Erlichman, Charles

AbstractBackgroundRecurrent/metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare, incurable disease. MYB is a putative oncogenic driver in ACC that is often overexpressed through an MYB‐NFIB rearrangement. The authors hypothesized that AKT inhibition with the allosteric inhibitor MK‐2206 could decrease MYB expression and induce tumor regression in patients with incurable ACC (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01604772).MethodsPatients with progressive, incurable ACC were enrolled and received MK‐2206 150 mg weekly; escalation to 200 mg was allowed. The primary end point was confirmed response. Secondary end points were progression‐free survival, overall survival, and safety. An exploratory analysis evaluating the effect of MK‐2206 on MYB expression was conducted in a subset of patients.ResultsSixteen patients were enrolled, and 14 were evaluable for efficacy. No confirmed responses were observed. Thirteen patients had stable disease, and one had disease progression as their best response. The median progression‐free survival was 9.7 months (95% CI, 3.8–11.8 months), and the median overall survival was 18.0 months (95% CI, 11.8–29.9 months). Nine of 16 patients (56%) had at least one grade 3 treatment‐related adverse event, and the most common were rash (38%), fatigue (19%), decreased lymphocyte count (13%), and hyperglycemia (13%). Twelve of 14 tumors (86%) had detectable MYB expression by immunohistochemistry, and seven of 14 tumors (50%) had an MYB‐NFIB gene rearrangement. Serial biopsies revealed decreased MYB levels with MK‐2206 in four of five patients.ConclusionsMK‐2206 failed to induce clinical responses in patients with incurable ACC. AKT inhibition may diminish MYB protein levels, although the effect was highly variable among patients. Novel approaches to target MYB in ACC are needed.

We assessed the efficacy and safety of combining bevacizumab with temsirolimus in patients with advanced extra-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. This NCI-sponsored multicenter, open-label, phase II study (NCT01010126) enrolled patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic extra-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. All patients were treated with temsirolimus and bevacizumab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Temsirolimus 25 mg was administered i.v. on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg i.v. on days 1 and 15 of a 4-week cycle. Discontinuation of temsirolimus or bevacizumab did not require discontinuation of the other agent. The primary endpoints were objective response rate and 6-month progression-free survival rate. Fifty-nine patients were enrolled in this study, and 54 were evaluated for efficacy and adverse events. While median progression-free survival was 7.1 months, the median duration of treatment with temsirolimus was 3.9 months and that with bevacizumab was 3.5 months. The objective response rate of combination therapy was 2%, and 6-month progression-free survival was 48%. The most frequently reported grade 3–4 adverse events included fatigue (13%), hypertension (13%), and bleeding (13%). Close to 54% of the patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events, refusal of further treatment, or treatment delays. Three deaths occurred in the study, of which two were due to treatment-related bowel perforations. Given the minimal efficacy and increased toxicity seen with the combination of bevacizumab and temsirolimus, we do not recommend the use of this regimen in patients with advanced extra-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Abstract Background Colon cancer (CC) incidence in young adults (age 20-49 years), termed early-onset CC (EO-CC), is increasing. Methods Individual patient data on 35 713 subjects with stage III colon cancer from 25 randomized studies in the Adjuvant Colon Cancer ENdpoint database were pooled. The distributions of demographics, clinicopathological features, biomarker status, and outcome data were summarized by age group. Overall survival, disease-free survival, time to recurrence, and survival after recurrence were assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models stratified by treatment arms within studies, adjusting for sex, race, body mass index, performance status, disease stage, grade, risk group, number of lymph nodes examined, disease sidedness, and molecular markers. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results Using a 5% difference between age groups as the clinically meaningful cutoff, patients with stage III EO-CC had similar sex, race, performance status, risk group, tumor sidedness, and T stage compared with patients with late-onset CC (age 50 years and older). EO-CC patients were less likely to be overweight (30.2% vs 36.2%) and more commonly had 12 or more lymph nodes resected (69.5% vs 58.7%). EO-CC tumors were more frequently mismatch repair deficient (16.4% vs 11.5%) and less likely to have BRAFV600E (5.6% vs 14.0%), suggesting a higher rate of Lynch syndrome in EO-CC. Patients with EO-CC had statistically significantly better overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.74 to 0.89; P < .001), disease-free survival (HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.98; P = .01), and survival after recurrence (HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.97; P = .008) in the analysis without molecular markers; however, age at onset of CC lost its prognostic value when outcome was adjusted for molecular markers. Conclusion Tumor biology was found to be a more important prognostic factor than age of onset among stage III colon cancer patients in the Adjuvant Colon Cancer ENdpoint database.

