Shallis, Rory M.

Background: Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is one of the most treatable leukemias in the current era, with cure rates upwards of 90%. Early mortality due to coagulopathies often seen at diagnosis is a major driver of adverse outcomes. Prompt initiation of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) is crucial for suspected APL, as it is known to reverse these coagulopathies. Chemotherapy-free protocols consisting of arsenic trioxide (ATO) and ATRA have become the standard of care for low-risk APL with high cure rates and reduced hematologic toxicities. For high-risk disease, there are multiple treatment options that have not been compared. Since APL is rare, there is a lack of real-world data for this disease. This retrospective review aimed to assess the outcomes of APL patients (pts) across multiple institutions and to examine the most common induction regimens, characteristics linked to early (30-day) mortality, and supportive care strategies. Methods: This retrospective study involved 9 institutions in the US and was conducted through the Consortium on Myeloid Malignancies and Neoplastic Diseases (COMMAND). Data included pts admitted from 8/5/2006 through 2/3/2024 with a confirmed diagnosis of APL. Each institution received a data-collection form and contributed data on APL pts from presentation to last follow-up. Key data categories included patient demographics, presenting laboratory and molecular data, treatment regimen, supportive care, and patient outcomes. Results: Data for 412 pts were identified with a median age of 51 (range 17-90) and 49% were female. Cardiovascular comorbidities were present in 44% of pts and 16% had a known pulmonary comorbidity. At presentation 109 (27%) had high risk-disease, defined as a white blood cell count (WBC) greater than 10 x 109/L. A FLT3 mutation was seen in 50% of tested pts, WT1 (22%), KRAS (3.6%), and NRAS (6.5%). The median WBC at presentation was 2 x 109/L (range: 0-166 x 109/L) and the median platelet count was 27 x 109/L (range: 2.0-315 109/L). Twenty-six percent presented with grade 2+ thrombosis, bleeding, or both. A higher percentage of pts with high-risk vs. low-risk disease presented with grade 2+ thrombosis, bleeding, or both (43% vs. 20%), DIC (60% vs. 36%), and mutated FLT3 (81% vs. 37%). The majority of pts received a chemotherapy-free induction regimen consisting of ATRA plus ATO. It was determined that 36 (8.7%) pts received induction with intermittent ATO plus ATRA (Burnett AK, Lancet Oncol 2015), 276 (67%) received daily ATO plus ATRA (Ravandi F, J Clin Oncol 2009 and Lo Coco, NEJM 2013), and 70 (17%) received a regimen inclusive of an anthracycline plus ATRA. Eleven pts did not start an induction regimen other than single-agent ATRA due to early death, while 19 had their regimen classified as “other” because they did not follow a conventional induction path. In total, 295/358 (82%) received ATRA within 24 hours of admission. At least 1 dose of gemtuzumab ozogamicin was given to 58 (14%) pts, of which 35 (60%) were considered high risk. The incidence of differentiation syndrome (DS) was 37% (n=154). Among the 243 pts who received steroid prophylaxis, 30% developed DS, compared to 52% of those who did not receive prophylaxis. Among the 360 pts with at least 1 available PCR result after starting induction, 94% achieved PCR-negativity. The 30-day mortality rate was 6.6%. On univariate analysis, presenting variables associated with a higher 30-day mortality include older age, diabetes, cardiovascular comorbidities, thrombosis or bleeding, DIC, eGFR < 60, elevated total bilirubin and D-dimer levels, and high-risk disease. The median overall survival (OS) of the cohort was not reached, and the 5- and 10-year OS was 88% (95% CI: 84-91%) and 79% (95% CI: 72-87%) respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years was 2.7% (95% CI: 1.4 - 5.1%), with no additional relapses observed. The incidence of CNS relapse at 3 years was 0.9% (95% CI: 0.3% - 2.8%), with 2 of the 4 pts classified as high-risk. Conclusion: This is the largest real-world evidence data collection in the US evaluating the outcome of pts with APL in the current era, inclusive of ATO as front-line induction. Outcomes for this disease remain extremely positive, with low 30-day mortality rates noted in this study along with durable OS rates and low incidence of relapse. Additional information on outcomes, safety, and supportive care will be presented at the meeting.

AbstractCore‐binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF‐AML) is characterized by the presence of inv(16)/t(16;16) or t(8;21) and is classified as a favorable risk by the 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines. The CD33‐targeting antibody‐drug conjugate, gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), is commonly added to intensive chemotherapy (IC) in CBF‐AML. We sought to compare outcomes in patients treated with IC with or without GO in CBF‐AML. We included 200 patients with CBF‐AML treated with IC across seven academic centers. Induction treatment regimens were categorized as IC alone, IC with GO, or IC with KIT inhibitor (dasatinib or midostaurin). Median follow‐up for the whole cohort was 2.5 years. Three‐year overall survival (OS) was 70% and 3‐year event‐free survival (EFS) was 51%. Patients treated with IC with GO experienced a 3‐year EFS of 50% compared to those treated with IC alone who experienced a 3‐year EFS of 47%, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.62). Similarly, those treated with IC with GO did not experience an improved OS compared to those treated with IC alone (p = 0.67). Patients treated with IC with KIT inhibitor experienced a significantly improved 3‐year EFS of 85% compared to those with IC with or without GO (p = 0.04). We find in our study that there is no survival benefit in patients treated with IC with the addition of GO; improved EFS was seen in patients with CBF‐AML treated with IC plus KIT inhibitors, consistent with outcomes noted in prospective studies utilizing this approach.

