Wolanskyj-Spinner, Alexandra P.

Abstract Gentically driven classical hematological disorders have variable prevelance in the general population, sickle cell disease (SCD) being the most common at 30 per 100,000 people, hemophilia (hem) 12 per 100,000 people for hemophilia A, 4 per 100,000 people for hemophilia B, and thalassemia (thal) at 18 per 100,000 people, with regional and racial-ethnic variation across US. There has been a dramatic change in the therapeutic landscape for these diseases in the past decade. Several new drugs and biological therapies including gene therapies have been approved for each of these disorders. Clinicians utilize different information sources to assimilate this rapid influx of knowledge into their practice; in the era of social media, the readership is not limited to original publications. As research visibility influences clinical adoption and patient awareness, it is vital to understand the modalities of engagement of gene therapy studies by clinicians and patients. An altmetric score is a simple and effective way of understanding engagement with research across platforms. It. measures digital attention received by research output, allowing us to gauge the social impact of an article. We sought to compare the impact and scientific dissemination of publications of gene therapy trials in these 3 diseases by capturing the number of traditional citations and Altmetric assessment score. Methods: A PubMed search was conducted for gene therapy trials in SCD, Hem and Thal between 2015 to 2025 and citations were captured using metrics from Google Scholar. The Altmetric assessment score for each article was determined using www.altmetric.com which includes any mention by news outlets, blogs, Twitter (X), Facebook, and Mendeley reader counts. Descriptive statistics are reported for the number of citations as well as the Altmetric assessment score in each of the disease categories. Median and range were reported due to the skewed distribution of the data. Comparison across groups for significance was done using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: The number of qualifying studies for SCD (n=7) were lower than hem (n=21) and thal (n=12). Median PubMed citations were highest for SCD (147, range 4-436), followed by hem (26, range 0-828) and thal (42, range 0-801), though the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.4) Altmetric scores demonstrated differences that approached statistical significance with p=0.08: SCD had the highest median (422, range 4-770), driven by exceptional Twitter engagement, while hem and thal medians were 20 (range 0-2038) and 49 (range 0-825) respectively. Twitter/X was the leading social platforms for all diseases. Scholarly interest measured by Mendeley readers was also highest for SCD (median 195, range 11-542), with thal and hem medians at 50 (range 0-773) and 64 (range 8-646) respectively. Conclusion: We observed substantial variability in both academic and social media dissemination of practice-changing SCD, Hem and thal gene therapy studies, though not statistically significant likely due to the limited number of studies overall. Higher citation count and Altmetric score in SCD studies may reflect recent robust dissemination efforts by ASH and patient advocacy groups. Intentional promotion across academic and media platforms increases awareness, helping with early dissemination of updated information that could have significant impact on patient outcomes.

Introduction: Romiplostim is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved by the US FDA for chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in patients who have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy. The recommended dose is 1 mcg/kg/week subcutaneously, escalated weekly by increments of 1 mcg/kg to achieve and maintain a platelet count of 50 x 10 9 /L g ( Kuter et al 2021). It has been postulated that starting at the maximum recommended dose of 10 mcg/kg/week in patients with severe bleeding may swiftly increase platelets and minimize bleeding ( Roumier et al 2021). However, this approach may also increase the risk of major thrombotic events (TE). It is unclear if the more aggressive dosing strategy results in more rapid, robust responses and a tolerable safety profile compared to the FDA approved approach. Methods: This retrospective chart review included adult patients who initiated romiplostim while admitted for ITP at a Mayo Clinic Enterprise site from May 2018 to May 2022. Outcomes included rate of TE at 30 days and 90 days and time to first TE in patients receiving initial romiplostim doses of < 5 mcg/kg (low dose, LD) and > 5 mcg/kg (high dose, HD), median time to platelet response (defined as platelets > 30 x10 9/L and > 50 x10 9/L on 2 separate checks) in LD vs HD, and cost to the institution comparing LD to HD. Outcomes were summarized using descriptive statistics. Statistical analysis was done using BlueSky. Fischer's exact test and chi-squared were performed for categorical data, and Wilcoxon rank sum test were done for continuous variables. Results: Forty-five patients