Kearns, Ann E.

Objective Preeclampsia, a hypertensive pregnancy disorder, increases the risk for cardiovascular disease including coronary artery calcification (CAC) as women age. Controversy exists regarding the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and CAC in menopausal women. This study was designed to determine and compare the relationship between BMD and CAC in postmenopausal women with defined histories of either normotensive or preeclamptic pregnancies. Methods Women who gave birth in Olmsted County, MN between 1976 and 1982 were identified from their medical record as having a preeclamptic pregnancy (PE, n=40) and were age/parity‐matched with women having normotensive pregnancies (NP, n=40). The study was approved by the IRB at Mayo Clinic and all participants gave written informed consent. Quantitative Computed Tomography was used to assess vertebral (T7‐9) BMD and CAC. Statistical analyses included linear regression with general estimating equation (GEE) to correct for within‐subject correlations. Results Women averaged 35 years since the index pregnancy and were 60 years of age at the time of the study. CAC was significantly greater in women of the PE group (median (25 th , 75 th percentiles: 0 (0, 0.3) NP and 0 (0, 25) PE, P=0.026). There were no significant differences in cortical, trabecular or central BMD between PE and NP groups. However, there was a positive correlation between cortical BMD and CAC in the PE group (ρ=0.336, P=0.042) and a negative correlation between central BMD and CAC in the NP group (ρ=−0.392, P=0.017). Conclusions Although CAC was greater in women with a history PE, BMD did not differ from women with a history of NP. Associations between cortical and central BMD with CAC differed by pregnancy history suggesting that there may be underlying differences in calcium metabolism associated with PE. Support or Funding Information This work was funded by grants from the NIH AG44170, AG034676, UL1 TR000135 and the Mayo Foundation.

Background: There is limited long-term follow-up of patients undergoing parathyroidectomy. Recurrence is described as 4% to 10%. This study evaluated persistence and recurrence of hypercalcemia in primary hyperparathyroidism after parathyroidectomy. Methods: Single-institution retrospective (1965–2010) population-based cohort from Olmsted County (MN) of patients undergoing surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism. Patients’ demographic data, preoperative and postoperative laboratory values, clinical characteristics, surgical treatment, and follow-up were noted. Results: A total of 345 patients were identified, 75.7% female, and median age 58.4 years [interquartile range (IQR): 17.6]. In all, 68% of patients were asymptomatic and the most common symptoms were musculoskeletal complaints (28.4%) and nephrolithiasis (25.6%). Preoperative median serum calcium was 11 mg/dL (IQR: 10.8–11.4 mg/dL), and median parathyroid hormone was 90 pg/mL (IQR: 61–169 pg/dL). Bilateral cervical exploration was performed in 38% and single gland resection in 79% of cases. Median postoperative serum calcium was 9.2 mg/dL (IQR: 5.5–11.3). Nine percent of patients presented persistence of hypercalcemia, and recurrence was found in 14% of patients. Highest postoperative median serum calcium was 10 mg/dL (IQR: 6–12.4), and median number of postoperative calcium measurements was 10 (IQR: 0–102). Postoperative hypercalcemia was identified in 37% of patient. Fifty-three percent were attributed to secondary causes, most commonly medications, 22%. Three percent of patients required treatment for postoperative hypercalcemia. Median time to recurrence and death were 12.2 and 16.7 years, respectively. Conclusion: Recurrent hypercalcemia after successful parathyroidectomy is higher than previously reported. Most cases are transient and often associated to other factors with only the minority requiring treatment. Long-term follow-up of serum calcium should be considered in patients after successful parathyroidectomy.

