Thompson, Paul M.

Diffusion MRI (dMRI) enables assessment of white matter microstructural abnormalities in Alzheimer's disease (AD), and multisite datasets enable more robust modeling of non-biological variation that can confound analyses. The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) includes over 10 dMRI protocols, necessitating robust methods to model protocol-related variability when pooling data. Here, we compared three harmonization approaches: (1) mixed-effects models, (2) ComBat-GAM, and (3) eHarmonize, a reference-based lifespan method. We assessed their ability to reduce protocol-related variability in diffusion tensor imaging fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) while preserving associations with cognitive impairment (CI), and amyloid-beta (Aβ) and tau PET burden in 1,086 ADNI3/4 participants. All approaches yielded more closely aligned FA/MD distributions across protocols. Associations with clinical indicators of CI were highly consistent across approaches, whereas PET associations were less widespread and more variable. Overall, multiple strategies effectively modeled protocol-related variability while preserving AD-related associations.

Abstract Background The Global Bipolar Cohort (GBC) was established to identify existing bipolar disorder (BD) cohorts worldwide and foster collaborations focused on descriptive and analytic outcomes relevant to BD. A distributed analytic framework has been implemented to engage multiple sites without the need for central data pooling. This report describes the GBC endeavor and global functional impairment patterns. Cross-cohort comparisons of functional correlates are limited by heterogeneous measures and data-sharing constraints. Large, culturally diverse comparisons are needed to distinguish broadly reproducible correlates from cohort-specific effects. Participating sites completed a 28-item descriptive survey covering diagnostic methods, cognition, genetics, treatment, functioning, and follow-up strategies. We implemented a harmonized local logistic regression model of dichotomized functional outcome and shared summary statistics only. Results We identified 69 cohorts across five continents. Thirty-seven cohorts contributed functional outcome analyses from 17,130 participants. Outcome measures included clinician-rated disability scales and social indicators such as employment and marital status. The proportion classified with poor functioning ranged from 16% to 77% (mean 50%). In 32 of 37 cohorts, the overall regression model significantly explained variance in functioning. Current depressive symptoms were the most robust and reproducible correlate of poor functional outcome: they were assessed in 29 cohorts, significant in 22 (75.8%), ranked among the top three correlates in 22, and were the top-ranked correlates in 19. Associations between depressive burden and poor functioning were observed across clinician-rated disability scales and work or social indicators, and across geographically diverse cohorts. Comorbid substance use disorder and medication-related variables were associated with poorer functioning in subsets of cohorts, whereas sex, ancestry, bipolar subtype, psychosis history, and premorbid IQ showed weak or inconsistent associations. Cognitive measures, available in a minority of regression models, showed modest and non-uniform effects. Conclusions Across heterogeneous international cohorts, current depressive symptom burden emerged as the most consistent correlate of poor functioning in bipolar disorder. These findings replicate earlier multisite work at a larger scale, show that protocol-based distributed analyses can identify reproducible clinical signals without sharing individual-level data, and support prioritizing detection and treatment of depressive symptoms when aiming to improve real-world functioning. Future work should expand longitudinal harmonization and representation of under-studied populations.