met eligibility criteria: 33 (73%) received initial romiplostim doses < 5 mcg/kg and 12 (27%) received doses > 5 mcg/kg. The majority of patients (43/45 (96%)) presented with platelets < 50 x 10 9/L. The median age was 65 years (68 in LD vs 57 HD). There were 24 (73%) males in the LD group vs five (42%) in the HD group. At baseline, 64% (n = 21) of LD patients and 75% (n = 9) of HD patients presented with bleeding. Major bleeding (defined by 2019 ASH ITP guidelines) was present in 21% (n= 7) vs 17% (n = 2) of patients, LD versus HD, respectively ( Neunert et al 2019). The overall incidence of TE in this study was 24% (n = 11): LD 5 (15%) and HD 6 (50%) (p = 0.044) at 90 days. Median days to TE was 21 days, 12 days in LD group (range 5-21) vs 24.5 days (range 14-58) in HD group (p = 0.067). TE included deep vein thrombosis (DVT, n = 6), DVT with pulmonary embolism (n = 1), portal vein thrombus (n = 1), multiple brain infarcts (n = 1), splenic vein thrombus (n = 1), and left atrial appendage thrombus (n = 1). The median platelet count at the time of TE was 304 x 10 9/L, 415 x 10 9/L (range 58-900) in the LD group vs 323 x 10 8/L (range 33-1427) in the HD group (p = 0.79). Thirty-two (71%) out of 45 patients had a response to romiplostim: 22 in the LD group (71%) vs 10 (83.3%) in the HD group (p = 0.698). Of the patients that responded, the median time to response was 6 days in the LD group vs 11.5 days in the HD group (p = 0.09) The median dose at time of initial response was 2 mcg/kg in the LD group and 6 mcg/kg in the HD group. Wholesale Acquisition Cost (WAC) was used to determine the cost per dose, rounded to the nearest vial size. The average WAC for the initial dose in LD patients was $1806.80 compared to $6061.79 in HD patients. Conclusion:There was a significantly increased incidence of thrombosis in patients admitted with ITP that received initial romiplostim doses > 5 mcg/kg, with no differences in the time to platelet response. Careful consideration of risks versus benefits should be given prior to initiating romiplostim at doses higher than recommended doses.

Background: Warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (WAIHA) is mostly IgG mediated (IgG+C3-), which may at times fix complement (IgG+C3+). Whether the clinical outcome of complement-fixing (C3+) WAIHA is different from that of non-complement fixing (C3-) WAIHA remains unclear. The goal of this retrospective study was to describe and compare the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with C3+ and C3- WAIHA. Methods: We included adult WAIHA patients seen at our institution from 2001-2023 who met all of the following criteria: A) age >18 years; B) direct antiglobulin test [DAT] IgG+ + C3+ with no cold agglutinin; and C) biochemical evidence of hemolysis. Response to treatment was based on the international consensus criteria: complete (CR; normal Hb or Hb ≥12 g/dL, with resolution of hemolysis); partial (PR; Hb >10 but <12 g/dL or Hgb >12 g/dL without resolution of hemolysis); or no response (neither CR nor PR). 223 WAIHA patients were found, and 132 patients were ultimately included. The most common reason for exclusion was a lack of complete DAT that included C3 testing. Results: There were 59 patients with C3- WAIHA and 73 patients with C3+ WAIHA, reflecting 44.7% and 55.3% of total patients respectively. Pertinent demographic, clinical, and treatment information are shown in Table 1. Slightly over half (52.3%) were males and the mean age (SD) was 63.9 years (18.1). Concomitant lymphoproliferative disease was present in 34.1% of the patients. The 3 most common treatments were steroids (97%), rituximab (66.7%), and splenectomy (18.2%). The median follow-up from diagnosis was 20.0 months (range, 1.0-251.8 months), and 14.4% of patients had died at the time of this analysis with no difference between the groups (P=0.82). There was no significant difference in the demographic composition, clinical findings, and treatment received in both groups. The number of treatments received were similar between C3- and C3+ WAIHA groups (Table 1). After first line of treatment, response was achieved in 86.4% and 94.4% of the C3- and C3+ groups (P=0.12), respectively. Additionally, 62.7% of the C3- group and 80.8% of the C3+ group were in PR or CR by their most recent CBC (P=0.02). 33.9% and 43.8% of the C3- and C3+ groups relapsed at least once (P=0.25). In those who relapsed, there was an average of 2.6 relapse events in the C3- WAIHA group compared to 1.8 relapse events in the C3+ WAIHA group (P=0.03). However, there was no difference in time to first relapse between the groups (P=0.51), shown in Figure 1. Conclusion: There have been retrospective descriptions of multiple AIHA subtypes and response rates to different therapies; however, this is one of the first studies to our knowledge to focus specifically on outcomes between complement subgroups. In our large group of patients with C3- and C3+ WAIHA, the clinical presentation, treatments utilized, and response to treatment were similar. Our data suggest that C3- and C3+ WAIHA can be approached and treated similarly.

