Patel, Anand

The Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a group of heterogenous hematologic malignancies characterized by the proliferation of blood cells and consist of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia. The NCCN Guidelines for MPN were developed as a result of meetings convened by a multidisciplinary panel with expertise in MPN, with the aim of providing recommendations for the comprehensive care of adults with these diseases. The panel of experts convenes at least once a year to discuss requested changes to the Guidelines and to evaluate emerging data. These Guideline Insights focus on some of the recent updates for myelofibrosis.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous hematologic malignancy characterized by the clonal expansion of myeloid blasts in the peripheral blood, bone marrow, and/or other tissues. It is the most common form of acute leukemia among adults and accounts for the largest number of annual deaths from leukemias in the United States. 1 The NCCN Guidelines Panel for AML convenes annually to update recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of AML in adults. These recommendations are based on a review of recently published clinical trials that have led to significant improvements in treatment or have yielded new information regarding biologic factors that may have prognostic importance. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding the monitoring and management of measurable (minimal) residual disease.

Abstract TP53 and PPM1D are key regulators of DNA damage response and repair, and somatic mutations in these genes often co-occur in hematopoietic cells, expanding under genotoxic stress. Unlike TP53 mutations, where mechanisms of progression are defined, pathways underlying clonal fitness and transformation in PPM1D mutant cells remain unclear. In collaboration with 5 academic institutions, we analyzed the clinical and molecular landscape of 337 patients with clonal hematopoiesis (CH) and clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) across 4 genotypes: PPM1Dmt/TP53wt (n = 170 [50%]), PPM1Dmt/TP53mt (n = 25 [7%]), TP53mt/PPM1Dwt (n = 17 [5%]), and TP53wt/PPM1Dwt (n = 125 [38%]). All PPM1D variants were truncating, located in exon 6 of the gene, with a median variant allele frequency (VAF) of 6% (range, 0.3%-64%). The PPM1Dmt/TP53mt genotype was most frequently encountered in therapy-related CH/CCUS (t-CH/t-CCUS; 80%, 66.5%, 76.5%, and 19%; P ≤ .001) and had a shorter time interval to detection from last genotoxic exposure (6.2, 5.9, 11.25, and 24.5 months; P ≤ .001) compared with PPM1Dmt/TP53wt, TP53mt/PPM1Dwt, and TP53wt/PPM1Dwt genotypes, respectively. Acknowledging the short follow-up duration, rates of malignant transformation were lower in the PPM1Dmt/TP53wt (2%) and PPM1Dmt/TP53mt (4%) groups compared with PPM1Dwt/TP53wt (12%) and PPM1Dwt/TP53mt (17%) groups (P ≤ .001), respectively. In summary, PPM1D mutations are frequently observed in t-CH/t-CCUS, with low median VAFs, and are associated with low rates of progression, even when comutated with TP53.

ABSTRACT Background Isolated chromosome 5/5q losses (–5/5q) without TP53 mutations are associated with favorable outcomes in myeloid neoplasms (MN) with <5% blasts. However, the clinical implication of concurrent −5/5q and TP53 aberrations in MN with ≥5% blasts is poorly understood. Methods Patients with TP53 ‐mutated MN carrying ≥5% blasts assessing the prognostic impact of ‐5/5q on 24‐month overall survival (OS24) were examined. Results Of 587 patients, 515 (88%) exhibited −5/5q overwhelmingly in the context of a complex karyotype (98.3% vs. 61.1% complex karyotype without −5/5q; p < .0001) and multihit TP53 allelic state (88.3% vs. 56.9%; p < .0001). Proportions of patients with blasts ≥20% were comparable between groups with and without −5/5q; p = 0.26. Notably, patients with −5/5q exhibited significantly fewer coalterations; p < .0001. Looking at outcomes, presence of −5/5q was associated with shorter median 24‐month overall survival (7.8 months vs. 11.2 months; p Log‐rank = .012), an effect restricted to subgroups with blasts <20% ( p = .039; N = 163), absent −7/7q ( p = .007; N = 225), or WHO5‐defined single hit allelic state ( p = 0.030; N = 91). Importantly, −5/5q retained independent adverse prognostic significance regardless of TP53 allelic state in a multivariable model. Furthermore, among the subset of 75 (13%) patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation, −5/5q predicted significantly shorter median 5‐year posttransplant survival (16.2 months vs. median not reached; p Log‐rank = .009). Conclusions These findings emphasize the independent prognostic relevance of chromosome 5/5q losses underscoring the clinical relevance of cytogenetic testing for −5/5q even in this high‐risk cohort.

