Weiss, Anna

Importance Observational studies of survivors of breast cancer and prospective trials of aspirin for cardiovascular disease suggest improved breast cancer survival among aspirin users, but prospective studies of aspirin to prevent breast cancer recurrence are lacking. Objective To determine whether aspirin decreases the risk of invasive cancer events among survivors of breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants A011502, a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial conducted in the United States and Canada with 3020 participants who had high-risk nonmetastatic breast cancer, enrolled participants from 534 sites from January 6, 2017, through December 4, 2020, with follow-up to March 4, 2023. Interventions Participants were randomized (stratified for hormone receptor status [positive vs negative], body mass index [≤30 vs >30], stage II vs III, and time since diagnosis [<18 vs ≥18 months]) to receive 300 mg of aspirin (n = 1510) or placebo once daily (n = 1510) for 5 years. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was invasive disease–free survival. Overall survival was a key secondary outcome. Results A total of 3020 participants were randomized when the data and safety monitoring committee recommended suspending the study at the first interim analysis because the hazard ratio had crossed the prespecified futility bound. By median follow-up of 33.8 months (range, 0.1-72.6 months), 253 invasive disease–free survival events were observed (141 in the aspirin group and 112 in the placebo group), yielding a hazard ratio of 1.27 (95% CI, 0.99-1.63; P = .06). All invasive disease–free survival events, including death, invasive progression (both distant and locoregional), and new primary events, were numerically higher in the aspirin group, although the differences were not statistically significant. There was no difference in overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.82-1.72). Rates of grades 3 and 4 adverse events were similar in both groups. Conclusion and Relevance Among participants with high-risk nonmetastatic breast cancer, daily aspirin therapy did not improve risk of breast cancer recurrence or survival in early follow-up. Despite its promise and wide availability, aspirin should not be recommended as an adjuvant breast cancer treatment. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02927249

Importance Adding fulvestrant to anastrozole (A+F) improved survival in postmenopausal women with advanced estrogen receptor (ER)–positive/ERBB2 (formerly HER2)–negative breast cancer. However, the combination has not been tested in early-stage disease. Objective To determine whether neoadjuvant fulvestrant or A+F increases the rate of pathologic complete response or ypT1-2N0/N1mic/Ki67 2.7% or less residual disease (referred to as endocrine-sensitive disease) over anastrozole alone. Design, Setting, and Participants A phase 3 randomized clinical trial assessing differences in clinical and correlative outcomes between each of the fulvestrant-containing arms and the anastrozole arm. Postmenopausal women with clinical stage II to III, ER-rich (Allred score 6-8 or >66%)/ERBB2-negative breast cancer were included. All analyses were based on data frozen on March 2, 2023. Interventions Patients received anastrozole, fulvestrant, or a combination for 6 months preoperatively. Tumor Ki67 was assessed at week 4 and optionally at week 12, and if greater than 10% at either time point, the patient switched to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or immediate surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the endocrine-sensitive disease rate (ESDR). A secondary outcome was the percentage change in Ki67 after 4 weeks of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) (week 4 Ki67 suppression). Results Between February 2014 and November 2018, 1362 female patients (mean [SD] age, 65.0 [8.2] years) were enrolled. Among the 1298 evaluable patients, ESDRs were 18.7% (95% CI, 15.1%-22.7%), 22.8% (95% CI, 18.9%-27.1%), and 20.5% (95% CI, 16.8%-24.6%) with anastrozole, fulvestrant, and A+F, respectively. Compared to anastrozole, neither fulvestrant-containing regimen significantly improved ESDR or week 4 Ki67 suppression. The rate of week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10% was 25.1%, 24.2%, and 15.7% with anastrozole, fulvestrant, and A+F, respectively. Pathologic complete response/residual cancer burden class I occurred in 8 of 167 patients and 17 of 167 patients, respectively (15.0%; 95% CI, 9.9%-21.3%), after switching to neoadjuvant chemotherapy due to week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10%. PAM50 subtyping derived from RNA sequencing of baseline biopsies available for 753 patients (58%) identified 394 luminal A, 304 luminal B, and 55 nonluminal tumors. A+F led to a greater week 4 Ki67 suppression than anastrozole alone in luminal B tumors (median [IQR], −90.4% [−95.2 to −81.9%] vs −76.7% [−89.0 to −55.6%]; P < .001), but not luminal A tumors. Thirty-six nonluminal tumors (65.5%) had a week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10%. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, neither fulvestrant nor A+F significantly improved the 6-month ESDR over anastrozole in ER-rich/ERBB2-negative breast cancer. Aromatase inhibition remains the standard-of-care NET. Differential NET response by PAM50 subtype in exploratory analyses warrants further investigation. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588