PURPOSE: In patients with stage III colon cancer (CC) whose tumors demonstrate microsatellite instability (MSI), the efficacy of adjuvant fluoropyrimidine (FP) with or without oxaliplatin has not been clearly demonstrated and the prognostic value of MSI remains uncertain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Individual patient data from the ACCENT database were used to evaluate the effect of FP with or without oxaliplatin on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with MSI stage III CC and the prognostic value of MSI in patients treated with FP plus oxaliplatin, by stratified Cox models adjusted for demographic and clinicopathological factors. RESULTS: MSI status was available for 5,457 patients (609 MSI, 11.2%; 4848 microsatellite stable [MSS], 88.8%) from 12 randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Oxaliplatin significantly improved OS of MSI patients from the two RCTs testing FP with or without oxaliplatin (n = 185; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.52, 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.93). Among the 4,250 patients treated with FP plus oxaliplatin (461 MSI and 3789 MSS), MSI was associated with better OS in the N1 group compared with MSS (aHR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.95) but similar survival in the N2 population (aHR = 1.13; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.48; P interaction = .029). The main independent prognosticators of MSI patients treated with FP plus oxaliplatin were T stage (aHR = 2.09; 95% CI, 1.29 to 3.38) and N stage (aHR = 3.57; 95% CI, 2.32 to 5.48). Similar results were observed for DFS in all analyses. CONCLUSION: Adding oxaliplatin to FP improves OS and DFS in patients with MSI stage III CC. Compared with MSS, MSI patients experienced better outcomes in the N1 group but similar survival in the N2 group.

5039 Background: Combined mTOR and VEGF blockade is a potentially promising and rational strategy for the treatment of advanced RCC. We previously reported the phase I safety and efficacy results of CCI 779 (C) +bevacizumab (B) n RTKI naïve stage IV RCC patients (pts) (J Clin Oncol. 2007;25[18S Suppl]:5034). We now report the interim results of the phase 2 study of C+B in RTKI refractory RCC patients. Methods: Design: Open label, phase I/II study of C+B in advanced RCC pts. Patients with measurable stage IV RCC with a component of clear/conventional cell type, performance status 0–2 and good organ function were eligible. Up to two prior treatment regimens were allowed (at least one prior RTKI). Phase II dose was C = 25 mg IV weekly and B = 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks repeated in 4 week cycles. The primary objective of the phase II portion was to assess the proportion of patients who were progression-free 6 months after study entry. Secondary objectives were assessment of response rates and toxicity. Accrual goal = 40 pts. Results: Thirty-five pts have been enrolled into the phase 2 portion to date with 4 pts ineligible. Twenty-five pts are evaluable for response assessment and 29 pts are evaluable for toxicity. Baseline characteristics (N: 35): M/F: 28/7; Number of met. sites: 1/2/3+: 15/9/11; prior nephrectomy: 31; Number of prior therapies: 1 = 29; 2 = 2. Most common (>5%) Gr 3–4 AEs (N = 29) included fatigue (6), hypercholesterolemia (2), hypertriglyceridemia (2), anorexia (2), rash (2), and anemia (2). Responses were: PR/SD/PD = 4 (16%)/18 (72%)/3 (12%). Median number of cycles administered was 4. Six month progression free rates will mature by may 2009. Conclusions: C+B combination at the recommended phase 2 doses is feasible and well tolerated. Clinical benefit rates (PR/SD) in RTKI refractory RCC patients (88%) are encouraging. Data on 6 month progression-free rates are expected to mature in 4/09. Updated data on safety, response rates, and 6-month progression free rates will be presented on all evaluable patients. Correlative studies on available plasma, serum and tumor samples for angiogenic and molecular biomarkers are underway. Supported by N01-CM62205, R21 CA 119545–02, and Commonwealth Foundation. [Table: see text]