Abstract Introduction: Clinical outcomes for patients (pts) with Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) B-cell precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) have significantly improved with the incorporation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immunotherapy. Although the incidence of central nervous system (CNS) relapse in Ph+ B-ALL is rare, it has become an emerging challenge with chemotherapy-free approaches. While IKZF1, CDKN2A/B and emergence of T315I kinase domain mutations in ABL1 have been associated with worse outcomes (Foà R, JCO, 2024),further characterization of patients with CNS relapse could prove useful in risk stratification and optimizing treatment intensification. Currently, high white blood cell count (WBC) is being assessed as a marker to identify pts who may benefit from addition of CNS penetrant chemotherapy (ex. cytarabine or high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)) to TKI and immunotherapy protocols (Short NJ, J Hematol Oncol, 2025). Methods This is a multicenter retrospective study of relapsed/refractory Ph+ B-ALL pts under the COMMAND consortium. Age, gender, induction regimen and TKI of choice during induction were descriptively reported for the entire cohort. Categorical variables were compared, using Fisher's exact test, between pts with CNS relapse and pts with systemic relapse. Variables of interest were the presence of IKZF1 or CDKN2A/B alterations, emergence of T3151 mutation, CNS disease at diagnosis (dx), WBC &gt;70K/microliter at dx, use of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) during induction or consolidation, and use of TKI as part of the induction regimen. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported for each variable. Results A total of 654 Ph+ B-ALL pts were initially identified across multiple centers in the United States, of whom 20 (3%) experienced a CNS relapse and 157 (24%) experienced a systemic relapse on median follow up of 29 months (range, 0-207). A total of 15 pts with CNS relapse and 114 pts with systemic relapse were used for this analysis after exclusion of pts without molecular data. The median age for the 129 pt cohort was 55 years (range 22-85), of whom 65 pts (50%) were male. Induction regimens used were intensive chemotherapy (IC)+TKI for 79 pts (61%), low-intensity chemotherapy or steroids (LDC-S)+TKI for 40 pts (31%), IC without TKI during induction for 5 pts (4%) and blinatumomab+TKI for 1 pt (1%). TKI of choice during induction included second-generation TKIs (dasatinib, nilotinib) for 77 pts (60%), imatinib for 30 pts (23%), ponatinib for 15 pts (12%) and none during induction for 5 pts (4%). CNS disease at dx was found in 6/15 pts (40%) with CNS relapse and 9/114 pts (8%) with systemic relapse, which was a statistically significant difference (p=0.002, OR= 7.57, 95% CI= 1.81 - 31.08). The systemic treatment regimens for the 15 pts with CNS disease at x were IC+TKI for 10 pts (66%) and LDC-S+TKI for 5 pts (33%), 9 of the pts (60%) received HD-MTX during induction. Intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy administration data at dx was available for 8 pts (53%) with CNS disease at dx, of whom 2 pts received &lt;9 doses, 4 pts received 9-12 doses and 2 pts received &gt;12 doses of IT chemotherapy. Although not statistically significant, pts with CNS relapse were more likely to have IKZF1 or CDKN2A/B alterations (p = 0.648, OR= 1.44, 95% CI= 0.14-7.78), WBC &gt;70K/mcl (p = 0.472, OR= 1.73, 95% CI= 0.34-7.41), emergence of T3151 mutations (p = 0.123, OR= 2.54, 95% CI= 0.72-8.84) and use of HD-MTX during induction or consolidation (p = 0.262, OR= 2.15, 95% CI= 0.61-8.61); while they were less likely to have received a TKI during induction (p = 0.106, OR= 0.18, 95% CI= 0.02-2.34). Conclusion This data confirms that the presence of CNS disease at dx is associated with CNS relapse. Despite recent incorporation into clinical trials, WBC≥70K/mcl and omission of HD-MTX were not seen more frequently in pts with CNS relapse in this cohort. However, this analysis is limited by the small number of pts who experienced CNS relapse. With the rising use of chemotherapy-free regimens, prospectively trialing treatment intensification, such as with additional IT chemotherapy or HD-MTX, could be prospectively trialed in pts with CNS disease at dx to potentially improve outcomes for this subset of pts. The impact of increasing IT chemotherapy doses or additional cycles of systemic chemotherapy in this pt population is yet to be elucidated.

