Back to Authors

North, Taylor J

0000-0001-6754-9848

Mayo Clinic

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Citations 3

Thread carpal tunnel release: a retrospective review of the first 300 cases performed at a tertiary medical centre
North, Taylor , Asserson, Derek B. , Brault, Jeffrey S. , North, Taylor J , Brault, Jeffrey S , Shin, Alexander Y.

Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) | June 13, 2023 | Volume: 48 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 936-937

10.1177/17531934231176960 Get It

Return to work following ultrasound guided thread carpal tunnel release versus open carpal tunnel release: a comparative study
Asserson, Derek B. , North, Taylor , Rhee, Peter C. , Brault, Jeffrey S. , Shin, Alexander Y. , North, Taylor J , Shin, Alexander Y , Bishop, Allen T.

Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) | October 11, 2021 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 359-363

10.1177/17531934211051276 Get It

A retrospective review of hospital employees at a single employer institution who underwent ultrasound guided thread carpal tunnel release (TCTR) or open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) between January 2018 and August 2020 was performed to ascertain differences in return-to-work status. Patient age, sex, occupation, handedness, severity of carpal tunnel syndrome, prior treatments and surgical outcomes were reviewed. A total of 18 patients underwent TCTR and 17 patients underwent OCTR. The TCTR group averaged 12 days to return to work without restrictions, as opposed to 33 days for the OCTR group. Resolution of symptoms was afforded in all patients without any complications regardless of surgical technique. While both TCTR and OCTR were effective, our data indicates that TCTR resulted in a shorter return to work. Level of evidence: III
Skin Closure Technique and Postprocedural Pain after Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation: A Retrospective Review
Bendel, Markus A. , D’Souza, Ryan S. , North, Taylor , Hagedorn, Jonathan M. , North, Taylor J , Hagedorn, Jonathan M , D'Souza, Ryan S , Pittelkow, Thomas P.

Pain Research and Management | June 4, 2021 | Volume: 2021 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-7

10.1155/2021/9912861 Get It

Spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion stimulation are minimally invasive surgical techniques used to treat an array of chronic pain disorders. There is a paucity of data related to defining best practices in these specific patient populations, and historically, providers have relied on consensus committees to opine on the best techniques for patient safety and experience. The most efficacious mechanism of surgical closure—specifically a running suture closure compared to a surgical staple closure—is debated. A retrospective review of 155 patients implanted with either a spinal cord or dorsal root ganglion stimulator between 2017 and 2019 was undertaken to determine if the type of surgical closure was related to degree of postoperative surgical site discomfort. The primary outcome showed no statistically significant difference on postoperative pain scores between the suture (6.0 (IQR 5.0–8.0)) and staple (7.0 (IQR 5.0–8.0)) cohorts at postoperative day (POD) #1 (adjusted β 0.17 (95% CI −0.61 to 0.95), P = 0.670 ). This finding held for postoperative pain scores at POD #10 as well (staples (1.0 (IQR 0.0–4.0)) and suture (2.0 (IQR 0.0–5.0), adjusted β −0.39 (95% CI −1.35 to 0.58), P = 0.432 )). A regression analysis was performed to identify secondary factors impacting postoperative pain scores. Higher preoperative pain score (β 0.50 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.92), P = 0.019 ) and female gender (β 1.09 (95% CI 0.15 to 2.02), P = 0.023 ) were predictive of higher incisional pain scores at POD#10. Increasing age was associated with decreased incisional pain scores at POD#10 (β −0.06 (95% CI −0.09 to −0.03), P < 0.001 ). These findings are of interest to the pain practitioner and may be valuable in preoperative discussions with prospective patients.