Wagner, Lilly H.

Purpose: To describe a case of locally invasive conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) refractory to plaque radiotherapy. Case Description: A 69-year-old man presented with a recurrent conjunctival tumor after 6 previous cycles of topical 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy and excisional biopsy showing invasive SCC with positive margins. There was a mild anterior chamber reaction. By the time of repeat excisional biopsy, the conjunctiva had ulcerated with underlying scleralysis associated with histopathologic evidence of scleral involvement by SCC. After subsequent tectonic scleral patch grafting, plaque radiotherapy was applied after which the disease appeared to be controlled for 9 months. The eye then developed progressive conjunctival ulceration and scleralysis with progressive ectropion. Exenteration was performed, revealing locally invasive SCC into palpebral conjunctiva, ciliary body, and choroid. Conclusions: Conjunctival SCC can be locally invasive with destruction of the globe, despite plaque radiotherapy. Clinicians should be suspicious of invasive diseases in cases of ocular surface squamous neoplasia that are poorly responsive to topical chemotherapy. Associated anterior chamber cell and progressive scleralysis should also raise concern for invasive malignancy.

Background Malpositioned orbital implants are an underappreciated source of significant postoperative morbidity, often necessitating revision surgery. Decision-making regarding practical frameworks to guide revision remains challenging and is not well standardized or characterized. Objective To analyze clinical presentations, radiographic failure patterns, multidisciplinary surgical strategies, and outcomes of patients undergoing revision surgery for malpositioned orbital implants. Methods A single-center retrospective consecutive case series was conducted of patients who underwent removal or replacement of malpositioned orbital implants. Patient demographics, presenting symptoms, radiographic findings, surgical approaches, implant management strategies, and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. Most cases were co-managed by plastic/reconstructive and oculoplastic surgeons. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize findings. Results Five of seven patients (71.4%) were female, with a median age of 60 years (range 29–78). Diplopia was the most common presenting symptom (5/7, 71.4%) along with pain or swelling (5/7, 71.4%) followed by globe malposition (3/7, 42.9%). CT demonstrated implant protrusion into orbital soft tissue in 4/7 patients (57.1%) and peri-implant inflammatory collections in 3/7 (42.9%). Out of our 7 revision cases, four patients (57.1%) underwent explantation alone, and three (42.9%) underwent secondary reconstruction with custom or semi-custom implants. At follow-up, diplopia improved or resolved in 4/5 affected patients (80%), and pain, swelling, and globe position improved in all symptomatic patients. Conclusion Malpositioned orbital implants demonstrate heterogeneous failure mechanisms that require individualized surgical management. A multidisciplinary approach can guide decision-making regarding implant removal versus revision of reconstruction, enabling safe revision surgery and favorable clinical outcomes. Additionally, virtual surgical planning and intraoperative navigation are enablers of safe and precise revision orbital surgery.

Belt buckle ectropion is a newly recognized mechanism of lower eyelid malposition following Mohs reconstruction. Unlike cicatricial ectropion caused by vertical skin shortage, this variant results from horizontal flap tension acting on a lax tarsus. We retrospectively reviewed three patients who developed postoperative ectropion following subciliary Mohs reconstruction without lid margin involvement. Mechanism, management, and outcomes were analyzed. In all cases, the ectropion resulted from horizontal anterior lamellar tension producing anterior tarsal tilt, confirmed by a negative forced traction test. One case resolved spontaneously, and two required lateral tarsal strip procedures, both yielding successful anatomic and functional outcomes. Belt buckle ectropion represents a distinct post-reconstructive malposition mechanism, correctable with horizontal tarsal tightening rather than skin grafting. Recognition of this pattern may prevent misclassification as cicatricial ectropion and guide appropriate surgical management.

Purpose: To determine current dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) practice patterns of American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery members and identify surgeon and case-related factors impacting preference for endoscopic versus external DCR and the use of preoperative imaging. Methods: A cross-sectional web-based anonymous 16-question survey was distributed to 277 American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery members enrolled in survey-based research. The survey assessed surgeons’ demographics, practice settings, surgical preferences, and imaging practices. Responses were summarized and compared using statistical tests for frequency distribution. Results: A total of 111 surgeons (40.0%) responded to the survey. Utilization of endoscopic DCR (endoDCR) was highly variable, with 57% of junior surgeons (<5 years in practice) using it for >66% of their cases, compared with only 18.3% of surgeons with >15 years postfellowship experience. High utilization of endoDCR (>66% of cases) was more common in academic surgeons compared with private practice (48.4% vs. 19.6%, p < 0.01). The most cited reasons for endoDCR were scar avoidance and revision surgery. For external DCR, anatomical barriers and concern for mass/need for biopsy were common indications. Most surgeons only order imaging for certain indications, such as prior sinonasal surgery, facial trauma, suspected tumor, or atypical presentation. Conclusion: Utilization of endoDCR was correlated with years in practice, with younger surgeons preferring the endoscopic technique. A large majority felt that the relevance of imaging is low in most patients. Future research is needed to standardize case-based indications for endoscopic versus external approaches and preoperative imaging.