Abstract Introduction: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are observed in ~20% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In the U.S., ivosidenib (ivo) is approved with or without azacitidine (aza) in the frontline (FL) and as monotherapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) IDH1-mutated (mut) AML. Olutasidenib (oluta) is approved as monotherapy for R/R IDH1-mut AML. Enasidenib (ena) is approved as monotherapy for R/R IDH2-mut AML. This study describes real-world IDH inhibitor (IDHi) administration patterns and evaluates their outcomes in on-label settings. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with IDH1/2-mut AML who received ivosidenib, olutasidenib, or enasidenib was conducted at 12 academic institutions in the U.S. Best response at any time during treatment, including complete response (CR) and complete response with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), were graded using European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2022 criteria. Results: A total of 387 patients with IDH1- and IDH2-mut AML were treated with an IDHi in the FL or R/R setting. Median follow-up was 9.6 months (range, 0.03-90.7). Demographics include 79% White, 14% Black, 3% Asian, and 4% other/unknown race; 5% were Hispanic ethnicity; 46% were female; the median age was 70 years (range, 28-95). 70% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, 26% had secondary AML, and 10% had therapy-related AML. Per the ELN 2024 less-Intensive risk classification, 58% were favorable risk, 29% intermediate, 7% adverse, and 6% unknown. Overall, 209 of 387 patients (54%) received IDHi regimens on-label. In FL IDH1-mut AML (n=45), 11 received ivo monotherapy, 25 aza/ivo, and 9 used off-label combinations: 3 hypomethylating agent (HMA) + venetoclax (ven) + ivo, 5 decitabine/ivo, 1 intensive chemotherapy (IC)/ivo. Among R/R IDH1-mut AML (n=109), 47 received ivo monotherapy, 7 oluta monotherapy, and 55 off-label (31 HMA/ivo, 16 HMA/ven/ivo, 3 IC/ivo, and 5 other). 44 received off-label ena for FL treatment of IDH2-mut AML (25 ena monotherapy, 9 HMA/ena, 8 HMA/ven/ena, and 2 IC/ena). In R/R IDH2-mut AML (n=189), 119 patients received ena monotherapy and 70 received off-label combinations (25 HMA/ena, 30 HMA/ven/ena, 7 IC/ena, 6 ena/gilteritinib, and 2 other). In on-label treatment of FL IDH1-mut AML, one of four patients with response assessment of FL ivo monotherapy had a CR/CRh. Of 19 patients with response assessment on FL aza/ivo, 13 patients (68.4%) had a CR as best response (95% CI, 46.0-84.6%). Median OS was 14.9 mo (95% CI, 4.17-NR) for ivo monotherapy (n=11) and 31.9 mo (95% CI, 9.1-NR) for aza/ivo (n=25), with 0 and 2 patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT), respectively. In R/R IDH1-mut AML, the rate of CR/CRh was 35.5% (95% CI, 21.1-53.1) for on-label ivo monotherapy. All 4 patients with response assessment for on-label oluta monotherapy had a CR. Median OS was 14.0 mo (95% CI, 10.1-22.4) for ivo monotherapy and NR for oluta monotherapy (95% CI, 10.1-NR), with 10 and 0 receiving allo-SCT, respectively. The CR/CRh rate for ivo was 38.1% (8 of 21 assessed; 95% CI, 20.8-59.1) in age &lt; 70, and 30.0% (3 of 10 assessed; 95% CI, 10.8-60.3) in age ≥ 70. Median OS was 15.2 mo (95% CI 9.3-NR) in age &lt; 70 (n=27) and 10.4 mo (95% CI 8.0-18) in age ≥ 70 (n=20). In R/R IDH2-mut AML, the rate of CR/CRh for on-label ena monotherapy was 38.2% (95% CI, 27.6-50.1). Median OS was 12.1 mo (95% CI, 8.2-16.6), with 5 having received allo-SCT. In demographic subgroups for ena monotherapy, 52 non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients with response assessment had a CR/CRh rate of 42.3% (95% CI, 0.30-0.56). Only 1 of 13 non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients with response assessment had a CRh (7.7%; 95% CI, 1.4-33.0) as best response, with none attaining CR. Median OS was 13.7 mo (95% CI 10.3-26.3) in NHW (n=82), 11.2 mo (95% CI, 6.1-NR) in NHB (n=18), and 69.1 mo (95% CI, 52.6-NR) in Hispanic patients (n=8). The CR/CRh rate was 48.6% (17 of 35 assessed; 95% CI, 33.0-64.4) for age &lt; 70, and 27.3% (9 of 33 assessed; 95% CI, 15.1-44.2) for age ≥ 70. Median OS was 12.0 mo (95% CI, 9.9-22.1) in age &lt; 70 (n=48) and 5.8 mo (95% CI, 4.1-8.7) in age ≥ 70 (n=69). Conclusion: Practice patterns for IDH inhibitors in AML vary considerably, with high amounts of off-label use. Response rates for ivosidenib and enasidenib in the real-world setting are comparable to those of clinical trials. Descriptive analyses of demographic subgroups highlight areas in need of further research.