Bone loss and development of atherosclerosis characterized by coronary arterial calcification (CAC) accelerate in women after menopause. This study evaluated the relationship between blood borne markers of bone turnover and development of CAC in newly menopausal women being screened for the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study. Women (n=137) were 52.3±2.3 years of age and were 18.1±9.2 months past their last menses. CAC was measured using 64‐slice computed tomography. Concentrations of osteocalcin, bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), tartrate‐resident acid phosphatase 5b and osteopontin as bone matrix protein in serum and plasma were evaluated by ELISA. CAC scores ranged from 0 to 327.6 Agatston Unit (AU); 113 women had scores of 0 AU, 20 had CAC scores of 0<50 and 4 had CAC scores >50. Average levels of all of the markers of bone turnover were within a normal range reported in the literature. There was a positive correlation between BAP and osteocalcin. However, levels of these markers did not correlate with age or months past menopause. None of the markers correlated with CAC scores. These results suggest that blood borne markers of bone turnover do not correlate with the presence of CAC in newly menopausal women. Additional work is needed to determine if this relationship would change with increasing age. Supported by the Kronos Longevity Research Institute and Mayo Foundation.

Abstract Background: Vitamin D deficiency is common in patients presenting with low energy hip fractures. The relationship between Vitamin D levels at the time of a fracture with long term functional outcomes has not been studied. Identifying a benefit to recovery with adequate vitamin D would support supplementation in elderly patients at risk for hip fracture. Methods: A retrospective cohort of patients &gt;/= 50 years, who were treated surgically for low energy hip fracture between July 1 2016 and June 30 2018 were identified. The correlation between Vitamin D levels and functional recovery, assessed using the time up and go (TUG) test, survival at 3 months and 1 year, and readmission within 3 months was examined. The Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) at baseline was also assessed. Results: A total of 216 patients were treated for a hip fracture of which 174 were included with measured baseline Vitamin D levels. A majority were female (112, 64.4%), mean age 79.6 years (+/-11.9), mean Vitamin D level 28.2 ng/ml (+/- 12.4) and mean CCI 5.9 (+/- 2.5). Vitamin D &lt;20 ng/ml was seen in 39 (22.4%) patients and all received appropriate supplementation. 39 (22.4%) individuals died within a year of surgery, among whom 17 (43.6% of 39) passed away within 3 months. 36 (20.7%) were readmitted within 3 months of surgery and 14 (8%) sustained a second fracture within a year. The correlation of Vitamin D levels, taken as a continuous variable, to outcomes, was analyzed using logistic regression. Although not significant, higher Vitamin D was found to be protective against death within 3 months (OR=0.995, p=0.8), but actually increased the odds of death within 1 year (OR=1.008, p=0.62), readmission within 3 months (OR=1.001, p=0.96), second fracture within 1 year (OR=1.017, p=0.33) and failure to recover (OR=1.002, 0.86). After adjusting for age, gender and CCI, Vitamin D levels were non-significantly inversely associated with both TUG 1 and TUG2, with every 1 unit higher Vitamin D associated with a TUG lowered by 0.15 seconds, p=0.42 and 0.44. Vitamin D was poorly correlated to CCI with correlation coefficient of 0.02, p = 0.71. Conclusions: Our results indicate that Vitamin D levels at the time of a hip fracture do not correlate with patients’ functional outcomes. It is possible that replacing vitamin D eliminated the possible negative impact on functional recovery.