3521 Background: Systemic therapies have had little impact on the outcomes of patients with advanced differentiated thyroid cancers. Methods: A three-outcome one-stage Phase II trial was conducted to assess the anti-tumor activity and toxicities of the orally bioavailable VEGF/tyrosine kinase inhibitor pazopanib (800 mg daily) in patients with advanced and progressive radioiodine-insensitive differentiated thyroid cancers. Up to 2 prior therapies were allowed, with measurable disease required. Design: at the 0.10 significance level, there would be a 90% chance of detecting a RECIST response rate of >20% given a true response rate of >5%; with the regimen considered promising if >4 confirmed responses observed. Results: From February to November 2008, 32 patients (53% male) aged 23–79 years (median: 63 years) were enrolled. Common sites of metastases were: lung (100%), nodes (52%), and bone (39%). Measurement data are available for 26 patients, with the median number of cycles administered thus far 4 (range: 1–8, total: 101). Overall, therapy has been well tolerated. Six patients (23%) required dose reduction due to: grade 2+ ALT (3 pts), grade 3 mucositis (1 pt); grade 3 diarrhea and dehydration (1 pt), and grade 3 abdominal pain (1 pt.). Other serious toxicities included grade 3 colon perforation and grade 3 chest pain (1 pt). No thyroglobulin antibody (TGA) negative patient has become TGA positive, and 11 of 16 patients (69%) with initially elevated thyroglobulin levels experienced a decline in thyroglobulin of >50%. Five RECIST partial responses have been confirmed to date (19%). Two patients are alive with disease progression and another has died from disease progression. Conclusions: Pazopanib appears to have both a favorable toxicity profile and promising clinical activity in patients with advanced and progressive differentiated thyroid cancers. Supported in part by NCI CA15083 and CM62205. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Introduction: Multikinase inhibitors have clinical activity in radioactive iodine refractory (RAIR) differentiated thyroid cancers (DTCs) but are not curative; optimal management and salvage therapies remain unclear. This study assessed clinical effects of pazopanib therapy in RAIR-DTC patients with progressive disease, examining in parallel biomarker that might forecast/precede therapeutic response. Methods: Assessment of responses and toxicities and of any association between thyroglobulin (Tg) changes cycle 1 and RECIST (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) response to pazopanib therapy were prospectively undertaken in Tg antibody negative RAIR-DTC patients. RECIST progressive metastatic disease <6 months preceding enrollment was required. With a sample size of 68 (assuming 23 attaining partial response [PR]), there would be 90% chance of detecting a difference of >30% when the proportion of patients attaining PR whose Tg values decrease by >50% is >50% cycle 1 (one-sided α = 0.10, two sample test of proportions). Mean corpuscular volume (MCV) change or mutational status or pretreatment were also explored as early correlates of eventual RECIST response. Results: From 2009 to 2011, 60 individuals were treated and evaluated; (one additional patient withdrew; another was found ineligible before therapy initiation); 91.7% had previous systemic therapy beyond RAI. Adverse events included one death (thromboembolic) deemed possibly pazopanib associated. Twenty-two confirmed RECIST PRs resulted (36.7%, confidence interval; CI [24.6–50.1]); mean administered 4-week cycles was 10. Among 44 fully accessible patients, the Tg nadir was greater among the 20 attaining PR (median: −86.8%; interquartile range [IQR]: −90.7% to −70.9%) compared with the 28 who did not (median: −69.0%; IQR: −78.1% to −27.7%, Wilcoxon rank-sum test: p = 0.002). However, the difference in the proportion of PRs among those whose Tg fell ≥50% after cycle 1 versus those that did not were not significantly correlated (−23.5% [CI: −55.3 to 8.3]; Fisher's exact test p -value = 0.27). RECIST response was also not correlated with/predicted by early MCV change, receipt of prior therapy, or tumor mutational status. Conclusions: This trial prospectively confirmed pazopanib to have clinical activity and manageable toxicities in patients with progressive RAIR-DTC. Response to pazopanib, however, was not robustly forecast by early associated changes in Tg or MCV, by prior therapy, or by tumor mutational status. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00625846.

