Starlinger, Patrick

Abstract Background Liver surgery carries a high risk of complications due to the complex interplay of patient-related factors, disease characteristics, and liver function. Expertise is essential for healthcare professionals managing hepatobiliary patients. This European consensus provides evidence-based guidance on selected aspects of peri- and postoperative care. Methods A modified Delphi process was used to achieve consensus, with a 70% agreement threshold. The expert panel comprised hepatobiliary surgeons, anaesthetists, hepatologists, a specialist nurse, and a physiotherapist. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Six topics were addressed: thromboprophylaxis; perioperative antibiotics; prehabilitation/nutrition/mobilization; bile leak including bilioenteric anastomosis leaks; post-hepatectomy haemorrhage; and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Evidence appraisal and statement development followed Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology. A patient representative reviewed the guideline. Results Searching the literature yielded 204 included publications from an initial 6514. Thirty-two statements were formulated with a median evidence level of 2. Evidence strength varied by topic with noticeably lower evidence levels in complex surgery settings and less prevalent conditions. In some topics, study heterogeneity and specific inclusion criteria resulted in conditional recommendations, despite high-level evidence. Notably, the weakest evidence was found for perioperative thromboprophylaxis and PHLF management. Strong recommendations were formulated for prehabilitation, early postoperative mobilization, and avoidance of routine drain use. Several evidence gaps warranting multicentre studies were identified. Conclusion Optimizing peri- and postoperative care after liver resection remains challenging. Standardizing key practices and addressing evidence gaps through collaborative research are vital to improve outcomes.

Background and Aims: Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) improves outcomes in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), but reliance on University of Wisconsin machine perfusion solution (UW-MPS) increases costs and logistical burden. Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) has potential as a single-solution alternative for HOPE. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of HTK versus UW-MPS during HOPE. Methods: A retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study including 46 patients who received donation after brain death (DBD) grafts that were preserved with HOPE at the Medical University of Vienna between May 2018 and October 2024 was conducted. A total of 23 patients received grafts perfused with HTK; another 23 patients transplanted with organs perfused with UW-MPS were matched based on recipient age and sodium model of end-stage liver disease score, donor age and sex, cold ischemia time, and perfusion time. Postoperative outcomes, perfusion parameters, and cost differences were assessed. Results: The HTK and UW-MPS cohorts demonstrated comparable perfusion dynamics and vascular resistance. While arterial pressure and flow were higher in the UW-MPS group, clinical outcomes—including early allograft dysfunction (47.8% each), ICU stay, and comprehensive complication index—were statistically similar. A trend toward fewer biliary complications (13.0% vs. 30.4%) and reduced hemodialysis requirement (17.4% vs. 30.4%) was observed in the HTK group. Use of HTK reduced perfusion-related costs by approximately EUR 560 per procedure. Conclusion: HTK is a viable alternative to UW-MPS during HOPE in OLT of DBD grafts, offering comparable short-term outcomes and relevant cost savings. Prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore broader applications of single-solution perfusion strategies.

Importance Total pancreatectomy (TP) is indicated for advanced pancreatic cancer or multifocal tumors. Furthermore, TP may be performed to avoid the risk of pancreatic fistula in selected patients to improve the perioperative risk profile. Objective To define reference values for TP based on a low-risk cohort treated at expert centers. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter study analyzed outcomes from patients undergoing primary TP for malignant or benign lesions from 25 international expert centers from January 2017 to November 2023. Low-risk patients undergoing TP (LR-TP) were without vascular resections or significant comorbidities. Exposures TP. Main Outcomes and Measures Twenty reference values were derived from the 75th or the 25th percentile of the median values of all centers. Outcomes of LR-TP were compared with a cohort of TP with vascular resection, TP due to high-risk pancreatic anastomosis, and the benchmark values for low-risk pancreatoduodenectomy. Results Of 994 patients, 333 (33.5%; median [IQR] age, 66 [58-72] years; 171 male [51.4%]) qualified as the LR-TP cohort. Reference values included blood loss (≤1000 mL), major complications (≤37%), 3-month postoperative mortality (<6%), and retrieved lymph nodes (≥29). Compared with TP with vascular resections, reference cutoffs were not met for major complications (51% vs LR-TP ≤37%) and 90-day mortality (11% vs LR-TP ≤6%). For TP due to high-risk anastomosis, failure to rescue rate (38% vs ≤6%) and 90-day mortality (11% vs LR-TP ≤6%) were not met. Compared with pancreatoduodenectomy, reference values for postoperative mortality were 3 times higher for LR-TP (≤2% vs ≤6%) and less for resected lymph nodes (≥16 vs ≥29). Conclusions and Relevance This case-control study provided global reference values for TP, indicating significantly higher postoperative morbidity and mortality compared with pancreatoduodenectomy. Perioperative morbidity of TP was especially increased in patients with vascular resections. These reference values can serve for quality control of pancreatic surgery.