Abstract Background: Hypomethylating agent (HMA) with venetoclax (VEN) is used in clinical practice for frontline management of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) based on encouraging data from phase 1 clinical trial (Garcia JS et al. Blood 2025). While the randomized clinical trial (VERONA-NCT04401748) did not show a survival benefit of azacitidine-VEN, the study had important differences such as exclusion of therapy related MDS and being conducted in several non-academic US centers. To better understand the impact of this regimen and its effects in subgroups, we conducted a real-world analysis of frontline MDS patients treated mainly at academic medical centers with HMA-VEN and compared to HMA monotherapy. Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective study of 19 US academic medical centers. We included contemporary cohorts of adults (age≥18 years) with MDS (intermediate, high or very high risk by IPSS-R) who were treated outside of clinical trials with either upfront combination of HMA-VEN or HMA monotherapy. Data on patient-related, disease-related and treatment-related variables were collected through chart review. Descriptive statistics were used for baseline characteristics. Overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS: progression, leukemic transformation, death as events) analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier method. Determinants of outcomes were analyzed using multivariable regression models. All analyses were conducted at a significance level of p&lt;0.05. Results: Among 1198 patients with intermediate, high or very-high risk MDS, 313 patients received upfront VEN in combination with HMA [HMA-VEN] and 885 patients received HMA monotherapy. Median age was 70 (63-76) years and majority of patients had MDS with excess blasts-1 (34% overall, HMA-VEN=26%, HMA=37%) or MDS with excess-blasts-2 (41% overall, HMA-VEN=60%, HMA=34%). Disease risk by IPSS-R was intermediate (29% overall, HMA-VEN=18%, HMA=33%), high (30% overall, HMA-VEN=31%, HMA=30%) or very-high risk (41% overall, HMA-VEN=51%, HMA=37%, p&lt;0.001). Therapy related MDS (t-MDS) was seen in 27% of patients (HMA-VEN=33%, HMA=25%, p=0.004), 34% had TP53 mutation (HMA-VEN=40%, HMA=32%, p=0.005) and 33% underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) (HMA-VEN=42%, HMA=30%, p&lt;0.001). The most common mutations detected at baseline included TP53 (34%), ASXL1 (22%), DNMT3A (16%), RUNX1 (16%), TET2 (14%), SRSF2 (13%), and U2AF1 (11%). The response rate by IWG 2006 criteria was significantly higher with HMA-VEN than HMA monotherapy (overall 81% vs 39%, CR: 17% vs 9.6%; marrow CR: 56% vs 14%, p&lt;0.001). In multivariable analysis accounting for upfront treatment, AHSCT, genomic mutations, baseline bone marrow blasts and t-MDS, patients treated with HMA-VEN in the upfront setting had significantly improved EFS (median EFS 10.7 vs. 7.8 mon, HR 0.83, 95%CI 0.72-0.96, p=0.01) and OS (median OS 22.4 vs. 18.1 mon, HR 0.79, 95%CI 0.64-0.97, p=0.02). In addition, TP53 mutation status (OS: HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.57-2.26, p&lt;0.001, EFS: HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.23-1.65, p&lt;0.001), subsequent AHSCT (OS: HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.27-0.41, p&lt;0.001; EFS: HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.40-0.54, p&lt;0.001), and therapy related MDS (OS: HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.00-1.44, p=0.04, EFS: HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.96-1.27, p=0.2) were significant predictors on multivariable analysis. When separately investigated in subgroups, an OS benefit of HMA-VEN over HMA was seen in patients undergoing subsequent AHSCT (median OS 40.6 vs. 30 mon, p=0.05), bone marrow blast 10-19% (median OS 25.1 vs. 17.4 mon, P=0.01), de novo MDS (median OS 30 vs. 20.1 mon, P=0.003) and absence of TP53 mutation (median OS 34.9 mon vs. 23.1 mon, p=0.004). The benefit of HMA-VEN over HMA was also seen across molecular mutations including presence of ASXL1 mutation (median OS 35.2 vs 20.9 mon, p=0.03). Conclusions: In this large multicenter retrospective analysis from US academic medical centers, we found that HMA-VEN therapy significantly improved OS in certain subsets of high risk MDS including patients with 10-19% blasts, denovo MDS, subsequent AHSCT and those without TP53 mutation. While our analysis is limited by its retrospective design, prospectively exploring subgroups of MDS patients who could benefit from HMA-VEN therapy is needed.

