Study Design: Retrospective cohort. Objective: This study aims to assess the effects of CT-based subsidence on lumbar sagittal alignment and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), and to determine if subsidence and cage properties are independent predictors of postoperative changes in regional lordosis. Summary of Background Data: Subsidence is a well-known complication following interbody fusion and has previously been associated with recurrence of preoperative symptoms and higher reoperation rates. There is incomplete evidence to characterize the effects of subsidence on lumbar alignment and PROMs following TLIF. Methods: All adult patients who underwent 1- or 2-level TLIF at a multi-institutional academic center between 2017 and 2019 were retrospectively identified. Interbody subsidence at the superior and inferior endplate of each TLIF level was directly measured on both coronal and sagittal CT scans obtained between 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Patients were grouped based on the maximum subsidence at each operative level: mild-moderate (<4 mm) or severe (≥4 mm). Preoperative, immediate (<3 mo), and intermediate (>6 mo) postoperative radiographic outcomes (local and global lumbar alignment) and PROMs (VAS Back, Oswestry Disability Index, PROMIS Physical Function and Mood) were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis compared patient demographics, surgical factors, and changes in radiographic measures and PROMs across subsidence groups. Multiple linear regression analyzed independent effects of subsidence and cage characteristics on alignment. Results: Sixty-seven patients with 85 unique fusion levels were included (55 with mild-moderate subsidence, 30 with severe subsidence). Levels with severe subsidence demonstrated significantly less regional lordosis at final follow-up than nonseverely subsided levels (6.4 vs. 9.1 degrees, P =0.032). No PROM significantly differed between severe and nonsevere subsidence subgroups. Linear regression analysis revealed that severe subsidence was a strong independent predictor of regional lordosis ( P =0.029) at final follow-up. Conclusions: Severe subsidence negates perioperative improvements in regional lordosis following TLIF, while changes in regional alignment are maintained in the absence of severe subsidence. Level of Evidence: Level III.
Perioperative Change in Bone Quality Following Posterior Cervical Fusion and Its Effects on Postoperative Outcomes
Study Design: Retrospective cohort analysis. Objective: To determine the effect of long-segment posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) on perioperative changes in vertebral Hounsfield Units (HUs) and the impact of these changes on radiographic outcomes and fusion status. Summary of Background Data: Low preoperative CT HUs have been associated with adverse outcomes after spinal fusion, including hardware complications and reoperation. No existing studies have investigated the preoperative to postoperative change in HUs after cervical spinal fusion. Stress shielding may decrease bone quality within the fusion construct. Whereas, altered junctional loading and increased segmental mobility may precipitate bony hypertrophy in the terminal and adjacent levels. Methods: All adult patients who underwent C2-T2 PCDF for myelopathy/ myeloradiculopathy at an academic center between 2013 and 2020 were retrospectively identified. Preoperative and postoperative HUs were assessed on axial CT images in the cranial, middle, and caudal C2, C6, T2, and T3 vertebral bodies, outside of the region of instrumentation and artifact by 2 independent reviewers. Paired t test compared preoperative to postoperative changes in HUs. Preoperative and long-term postoperative cervical alignment, fusion, and revision rates were assessed. Univariate and regression analysis compared patient factors and outcomes between groups with perioperative increase versus decrease in vertebral HUs. Results: One hundred patients were included. The average preoperative to postoperative change in HUs in the C2, C6, T2, and T3 vertebral bodies were −19.80 (P=0.008), −52.63 (P<0.001), 15.15 (P=0.014), and 9.41 (P=0.346), respectively. Perioperative increase in C2 HUs was predictive of increased postoperative distal junctional angle (β=3.41, P=0.048) and increased T1–T4 kyphosis (β=6.50, P=0.003). Perioperative increase in C6 HU predicted pseudoarthrosis (fusion odds ratio: 0.19, P=0.007). Conclusions: Significant perioperative decreases in C6 HUs within a long-fused construct may demonstrate stress shielding. The significant association between greater distal kyphosis and an increase in C2 HUs may be attributed to a stress riser effect. Level of Evidence: Level III.