Abstract INTRODUCTION The Consortium for Clarity in Alzheimer's disease related dementias (ADRD) Research Through Imaging (CLARiTI) is a study that aims to collect standardized imaging and plasma biomarkers on 2000 Clinical Core participants enrolled across all Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRC) sites. We sought to summarize the known heterogeneity across centers regarding scientific focus and initial enrollment plans for CLARiTI. METHODS We developed and distributed a survey capturing information on the 36 CLARiTI site's theme/expertise, recruitment plans, and the intersection of CLARiTI with other ADRC imaging efforts. RESULTS Anticipated CLARiTI enrollees spanned 11 different categories of suspected etiologies underlying impairment. A wide range of risk factors were endorsed across sites regarding the enrollment of unimpaired individuals. Variability also existed regarding site‐level strategies in enrollment into CLARiTI versus other imaging efforts. DISCUSSION We anticipate that the 2000 individuals that will enroll into CLARiTI will reflect the clinical heterogeneity already in place across the ADRC network. Highlights The ADRC Consortium for Clarity in ADRD Research Through Imaging (CLARiTI) will leverage and contribute to the existing Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRC) program by supporting standardized imaging and plasma collection across all centers. We summarize the variation in scientific focus and enrollment plans across ADRC sites participating in CLARiTI. The anticipated CLARiTI cohort will reflect the clinical heterogeneity that already exists across the ADRC network. CLARiTI will contribute to scientific goals related to the detection of multi‐etiological signatures relevant for Alzheimer's disease and related disorders (ADRDs).

AbstractBackgroundNormative models (NM) of brain metrics based on large, diverse populations offer novel strategies to detect individual brain abnormalities. To create an age‐dependent statistical model of brain microstructure over the human lifespan, we built the largest multi‐site NM of white matter (WM) diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics based on 54,591 subjects. We used state‐of‐the‐art tools to adjust for site‐dependent effects.MethodWe used Hierarchical Bayesian Regression (HBR) to determine the age trajectory and lifespan centile curves (ages 3‐100 years) by merging data from different sections of the lifespan. We analyzed 19 international public datasets with the ENIGMA‐DTI protocol. Mean fractional anisotropy (FA), mean, axial, and radial diffusivity (MD, AxD, RD) were extracted for 21 bilateral ROIs from the JHU‐WM atlas and the whole WM skeleton. Regressions were run with each metric per ROI as a function of age and sex, and the DTI protocol as the batch effect (37 protocols). Z‐scores were derived for 81 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD; mean age: 77y±8.4, 46M/35F) and 225 MCI participants (mean age: 75.1y±8.1, 127M/98F) and extreme deviations (Z>|2|) were quantified for each condition. ROI‐wise areas under the ROC curve were calculated to determine the classification accuracy of the Z‐scores.ResultThe average FA for the overall WM skeleton reached its peak value at 27 years, with minima for MD, RD and AxD at 47, 42 and 54 years, respectively. We found extreme FA deviations (Z>2) for MCI (AUC=0.67) and AD (AUC=0.66) in the genu of the corpus callosum, extreme RD deviations (Z<2) in the tapetum (AUC=0.73) and Extreme AxD deviations (Z>2) for MCI in the superior longitudinal fasciculus (AUC=0.65). See Figures 1 & 2.ConclusionNM of brain microstructure with HBR yielded lifespan trajectories for widely‐used DTI metrics. By pooling large scale multi‐site dMRI to create a statistical reference, single subject deviations are detectable across the lifespan for AD and MCI. These NM will be publicly available to the research community.