Abstract Background Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare, indolent B-cell malignancy accounting for ~1% of all lymphoid neoplasms. While purine analogs remain the standard first-line therapy, the increasing use of combination regimens and targeted agents has expanded the therapeutic landscape. Data on long-term outcomes in real-world practice remain limited. Methods This is a retrospective, multicenter cohort study. We included 104 patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of HCL who had at least one oncology visit from January 1, 2010, to July 17, 2025. Patients diagnosed prior to 2010 were left-truncated to account for survivorship bias. Data were abstracted from electronic medical records. Key outcomes included treatment patterns, response rates, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Results The median age at diagnosis was 56.9 years (range 32.1–83.8), and 80% were male. Most patients (77%) were diagnosed during or after 2010. The most frequent frontline therapies were cladribine (63%), cladribine with rituximab (12%), rituximab monotherapy (9.7%), vemurafenib-based regimens (7.7%), splenectomy with or without interferon (3.8%), interferon monotherapy (2.9%), and other (1.9%). The overall complete response (CR) rate to first-line therapy was 63%, with 15% achieving a partial response (PR) and 22% having stable or no response. For patients receiving cladribine with rituximab first-line (n = 12), 92% had a CR. For patients receiving cladribine monotherapy first-line (n = 65), 63% had a CR and 12% had a PR. For patients receiving rituximab monotherapy first-line (n = 10), 50% had a CR and 20% had a PR. For patients receiving vemurafenib-based regimens first-line (n = 8), 75% had a CR. Among the 39 patients who received second-line therapy, the most common regimens included cladribine (31%), rituximab (26%), cladribine plus rituximab (18%), and vemurafenib-based regimens (13%). The CR rate after second-line therapy was 72%. For patients receiving cladribine with rituximab second-line (n = 7), 86% had a CR and 14% had a PR. For patients receiving cladribine monotherapy second-line (n = 12), 67% had a CR. For patients receiving rituximab monotherapy second-line (n = 10), 80% had a CR and 10% had a PR. For patients receiving vemurafenib-based regimens second-line (n = 5), 40% had a CR and 20% had a PR. Among the 17 patients who received third-line therapy, the most common regimens included rituximab (41%), cladribine (18%), and vemurafenib-based regimens (18%). The CR rate after third-line therapy was 50%. For patients receiving rituximab monotherapy third-line (n = 7), 43% had a CR and 14% had a PR. For patients receiving cladribine monotherapy third-line (n = 3), 33% had a CR. For patients receiving vemurafenib-based regimens third-line (n = 3), 67% had a CR and 33% had a PR. Overall, treatment-related hospitalizations for first-line therapy occurred in 27% of patients. 50% of patients receiving first-line cladribine with rituximab had treatment-related hospitalizations. 25% of patients receiving first-line vemurafenib-based treatment had treatment-related hospitalizations. 23% of patients receiving first-line cladribine monotherapy had treatment-related hospitalizations. 20% of patients receiving first-line rituximab monotherapy had treatment-related hospitalizations. Overall, after a median follow-up of 6.6 years (range 0.1–46), estimated OS was 96.6% at 5 years, 85.7% at 10 years, and 80.3% at 15 years. The median OS was 24.5 years [95% CI: 18.3, not reached]. Estimated PFS was 95.1% at 1 year, 89.9% at 3 years, 74.8% at 5 years, and 50.8% at 10 years. Median PFS was 12.2 years [95% CI: 7.0, not reached]. Estimated OS for first-line cladribine monotherapy was 100% at 5 years and 86.5% at 10 years. Estimated OS for first-line vemurafenib-based treatment was 85.7% at 5 years and 85.7% at 10 years. Conclusions This large real-world cohort provides important insights into the long-term management of HCL. Cladribine-based regimens remain the predominant first-line approach, with high response rates and durable remissions. However, treatment-related toxicity is common. Outcomes in later lines remain favorable, particularly with re-treatment using purine analogs or combination regimens. These findings underscore the importance of individualized treatment planning and the continued need for real-world evidence to inform care in rare hematologic malignancies.