The superiority of endplate Hounsfield units relative to cervical vertebral Hounsfield units in predicting subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
OBJECTIVE The present investigation aimed to 1) develop a new CT-based assessment of endplate bone density (endplate Hounsfield unit [EP-HU]) and 2) analyze if EP-HU was a better predictor than vertebral Hounsfield unit (HU) for subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS All adult patients who underwent one- to three-level ACDF with a titanium interbody for radiculopathy and/or myelopathy at an academic center between 2018 and 2020 were retrospectively identified. Based on preoperative sagittal CT scans (left, right, and middle cuts), 2-mm superior and inferior endplate regions were circumscribed with the free draw tool to account for endplate surface undulations. The average of the superior and inferior EP-HUs on all CT cuts was used to calculate EP-HU. Cervical vertebral HUs were determined from the average of axial CT cranial, middle, and caudal cuts circumscribing only trabecular bone. The interbody subsidence of the cranial and caudal endplates of each ACDF level was directly measured on the endplate-facing surface of both coronal and sagittal cuts of postoperative CT scans (at 1 year) to determine the maximum subsidence (subsidence defined as ≥ 2 mm). Univariate and stepwise logistic regression analyses were used to compare subsidence based on CT bone metrics. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to determine the probability of subsidence based on EP-HUs and vertebral HUs. RESULTS A total of 35 patients were included. Subsidence occurred at 32 of 67 unique fusion levels. Subsidence was associated with older age (p = 0.008), diabetes diagnosis (p = 0.015), and decreased interbody length (p = 0.019). EP-HUs exhibited moderate correlation with cervical vertebral HUs (Pearson’s ρ = 0.63). Subsidence was significantly associated with decreased total EP-HUs (subsidence: 475 HU, no subsidence: 543 HU; p = 0.019) and decreased lumbar vertebral HUs (subsidence: 296 HU, no subsidence: 341 HU; p = 0.011). ROC curve analysis identified an optimal EP-HU cutoff of 512.30 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.701) to predict subsidence. The AUC of the vertebral HUs with respect to subsidence was 0.662. EP-HUs < 512.30 predicted subsidence (OR 6.67, p = 0.001) independent of significant demographic and surgical factors. CONCLUSIONS CT cervical EP-HUs rather than vertebral cervical trabecular HUs may be more efficacious in predicting subsidence after ACDF.
Surgical management of tic-induced myelopathy and the importance of perioperative tic control: illustrative cases
BACKGROUND Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of adult spinal cord dysfunction. Tourette syndrome (TS) represents a rare cause of DCM that is incompletely characterized in the literature. Patients with TS might develop repetitive involuntary cervical movements that can accelerate spondylotic changes. Therefore, patients with myelopathy secondary to TS or other tic disorders might exhibit DCM symptoms at younger ages. The present study examines the surgical management of DCM secondary to TS in the literature and describes the outcomes of 3 patients who were treated for DCM secondary to TS. OBSERVATIONS In these 3 described cases, fractures led to DCM in 2 patients, while cervical spondylosis led to DCM in 1 patient, all associated with TS. Treating motor tics with medications or deep brain stimulation (DBS) provided effective tic management. All 3 patients experienced improvements in their neurological symptoms following surgery, consistent with other reports in the literature. LESSONS When treating patients with cervical myelopathy secondary to TS, the authors recommend prioritizing motor tic management prior to considering secondary interventions such as surgery. According to the authors, treating motor tics with medications or DBS provides effective tic management. This approach allows for an uncomplicated postoperative course and satisfactory relief of cervical myelopathy. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24751
Contemporary Practice Patterns in the Treatment of Cervical Stenosis and Central Cord Syndrome
Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Objective: To evaluate for areas of consensus and divergence of opinion within the spine community regarding the management of cervical spondylotic conditions and acute traumatic central cord syndrome (ATCCS) and the influence of the patient's age, disease severity, and myelomalacia. Summary of Background Data: There is ongoing disagreement regarding the indications for, and urgency of, operative intervention in patients with mild degenerative myelopathy, moderate to severe radiculopathy, isolated axial symptomatology with evidence of spinal cord compression, and ATCCS without myelomalacia. Methods: A survey request was sent to 330 attendees of the Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) 2021 Annual Meeting to assess practice patterns regarding the treatment of cervical stenosis, myelopathy, radiculopathy, and ATCCS in 16 unique clinical vignettes with associated MRIs. Operative versus nonoperative treatment consensus was defined by a management option selected by >80% of survey participants. Results: Overall, 116 meeting attendees completed the survey. Consensus supported nonoperative management for elderly patients with axial neck pain and adults with axial neck pain without myelomalacia. Operative management was indicated for adult patients with mild myelopathy and myelomalacia, adult patients with severe radiculopathy, elderly patients with severe radiculopathy and myelomalacia, and elderly ATCCS patients with pre-existing myelopathic symptoms. Treatment discrepancy in favor of nonoperative management was found for adult patients with isolated axial symptomatology and myelomalacia. Treatment discrepancy favored operative management for elderly patients with mild myelopathy, adult patients with mild myelopathy without myelomalacia, elderly patients with severe radiculopathy without myelomalacia, and elderly ATCCS patients without preceding symptoms. Conclusions: Although there is uncertainty regarding the treatment of mild myelopathy, operative intervention was favored for nonelderly patients with evidence of myelomalacia or radiculopathy and for elderly patients with ATCCS, especially if pre-injury myelopathic symptoms were present. Level of Evidence: Level V.