101 Background: In the US, minority patients are underrepresented in cancer clinical trials. This is due to multiple factors, including socioeconomic barriers, limited medical insurance coverage and restrictive clinical trial eligibility, e.g., ANC cutoff. For the latter, conservative ANC cutoff disadvantages Black patients. Two-in-three Black individuals have a Duffy-null phenotype, that is associated with lower ANC with 5% prevalence of ANC <1,500 cells/µl. To improve Black patient accrual to cancer clinical trials, lowering the ANC cutoff was proposed as a potential solution over a decade ago. Its implementation is not known. This study evaluates the ANC cutoff values as part of the eligibility criteria for cancer clinical trials. Methods: We accessed the Clinicaltrials.gov website on 5/25/2023 and obtained the ANC cutoff of cancer clinical trials conducted in the US. We included adult therapeutic trials in the phases of recruiting, not yet recruiting, enrolling by invitation, and active-not yet recruiting. Trials with drug interventions were selected. Those focusing on surgical, behavioral, nutritional and radiotherapeutic interventions were excluded. All ANC cutoff values were converted to “cells/µl” for analysis. Results: A total of 911 trials were evaluated, and 470 met the eligibility criteria. Of the 470 trials, 366 (78%) involved solid malignancies, and 104 (22%) involved hematologic malignancies. Hematologic trials have significantly lower ANC cutoffs compared to solid tumor trials with median ANC cutoff of 1,000 (range, 250-2000) vs. 1,500 (range 250-3,000); p=<0.001. In all, 323 trials (68.7%) required patients to have ANC >1,500, and 116 trials (24.6%), primarily hematologic, required patients to have ANC >1,000. For myeloma and prostate cancer, two cancers with higher incidence among Blacks, 12.9% and 86.4% of the trials require ANC >1,500, respectively. All genitourinary, breast, head & neck, sarcoma, lung, skin, and neuroendocrine tumor trials excluded patients with ANC <1,000. Conclusions: Most hematologic malignancy trials have a more liberal ANC cutoff allowing patients with ANC <1,500 to participate. However, solid tumor trials remain more conservative, with 4 in 5 trials requiring an ANC cutoff of >1,500. A strict ANC cutoff remains a barrier to minority accrual.[Table: see text]

TPS7080 Background: Myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) are classified as a distinct category under the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms. MDS/MPN with RS and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T) and MDS/MPN, unclassifiable with > 15% bone marrow ring sideroblasts (MDS/MPN-U-RS) have similar clinical and pathological characteristics with symptomatic or transfusion-dependent anemia as the predominant morbidity. Luspatercept has been approved in myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts (MDS-RS) and MDS/MPN overlap syndromes, based on the phase 3 MEDALIST clinical trial which primarily included MDS-RS patients with an objective erythroid response rate of approximately 40 per cent. In this trial, some MDS-RS patients also experienced an increase in neutrophil and platelet counts. This raises a safety concern for MDS/MPN patients with elevated platelet or WBC counts such as MDS/MPN-RS-T and MDS/MPN-U-RS. Previous studies have shown clinical and biological differences between MDS-RS and MDS/MPN-RS-T, with the latter group at a significantly elevated risk for thrombotic events. Additionally, several MDS/MPN-RS-T patients are on hydroxyurea which may blunt the erythroid response of luspatercept. Therefore, it is imperative to establish the safety and efficacy of luspatercept in this patient group. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated, prospective, phase II study of luspatercept in MDS/MPN overlap neoplasms with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis or unclassifiable with ring sideroblasts with 2 arms; hydroxyurea-independent (cohort A) and hydroxyurea-dependent (cohort B). Hydroxyurea and/or aspirin use is allowed as per investigator discretion. The primary goal is to study the efficacy and safety of luspatercept in MDS/MPN-RS-T or MDS/MPN-U-RS with symptomatic anemia. The primary endpoint is to assess erythroid response rate as per the 2015 International Working Group MDS/MPN response criteria. Secondary endpoints include response duration, time to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transformation, thrombosis rate, AML-free and overall survival. Inclusion criteria include newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory adult patients with WHO-defined diagnosis of MDS/MPN-RS-T or MDS/MPN-U-RS with symptomatic or transfusion-dependent anemia and unlikely to respond (EPO level > 200 IU/L) or intolerant to erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) therapy. Prior therapy with lenalidomide, hypomethylating agents or immunosuppressive therapy is allowed. The overall plan is to enroll 54 patients across the three Mayo Clinic sites, Minnesota, Arizona and Florida. Enrollment to the trial began in January 2022 with 1 patient enrolled at the time of abstract submission. Clinical trial information: NCT05005182.

