Back to Authors

Shen, Longbin

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4023-1519

Mayo Clinic

First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University

Citations 2

Efficacy and safety of Tuina for chronic nonspecific low back pain: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
Yang, Juan , Zhou, Xuan , Ma, Qingyu , Woods, Jeffrey , Mohabbat, Arya B. , Do, Alexander , Brault, Jeffrey S. , Jensen, Mark A. , Shin, Kyung-Min , Shen, Longbin , Zhao, Canghuan , Cheong, Philip , He, Kejie , Guo, Yu , Chen, Zhuoming , Tang, Yong , Tan, Celia Ia Choo , Bauer, Brent A. , Woods, Jeffrey T., Tang, Shujie , Chen, Jiaxu

Medicine | March 2, 2023 | Volume: 102 | Issue: 9 | Pages: e33018

10.1097/md.0000000000033018 Get It

Objective: Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) is a serious medical and social problem resulting in functional decline and decreased work ability. Tuina, a form of manual therapy, has been sparsely used to treat patients with CNLBP. To systematically assess the efficacy and safety of Tuina for patients with CNLBP. Methods: Multiple English and Chinese literature databases were searched until September 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Tuina in the treatment of CNLBP. The methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool, and certainty of the evidence was determined with the online Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool. Results: Fifteen RCTs with 1390 patients were included. Tuina demonstrated a significant effect on pain (SMD: −0.82; 95% CI −1.12 to −0.53; P < .001; I 2 = 81%) and physical function (SMD: −0.91; 95% CI −1.55 to −0.27; P = .005; I 2 = 90%) when compared to control. However, Tuina resulted in no significant improvement for quality of life (QoL) (SMD: 0.58; 95% CI −0.04 to 1.21; P = .07; I 2 = 73%;) compared to control. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation evidence quality was determined to be low level for pain relief, physical function, and QoL measurements. Only six studies reported adverse events; none were serious. Conclusion: Tuina might be an effective and safe strategy for treating CNLBP in terms of pain and physical function, but not for QoL. The study results should be interpreted with caution for their low-level evidence. More multicenter, large-scale RCTs with a rigorous design are required to further confirm our findings.
The effectiveness of Tuina in managing chronic non-specific low back pain
Zhou, Xuan , Yang, Juan , Ma, Qingyu , Guo, Yu , He, Kejie , Shen, Longbin , Fan, Qiao , Philip, Cheong Kwok Chee, Keng, Tay Boon, Celia, Tan Ia Choo, Bauer, Brent A. , Chen, Jiaxu

Medicine | April 1, 2022 | Volume: 101 | Issue: 7 | Pages: e28883

10.1097/md.0000000000028883 Get It

Abstract Background: Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) is a common complaint about medical care and carries a heavy social burden. The efficacy of Tuina (TN) or physiotherapy (PT) for CNLBP has been evaluated in previous systematic reviews. However, there is no high-quality evidence to support the efficacy of Tuina. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a large-scale, multicenter, high-quality clinical trial to provide evidence for Tuina to treat CNLBP. Methods: This is a multicenter, assessor-, and analyst-blinded, randomized controlled trial with 3 parallel arms: TN, PT, and TN combined with PT (Tuina combined with physiotherapy) group. Six hundred twelve eligible CNLBP patients will be randomly assigned to the groups in a 1:1:1 ratio in 3 centers. The TN intervention includes 9-step routine techniques, while the PT intervention includes a physiotherapy treatment plan based on a patient's symptoms. The interventions for both groups will last for 30 minutes and will be carried out for 6 sessions in 8 weeks. The primary outcome will be the visual analog scale pain score. And the secondary outcomes will include the Oswestry Disability Index, spinal range of motion, 36-item short-form health survey. Safety evaluation will be recorded during the whole study. All data in this randomized controlled trial will be analyzed by SAS 9.4. Discussion: The results of this trial will provide evidence to evaluate the efficacy of Tuina's value as a treatment for CNLBP. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000040288, November 27, 2020).