Serum Concentrations of Prostate-Specific Antigen Measured Using Immune Extraction, Trypsin Digestion, and Tandem Mass Spectrometry Quantification of LSEPAELTDAVK Peptide
Context.— Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a 34-kDa glycoprotein with chymotrypsin-like enzyme activity that circulates both in free forms and complexed to various enzyme inhibitors including antichymotrypsin and α 2 -macroglobulin. Prostate-specific antigen bound to α 2 -macroglobulin is not detected by commercial PSA immunoassays. Objective.— To develop a mass spectrometry assay that detects the same forms of PSA as the immunoassays, which could serve as a reference for harmonizing PSA immunoassays. Design.— Prostate-specific antigen was immune extracted from serum, trypsin was digested, and the LSEPAELTDAVK peptide was quantitated on an API 5000 spectrometer. Calibrators were made by adding 10% free and 90% antichymotrypsin-bound PSA to female sera. The assay was standardized to the World Health Organization 96/670 reference standard. Validation of clinical utility and comparisons with 2 immunoassays (Roche cobas and Beckman Access) were performed using frozen sera aliquots from 100 men undergoing prostate biopsy (50 negative, 50 with cancer) and 5 serial samples collected over time from 5 men with advanced prostate cancer. Results.— The antibody extraction efficiency was greater than 99%. The assay has an analytic range from 1.2 to 76 ng/mL, with precision ranging from 8.6% at 1.5 ng/mL to 5.4% at 27 ng/mL. The mass spectrometry assay correlated well with 2 immunoassays. All 3 assays showed statistically equivalent separation of prostate cancer from benign disease using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Conclusions.— This mass spectrometry assay can reliably measure PSA concentrations in human serum and could serve as a reference standard for harmonizing PSA immunoassays.
Verifying Performance Characteristics of Quantitative Analytical Systems: Calibration Verification, Linearity, and Analytical Measurement Range
Context.— Both the regulations in the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) and the checklists of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) Laboratory Accreditation Program require clinical laboratories to verify performance characteristics of quantitative test systems. Laboratories must verify performance claims when introducing an unmodified, US Food and Drug Administration–cleared or approved test system, and they must comply with requirements for periodic calibration and calibration verification for existing test systems. They must also periodically verify the analytical measurement range of many quantitative test systems. Objective.— To provide definitions for many of the terms used in these regulations, to describe a set of basic analyses that laboratories may adapt to demonstrate compliance with both CLIA and the CAP Laboratory Accreditation Program checklists for performing calibration verification and for verifying the analytical measurement range of test systems, to review some of the recommended procedures for establishing performance goals, and to provide data illustrating the performance goals used in some of the CAP's calibration verification and linearity surveys. Data Sources.— The CAP's calibration verification and linearity survey programs, the CLIA regulations, the Laboratory Accreditation Program requirements, and published literature were used to meet these objectives. Conclusions.— Calibration verification and linearity and analytical measurement range verification should be performed using suitable materials with assessment of results using well-defined evaluation protocols. We describe the CAP's calibration verification and linearity programs that may be used for these purposes.
The Cistrome and Gene Signature of Androgen Receptor Splice Variants in Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Cells
Mass Spectrometry Measurements of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Peptides Derived From Immune-Extracted PSA Provide a Potential Strategy for Harmonizing Immunoassay Differences
Estrogen (E) deficiency associated with the menopause is the major cause of bone loss in aging women. However, men also lose significant amounts of bone with age, but they do not have the equivalent of menopause, and serum total testosterone (T) and E levels decline only marginally with age in men. Thus, it has been difficult to attribute bone loss in aging men to either T or E deficiency. Here, we show in a population-based, age-stratified sample of 346 men, aged 23–90 yr, that serum total T and E (estradiol plus estrone) levels decreased over the life span by 30% and 12%, respectively, but bioavailable (or nonsex hormone-binding globulin-bound) T and E levels decreased by 64% and 47%, respectively. In these men and in a parallel cohort of 304 women, aged 21–94 yr, serum PTH increased 84% and 64% over the life span, and urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx) excretion, a bone resorption marker, increased 77% and 80% between age 50–85 yr in the men and women, respectively. By univariate analyses, serum bioavailable T and E levels correlated positively with bone mineral density (BMD) at the total body, spine, proximal femur, and distal radius and negatively with urinary NTx excretion in men and women. Urinary NTx excretion was also negatively associated with BMD in both sexes. By multivariate analyses, however, serum bioavailable E level was the consistent independent predictor of BMD in both men and postmenopausal women. Thus, bioavailable E levels decline significantly with age and are important predictors of BMD in men as well as women. These studies suggest that in contrast to traditional belief, age-related bone loss may be the result of E deficiency not just in postmenopausal women, but also in men.