrhythmia in overall-cohort was severely reduced with MAD (41±4% vs. 62±3% for no-MAD). Conclusion In this unique MVP cohort, with arrhythmia and MAD comprehensively-characterized, MAD presence was frequent and independently associated to bileaflet-MVP and leaflet-redundancy. Long-term, MAD compared to no-MAD is not independently associated with higher-mortality but to reduced arrhythmia-freedom occurrence. Survival overall and by V arrhythmia Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Mayo Foundation

Abstract Background Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is an important cause of AR; these patients belong to a young and male predominant population and are distinctively different from tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). However, the differences between BAV and TAV in AR have not been completely explored. Purpose To explore differences between patients with BAV and TAV in hemodynamically significant aortic regurgitation (AR). Methods Consecutive patients with ≥moderate-severe AR were retrospectively identified from 2006 to 2017. Results Of 798 patients (502 with TAV, mean age 67±14 years; 296 with BAV, mean age 46±14 years) followed for 6.1±3.6 years, 403 underwent AV surgery (AVS); 154 died during follow-up. BAV men (94%) tended to become symptomatic when left ventricle enlarged; TAV patients became symptomatic before left ventricular (LV) enlargement. During follow-up, BAV patients had lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19; P&lt;0.0001) and higher incidence of AVS (HR, 1.28; P=0.01) than TAV, which attenuated after adjusted on age, sex, comorbidities, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), functional class, and time-dependent AVS. In a propensity-matched cohort, differences of survival and incidence of AVS between BAV and TAV were not demonstrated. After a median of 6.3 (IQR: 3.3–9.3) years, 53 patients died post-AVS; TAV patients having class I surgical triggers had poor survival than TAV-non-class I patients and BAV patients with and without class I triggers (Figure). Class I triggers had no effect on BAV patients regarding post-AVS survival. LVEF&lt;60% was associated with increased mortality in both TAV and BAV. Conclusions The correlation between larger LV size and symptomatic status only applied in BAV men. Patients with BAV and significant AR tended to have better survival and higher incidence of AVS, likely driven by inherent younger age and less comorbidity than patients with TAV. Class I surgical triggers had heavier negative impact on poor survival in TAV patients. The cutoff of LV dysfunction in AR may be LVEF 60%. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier curves post-AVS Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Objective To comprehensively explore contemporary differences between bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients with chronic haemodynamically significant aortic regurgitation (AR). Methods Consecutive patients with chronic ≥moderate-severe AR from a tertiary referral centre (2006–2017) were included. All-cause mortality, surgical indications and aortic valve surgery (AVS) were analysed. Results Of 798 patients (296 BAV-AR, age 46±14 years; 502 TAV-AR, age 67±14 years, p<0.0001) followed for 5.5 (IQR: 2.9–9.2) years, 403 underwent AVS (repair in 96) and 154 died during follow-up. The 8-year AVS incidence was 60%±3% versus 53%±3% for BAV-AR and TAV-AR, respectively (p=0.014). The unadjusted (real-life) 8-year total survival was 93%±7% versus 71%±2% for BAV-AR and TAV-AR, respectively (p<0.0001), and became statistically insignificant after sole adjustment for age (p=0.14). The within-group relative risk of death in BAV-AR patients demonstrated a large age-dependent increase (two fold at 50–55 years, up to 10-fold at 70 years). The presence of baseline symptoms was significantly associated with death for both BAV-AR (p=0.039) and TAV-AR (p<0.0001), but the strength of the association decreased with age adjustment for BAV-AR (age-adjusted HR 2.43 (0.92–6.39), p=0.07) and not for TAV-AR (age-adjusted HR, 2.3 (1.6–3.3), p<0.0001). As compared with general population, TAV-AR exhibited baseline excess risk which further increased at left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <60% and left ventricular end-systolic dimension index (LVESDi) >20 mm/m2; similar thresholds were observed for BAV-AR patients. Conclusion BAV-AR patients were two decades younger than TAV-AR and underwent AVS more frequently, resulting in a considerable real-life survival advantage for BAV-AR that was determined primarily by age and not valve anatomy. Pragmatically, regardless of valve anatomy, patients with haemodynamically significant AR and age >50–55 years require a low-threshold for surgical referral to prevent symptom development where LVEF <60% and LVESDi >20 mm/m2 seem appropriate referral thresholds.