PURPOSE Financial toxicity (FT) affects 20% of cancer survivors and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. No large-scale programs have been implemented to mitigate FT. We evaluated the effect of monthly FT screening as part of a larger patient-reported outcomes (PROs) digital monitoring intervention. METHODS PRO-TECT (AFT-39) is a cluster-randomized trial of patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic cancer. Practices were randomly assigned 1:1 to digital symptom monitoring (PRO practices) or usual care (control practices). Digital monitoring consisted of between-visit online or automated telephone patient surveys about symptoms, functioning, and FT (single-item screening question from Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity) for up to 1 year, with automated alerts sent to practice nurses for concerning survey scores. Clinical team actions in response to alerts were not mandated. The primary outcome of this planned secondary analysis was development or worsening of financial difficulties, assessed via the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 financial difficulties measure, at any time compared with baseline. A randomly selected subset of patients and nurses were interviewed about their experiences with the intervention. RESULTS One thousand one hundred ninety-one patients were enrolled (593 PRO; 598 control) at 52 US community oncology practices. Overall, 30.2% of patients treated at practices that received the FT screening intervention developed, or experienced worsening of, financial difficulties, compared with 39.0% treated at control practices ( P = .004). Patients and nurses interviewed stated that FT screening identified patients for financial counseling who otherwise would be reluctant to seek, or unaware of the availability of, assistance. CONCLUSION In this report of a secondary outcome from a randomized clinical trial, FT screening as part of routine digital patient monitoring with PROs reduced the development, or worsening, of financial difficulties among patients undergoing systemic cancer therapy.

180 Background: Financial toxicity affects 20% of cancer survivors and is associated with decreased treatment adherence and poor clinical outcomes. No large-scale programs have been implemented to mitigate financial toxicity among patients undergoing cancer treatment. We evaluated the effect of monthly patient-reported financial toxicity screening as part of a larger digital monitoring intervention. Methods: PRO-TECT (AFT-39) is a cluster-randomized trial of patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic cancer. Practices were randomized 1:1 to digital symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes (“PRO practices”) or usual care (“control practices”). Digital monitoring consisted of between-visit online or automated telephone patient surveys containing symptom, functioning, and financial toxicity screening questions for up to one year, with automated alerts sent to practice nurses for concerning survey scores. Clinical team actions in response to alerts were not mandated. The primary outcome of this analysis was development or worsening of financial difficulties, assessed via the EORTC QLQ-C30 (“Has your physical condition or medical treatment caused you financial difficulties?”), at any time compared to baseline. A randomly selected subset of patients and nurses were interviewed about their experiences with the intervention. Results: 1,191 patients were enrolled (593 PRO; 598 control) at 52 US community oncology practices. Overall, 30.2% of patients treated at practices that received the intervention developed, or experienced worsening of, financial difficulties, compared to 39.0% of patients treated at control practices (p = 0.01). Patients and nurses interviewed stated that financial toxicity screening identified patients for financial counseling who otherwise would be reluctant to seek, or unaware of the availability of, assistance. Conclusions: Screening for financial toxicity as part of routine digital patient monitoring with PROs reduces the development, or worsening, of financial difficulties among patients undergoing systemic cancer therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03249090.

