Back to Authors

Lyden, Sean P.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1666-017X

Mayo Clinic

Cleveland Clinic

Citations 3

Advancements in imaging for endovascular treatment of peripheral artery disease
Raskin, Daniel , Zivkovic, Mia, Kirksey, Levester , Lyden, Sean P. , Levitin, Abraham, Sorin, Vera , Ghibes, Patrick , Klang, Eyal , Partovi, Sasan , Zivkovic, Mia, Partovi, Sasan

Vasa | October 15, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1024/0301-1526/a001242 Get It

Summary: Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) is a significant global health concern, leading to morbidity through progressive stenosis and eventually occlusion of the lower extremity arterial vasculature. Advanced imaging modalities play a major role in diagnosing PAD, in planning endovascular as well as surgical interventions, and in monitoring post-treatment outcomes. This review highlights the current major imaging techniques, including duplex ultrasound, computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). It provides insights into their applications, advantages, limitations and the importance of individualized imaging strategies for optimizing patient outcomes.
Results of the North American Complex Abdominal Aortic Debranching (NACAAD) Registry
Escobar, Guillermo A. , Oderich, Gustavo S. , Souza, Leonardo Reis de, Quiñones‐Baldrich, William J., Patel, Himanshu J. , Eliason, Jonathan L. , Timaran, Carlos H. , Black, James H. , Ellozy, Sharif H. , Woo, Edward Y., Fillinger, Mark F., Singh, Michael J. , Lee, Jason T. , Lall, Purandath , Gloviczki, Péter , Kalra, Manju , Duncan, Audra A. , Lyden, Sean P. , Tenorio, Emanuel R. , Investigators, for the NACAAD, Patel, Himanshu J , H Timaran, Carlos , Tenorio, Emanuel R , Oderich, Gustavo S , Farber, Mark , Upchurch, Gilbert R. , Jiménez, Juan Carlos , Investigators, for the NACAAD, Gloviczki, Péter

Circulation | October 10, 2022 | Volume: 146 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 1149-1158

10.1161/circulationaha.120.045894 Get It

Background: Hybrid debranching repair of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms was initially designed as a better alternative to standard open repair, addressing the limitations of endovascular repair involving the visceral aorta. We reviewed the collective outcomes of hybrid debranching repairs using extra-anatomic, open surgical debranching of the renal-mesenteric arteries, followed by endovascular aortic stenting. Methods: Data from patients who underwent hybrid repair in 14 North American institutions during 10 years were retrospectively reviewed. Society of Vascular Surgery scores were used to assess comorbidity risk. Early and late outcomes, including mortality, morbidity, reintervention, and patency were analyzed. Results: A total of 208 patients (118 male; mean age, 71±8 years old) were treated by hybrid repair with extraanatomic reconstruction of 657 renal and mesenteric arteries (mean 3.2 vessels/patient). Mean aneurysm diameter was 6.6±1.3 cm. Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms were identified in 163 (78%) patients and pararenal aneurysms in 45 (22%). A single-stage repair was performed in 92 (44%) patients. The iliac arteries were the most common source of inflow (n=132; 63%), and most (n=150; 72%) had 3 or more bypasses. There were 30 (14%) early deaths, ranging widely across sites (0%–21%). A Society of Vascular Surgery comorbidity score >15 was the primary predictor of early mortality ( P <0.01), whereas mortality was 3% in a score ≤9. Early complications occurred in 140 (73%) patients and included respiratory complications in 45 patients (22%) and spinal cord ischemia in 22 (11%), of whom 10 (45%) fully recovered. At 5 years, survival was 61±5%, primary graft patency was 90±2%, and secondary patency was 93±2%. The most significant predictor of late mortality was renal insufficiency ( P <0.0001). Conclusions: Mortality after hybrid repair and visceral debranching is highly variable by center, but strongly affected by preoperative comorbidities and the centers’ experience with the technique. With excellent graft patency at 5 years, the outcomes of hybrid repair done at centers of excellence and in carefully selected patients may be comparable (or better) than traditional open or even totally endovascular approaches. However, in patients already considered as high-risk for surgery, it may not offer better outcomes.
Mortality and Paclitaxel-Coated Devices
Rocha‐Singh, Krishna J. , Duval, Sue , Schneider, Peter A. , Ansel, Gary M. , Lyden, Sean P. , Ioannidis, John P. A. , Tzafriri, Abraham R. , Edelman, Elazer R. , Granada, Juan F. , Misra, Sanjay , Misra, Sanjay , Ioannidis, John P A , Jaff, Michael R. , Mullin, Christopher M., Misra, Sanjay, White, Christopher J. , Beckman, Joshua A.

Circulation | May 6, 2020 | Volume: 141 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 1859-1869

10.1161/circulationaha.119.044697 Get It

Background: Paclitaxel-containing devices (PTXDs) significantly reduce reintervention in patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease. A recent aggregate-data meta-analysis reported increased late mortality in patients with peripheral artery disease treated with PTXDs. We performed an individual patient data meta-analysis to evaluate mortality. Methods: Manufacturers of US Food and Drug Administration–approved and commercially available devices in the United States provided deidentified individual patient data for independent analysis. Cox proportional hazards 1-stage meta-analysis models using intention-to-treat methods were used for the primary analysis. A secondary analysis of recovered missing vital status data was performed. The impact of control crossover to PTXDs, cause-specific mortality, and drug dose mortality were assessed. Results: A total of 2185 subjects and 386 deaths from 8 PTXD trials with 4-year median follow-up were identified. The primary analysis indicated a 38% (95% CI, 6% to 80%) increased relative mortality risk, corresponding to 4.6% absolute increase, at 5 years associated with PTXD use. Control and treatment arm loss to follow-up and withdrawal were 24% and 23%, respectively. With inclusion of recovered vital status data, the excess relative mortality risk was 27% (95% CI, 3%–58%). This observation was consistent across various scenarios, including as-treated analyses, with no evidence of increased risk over time with PTXDs. Mortality risk tended to be increased for all major causes of death. There were no subgroup differences. No drug dose–mortality association was identified. Conclusions: This individual patient data meta-analysis, based on the most complete available data set of mortality events from PTXD randomized controlled trials, identified an absolute 4.6% increased mortality risk associated with PTXD use.