Abstract Osteoporosis-related fractures are undertreated, due in part to misinformation about recommended approaches to patient care and discrepancies among treatment guidelines. To help bridge this gap and improve patient outcomes, the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research assembled a multistakeholder coalition to develop clinical recommendations for the optimal prevention of secondary fractureamong people aged 65 years and older with a hip or vertebral fracture. The coalition developed 13 recommendations (7 primary and 6 secondary) strongly supported by the empirical literature. The coalition recommends increased communication with patients regarding fracture risk, mortality and morbidity outcomes, and fracture risk reduction. Risk assessment (including fall history) should occur at regular intervals with referral to physical and/or occupational therapy as appropriate. Oral, intravenous, andsubcutaneous pharmacotherapies are efficaciousandcanreduce risk of future fracture.Patientsneededucation,however, about thebenefitsandrisks of both treatment and not receiving treatment. Oral bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate are first-line options and are generally well tolerated; otherwise, intravenous zoledronic acid and subcutaneous denosumab can be considered. Anabolic agents are expensive butmay be beneficial for selected patients at high risk.Optimal duration of pharmacotherapy is unknown but because the risk for second fractures is highest in the earlypost-fractureperiod,prompt treatment is recommended.Adequate dietary or supplemental vitaminDand calciumintake shouldbe assured. Individuals beingtreatedfor osteoporosis shouldbe reevaluated for fracture risk routinely, includingvia patienteducationabout osteoporosisandfracturesandmonitoringfor adverse treatment effects.Patients shouldbestronglyencouraged to avoid tobacco, consume alcohol inmoderation atmost, and engage in regular exercise and fall prevention strategies. Finally, referral to endocrinologists or other osteoporosis specialists may be warranted for individuals who experience repeated fracture or bone loss and those with complicating comorbidities (eg, hyperparathyroidism, chronic kidney disease).©2019American Society for Bone andMineral Research.

ABSTRACT Osteoporosis-related fractures are undertreated, due in part to misinformation about recommended approaches to patient care and discrepancies among treatment guidelines. To help bridge this gap and improve patient outcomes, the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research assembled a multistakeholder coalition to develop clinical recommendations for the optimal prevention of secondary fracture among people aged 65 years and older with a hip or vertebral fracture. The coalition developed 13 recommendations (7 primary and 6 secondary) strongly supported by the empirical literature. The coalition recommends increased communication with patients regarding fracture risk, mortality and morbidity outcomes, and fracture risk reduction. Risk assessment (including fall history) should occur at regular intervals with referral to physical and/or occupational therapy as appropriate. Oral, intravenous, and subcutaneous pharmacotherapies are efficacious and can reduce risk of future fracture. Patients need education, however, about the benefits and risks of both treatment and not receiving treatment. Oral bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate are first-line options and are generally well tolerated; otherwise, intravenous zoledronic acid and subcutaneous denosumab can be considered. Anabolic agents are expensive but may be beneficial for selected patients at high risk. Optimal duration of pharmacotherapy is unknown but because the risk for second fractures is highest in the early post-fracture period, prompt treatment is recommended. Adequate dietary or supplemental vitamin D and calcium intake should be assured. Individuals being treated for osteoporosis should be reevaluated for fracture risk routinely, including via patient education about osteoporosis and fractures and monitoring for adverse treatment effects. Patients should be strongly encouraged to avoid tobacco, consume alcohol in moderation at most, and engage in regular exercise and fall prevention strategies. Finally, referral to endocrinologists or other osteoporosis specialists may be warranted for individuals who experience repeated fracture or bone loss and those with complicating comorbidities (eg, hyperparathyroidism, chronic kidney disease). © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Background Heart fats (epicardial and paracardial adipose tissue [PAT]) are greater after menopause. Endogenous estrogen may regulate these fat depots. We evaluated the differential effects of hormone therapy formulations on heart fat accumulations and their associations with coronary artery calcification ( CAC ) progression in recently menopausal women from KEEPS (Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study). Methods and Results KEEPS was a multicenter, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial of the effects of 0.45 mg/d oral conjugated equine estrogens and 50 µg/d transdermal 17β‐estradiol, compared with placebo, on 48‐month progression of subclinical atherosclerosis among 727 early menopausal women. CAC progression was defined if baseline CAC score was 0 and 48‐month CAC score was >0 or if baseline CAC score was >0 and <100 and annualized change in CAC score was ≥10. Of 727 KEEPS participants, 474 (mean age: 52.7 [SD: 2.6]; 78.1% white) had computed tomography–based heart fat and CAC measures at both baseline and 48 months. Compared with women on placebo, women on oral conjugated equine estrogens were less likely to have any increase in epicardial adipose tissue (odds ratio for oral conjugated equine estrogens versus placebo: 0.62 [95% CI, 0.40–0.97]; P =0.03). PAT did not change in any group. Changes in epicardial adipose tissue and PAT did not differ by treatment group. CAC increased in 14% of participants. The assigned treatment modified the association between PAT changes and CAC progression ( P =0.02) such that PAT increases were associated with CAC increases only in the transdermal 17β‐estradiol group. Conclusions In recently menopausal women, oral conjugated equine estrogens may slow epicardial adipose tissue accumulation, whereas transdermal 17β‐estradiol may increase progression of CAC associated with PAT accumulation. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 00154180.