Abstract Introduction: The ALTERNATE trial randomized postmenopausal women with ER Allred 6-8 HER2- breast cancer to 6 months of NET with anastrozole (A), fulvestrant (F) or the combination (A+F). Biopsies were taken preNET and after 4-weeks(wks). Patients with Ki67 values >10% at 4-wks were offered triage to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with on-treatment Ki67 ≤ 10% who completed NET underwent surgery and Ki67 was reassessed. The primary endpoint was endocrine-sensitive disease rate (ESDR). ESD is defined as pCR or PEPI-0 residual disease (pT1-2, pN0, Ki67 ≤ 2.7%). We previously reported that the ESDR difference between the F-containing arms and the A arm was not >10% (ASCO 2020) and that baseline RNA-seq-based intrinsic subtypes predicted outcomes overall (SABCS 2021). Herein we describe relationships between PAM50 intrinsic subtype and Ki67 values by treatment arm because comparative drug effectiveness in adjuvant endocrine therapy studies in ER+ HER2- breast cancer can be predicted by the degree of Ki67 suppression (PMC3518447). Methods: 743 of the 1297 eligible patients (A: 264; F: 231; A+F: 248) had RNA extracted from preNET frozen tumor biopsies with >50% tumor content and subjected to RNA seq. Intrinsic subtypes were then assigned as LumA, LumB, and NonLum (Basal or HER2-E) using open-source PAM50-based informatics. Differences in the proportion with wk4 Ki67 > 10%, % change in wk4 ki67, and surgical CCCA (Ki67 ≤ 2.7%) rate (sxCCCA) between treatments and by intrinsic subtype was assessed using stratified logistic regression, Wilcoxon rank sum test, and Fisher’s exact test, respectively. Analysis of sxCCCA excluded those who failed to complete NET for reasons other than disease progression or early Ki67 >10%. Results: Amongst the 358 LumA cases there were no significant differences in Ki67-based endpoints between treatments. Among the 292 LumB cases, the wk4 ki67 > 10% rate was lower with A+F (19.4%) than A (43%) (P=0.0002) and was somewhat lower in F (31%) versus A (P=0.076). The % change in wk4 Ki67 in LumB cases, adjusted for baseline Ki67, showed markedly superior suppression for A+F versus A (-90% vs. -77%; P=<0.0001) and versus F (-90% vs. -80%; P=0.0026). Furthermore sxCCCA rates were significantly higher with A+F than A (53% vs. 25% P = <0.0001) and somewhat higher for F (37%) than A (p=0.068), indicating that superior antiproliferative effects for A+F persist after 6 months on therapy. Lack of Ki67 suppression in response to treatment was observed in the majority of 43 NonLum samples regardless of treatment. Conclusion: The combination of A+F was significantly more effective than either drug alone for the control of LumB breast cancer cell proliferation. This suggests that A+F may be a more effective adjuvant endocrine therapy than A alone in LumB disease. The lower Ki67 suppression with A alone also suggests that poorer outcome in some LumB tumors may be due to insufficient ER targeting rather than ER-independent tumor growth Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, UG1CA189856, U10CA180868 (NRG), NCI BIQSFP, BCRF, Genentech, AstraZeneca. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. (MJE) CPRIT RR140033, P50-CA186784, P50-CA58223, U01-CA214125, U24-CA210954, Gift from Ralph and Lisa Eads, McNair Scholarship. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588 Citation Format: Matthew J. Ellis, Meenakshi Anurag, Jeremy Hoog, Aranzazu Fernandez-Martinez, Cheng Fan, Richard Gibbs, Souzan Sanati, Kiran Vij, Mark Watson, Travis Dockter, Olwen Hahn, Joseph Guenther, Abigail Caudle, Erica Crouch, Amy Tiersten, Monica Mita, Wajeeha Razaq, Tina J. Hieken, Yang Wang, A. Marilyn Leitch, Gary W. Unzeitig, Eric Winer, Anna Weiss, Kelly Hunt, Ann H. Partridge, Charles M. Perou, Vera Suman, Cynthia X. Ma, Lisa A. Carey. The effect of intrinsic subtype on inhibition of tumor growth by anastrozole vs. fulvestrant vs. the combination: Results from the Alliance neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) ALTERNATE trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT026.