BACKGROUND: The first total pancreatectomy (TP) resulting in survival past the immediate postoperative period was performed at Mayo Clinic in 1944. Although still uncommonly performed, indications have recently fluctuated. We aimed to evaluate trends in TP use and outcomes over four decades. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who underwent single-stage TP at Mayo Clinic Rochester from 1988 to 2024 were analyzed in two cohorts: early era (EE, 1988 to 2009) and modern era (ME, 2010 to 2024). RESULTS: In total, 437 patients were identified: 118 during EE (mean 8 per year) and 319 during ME (mean 21 per year). Primary indications were adenocarcinoma (42% EE vs 60% ME), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (31% EE vs 17% ME), and chronic pancreatitis (11% EE vs 13% ME; p < 0.001). Concurrent vascular resection was performed in 9.3% (EE; all venous only) vs 53% (ME; venous alone in 20% and arterial with or without venous in 33%; p < 0.001). Multivisceral resection was performed in <1% (EE) vs 24% (ME; p < 0.001). Major complications occurred in 13% (EE) vs 27% (ME; p = 0.018), and 90-day mortality was 3.4% (EE) vs 6.3% (ME; p = 0.35). For adenocarcinoma, 5-year median overall survival from both surgery and diagnosis was significantly improved in ME (p = 0.009 and p < 0.001, respectively). Median last HbA1c was 7.7 (EE) vs 7.3 (ME; p < 0.001). Among patients surviving more than 1 year, insulin pumps were used in 12% (EE) vs 49% (ME; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The use of TP has dramatically increased in recent years, primarily for adenocarcinoma alongside increased use of neoadjuvant therapy and ever-expanding criteria for anatomic resectability. Operative complexity has significantly increased with resultant increased perioperative morbidity. TP remains a higher-risk procedure, specifically with en bloc vascular resections, emphasizing the importance of appropriate patient selection, preoperative patient education, and thoughtful postoperative and long-term management.

Abstract Background Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) is a leading cause of cancer death. FDA-approved first-line systemic therapies include atezolizumab/bevacizumab (atezo/bev) and durvalumab/tremelimumab (durva/treme); however, there is a lack of comparative data. Methods We reviewed outcomes of patients with uHCC who initiated atezo/bev or durva/treme between 2017 and 2024, across six institutions. Overall survival (OS) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier and Cox models, adjusting for baseline characteristics. Results Four hundred fifty-two uHCC pts were included. Median age: 68 years; 77% male; 81% white. Most common etiologies were viral hepatitis (38.9%) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (19.5%). Disease progression was the primary reason for treatment discontinuation, atezo/bev (56%) and durva/treme (42%). Outcomes were not statistically significant (median OS [month, m]: 14.0 vs 14.6 [P = .66]; median TTD [m]: 4.9 vs 3.9 [P = .42] for atezo/bev vs durva/treme). Outcomes were significantly different between Child-Pugh classes (CP: A, B7, B8/9, C) respectively, median OS(m): 19.0, 6.1, 5.1, 2.0 (P &lt; .001); median TTD(m): 6.1, 2.3, 3.0, 1.3 (P &lt; .001). Conclusions In this real-world study of uHCC, no significant difference in clinical outcomes was observed between atezo/bev and durva/treme in the first-line setting. CP scores were a key prognostic variable with both regimens.

Abstract Importance and Objective Pancreatic cancer can lead to severe stenosis of the portomesenteric venous (PV/SMV) confluence due to extrinsic compression or direct invasion. This can result in venous hypertension associated with post-prandial abdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleeding, and ascites. In patients with unresectable tumors, transhepatic PV/SMV stenting has been reported; however, its safety and efficacy are poorly understood. Design, Setting and Participants All unresectable pancreatic cancer patients referred to Interventional Radiology to undergo palliative transhepatic PV/SMV stenting (2011–2024) were collected. Patient demographics, CT scans, transhepatic venograms, and clinical outcomes were reviewed. Intervention, Main Outcomes and Results In total, 129 patients were included; 92% had pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Tumors were unresectable due to unreconstructable vascular involvement, metastatic disease, or poor performance status. Nearly 81% were symptomatic, while the remaining 24 asymptomatic patients presented with significant venous hypertensive varices and collaterals on imaging. Complete venous occlusion was seen in 39% of patients at the PV, the SMV, or the PV/SMV confluence; 97% of procedures were successful, with 4 technical failures at obtaining distal venous wire access. Adverse events occurred in 4 patients. Radiological follow-up was available in 94% of patients. Post-procedural primary stent patency was 80% at a median follow-up time of 20 months. Follow-up was available in 102 of the 105 symptomatic patients, with 85% reporting an improvement in symptoms. Conclusions and Relevance Palliative transhepatic PV/SMV stenting is a technically feasible and safe procedure in well-selected patients. Symptoms improvement can be seen in most patients. High-volume centers should consider this technique for patients with unresectable tumors who present with symptomatic stenosis or short segment occlusion.