Abstract Objective Several studies indicate that patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) undergoing parathyroid surgery have improvement in mood and neuropsychological functioning. The current analysis aims to examine the relationship between biochemical and clinical variables and the improvement in depression scores and in specific symptoms, after parathyroidectomy. Design A prospective observational case‐control study at a referral centre. Patients Patients with PHPT undergoing parathyroidectomy (n = 88) or thyroid surgery (n = 85). Measurements The Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 (PHQ‐9) was utilized to obtain depression scores at enrolment and 12 months after surgery. The changes in PHQ‐9 were analysed and correlated with baseline clinical and biochemical parameters. Results At enrolment, there was no difference between the groups in the number with a depression diagnosis (PHPT 34.1%, thyroid surgery, 35.5%, P = 0.86). However, baseline PHQ‐9 scores were significantly higher in PHPT (median 7.5, range 0‐27) than thyroid surgery patients (median 3.0, range 0‐18, P < 0.0001). Following surgery, all PHQ‐9 scores, total and symptom group (cognitive, somatic) improved and were no longer different between PHPT (total PHQ‐9 median 2, range 0‐16) and thyroid (median 1, range 0‐14, P = 0.31) groups. Baseline parathyroid hormone level, but not calcium, had a weak relationship with change in PHQ‐9 score after parathyroid surgery ( P = 0.003). Baseline PHQ‐9 score was correlated with change in PHQ‐9 score at 12 months after parathyroid surgery ( P < 0.001). Conclusions Depression scores improve in both somatic and cognitive domains after parathyroidectomy for PHPT and baseline severity of depression predicts the response.

BACKGROUNDPostmenopausal women with breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitors are at an increased risk of bone loss. The current study was undertaken to determine whether upfront versus delayed treatment with zoledronic acid (ZA) impacted bone loss. This report described the 5‐year follow‐up results.METHODSA total of 551 postmenopausal women with breast cancer who completed tamoxifen treatment and were undergoing daily letrozole treatment were randomized to either upfront (274 patients) or delayed (277 patients) ZA at a dose of 4 mg intravenously every 6 months. In the patients on the delayed treatment arm, ZA was initiated for a postbaseline bone mineral density T‐score of <‐2.0 or fracture.RESULTSThe incidence of a 5% decrease in the total lumbar spine bone mineral density at 5 years was 10.2% in the upfront treatment arm versus 41.2% in the delayed treatment arm (P<.0001). A total of 41 patients in the delayed treatment arm were eventually started on ZA. With the exception of increased NCI Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade 1/2 elevated creatinine and fever in the patients treated on the upfront arm and cerebrovascular ischemia among those in the delayed treatment arm, there were no significant differences observed between arms with respect to the most common adverse events of arthralgia and back pain. Osteoporosis occurred less frequently in the upfront treatment arm (2 vs 8 cumulative cases), although this difference was not found to be statistically significant. Bone fractures occurred in 24 patients in the upfront treatment arm versus 25 patients in the delayed treatment arm.CONCLUSIONSImmediate treatment with ZA prevented bone loss compared with delayed treatment in postmenopausal women receiving letrozole and these differences were maintained at 5 years. The incidence of osteoporosis or fractures was not found to be significantly different between treatment arms. Cancer 2015;121:2537–2543. © 2015 American Cancer Society.