Paraspinal Sarcopenia and Lower Hounsfield Units are Independent Predictors of Increased Risk for Proximal Junctional Complications Following Thoracolumbar Fusions Terminating in the Upper Thoracic Spine
Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective The impact of paraspinal sarcopenia following fusions that extend to the upper thoracic spine remain unknown. The purpose of the present study was to assess the impact of sarcopenia on the development of PJK and PJF following spine fusion surgery from the upper thoracic spine to the pelvis. Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent spine fusion surgery that extended caudally to the pelvis and terminated cranially between T1-6. The cohort was divided into 2 groups: (1) patients without PJK or PJF and (2) patients with PJK and/or PJF. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine risk factors for the development of proximal junctional complications. Results We identified 81 patients for inclusion in this study. Mean HU at the UIV was 186.1 ± 47.5 in the cohort of patients without PJK or PJF, which was substantially higher than values recorded in the PJK/PJF subgroup (142.4 ± 40.2) ( P < 0.001). Severe multifidus sarcopenia was identified at a higher rate in the subgroup of patients who developed proximal junction pathology (66.7%) than in the subgroup of patients who developed neither PJK nor PJF (7.4%; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated both low HU at the UIV and moderate-severe multifidus sarcopenia to be risk factors for the development of PJK and PJF. Conclusions Severe paraspinal sarcopenia and diminished bone density at the UIV impart an increased risk of developing PJK and PJF in following thoracolumbar fusions from the upper thoracic spine to the pelvis.
Change in spinal bone mineral density as estimated by Hounsfield units following osteoporosis treatment with romosozumab, teriparatide, denosumab, and alendronate: an analysis of 318 patients
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of osteoporosis medications on opportunistic CT-based Hounsfield units (HU). METHODS Spine and nonspine surgery patients were retrospectively identified who had been treated with romosozumab for 3 to 12 months, teriparatide for 3 to 12 months, teriparatide for > 12 months, denosumab for > 12 months, or alendronate for > 12 months. HU were measured in the L1–4 vertebral bodies. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the mean change in HU among the five treatment regimens. RESULTS In total, 318 patients (70% women) were included, with a mean age of 69 years and mean BMI of 27 kg/m 2 . There was a significant difference in mean HU improvement (p < 0.001) following treatment with romosozumab for 3 to 12 months (n = 32), teriparatide for 3 to 12 months (n = 30), teriparatide for > 12 months (n = 44), denosumab for > 12 months (n = 123), and alendronate for > 12 months (n = 100). Treatment with romosozumab for a mean of 10.5 months significantly increased the mean HU by 26%, from a baseline of 85 to 107 (p = 0.012). Patients treated with teriparatide for > 12 months (mean 23 months) experienced a mean HU improvement of 25%, from 106 to 132 (p = 0.039). Compared with the mean baseline HU, there was no significant difference after treatment with teriparatide for 3 to 12 months (110 to 119, p = 0.48), denosumab for > 12 months (105 to 107, p = 0.68), or alendronate for > 12 months (111 to 113, p = 0.80). CONCLUSIONS Patients treated with romosozumab for a mean of 10.5 months and teriparatide for a mean of 23 months experienced improved spinal bone mineral density as estimated by CT-based opportunistic HU. Given the shorter duration of effective treatment, romosozumab may be the preferred medication for optimization of osteoporotic patients in preparation for elective spine fusion surgery.