Abstract The proposed immune-mediated mechanisms of action of Rituximab (ADCC or “vaccinal” effect) suggest that the efficacy of rituximab therapy depends on the immunocompetency of the host. Therapies, such as IL-12, that stimulate the immune system may increase the efficacy of rituximab. Recently, we reported that absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), as a surrogate maker of immune recovery, is a survival prognostic factor in autologous stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). We hypothesize host immune competence (i.e, normal ALC counts) would predict a superior survival in NHL patients treated with rituximab-based regimens. The primary end-point of the study was to assess whether the ALC count prior to rituximab therapy predicted progression-free survival (PFS) and the second end-point was to identify which lymphocyte subset was responsible for affecting PFS. We studied 41 NHL patients that participated in our Phase I interleukin-12 plus rituximab study. These patients were selected because the Phase I study required baseline ALC count and flow cytometry analysis providing lymphocyte subset data prior to treatment. There were 20 females and 21 males in the study. The median age of the cohort was 53 years (range: 34–84). PFS was assessed from the initial date of treatment. The median follow-up was 42 months (1–84 months). Patients with an ALC ≥ 0.9 × 109/l experienced a superior PFS versus an ALC &lt; 0.9 × 109/l prior to rituximab therapy (31 months vs 4 months, p &lt; 0.0001). The relapse rate in the ALC ≥ 0.9 × 109/l group was 55% (11/20) versus 95 % (20/21) in the ALC &lt; 0.9 × 109/l (p &lt; 0.0016). Patients with a CD4 count ≥ 500 cells/μl also experienced a superior PFS versus a CD4 count &lt; 500 cells/μl (21 months vs 9 months, p &lt; 0.0062). The relapse rate in the CD4 count ≥ 500 cells/μl group was 56% (9/16) versus 88 % (22/25) in the CD4 count &lt; 500 cells/μl (p &lt; 0.0216). No association with PFS was identified for CD3, CD8, CD19, CD16/56, the use of IL-12, or lymphoma type by WHO classification. CD4 count was found to be an independent prognostic factor for PFS. In the subgroup of patients with follicular lymphoma, patients with an ALC ≥ 0.9 × 109/l experienced a superior PFS versus an ALC &lt; 0.9 × 109/l prior to rituximab therapy (35 months vs 9 months, p &lt; 0.0076). The relapse rate in the ALC ≥ 0.9 × 109/l group was 45% (5/11) versus 90 % (9/10) in the ALC &lt; 0.9 × 109/l (p &lt; 0.0243). Patients with a CD4 count ≥ 500 cells/μl also experienced superior PFS versus a CD4 count &lt; 500 cells/μl (not reached vs 9 months, p &lt; 0.0098). The relapse rate in the CD4 count ≥ 500 cells/μl group was 29% (2/7) versus 86 % (12/14) in the group with a CD4 count &lt; 500 cells/μl (p &lt; 0.0216). CD4 count was found to be an independent prognostic factor for PFS when compared to the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index at the time of treatment. Our data suggest the significance of an immunocompetent host in predicting the efficacy of rituximab therapy. These data support our previous report that patients with higher number of activated CD4+ cells at the lymphoma site have a better prognosis (Ansell et al, JCO2001; 19: 720–6). These findings warrant further studies to understand the role of ALC (i.e, CD4 count) in the mechanism of action of rituximab. Supported in part by CA69912

Abstract BACKGROUND: Green tea has long been touted as a health promoting substance. The active chemical compounds in green tea are called polyphenols or catechins. Epigallocatechin gallate(EGCG) is the major catechin in green tea. We previously reported the in vitro ability of EGCG to induce apoptotic cell death in chronic lymphocytic leukemia(CLL) B-cells in vitro (Blood 104:788). After publication of our findings, clinical activity in individuals using over the counter green tea extracts were reported (Leuk Res 30:707). Based on this information, we opened a phase I/II trial of green tea extracts for patients with asymptomatic, early stage CLL in fall of 2005. METHODS: The purpose of the phase I portion of this trial was to determine the optimal dose of EGCG in the Polyphenon E preparation for chronic daily administration and define tolerability in CLL patients. Previously untreated patients with asymptomatic, Rai stage 0–II CLL not currently meeting National Cancer Institute(NCI) Working Group(WG) Criteria for treatment were eligible for participation. Polyphenon E with a standardized dose of EGCG was obtained from NCI. The phase I portion of the trial was designed with 8 dose levels(range 400–2000 mg orally BID) using the standard 3 patient per dose level design. Patients remained on study up to 6 months. Grade 2 adverse events attributed to study treatment that did not respond to supportive care were considered dose limiting