Abstract Importance and Objective Pancreatic cancer can lead to severe stenosis of the portomesenteric venous (PV/SMV) confluence due to extrinsic compression or direct invasion. This can result in venous hypertension associated with post-prandial abdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleeding, and ascites. In patients with unresectable tumors, transhepatic PV/SMV stenting has been reported; however, its safety and efficacy are poorly understood. Design, Setting and Participants All unresectable pancreatic cancer patients referred to Interventional Radiology to undergo palliative transhepatic PV/SMV stenting (2011–2024) were collected. Patient demographics, CT scans, transhepatic venograms, and clinical outcomes were reviewed. Intervention, Main Outcomes and Results In total, 129 patients were included; 92% had pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Tumors were unresectable due to unreconstructable vascular involvement, metastatic disease, or poor performance status. Nearly 81% were symptomatic, while the remaining 24 asymptomatic patients presented with significant venous hypertensive varices and collaterals on imaging. Complete venous occlusion was seen in 39% of patients at the PV, the SMV, or the PV/SMV confluence; 97% of procedures were successful, with 4 technical failures at obtaining distal venous wire access. Adverse events occurred in 4 patients. Radiological follow-up was available in 94% of patients. Post-procedural primary stent patency was 80% at a median follow-up time of 20 months. Follow-up was available in 102 of the 105 symptomatic patients, with 85% reporting an improvement in symptoms. Conclusions and Relevance Palliative transhepatic PV/SMV stenting is a technically feasible and safe procedure in well-selected patients. Symptoms improvement can be seen in most patients. High-volume centers should consider this technique for patients with unresectable tumors who present with symptomatic stenosis or short segment occlusion.
Abstract 6762: Baseline multiomics and chemotherapy efficacy in preclinical trials using patient-derived xenograft models of cholangiocarcinoma can reveal distinct signatures of chemotherapy response
Abstract Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a diverse type of cancer. For several years, platinum-based chemotherapy (Gemcitabine and Cisplatin) has been the standard treatment and serves as the foundation for current immunotherapy combinations. The typical response rates are generally between 20% and 30%. In this study, we present the results of preclinical efficacy trials conducted on CCA patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, correlating them with the baseline multiomics profiling of these models to identify molecular characteristics linked to treatment response. Methods: Tumor samples from twenty-eight CCA PDX were used to isolate RNA and protein to be included in multiomics analysis (Phosphoproteomics, Proteomics, and Transcriptomics). A subset of PDX models were treated with various doses of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin. The Median Efficacy Index (MEI) was calculated as the ratio of the difference in median of delta in tumor volume at the last day of the study between the treatment and the control arms divided by the median of delta in tumor volume of the control at the last day of the treatment (positive= growth, negative=inhibition, and 0=no efficacy). A Hierarchical All-Against-All algorithm was utilized to compare multiomics features to the MEI and pathway analysis completed for identified molecular features. Pathway enrichment was calculated using the KEGG database, and random-forest variable selection chose the pathways most influential in predicting sensitivity or resistance. Results: After conducting preclinical efficacy trials, the 11 tested CCA PDX models were classified into sensitive, moderately sensitive, and resistant models based on the MEI on each treatment arm. The top up-regulated genes were identified for Gemcitabine response (SRPK2, GLK2, and RIOK2) and Cisplatin response (NTRK1, PRPF4B, and SRPK2). The top up-regulated genes related to Gemcitabine resistance were NTRK1, PIP5K1C, and CSNK2A2, while those related to Cisplatin resistance were SRPK1, PRPF4B, and CSNK2A1. Downregulation of the anti-folate resistance pathway is a strong predictor of gemcitabine sensitivity, and the lysine degradation pathway is a strong predictor of cisplatin sensitivity. Conclusion: Multiomics signatures of cholangiocarcinoma can forecast responses to standard chemotherapy in preclinical models. New markers of resistance to Gemcitabine and Cisplatin were discovered, linked to NTRK1, SRPK1, and SRPK2. These resistance profiles will be tested using suitable targeted therapies on the resistant CCA patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Citation Format: Amro M. Abdelrahman, Danielle M. Carlson, Ellen L. Larson, Erik Jessen, Dong-Gi Mun, Isaac Lynch, Alessandro Fogliati, Stella Konadu Adjei Antwi, Aushinie Abeynayake, Akhilesh Pandey, Mark J. Truty, Gregory J. Gores, Rory L. Smoot. Baseline multiomics and chemotherapy efficacy in preclinical trials using patient-derived xenograft models of cholangiocarcinoma can reveal distinct signatures of chemotherapy response [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 6762.
Abstract 6912: Pretreatment multiomics in conjunction with preclinical trials on patient-derived xenograft models of cholangiocarcinoma can identify chemotherapy response signatures
Abstract Background Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a heterogeneous malignancy. Platinum-based chemotherapy (Gemcitabine and Cisplatin) has been the standard treatment for over a decade and is the base for the current immunotherapy combinations. Response rates are typically between 20-30%. Herein, we present outcomes of preclinical efficacy trials on CCA PDX models in correlation with baseline multiomics profiling of CCA patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models to identify molecular features associated with response. Methods Tumor samples from twenty-eight CCA PDX were used to isolate RNA and protein to be included in multiomics analysis (Phosphoproteomics, Proteomics, and Transcriptomics). A subset of PDX models were treated with various doses of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin. The Median Efficacy Index (MEI) was calculated as the ratio of the difference in median of delta in tumor volume at the last day of the study between the treatment and the control arms divided by the median of delta in tumor volume of the control at the last day of the treatment (positive= growth, negative=inhibition, and 0=no efficacy). A Hierarchical All-Against-All algorithm was utilized to compare multiomics features to the MEI and pathway analysis completed for identified molecular features. Results After conducting preclinical efficacy trials, the five tested CCA PDX models were classified into sensitive, moderately sensitive, and resistant models based on the MEI on each treatment arm. The top up-regulated genes were identified for Gemcitabine response (SRPK2, GLK2, and RIOK2) and Cisplatin response (NTRK1, PRPF4B, and SRPK2). The top up-regulated genes related to Gemcitabine resistance were NTRK1, PIP5K1C, and CSNK2A2, while those related to Cisplatin resistance were SRPK1, PRPF4B, and CSNK2A1. Conclusion Cholangiocarcinoma multiomics signatures can predict therapeutic response to standard-of-care chemotherapy in preclinical models. Novel mechanisms of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin resistance were identified related to NTRK1, SRPK1 and SRPK2. Resistant signatures will be challenged with the appropriate targeted therapies on the resistant CCA PDX models. Citation Format: Amro M. Abdelrahman, Danielle M. Carlson, Erik Jessen, Dong-Gi Mun, Isaac Lynch, Alessandro Fogliati, Stella Konadu Adjei Antwi, Aushinie Abeynayake, Akhilesh Pandey, Mark J. Truty, Gregory J. Gores, Rory L. Smoot. Pretreatment multiomics in conjunction with preclinical trials on patient-derived xenograft models of cholangiocarcinoma can identify chemotherapy response signatures [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6912.