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion subsidence: computed tomography analysis of incidence, associated risk factors, and impact on outcomes
OBJECTIVE The aims of this study were to 1) define the incidence of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) interbody subsidence; 2) determine the relative importance of preoperative and intraoperative patient- and instrumentation-specific risk factors predictive of postoperative subsidence using CT-based assessment; and 3) determine the impact of TLIF subsidence on postoperative complications and fusion rates. METHODS All adult patients who underwent one- or two-level TLIF for lumbar degenerative conditions at a multi-institutional academic center between 2017 and 2019 were retrospectively identified. Patients with traumatic injury, infection, malignancy, previous fusion at the index level, combined anterior-posterior procedures, surgery with greater than two TLIF levels, or incomplete follow-up were excluded. Interbody subsidence at the superior and inferior endplates of each TLIF level was directly measured on the endplate-facing surface of both coronal and sagittal CT scans obtained greater than 6 months postoperatively. Patients were grouped based on the maximum subsidence at each operative level classified as mild, moderate, or severe based on previously documented < 2-mm, 2- to 4-mm, and ≥ 4-mm thresholds, respectively. Univariate and regression analyses compared patient demographics, medical comorbidities, preoperative bone quality, surgical factors including interbody cage parameters, and fusion and complication rates across subsidence groups. RESULTS A total of 67 patients with 85 unique fusion levels met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Overall, 28% of levels exhibited moderate subsidence and 35% showed severe subsidence after TLIF with no significant difference in the superior and inferior endplate subsidence. Moderate (≥ 2-mm) and severe (≥ 4-mm) subsidence were significantly associated with decreases in cage surface area and Taillard index as well as interbody cages with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) material and sawtooth surface geometry. Severe subsidence was also significantly associated with taller preoperative disc spaces, decreased vertebral Hounsfield units (HU), the absence of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) use, and smooth cage surfaces. Regression analysis revealed decreases in Taillard index, cage surface area, and HU, and the absence of BMP use predicted subsidence. Severe subsidence was found to be a predictor of pseudarthrosis but was not significantly associated with revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS Patient-level risk factors for TLIF subsidence included decreased HU and increased preoperative disc height. Intraoperative risk factors for TLIF subsidence were decreased cage surface area, PEEK cage material, bullet cages, posterior cage positioning, smooth cage surfaces, and sawtooth surface designs. Severe subsidence predicted TLIF pseudarthrosis; however, the causality of this relationship remains unclear.
Lumbar Facet Arthroplasty Versus Fusion for Grade-I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis with Stenosis
Background: The comparative effectiveness of decompression plus lumbar facet arthroplasty versus decompression plus instrumented lumbar spinal fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and grade-I degenerative spondylolisthesis is unknown. Methods: In this randomized, controlled, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial, we assigned patients who had single-level lumbar spinal stenosis and grade-I degenerative spondylolisthesis to undergo decompression plus lumbar facet arthroplasty (arthroplasty group) or decompression plus fusion (fusion group). The primary outcome was a predetermined composite clinical success score. Secondary outcomes included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg pain, Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), Short Form (SF)-12, radiographic parameters, surgical variables, and complications. Results: A total of 321 adult patients were randomized in a 2:1 fashion, with 219 patients assigned to undergo facet arthroplasty and 102 patients assigned to undergo fusion. Of these, 113 patients (51.6%) in the arthroplasty group and 47 (46.1%) in the fusion group who had either reached 24 months of postoperative follow-up or were deemed early clinical failures were included in the primary outcome analysis. The arthroplasty group had a higher proportion of patients who achieved composite clinical success than did the fusion group (73.5% versus 25.5%; p < 0.001), equating to a between-group difference of 47.9% (95% confidence interval, 33.0% to 62.8%). The arthroplasty group outperformed the fusion group in most patient-reported outcome measures (including the ODI, VAS back pain, and all ZCQ component scores) at 24 months postoperatively. There were no significant differences between groups in surgical variables or complications, except that the fusion group had a higher rate of developing symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration. Conclusions: Among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and grade-I degenerative spondylolisthesis, lumbar facet arthroplasty was associated with a higher rate of composite clinical success than fusion was at 24 months postoperatively. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
MRI Vertebral Bone Quality Correlates With Interbody Cage Subsidence After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
Study Design: Retrospective observational study of consecutive patients Objective: The purpose of the study was to evaluate VBQ as a predictor of interbody subsidence and to determine threshold values that portend increased risk of subsidence. Summary of Background Data: Many risk factors have been reported for the subsidence of interbody cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). MRI Vertebral Bone Quality (VQB) is a relatively new radiographic parameter that can be easily obtained from preoperative MRI and has been shown to correlate with measurements of bone density such as DXA and CT Hounsfield Units. Methods: All patients who underwent 1- to 3-level ACDF using titanium interbodies with anterior plating between the years 2018 and 2020 at our tertiary referral center were included. Subsidence measurements were performed by 2 independent reviewers on CT scans obtained 6 months postoperatively. VBQ was measured on pre-operative sagittal T1 MRI by 2 independent reviewers, and values were averaged. Results: Eight-five fusion levels in 44 patients were included in the study. There were 32 levels (38%) with moderate subsidence and 12 levels with severe subsidence (14%). The average VBQ score in those patients with severe subsidence was significantly higher than those without subsidence (3.80 vs. 2.40, P<0.01). A threshold value of 3.2 was determined to be optimal for predicting subsidence (AUC=0.99) and had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 94.1% in predicting subsidence. Conclusions: VBQ strongly correlates with the subsidence of interbody grafts after ACDF. A threshold VBQ score value of 3.2 has excellent sensitivity and specificity for predicting subsidence. Spine surgeons can use VBQ as a readily available screening tool to identify patients at higher risk for subsidence. Level of Evidence: Level—IV