Abstract Background The two major types of cold autoimmune hemolytic anemias are cold agglutinin disease (CAD) and paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria (PCH). In CAD, the cold agglutinin is usually IgM with anti-I specificity. In PCH, the Donath-Landsteiner (DL) antibody is a cold reacting IgG with anti-P specificity. In this study, we describe the clinical and serological characteristics of patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia positive for both cold agglutinin and DL antibodies. Methods On review of our immunohematology reference laboratory database, we identified patients over a 16-year period (January 2000- March 2016) with the following: i) age ≥18 years, ii) hemoglobin (Hb) &lt;12g/dL, iii) positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) with hemolysis (increased lactate dehydrogenase/low serum haptoglobin/ elevated indirect bilirubin), and iv) tested for both CAD and DL antibodies. We classified the patients into 3 cohorts. Cohort 1 included patients positive for both cold agglutinin (titer ≥1:64) and DL antibodies. Cohort 2 consisted of patients with DL antibody but no cold agglutinin (titer &lt;1:64), while Cohort 3 was comprised of patients with cold agglutinin but no DL antibody. We evaluated the clinical response based on the GIMEMA (Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto) criteria (Barcellini W, et al . Blood 2014) defined as i) complete (CR): hemoglobin ≥12 g/dL with normalization of at least one previously abnormal hemolytic marker; ii) partial (PR): hemoglobin 10-12 g/dL with hemolysis; or iii) none (NR): if any of the above criteria were not met. Results Seven patients had cold autoimmune hemolytic anemia with concomitant cold agglutinin and DL antibodies (Cohort 1). The clinical and serological characteristics are described in table 1. The median age at diagnosis was 68 years (range: 59-78) and the median hemoglobin at onset was 10.3 g/dL (range: 8.2-10.6). Six had red cell agglutination in the blood smear. Two patients had a recent history of infection (1 with Mycoplasma pneumoniae and 1 with upper respiratory tract infection). The median follow-up was 4.8 months (range: 1.0-166.4). Five patients received steroid/other immunosuppressants and two were managed conservatively. The clinical response to treatment was CR in 28.6% patients, PR in 42.9%, and NR in 14.3%. In comparison, Cohort 2 had a 20% CR, 20% PR and 40% NR, while Cohort 3 had a 50% CR, 25% PR and 25% NR, respectively. Conclusion Our study is the first series describing patients with cold autoimmune hemolytic anemia with concomitant cold agglutinin and DL antibodies. In terms of clinical response, patients with negative DL antibodies and cold agglutinin titers &gt;1:64 had better response (50% CR, Cohort 3) to immunosuppressants compared to patients with positive DL antibody (20-30% CR, Cohorts 1 and 2). Large scale studies may be warranted to determine the treatment strategies among patients with concomitant DL and high cold agglutinin titers. Disclosures Kay: Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Tolero Corporation: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Winters: Fresenius Kabi USA: Consultancy; Eliaz Therapeutics Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Inc: Other: Moderated opinion leader's forum; Wiley Blackwell: Employment; Regional Health Inc: Consultancy; Mayo Clinic: Employment; Grifols International SA: Consultancy.

