Back to Authors

Shah, Neel

0009-0008-6893-9993

Mayo Clinic

AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)

Citations 2

Multicenter Phase II Study of Olaparib and the ATR Inhibitor Ceralasertib in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (TRAP)
Tsung, Irene , Smith, David C. , Heath, Elisabeth I. , Cackowski, Frank C. , Devitt, Michael , Braun, Thomas , Yentz, Sarah , Nguyen, Charles B. , Shah, Neel , Vaishampayan, Ulka N. , Caram, Megan E.V. , Palmbos, Phillip L. , Alumkal, Joshi J. , Reichert, Zachery R. , Cackowski, Frank C , Devitt, Michael E , Braun, Thomas M , Dean, Emma , Vaishampayan, Ulka , Caram, Megan E V , Palmbos, Phillip , Alumkal, Joshi J , Reichert, Zachery R , Chinnaiyan, Arul , Smith, Simon A.

JCO Precision Oncology | September 16, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: 9 | Pages: No page available

10.1200/po-25-00457 Get It

PURPOSE Preclinical studies suggest the combination of the poly(adenosine diphosphate[ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib and the ataxia telangiectasia–mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) inhibitor ceralasertib has synergistic antitumor activity in homologous recombination proficient (HRP) and homologous recombination repair gene mutation (HRRm) patients. This study aims to determine the efficacy of olaparib plus ceralasertib in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with and without HRRm. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-five HRP and 12 HRRm PARP inhibitor–naïve patients with mCRPC progressing on ≥1 line of therapy or previous androgen receptor pathway inhibitor were enrolled. Patients received olaparib (300 mg twice daily) and ceralasertib (160 mg once daily, days 1-7) in 28-day cycles. HRRm was defined as biallelic inactivation of BRCA2 or BRCA1 , monoallelic inactivation of ATM , or germline inactivation of any of these genes. The primary end point was disease response rate (dRR; confirmed prostate-specific antigen decline ≥50% and/or complete/partial radiographic response by RECIST v1.1) in HRP patients. Secondary end points included dRR in HRRm patients, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety/toxicity. Two-stage designs were used. RESULTS Four of 35 (11%; 95% CI, 3.2 to 26.7) HRP and four of 12 HRRm patients responded. Median PFS was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.3 to not reached) for HRP patients. Thirty-six percent of patients had ≥grade 3 toxicity, most commonly from anemia. Limitations include small, single-arm, nonrandomized trial design. CONCLUSION Combining ceralasertib with olaparib had limited activity in patients with HRP mCRPC. HRRm response rate was not greater than previous single-agent PARP inhibitor clinical trials.
Androgen Receptor Upregulation Mediates Radioresistance after Ionizing Radiation
Spratt, Daniel E. , Doran, Michael G. , Lee, Man Xia, Shah, Neel , Wongvipat, John, Carnazza, Kathryn E., Klee, George G., Polkinghorn, William R., Tindall, Donald J., Lewis, Jason S. , Davis, Brian J. , Evans, Michael J. , Lee, Man Xia, Sawyers, Charles L. , Spratt, Daniel E

Cancer Research | October 2, 2015 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 22 | Pages: 4688-4696

10.1158/0008-5472.can-15-0892 Get It

Abstract Clinical trials have established the benefit of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with radiotherapy in prostate cancer. ADT sensitizes prostate cancer to radiotherapy-induced death at least in part through inhibition of DNA repair machinery, but for unknown reasons, adjuvant ADT provides further survival benefits. Here, we show that androgen receptor (AR) expression and activity are durably upregulated following radiotherapy in multiple human prostate cancer models in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, the degree of AR upregulation correlates with survival in vitro and time to tumor progression in animal models. We also provide evidence of AR pathway upregulation, measured by a rise in serum levels of AR-regulated hK2 protein, in nearly 20% of patients after radiotherapy. Furthermore, these men were three-fold more likely to experience subsequent biochemical failure. Collectively, these data demonstrate that radiotherapy can upregulate AR signaling after therapy to an extent that negatively affects disease progression and/or survival. Cancer Res; 75(22); 4688–96. ©2015 AACR.