Venkatesh, Sudhakar K.

BackgroundDuctal features alone may not offer high diagnostic sensitivity or most accurate disease severity of chronic pancreatitis (CP).PurposeDiagnose CP based on multiparametric MRI and MRCP features.Study TypeProspective.PopulationBetween February 2019 and May 2021, 46 control (23 males, 49.3 ± 14.1 years), 45 suspected (20 males, 48.7 ± 12.5 years), and 46 definite (20 males, 53.7 ± 14.6 years) CP patients were enrolled at seven hospitals enrolled in the MINIMAP study. CP classification was based on imaging findings and clinical presentation.Field Strength and Sequences1.5 T. T1‐weighted (T1W) spoiled gradient echo, T1 map with variable flip angle, dual‐echo Dixon, secretin‐enhanced MRCP before and after secretin infusion.AssessmentDual‐echo fat fraction (FF), T1 relaxation time, extracellular volume (ECV), T1 signal intensity ratio of the pancreas to the spleen (T1 score), arterial‐to‐venous enhancement ratio (AVR), pancreatic tail diameter (PTD), pancreas volume, late gadolinium enhancement, pancreatic ductal elasticity (PDE), and duodenal filling grade of secretin‐enhanced MRCP were measured.Statistical TestsLogistic regression analysis generated CP‐MRI and secretin‐enhanced CP‐SMRI scores. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to differentiate definite CP from control. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient.ResultsCompared to control, definite CP cohort showed significantly higher dual‐echo FF (7% vs. 11%), lower AVR (1.35 vs. 0.85), smaller PTD (2.5 cm vs. 1.95 cm), higher ECV (28% vs. 38%), and higher incidence of PDE loss (6.5% vs. 50%). With the cut‐off of >2.5 CP‐MRI score (dual‐echo FF, AVR, and PTD) and CP‐SMRI score (dual‐echo FF, AVR, PTD, and PDE) had cross‐validated area under the curves of 0.84 (sensitivity 87%, specificity 68%) and 0.86 (sensitivity 89%, specificity 67%), respectively. Interobserver agreement for both CP‐MRI and CP‐SMRI scores was 0.74.ConclusionThe CP‐MRI and CP‐SMRI scores yielded acceptable performance and interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of CP.Evidence Level1Technical EfficacyStage 2

Objectives: Determine whether the timing of transplantation affects patient mortality. Background: Neoadjuvant therapy and liver transplantation have emerged as an excellent treatment option for select patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). However, the optimal timing of transplantation is not known. Methods: We reviewed all patients registered for a standardized pCCA protocol between 1996 and 2020 at our center. After adjusting for confounders, we examined the association of waiting time with patient mortality in an intention-to-treat cohort (n=392) and those who received a liver transplant (n=256). Results: The median (interquartile range) time from registration to transplant or dropout was 5.74 (3.25–7.06) months. Compared with a short wait time (0–3 mo), longer waiting times did not affect all-cause mortality: (3–6 mo) hazard ratio (HR) 0.98; 95% CI: 0.52–1.84; (6–9 mo) HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.39–1.65; (9–12 mo) HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.26–1.22. Subgroups with a shorter waiting time had similar survival to those with long waiting times: living donor available HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.67–1.42; AB or B blood group HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.62–1.39. Longer waiting times were associated with decreased all-cause mortality after transplantation (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.87–0.97). This benefit began after a 6-month waiting time minimum (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.26–1.10) and increased further after 9 months (HR: 0.43 95% CI: 0.20–0.93). Waiting time was not associated with residual adenocarcinoma in the explant (odds ratio 0.99; 95% CI: 0.98–1.00). Conclusions: A waiting time of at least 6 months will optimize results with transplantation without affecting overall (intention-to-treat) patient survival.

BackgroundMR elastography (MRE) at 60 Hz is widely used for staging liver fibrosis. MRE with lower frequencies may provide inflammation biomarkers.PurposeTo establish a practical simultaneous dual‐frequency liver MRE protocol at both 30 Hz and 60 Hz during a single examination and validate the occurrence of second harmonic waves at 30 Hz.Study TypeRetrospective.SubjectsOne hundred six patients (48 females, age: 50.0 ± 13.4 years) were divided as follows: Cohort One (15 patients with chronic liver disease [CLD] and 25 healthy volunteers) with simultaneous dual‐frequency MRE. Cohort Two (66 patients with CLD) with second harmonic MRE.Field Strength/Sequence3‐T, single‐ or dual‐frequency MRE at 30 Hz and 60 Hz.AssessmentLiver stiffness (LS) in both cohorts was evaluated with manually placed volumetric ROIs by two independent analyzers. Image quality was assessed by three independent readers on a 4‐point scale (0–3: none/failed, fair, moderate, excellent) based on the depth of wave propagation with 1/3 incremental penetration. The success rate was derived from the percentage of nonzero quality scores.Statistical TestsMeasurement agreement, bias, and repeatability of LS were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Bland–Altman plots, and repeatability coefficient (RC). Mann–Whitney U tests were used to evaluate the differences in image quality between different methods. A P‐value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsSuccess rate was 97.5% in Cohort One and 91% success rate for the second harmonic MRE in Cohort Two. The second harmonic and conventional MRE showed excellent agreement in LS (all ICCs >0.90). The quality scores for the second harmonic wave images were lower than those from the conventional MRE (Z = −4.523).Data ConclusionCompared with conventional and second harmonic methods, simultaneous dual‐frequency had better image quality, high success rate and the advantage of intrinsic co‐registration, while the second harmonic method can be an alternative if custom waveform is not available.Evidence Level3Technical EfficacyStage 1

Background and Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound shear wave elastography (EUS-SWE) is a novel modality for liver stiffness measurement. The aims of this study are to evaluate the performance and reliability of EUS-SWE for detecting advanced liver disease in a prospective cohort. Methods: EUS-SWE measurements were prospectively obtained from patients undergoing EUS between August 2020 and March 2023. Liver stiffness measurements were compared between patients with and without advanced liver disease (ALD), defined as stage ≥3, to determine diagnostic accuracy for advanced fibrosis and portal hypertension. Logistic regression was performed to identify variables that impact the reliability of EUS-SWE readings. Select patients underwent paired magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for liver fibrosis correlation. Results: Patients with ALD demonstrated higher liver stiffness compared to healthy controls (left lobe: 17.6 vs. 12.7 kPa, P <0.001; median right lobe: 24.8 vs. 11.0 kPa, P <0.001). The area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) for the detection of ALD was 0.73 and 0.80 for left and right lobe measurements, respectively. General anesthesia was associated with reliable EUS-SWE liver readings (odds ratio: 2.73, 95% CI: 1.07-7.39, P =0.040). Left lobe measurements correlated significantly with MRE with an increase of 0.11 kPa (95% CI: 0.05-0.17 kPA) for every 1 kPa increase on EUS-SWE. D. Conclusions: SWE is a promising technology that can readily be incorporated into standard EUS examinations for the assessment of ALD.

LINKED CONTENTThis article is linked to Trivedi et al paper. To view this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17944