Abstract Background: There is debate regarding the benefit of breast surgery in women with stage IV breast cancer, especially among those with oligometastatic disease and good response to systemic therapy. Although some retrospective studies have suggested that locoregional therapy may improve survival, this finding has not been universally replicated in randomized controlled trials (RCT) in India, Turkey, and recently the US. To assess need for dissemination of trial results by members of the Alliance/American College of Surgeons Clinical Research Program Dissemination and Implementation (ACS CRP D&I) committee, we sought to determine trends in surgical resection and other therapies for stage IV breast cancer in response to these findings. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to identify women diagnosed with clinical stage IV breast cancer of ductal, lobular, or metaplastic histology between 2004-2017. Trends in the rate of women who underwent surgery with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy, radiation, and/or systemic treatments were compared. Possible predictors of breast surgery were examined in univariable and multivariable analysis. Results: We identified 87,331 cases meeting inclusion criteria and assessed demographics for surgery versus no surgery. Of the 87,331 cases, 7,718 (9%) underwent BCS and 17,625 (20%) underwent mastectomy. Rates of breast surgical resection for women with clinically diagnosed stage IV breast cancer rose until 2009, reaching a peak at 37%, followed by a decline to a rate of 18% in 2017 (Table). The largest decline was seen in the hormone receptor positive (HR+) and HER2- subgroup with 71% of patients undergoing surgery in 2007 down to 15% in 2017. Concurrently, the mean number of days between chemotherapy initiation and definitive surgery has been on the rise, ranging from 52 days in 2004 up to 94 days in 2017. In 2004, the rate of systemic therapy alone was slightly more common than locoregional therapy (surgery and/or radiation) with or without systemic therapy (48% vs 37%). By 2017, systemic therapy alone was by far more frequently utilized (69% vs 20%, p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with reduced odds of receiving surgery were older age, black race, higher comorbidity index, being uninsured, smaller tumors, lower histologic grade, multiple sites of metastasis, and treatment with chemo-endocrine therapy (all group p values ≤0.001). Factors associated with increased odds of receiving surgery were metaplastic histology, TN subtype, and radiation therapy (all group p values ≤0.001). Conclusions: Rates of surgical resection of the breast primary for stage IV breast cancer have been on the decline in recent years, especially for HR+/HER2- disease, suggesting that providers are responding to the lack of benefit demonstrated in RCTs. Higher rates of surgery in patients with HR-/HER2+ disease and the concurrent rise in the time interval between initiation of systemic therapy and definitive surgical intervention suggest that providers may still be selecting surgery for patients with certain subtypes or those with a durable response to systemic therapy. These areas of continued clinical equipoise could be a target for future studies or de-implementation strategies. OverallHR+/HER2-HER2+TNUnknownSurgery/Total%Surgery/Total%Surgery/Total%Surgery/Total%Surgery/Total%20041189/351334-55-30-50-3420051202/353834-65-35-23-3420061268/375834-54-36-31-3420071571/433636-71-41-32-3620081992/54203754/925926/544820/41491892/52333620092194/592437172/3604883/1525556/106531883/53063520102318/6419361162/331835554/134841352/80144250/9522620112322/6921341220/378932532/144137384/91542186/7762420122238/7110311177/393830587/163536339/85340135/6842020132147/7579281173/423128534/172831334/92536106/6951520142013/8033251086/442825496/185227306/99831125/7551720151805/794323914/434321517/198126288/9962986/6231420161609/819420829/464018459/196823247/10122474/5741320171477/813618722/467815421/190522256/10372578/51615Percent of women with stage IV breast cancer undergoing surgery by year and receptor subtype. Rows containing any number <10 are not reported by subtype to maintain confidentiality, per NCDB guidelines. Citation Format: Sasha R Douglas, Ingrid Lizarraga, Judy C Boughey, Anna Weiss, Kelly Hunt, Diana Dickson-Witmer, Preeti D Subhedar, Ko Un Park, Beiqun Zhao, Sarah Blair. Trends in surgical resection for stage IV breast cancer: Less surgery more systemic treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-06.