AbstractBackgroundNormative models (NM) of brain metrics based on large, diverse populations offer novel strategies to detect individual brain abnormalities. To create an age‐dependent statistical model of brain microstructure over the human lifespan, we built the largest multi‐site NM of white matter (WM) diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics based on 54,591 subjects. We used state‐of‐the‐art tools to adjust for site‐dependent effects.MethodWe used Hierarchical Bayesian Regression (HBR) to determine the age trajectory and lifespan centile curves (ages 3‐100 years) by merging data from different sections of the lifespan. We analyzed 19 international public datasets with the ENIGMA‐DTI protocol. Mean fractional anisotropy (FA), mean, axial, and radial diffusivity (MD, AxD, RD) were extracted for 21 bilateral ROIs from the JHU‐WM atlas and the whole WM skeleton. Regressions were run with each metric per ROI as a function of age and sex, and the DTI protocol as the batch effect (37 protocols). Z‐scores were derived for 81 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD; mean age: 77y±8.4, 46M/35F) and 225 MCI participants (mean age: 75.1y±8.1, 127M/98F) and extreme deviations (Z>|2|) were quantified for each condition. ROI‐wise areas under the ROC curve were calculated to determine the classification accuracy of the Z‐scores.ResultThe average FA for the overall WM skeleton reached its peak value at 27 years, with minima for MD, RD and AxD at 47, 42 and 54 years, respectively. We found extreme FA deviations (Z>2) for MCI (AUC=0.67) and AD (AUC=0.66) in the genu of the corpus callosum, extreme RD deviations (Z<2) in the tapetum (AUC=0.73) and Extreme AxD deviations (Z>2) for MCI in the superior longitudinal fasciculus (AUC=0.65). See Figures 1 & 2.ConclusionNM of brain microstructure with HBR yielded lifespan trajectories for widely‐used DTI metrics. By pooling large scale multi‐site dMRI to create a statistical reference, single subject deviations are detectable across the lifespan for AD and MCI. These NM will be publicly available to the research community.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) is sensitive to the microstructural properties of brain tissues and shows great promise in detecting the effects of degenerative diseases. However, many approaches analyze single measures averaged over regions of interest without considering the underlying fiber geometry. METHODS We propose a novel macrostructure‐informed normative tractometry (MINT) framework to investigate how white matter (WM) microstructure and macrostructure are jointly altered in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. We compared MINT‐derived metrics with univariate diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics to examine how fiber geometry may impact the interpretation of microstructure. RESULTS In two multisite cohorts from North America and India, we find consistent patterns of microstructural and macrostructural anomalies implicated in MCI and dementia; we also rank diffusion metrics' sensitivity to dementia. DISCUSSION We show that MINT, by jointly modeling tract shape and microstructure, has the potential to disentangle and better interpret the effects of degenerative disease on the brain's neural pathways. Highlights Changes in diffusion tensor imaging metrics may be due to macroscopic changes. Normative models encode normal variability of diffusion metrics in healthy controls. Variational autoencoder applied on tractography can learn patterns of fiber geometry. WM microstructure and macrostructure are modeled with multivariate methods. Transfer learning uses pretraining and fine‐tuning for increased efficiency.

Abstract The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Core has been operating since Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative's (ADNI) inception, providing 20 years of data including reliable, multi‐platform standardized protocols, carefully curated image data, and quantitative measures provided by expert investigators. The overarching purposes of the MRI Core include: (1) optimizing and standardizing MRI acquisition methods, which have been adopted by many multicenter studies and trials worldwide and (2) providing curated images and numeric summary values from relevant MRI sequences/contrasts to the scientific community. Over time, ADNI MRI has become increasingly complex. To remain technically current, the ADNI MRI protocol has changed substantially over the past two decades. The ADNI 4 protocol contains nine different imaging types (e.g., three dimensional [3D] T1‐weighted and fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR]). Our view is that the ADNI MRI data are a greatly underutilized resource. The purpose of this paper is to educate the scientific community on ADNI MRI methods and content to promote greater awareness, accessibility, and use. Highlights The MRI Core provides multi‐platform standardized protocols, carefully curated image data, and quantitative analysis by expert groups. The ADNI MRI protocol has undergone major changes over the past two decades to remain technically current. As of April 25, 2024, the following numbers of image series are available: 17,141 3D T1w; 6877 FLAIR; 3140 T2/PD; 6623 GRE; 3237 dMRI; 2846 ASL; 2968 TF‐fMRI; and 2861 HighResHippo (see Table 1 for abbreviations). As of April 25, 2024, the following numbers of quantitative analyses are available: FreeSurfer 10,997; BSI 6120; tensor based morphometry (TBM) and TBM‐SYN 12,019; WMH 9944; dMRI 1913; ASL 925; TF‐fMRI NFQ 2992; and medial temporal subregion volumes 2726 (see Table 4 for abbreviations). ADNI MRI is an underutilized resource that could be more useful to the research community.