Introduction Clonal cytopenias of undetermined significance (CCUS) is defined by the presence of somatic driver mutations/copy number variations in hematopoietic cells in patients with low blood counts, in the absence of morphological evidence for myeloid neoplasms. Patients with CCUS are often symptomatic and can be transfusion dependent (TD), with high rates of progression to myeloid neoplasms, especially myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). In addition, similar to MDS, there are reports of CCUS patients responding to hypomethylating agents. Due to the lack of a formal diagnosis/morphological dysplasia, CCUS patients are often denied therapies or clinical trial enrollment. We carried out this study to validate our hypothesis that CCUS shares similar clinical and survival characteristics with lower risk MDS (LR-MDS). Methods CCUS patients were prospectively identified from the clonal hematopoiesis clinic, whereas LR-MDS patients were retrospectively identified from our institutional database. LR-MDS was defined as very low, low and intermediate risk MDS based on the R-IPSS categorization. Baseline demographics, blood counts, bone marrow (BM) morphology, cytogenetics, and NGS results were abstracted. Transfusion dependency was defined as requiring at least one unit of red cell or platelets every 4 weeks. The Mann-Whitney-U and Fischer's exact test were used to compare quantitative and qualitative data in subgroups. Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) estimates were used for survival analysis and compared using the log-rank test. Results 186 patients were included in the study; 74 (40%) with CCUS and 112 (60%) with LR-MDS, median age 66 years, with 63% being male (Table 1). In the CCUS group, 93% had one or more mutations (67% &gt;1 mutation) detected by NGS, while 7% had clonal cytogenetic abnormalities. Common mutations in CCUS included TET2 (30%), SRSF2 (20%), DNMT3A (13%) and ASXL1 (11%); with 28% of patients being red cell TD and 15% being platelet TD. On application of the R-IPSS stratification, 40%, 45%, 12% and 3% were in the very low, low, intermediate and high risk categories, respectively. LR-MDS subtypes included MDS-RS (50%), MDS-MLD (21%), MDS-EB (10%), MDS del5q (7%), and MDS-U (12%). SF3B1 mutations were seen in 67% (95% of MDS-RS), while TET2 and DNMT3A mutations were seen in 29% and 21%, respectively. 60% of LR-MDS patients had &gt;1 mutation. 44% were red cell TD, while 10% were platelet TD. In comparison to patients with CCUS, LR-MDS patients were more likely to have higher white blood cell counts (p=0.002), higher neutrophil counts (p=0.009), higher platelet counts (p&lt;0.001), be red cell TD (p=0.031), have BM ring sideroblasts (p&lt;0.001), have higher BM blast% (p=0.004) and carry SF3B1 mutations (p&lt;0.001); whereas CCUS patients were more likely to have higher monocyte counts (p=0.009) and more likely to carry IDH1 (p=0.005), ZRSR2 (p=0.005) and ATM (p=0.012) mutations. Importantly there were no differences with regards to R-IPSS cytogenetic risk groups, R-IPSS prognostic categories, platelet TD, and mutations involving TET2, DNMT3A, SRSF2 and ASXL1 and TP53. Notably signal pathway mutations and mutations involving tumor suppressor genes were infrequent (&lt;5%) in both groups. The LR-MDS patients had a longer median follow up (53 vs 15 months) and at last follow up 72 (64%) and 11 (15%) deaths had been documented in the LR-MDS and CCUS groups respectively. 13 (18%) CCUS patients progressed to MDS (10) and AML (3) over a median of 15 months, while 9 (8%) LR-MDS patients progressed to higher grade MDS (1) and AML (8), respectively (median follow up 53 months). There was no difference in the median survival between CCUS (median OS not reached) versus LR-MDS (median OS 8.3 years) (p=0.372, Figure 1). Conclusion In spite of subtle phenotypic/molecular differences between LR-MDS and CCUS, both entities had similar prognostication, distribution of high risk mutations and survival outcomes. Within a short follow-up, 18% of CCUS patients progressed to MDS/AML, indicating that regardless of the absence of dysplasia these entities are a continuum of myeloid neoplasms. In order to improve access to treatments and clinical trial opportunities, we recommend that close consideration be given to consider CCUS as a MDS subtype. Disclosures Shah: Dren Bio: Consultancy.