Background and Objective: This study aimed to investigate glaucoma progression following secondary intraocular lens (SIOL) implantation by surgical approach. Patients and Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study of 440 eyes that received SIOL implantation, including scleral-sutured, scleral-fixated, anterior chamber, and sulcus-fixated. Glaucoma progression was defined as new diagnosis, procedure for intraocular pressure (IOP) control, or IOP elevation ≥ 24 mmHg or ≥ 5 mmHg above baseline requiring additional medications. Risk factors were assessed using multivariable analysis. Results: Mean age at surgery was 71.3 years and 29.3% of patients had prior glaucoma. Overall, 33.2% developed glaucoma progression. Prior glaucoma (hazard ratio 2.08 [95% CI 1.47–2.94], P < .001) and cystoid macular edema (1.63 [1.06–2.52], P = .026) were associated with glaucoma progression on multivariable analysis. There was no difference in glaucoma progression between scleral-sutured, scleral-fixated, anterior chamber, or sulcus-fixated implantation techniques. Conclusion: Our results suggest that surgeons should use their preferred SIOL implantation technique but closely monitor postoperative IOP.
Endophthalmitis Following Pars Plana Vitrectomy: An IRIS® Registry Study
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to characterize the clinical features, management strategies, and outcomes of endophthalmitis cases following pars plana vitrectomy using data from the American Academy of Ophthalmology (Academy) IRIS ® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of eyes that developed endophthalmitis following pars plana vitrectomy between 2013 and 2022. Data was collected from the Academy IRIS Registry. This study analyzed differences in visual acuity, intraocular pressure, rates of evisceration and enucleation, and rates of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment following endophthalmitis diagnosis. Results: A total of 1,223,777 unique eyes underwent a PPV during the study period, with 1,275 eyes meeting the inclusion criteria. The median time from pars plana vitrectomy to endophthalmitis diagnosis was 10 days. The majority of eyes (80.9%) were managed with intravitreal antibiotics alone, without a repeat pars plana vitrectomy. Long-term visual acuity, intraocular pressure, cup-to-disc ratio, and rate of evisceration or enucleation did not differ significantly between treatment groups. However, eyes that underwent the initial pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachment repair had poorer long-term vision and higher rates of retinal detachment following endophthalmitis. Overall, 16.1% of eyes required evisceration or enucleation in this cohort. Conclusions: Despite its rarity, post-pars plana vitrectomy endophthalmitis can cause significant morbidity and even globe loss. There were no significant differences observed between eyes that were treated with intravitreal tap and inject versus repeat pars plana vitrectomy.
Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Dacryocystorhinostomy for Secondary Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
Background Sinonasal pathology, such as chronic inflammatory disease or neoplasm, can cause secondary nasolacrimal duct obstruction (sNLDO). There is a paucity of data on dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) techniques and outcomes for NLDO secondary to known sinonasal pathologies. Objective To describe case characteristics, management, and surgical outcomes of sNLDO at a tertiary academic center. Methods Charts of DCR cases with at least 3 months follow-up done at a single institution over a 5-year period (2018-2022) were reviewed. Patient and surgical characteristics were recorded and compared between secondary and primary NLDO groups. The primary outcome was early functional success of DCR, assessed by improvement or resolution of epiphora at 3 months. Results A total of 236 cases were included. Of those, 79 (33.5%) were classified as secondary NLDO associated with sinonasal pathology. Reasons for sNLDO were sinonasal cancer (46.8%), chronic inflammatory disease (24.1%), trauma (16.5%), or prior head and neck radiation (31.6%). When comparing primary acquired NLDO to sNLDO cases, DCR for sNLDO was more likely to be performed endoscopically (68.4% vs 31.8%, P < .01), by a multidisciplinary team of rhinologist and oculoplastic surgeon (70.9% vs 8.3%, P < .01), and required bilateral surgery (36.7% vs 5.7%, P < .01). The overall functional success rate was 79.7% for sNLDO compared to 87.9% for primary acquired NLDO ( P < .01). Revision surgery for sNLDO, history of sinonasal malignancy, and radiation were associated with lower functional success rates (66.7%, 70.3%, and 68.0%, respectively). Canalicular pathology was more common in sNLDO cases (29.0% vs 8.3%, P < .01). Conclusions Secondary NLDO was more commonly managed with an endoscopic approach by a multidisciplinary team. Revisions for sNLDO, as well as cases with a history of sinonasal malignancy and radiation, had a markedly lower success rate, and sNLDO was frequently associated with canalicular obstruction. These findings may facilitate surgical planning and patient counseling.
A 72‐Year‐Old Man With a History of Rheumatoid Arthritis Presenting With Unilateral Eye and Jaw Pain