Background Sinonasal pathology, such as chronic inflammatory disease or neoplasm, can cause secondary nasolacrimal duct obstruction (sNLDO). There is a paucity of data on dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) techniques and outcomes for NLDO secondary to known sinonasal pathologies. Objective To describe case characteristics, management, and surgical outcomes of sNLDO at a tertiary academic center. Methods Charts of DCR cases with at least 3 months follow-up done at a single institution over a 5-year period (2018-2022) were reviewed. Patient and surgical characteristics were recorded and compared between secondary and primary NLDO groups. The primary outcome was early functional success of DCR, assessed by improvement or resolution of epiphora at 3 months. Results A total of 236 cases were included. Of those, 79 (33.5%) were classified as secondary NLDO associated with sinonasal pathology. Reasons for sNLDO were sinonasal cancer (46.8%), chronic inflammatory disease (24.1%), trauma (16.5%), or prior head and neck radiation (31.6%). When comparing primary acquired NLDO to sNLDO cases, DCR for sNLDO was more likely to be performed endoscopically (68.4% vs 31.8%, P < .01), by a multidisciplinary team of rhinologist and oculoplastic surgeon (70.9% vs 8.3%, P < .01), and required bilateral surgery (36.7% vs 5.7%, P < .01). The overall functional success rate was 79.7% for sNLDO compared to 87.9% for primary acquired NLDO ( P < .01). Revision surgery for sNLDO, history of sinonasal malignancy, and radiation were associated with lower functional success rates (66.7%, 70.3%, and 68.0%, respectively). Canalicular pathology was more common in sNLDO cases (29.0% vs 8.3%, P < .01). Conclusions Secondary NLDO was more commonly managed with an endoscopic approach by a multidisciplinary team. Revisions for sNLDO, as well as cases with a history of sinonasal malignancy and radiation, had a markedly lower success rate, and sNLDO was frequently associated with canalicular obstruction. These findings may facilitate surgical planning and patient counseling.

Purpose: To evaluate the role of women physicians in thyroid eye disease (TED) research and clinical care and describe relevance for academic medicine and patient access. Methods: A cross-sectional study of TED-related publications indexed on PubMed in 2000, 2010, and 2020, and of completed or currently active clinical trials was conducted. Author, journal, and principal investigator (PI) characteristics were noted. Author/PI gender was determined from institutional profile or subsequently via a previously described Google-based algorithm. American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS), American Board of Ophthalmology (ABO), and American Thyroid Association (ATA) information was obtained via direct communication. Trends in participation of men and women were evaluated. Results: A total of 444 manuscripts (61 from 2000; 117 from 2010; 266 from 2020) were included. The percentage of women as first and senior authors increased from 2000 to 2020 (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0003, resp.). First author gender distribution was near equal in 2020 (52.6% men, 47.4% women [p = 0.39]), whereas senior authors remained mostly men (68.0% men, 32.0% women [p < 0.0001]). As of 2020, the gender imbalance of senior authors was greater on multidisciplinary author teams (74.8% men, 25.2% women) compared with single specialty author teams (62.2% men, 37.8% women). Of the 98 TED-related clinical trials included, 34 had women PIs (35%). The percentage of women as members in ASOPRS, ABO, and ATA all increased significantly from 2000 to 2020, but remained disproportionately men in 2020 (all p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Gender-based discrepancies persist in TED research, especially among senior authors, who determine research direction, and on multidisciplinary teams, which reflect the preferred model of care. Further efforts are required to determine whether these findings affect patients with TED.