Abstract Background: Neoadjuvant ET (NET) offers an opportunity to assess ET sensitivity for ER+ HER2- BC and potentially to tailor therapy. Ki67 >10% on biopsy after 2-4 weeks (wks) of NET identifies patients (pts) with intrinsic ET resistance; while pathologic complete response (pCR) and modified preoperative endocrine prognostic index of 0 (mPEPI 0: pT1-2N0, Ki67 ≤2.7%) at surgery indicates sensitivity to ET. However, on-NET biopsy is not always acceptable or feasible and delays the ET sensitivity determination. PAM50 ROR score and intrinsic subtypes by tumor RNA profiling are prognostic in pts with early stage ER+ HER2- BC, and predict pCR rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) (PMC2667820). We therefore hypothesized that PAM50 analysis on pre-NET biopsies could predict the likelihood of a) a high on-NET Ki67, b) mPEPI-0 or pCR at surgery and, c) pCR for pts triaged to NCT. Methods: The ALTERNATE trial is a phase III study that randomized postmenopausal pts with clinical stage II/III ER+ (Allred score 6-8) HER2- BC to receive neoadjuvant anastrozole, fulvestrant, or both for 6 months before surgery. Research biopsy was required at pre-NET and wk 4, then optional at wk 12. Pts with Ki67 >10% on biopsy at wk 4 or 12 discontinued NET and were offered NCT. PAM50 intrinsic subtype and ROR-P values were generated from mRNA sequencing (RNASeq) analysis on pre-NET biopsies using open-source informatics (PMC7723687) and evaluated for prediction of on-NET Ki67 >10% at wk 4 or 12, pCR or mPEPI-0 post NET, and pCR post NCT. Results: 749 of 1,297 eligible trial pts were included in the analyses, after excluding 548 pts due to insufficient pre-NET tumor for RNASeq (n=511) or PAM50 normal subtype (n=37). Similar to the entire ALTERNATE population, the rate of Ki67 >10% at wk 4 or 12 was 24.4% (95% CI: 21.4-27.7%) and the rate of mPEPI-0/pCR post NET was 19.8% (95% CI: 17.0-22.8%). There were 393 (52.5%) Lum A, 302 (40.3%) Lum B, and 54 (7.2%) non-Lum (9 Basal, 45 HER2-E) BCs. These included 196 (26.2%) ROR-P low, 354 (47.3%) ROR-P medium and 199 (26.6%) ROR-P high BCs. Both the rates of Ki67 >10% at wk 4 or 12 and mPEPI-0/pCR differed significantly with respect to PAM50 subtype or ROR-P category, such that Lum A or ROR-P low BCs were least likely to have a Ki67 >10% at wk 4 or 12 and most likely to achieve mPEPI-0/pCR (Table). 93 of 168 (55.4%) pts triaged to NCT had RNA-seq results, yielding 26 Lum A, 49 Lum B, 4 Basal and 14 HER2-E, with the pCR rates of 0%, 6.1%, 0%, and 21.4%, respectively. There were 10 ROR-P low, 39 medium, and 44 high tumors, with a pCR rate of 0%, 5.1% and 9.1%, respectively. Conclusion: These data indicate that both baseline ROR-P and intrinsic subtype are predictive of early on-NET Ki67 > 10% and mPEPI 0/pCR at surgery after NET. For pts triaged to NCT based on an early on-NET Ki67 >10%, the HER2-E group had the highest pCR rate (20%) and no pCRs were observed in Lum A. These data may be useful for directing neoadjuvant therapy in postmenopausal pts with ER+ HER2- BC. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, UG1CA189856, U10CA180868 (NRG), NCI BIQSFP, BCRF, Genentech, AstraZeneca. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. (MJE) CPRIT RR140033, P50CA186784, P50-CA58223, U01 CA214125, U24CA210954, Gift from Ralph and Lisa Eads, McNair Scholarship. Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588. Table 1.Rates of Ki67 >10% and mPEPI-0/pCR post NET by PAM50 subtype and ROR-P categoryKi67 >10% at wk 4 or 12mPEPI 0/pCR post NETPAM50 SubtypenYes, n (%)PnNo, n (%)PLum A37251 (13.7%) 95% CI: 10.4-17.6%<0.0001393104 (26.5%) 95%CI: 22.2-31.1%<0.0001Lum B29394 (32.1%) 95% CI: 26.8-37.8%30243 (14.2%) 95%CI: 10.5-18.7%Non-luminal (Basal and HER2-E)5338 (71.7%) 95%CI: 57.6-83.2%541 (1.9%) 95%CI: 0.05-9.9%ROR-P CategorynYes, n (%)PnNo, n (%)PLow18018 (10.0%) 95%CI: 6.0-15.3%<0.000119660 (30.6%) 95%CI: 24.2-37.6%<0.0001Intermediate34474 (21.5%) 95%CI: 17.3-26.2%35471 (20.1%) 95%CI: 16.0-24.6%High19491 (46.9%) 95%CI: 39.7-54.2%19917 (8.5%) 95%CI: 5.1-13.3% Citation Format: Cynthia X Ma, Meenakshi Anurag, Travis Dockter, Jeremy Hoog, Aranzazu Fernandez-Martinez, Cheng Fan, Richard Gibbs, Souzan Sanati, Kiran Vij, Mark Watson, Olwen Hahn, Joseph Guenther, Abigail Caudle, Erika Crouch, Amy Tiersten, Monica Mita, Wajeeha Razaq, Tina J Hieken, Yang Wang, A. Marilyn Leitch, Gary W Unzeitig, Anna Weiss, Eric P Winer, Kelly Hunt, Ann H Partridge, Lisa A Carey, Charles M Perou, Matthew J Ellis, Vera Suman. Pam50 intrinsic subtype and risk of recurrence score (ROR) for the prediction of endocrine (ET) sensitivity and pathologic response to chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II/III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) in the alternate trial (Alliance A011106) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD9-03.

AbstractSurgical trials in breast cancer have catalyzed contemporary trial design for solid organ cancers and are a prime example of surgeons taking the lead in clinical trial design. Surgeons have lead trials that have improved patient outcomes and quality of life without sacrificing oncologic safety. We have evolved from radical mastectomy to breast conservation and sentinel node biopsy. Contemporary trial design in breast cancer now focus on personalizing care based on tumor genomics