Brault, Jeffrey S.

The breadth of medical practice for a physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) physician is quite extensive. Not only are practice areas quite different among PM&R physicians, but practice settings, procedures, and salary models also vary significantly. For PM&R residents and fellows who are making career decisions regarding specialization versus general practice and/or in the process of negotiating contracts, salary is a significant influence in their decision of clinical practice. Physician payment models may create inadvertent bias against women, those seeking less than full time clinical employment, and those interested in an academic career. In this review and commentary, we will discuss the more common payment models encountered, with a focus on a fixed salary payment model. We will also discuss our experiences as pediatric and adult PM&R providers in a salaried payment model at a not-for-profit academic institution.

Background: Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) is a prevalent, disabling condition worldwide. Tuina, a traditional Chinese manual therapy, has shown potential benefits, but evidence remains limited. Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of Tuina therapy in managing CNLBP in a U.S. population. Methods: A prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted at Mayo Clinic Rochester campus (February 2020-April 2024). 204 participants with CNLBP were randomized into 3 groups: Tuina (N = 68), physical therapy (N = 68), or a combination of both (N = 68). Each group received 6 treatments over 2 months. The primary outcome was pain intensity (VAS); secondary outcomes included disability (ODI), quality of life (SF-36), and adverse events. Additionally, participants completed a satisfaction survey at the end of the trial. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) was used for survey data collection. Data was assessed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the multiple repeated measurements, Kruskal-Wallis tests, while Chi-square tests, and Bonferroni correction in SAS software. Results: 185 subjects completed the study. Significant decreases in VAS, ODI, and SF-36 Overall Physical scores were found from baseline, to post treatment and follow-up in all groups ( P < .05), while there were no significant differences in VAS, ODI, or SF-36 outcomes between the Tuina group and the other 2 groups. There were 4 adverse events observed in the trial, 1 in the Physical therapy group and 3 in the Mixed group. Only 1 transient low back pain after Tuina therapy was observed in the Mixed group but did not require treatment. The high percentage of patients who received the Tuina program was extremely helpful (n = 94/126, 77.0%). The willingness to recommend was significantly higher for Tuina compared to physical therapy (Mixed group [N = 59/62, 95.2%], Tuina group [N = 57/64, 91.9%], and physical therapy group [N = 31/59, 59.6%] ( P < .05). Conclusion: Tuina therapy showed comparable benefits to physical therapy and combined treatment of both in improving pain, function, and quality of life in patients with CNLBP. With high patient satisfaction and a favorable safety profile, Tuina appears to be a safe and acceptable non-invasive treatment option. Further studies are needed to validate these findings in the future.

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral nerve entrapment syndrome. The thread carpal tunnel release (TCTR) is an incision-less ultrasound-guided approach to divide the transverse carpal ligament. This retrospective case series aims to identify and assess the bleeding risks associated with continuing anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy during TCTR. Methods: Retrospective chart review with follow-up questionnaires/surveys. One hundred and fourteen adult patients who were using antiplatelet or anticoagulation medication underwent 164 TCTR procedures during 2018 to 2023 at a single institution (tertiary care hospital) from June 29, 2018, and August 11, 2023. A chart review was performed to identify patients on antiplatelets or anticoagulants at the time of the procedure and to determine if there were any adverse events associated with continuing or holding their antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. Results: There were no significant complications associated with continuing or holding anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy during TCTR. Conclusions: Continuing antiplatelet therapy during TCTR appears safe. The decision to continue antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy should be made on a case-by-case basis.

Objective: Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) is a serious medical and social problem resulting in functional decline and decreased work ability. Tuina, a form of manual therapy, has been sparsely used to treat patients with CNLBP. To systematically assess the efficacy and safety of Tuina for patients with CNLBP. Methods: Multiple English and Chinese literature databases were searched until September 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Tuina in the treatment of CNLBP. The methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool, and certainty of the evidence was determined with the online Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool. Results: Fifteen RCTs with 1390 patients were included. Tuina demonstrated a significant effect on pain (SMD: −0.82; 95% CI −1.12 to −0.53; P < .001; I 2 = 81%) and physical function (SMD: −0.91; 95% CI −1.55 to −0.27; P = .005; I 2 = 90%) when compared to control. However, Tuina resulted in no significant improvement for quality of life (QoL) (SMD: 0.58; 95% CI −0.04 to 1.21; P = .07; I 2 = 73%;) compared to control. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation evidence quality was determined to be low level for pain relief, physical function, and QoL measurements. Only six studies reported adverse events; none were serious. Conclusion: Tuina might be an effective and safe strategy for treating CNLBP in terms of pain and physical function, but not for QoL. The study results should be interpreted with caution for their low-level evidence. More multicenter, large-scale RCTs with a rigorous design are required to further confirm our findings.

AbstractIntroductionCarpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral nerve entrapment syndrome. Although prior studies have explored the anatomic changes of the median nerve and carpal arch with different wrist deviations and positionings, the change in safe zone distance between the median nerve and ulnar artery with ulnar or radial wrist deviations has not been adequately investigated.ObjectiveTo identify the optimal wrist positioning that increases the safe zone distance between the median nerve and ulnar artery using ultrasound in patients with CTS.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingQuaternary medical center multidisciplinary outpatient hand clinic.ParticipantsTwenty five patients (41 wrists) with clinical CTS who received an electrodiagnostic study (EDX) to evaluate CTS within 1 year prior to enrollment.InterventionsUltrasound‐identified safe zone distance measurements were obtained in each patient between the ulnar aspect of the median nerve and the radial aspect of the ulnar artery with the wrist in neutral radial‐ulnar deviation as well as in passive ulnar and radial deviation.Main Outcome MeasureThe ultrasound‐identified safe zone distance with the wrist in each of the three positions.ResultsThe interstructural safe zone distance was significantly greater when measured in the ulnarly deviated position (1.08 cm) compared with either the neutral (0.61cm, p < .001) or radially deviated positions (0.52 cm, p < .001). Interstructural safe zone distance did not differ between those with normal, mild, moderate, or severe classifications of pathology, or between dominant and nondominant limbs.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that the ultrasound‐measured interstructural safe zone distance was significantly greater in the ulnarly deviated position than in either the neutral position or radially deviated position. These findings may lead to improvement in the safety of ultrasound‐guided injections.

Abstract Introduction/Aims Carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome (CTS, CuTS) are common among patients with hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure‐palsies (HNPP) and Charcot–Marie‐Tooth type 1A (CMT1A) and may impact quality of life. We aimed to evaluate the utility of nerve decompression surgeries in these patients. Methods Medical records were reviewed for patients with PMP22 mutations confirmed in Mayo Clinic laboratories from January 1999 to December 2020, who had CTS and CuTS and underwent surgical decompression. Results CTS occurred in 53.3% of HNPP and 11.5% of CMT1A, while CuTS was present in 43.3% of HNPP and 5.8% of CMT1A patients. CTS decompression occurred in 10‐HNPP and 5‐CMT1A patients, and CuTS decompression with/without transposition was performed in 5‐HNPP and 1‐CMT1A patients. In HNPP, electrodiagnostic studies identified median neuropathy at the wrist in 9/10 patients and ultrasound showed focal enlargements at the carpal and cubital tunnels. In CMT1A, median and ulnar sensory responses were all absent, and the nerves were diffusely enlarged. After CTS surgery, pain, sensory loss, and strength improved in 4/5 CMT1A, and 6/10 HNPP patients. Of clinical, electrophysiologic and ultrasound findings, only activity‐provoked features significantly correlated with CTS surgical benefit in HNPP patients (odds ratio = 117.0:95% confidence interval, 1.94 > 999.99, p = 0.01). One CMT1A and one HNPP patient improved with CuTS surgery while 2 HNPP patients worsened. Discussion CTS symptom improvement post‐surgery can be seen in CMT1A and (less frequent) in HNPP patients. CuTS surgery commonly worsened course in HNPP. Activity‐provoked symptoms in HNPP best informed benefits from CTS surgery.

A retrospective review of hospital employees at a single employer institution who underwent ultrasound guided thread carpal tunnel release (TCTR) or open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) between January 2018 and August 2020 was performed to ascertain differences in return-to-work status. Patient age, sex, occupation, handedness, severity of carpal tunnel syndrome, prior treatments and surgical outcomes were reviewed. A total of 18 patients underwent TCTR and 17 patients underwent OCTR. The TCTR group averaged 12 days to return to work without restrictions, as opposed to 33 days for the OCTR group. Resolution of symptoms was afforded in all patients without any complications regardless of surgical technique. While both TCTR and OCTR were effective, our data indicates that TCTR resulted in a shorter return to work. Level of evidence: III

Ultrasound guidance in the operative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome is gaining in popularity as it noninvasively provides the surgeon with a real-time high-resolution overview of anatomic structures. A new incision-less approach to achieve a division of the transverse carpal ligament has been developed that combines ultrasound guidance with cannulated needles and a thread. Conceptually, an abrasive thread is looped percutaneously around the ligament while avoiding injury to neurovascular structures, the palmar aponeurosis, and skin. The thread is positioned using 2 puncture sites and a contoured Tuohy needle under ultrasound visualization. With a minimal injury to surrounding structures, this approach is designed to minimize recovery time and decrease pillar pain. This article will provide a step-by-step overview of the technique and includes a review of clinical outcomes published so far.