Background Orbital decompression is an essential tool for reducing proptosis in thyroid eye disease (TED), yet the impact of surgical approach and preoperative factors on outcomes remains uncertain. Objective To compare proptosis reduction following different orbital decompression techniques, identify additional risk factors that may play a role in surgical orbital decompression outcomes, and develop clinical decision-making recommendations based on these results. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on TED patients who underwent endoscopic medial wall, orbital floor, and/or open lateral wall decompression. We evaluated the influence of preoperative comorbidities, anatomic and laboratory values, and surgical approach on postdecompression Hertel exophthalmometry outcomes. Results Analysis encompassed 130 orbits from 80 patients, 83% female, 48 with preoperative diplopia, and mean age of 54.4 years. Preoperative Hertel measurement was predictive of extent of proptosis reduction ( P < .0001), indicating that higher initial Hertel measurement predicts greater absolute reduction following surgical intervention. Surgical technique correlated with outcome on univariate analysis ( P = .04), but not multivariate ( P = .13) analyses. When categorized into preoperative Hertel ranges, combined endoscopic medial and open lateral wall decompression resulted in mean proptosis reduction of 3.13 mm for range 20.01 to 24 mm and 3.85 mm for range 24.01 to 28 mm. Three-wall decompression resulted in mean proptosis reduction of 2.49 mm for and 3.84 mm for these ranges, respectively. Variables such as smoking, body mass index, orbital wall height, and TRAb level, did not affect outcomes. Nine patients had new onset diplopia. Conclusions Preoperative Hertel exophthalmometry is the strongest predictor of proptosis reduction following orbital decompression in TED. Surgical technique appears to be less impactful on outcome than expected. Surgical decision making should be individualized based on patient goals; these findings can be used to achieve proptosis reduction and limit the risk of new onset diplopia.

Background: Development of ectropion is a frequently reported complication after reconstruction of infraorbital Mohs defects. This study aimed to characterize preoperative and surgical factors contributing to ectropion development in patients undergoing reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center case-control study on patients undergoing reconstruction of Mohs micrographic surgery defects involving the nonmarginal lower eyelid and upper cheek from 2011 to 2023. Pre- and postoperative photographs were reviewed to confirm defect location and postreconstructive eyelid malposition. Ectropion risk factors were determined with uni- and multivariate odds ratio analyses. Results: A total of 202 patients were included, 45 cases in the ectropion group and 157 in the control group. Negative orbital vector (P = 0.02), recurrent disease (P = 0.01), and greater defects size (P = 0.007) were associated with postreconstructive ectropion. Ectropion was more likely after multidisciplinary reconstruction (13.3% versus 1.4%, P < 0.001) and reconstruction with cervicofacial flaps (28.9% versus 4.2%, P < 0.0005); and less likely after primary closure (8.9% versus 28.5%, P < 0.001). Multivariate assessment (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], P value) revealed that combined cheek and eyelid defect involvement (4.32 [1.36–13.6], P = 0.01), larger size (1.07 [1.03–1.13], P < 0.001), and negative orbital vector (12.11 [2.65–65.42], P = 0.002) were independent risk factors for ectropion development. Conclusions: Combined cheek/lower eyelid defects and negative orbital vector increase the risk of postreconstructive ectropion. These findings can be used to optimize surgical technique and counsel patients on increased likelihood of this complication with possible need for revision surgery.

ABSTRACT Objective To estimate the incidence, prevalence, patient characteristics and healthcare utilization patterns of moderate to severe thyroid eye disease (TED) in the United States. Design Retrospective review of medical and prescription claims data from the Inovalon deidentified claims database. Patients Patients with moderate to severe TED were identified based on specific and sensitive definitions using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes selected by a group of TED specialists. Results The incident moderate to severe TED population included 3364 and 1730 patients using the sensitive and specific definitions, respectively. After adjusting for age and gender, corresponding incidence rates in the sensitive and specific populations were 8.97 (13.49 in women and 4.27 in men) and 4.37 (6.59 in women and 2.05 in men) per 100,000 person‐years, respectively. The prevalent population included 16,310 and 8018 patients using the sensitive and specific definitions, respectively, corresponding to adjusted prevalence rates of 44.13 (66.00 in women and 21.39 in men) and 20.55 (31.18 in women and 9.50 in men) per 100,000 persons. A preponderance of women was observed, and comorbidity rates were high, with > 40% of prevalent patients experiencing hypertension. Steroids were the most frequently prescribed medication. The impact of teprotumumab was not captured, since this study only included claims data through 2019. Conclusions The estimated incidence and prevalence rates of TED demonstrate the considerable impact of this disease in the United States, making the creation of a specific ICD code imperative for effective healthcare planning and management.