toxicity. The trial was designed to administer Polyphenon E in the fasting state. After accrual to dose levels 1 and 2, the U.S. FDA mandated all U.S. trials of Polyphenon E administer drug in the fed state. Accordingly, drug was administered in the fed state for dose levels 3–8. Trough plasma EGCG levels were measured 1 month after initiation of therapy. Response was classified using the NCI WG Criteria. RESULTS: As of August 2007, 33 patients have been accrued to dose levels 1–8. The maximum tolerated dose(MTD) has not been reached. Side effects have generally been mild. The most common toxicities were nausea(grade 1: 42%; grade 2: 3%), elevation in SGOT (42%; all grade 1), and abdominal pain (36%; all grade 1). To date, no patient has had a sustained 50% reduction in both absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and lymphadenopathy that would meet the NCI WG criteria for partial response. A majority of patients have had a reduction in ALC(Table). Among the 10 patients who had palpable adenopathy at study enrollment, 7 patients experienced at least a 50% reduction in the sum of the products of all nodal areas at some point during treatment. Trough plasma EGCG levels after 1 month of treatment ranged from 2.93974 ng/mL(median 40.5 ng/mL). Plasma levels did not clearly relate to the degree of reduction in ALC suggesting sensitivity to Polyphenon E may relate more to characteristics of the leukemic clone than plasma EGCG levels. CONCLUSION: Daily oral EGCG in the Polyphenon E preparation was well tolerated by CLL patients in this phase I trial. The MTD has not been reached. As classified by the NCI WG criteria, no partial or complete remissions have been observed to date, however declines in ALC and lymphadenopathy have been observed in the majority of patients. The phase II portion of this trial will open at Mayo Clinic Fall 2007. Best reduction in ALC n % of patients At least 10% decline 25 76% At least 20% decline 14 42% At least 30% decline 8 24% At least 40% decline 4 12% At least 50% decline 2 6%

Abstract Introduction Antisense oligonucleotides are used to inhibit messenger RNA function and inhibit protein translation. Bcl-2 expression proteins have been implicated in mediating resistance to apoptotic cell death in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM). Oblimersen sodium is a specific inhibitor of Bcl-2 expression and has shown activity in multiple myeloma and in Waldenstrom cell lines. The in vitro data led to the development of a phase I study for WM patients with relapsed or refractory disease. Materials and Methods Eligible patients had symptomatic WM who had failed prior cytotoxic chemotherapy. All patients had to have one of the following: a hemoglobin &lt;11 g/dL, a platelet count &lt;100,000/uL, bulky lymphadenopathy, or hyperviscosity syndrome. As a phase I study, the primary end point was toxicity assessment, but all patients were assessed for response, using monoclonal protein levels. Patients were enrolled and evaluated in cohorts of three. Drug was administered as a 24-hour continuous infusion for 7 days every 21 days, with intrapatient dose escalation each subsequent cycle beginning at 3 mg/kg/day up to a maximum of 7 mg/kg/day days 1–7 for a maximum of 8 cycles. Results To date 9 patients have been accrued, six at dose level one and three patients at dose level two. Data is available for the first six entered. Five women and 1 man have been accrued with a median age of 74.5 years, ranging from 58 to 81. Four patients had relapsed from prior therapy, 2 were refractory. Three had a history of transfusions. The median number of prior regimens was 4 (range 2–7). One patient had a dose-limiting toxicity on the first cycle of therapy, which was grade 3 fatigue and anorexia, and the dose for this patient was reduced. Two patients had non-hematologic grade 3 toxicity, possibly related to therapy. Five out of six patients on dose level one had grade 3 or greater hematologic toxicity. These toxicities occurred after cycle 1 was completed, during the toxicity observation period and were not considered dose limiting toxicities influencing dose escalation. Three patients required dose reductions in subsequent cycles. To date one patient has had a partial response with her serum M spike falling from 3.6 to 1.1 g/dL. Her quantitative IgM fell from 6,000 mg/dL to 1,000 mg/dL(figure). Conclusion Oblimersen was well tolerated at the first dose level in patients with WM. Hematologic toxicity is frequent in this cohort with heavily involved bone marrows when the dose was escalated during successive cycles. Dose reductions with subsequent cycles were frequently required. Evaluation of the maximum tolerated dose continues. Data on response for this dose level is promising, where efficacy will be fully evaluated in the phase II portion of this trial. Figure Figure