AbstractVenetoclax (VEN) combined with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) is the standard of care for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) unfit for intensive chemotherapy. To date, real‐world data published on HMAs plus VEN have been either single‐center studies or using community‐based electronic databases with limited details on mutational landscape, tolerability, and treatment patterns in elderly patients. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter retrospective study to assess the real‐world experience of 204 elderly patients (≥75 years) with newly diagnosed AML treated with HMAs plus VEN from eight academic centers in the United States. Overall, 64 patients achieved complete remission (CR; 38%) and 43 CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi; 26%) for a CR/CRi rate of 64%, with a median duration of response of 14.2 months (95% CI: 9.43, 22.1). Among responders, 63 patients relapsed (59%) with median overall survival (OS) after relapse of 3.4 months (95% CI, 2.4, 6.7). Median OS for the entire population was 9.5 months (95% CI, 7.85–13.5), with OS significantly worse among patients with TP53‐mutated AML (2.5 months) and improved in patients harboring NPM1, IDH1, and IDH2 mutations (13.5, 18.3, and 21.1 months, respectively). The 30‐day and 60‐day mortality rates were 9% and 19%, respectively. In conclusion, HMAs plus VEN yielded high response rates in elderly patients with newly diagnosed AML. The median OS was inferior to that reported in the VIALE‐A trial. Outcomes are dismal after failure of HMAs plus VEN, representing an area of urgent unmet clinical need.

Background: Hypomethylating agent (HMA) and venetoclax (Ven) frontline therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is astandard of care for patients (pts) deemed to be poor candidates for intensive induction due to age or fitness. However, given its attractive risk-benefit ratio, there is an increasing interest to extend the preference for HMA + Ven to other pts, including those who are fit for intensive therapy but with adverse risk disease. Unfortunately, most pts treated in this fashion will require future therapies for relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease and intensive therapy is given consideration mostly for pts with a path to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT). Little is known about the outcomes of pts who receive intensive induction therapy after use of a frontline less-intensive regimen in the modern era. In this multi-center study, we seek to describe the experience with such a patient population and identify predictors of differential clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a multi-center, retrospective study of pts with AML treated with frontline less-intensive chemotherapy, followed by intensive induction chemotherapy for R/R disease. We first described the baseline characteristics of this cohort. Nominal variables were summarized with frequency and percentage while continuous variables were summarized with median and interquartile range (IQR). Overall response rate (ORR) was defined as complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete count recovery, or morphologic leukemia free state. Differences in ORR were analyzed with Fisher's exact test for nominal variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine median overall survival (OS) after induction chemotherapy. Log-rank testing and Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine survival differences for nominal and continuous variables, respectively. Statistical significance was determined as p-value <0.05. Results: A total of 23 pts were included in this study. Median age at diagnosis was 64 years (IQR: 62-71). The majority of pts were male (n=12, 52%), white (n=20, 87%), and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 or 1 (n=18, 82%). The majority of pts (61%) at time of frontline therapy had AML arising out of MDS. As expected, the majority of pts had adverse risk ELN cytogenetics (n=16, 70%) with an enrichment for disease harboring TP53 mutation (n=6, 27%) and complex karyotype (n=9, 39%). Fifteen pts (65%) had frontline therapy with azacitidine backbone, 6 pts (26%) with decitabine; some pts received both before intensive therapy. The median number of cycles of frontline therapy was 2 (IQR: 2-5). Median WBC at time of R/R therapy was 1.9 x 10 9/L (IQR: 0.8-6.45), while hemoglobin was 8.4 g/dL (IQR: 7.5-9.45), platelets were 41 x 10 9/L (IQR: 19.5-116.5), and marrow blasts were 25% (IQR: 16.5-30%). The plurality of pts received CPX-351 as intensive R/R therapy (n=9, 39%). Other regimens included 7+3 (n=2, 9%), FLAG-Ida + Ven (n=2, 9%), HiDAC + Mitoxantrone +/- Ven (n=4, 17%) ( Table 1). ORR after intensive R/R therapy was 27% (n=6), with 23% achieving CR. CPX-351 after HMA + Ven was specifically associated with an ORR of 33% (CR rate 22%). Median OS after initiation was 5.8 months. Thirty- and 60-day mortality was 17% and 26%, respectively. Five patients (23%) proceeded to alloHCT ( Table 1). Univariate differences in response rate and median survival were analyzed for each of the aforementioned variables as illustrated in Table 1. While none of the covariates reached statistical significance for impacting ORR or OS, ECOG PS trended towards significantly impacting OS ( p=0.074) and the median OS among patients proceeding to alloHCT was numerically doubled (8.0 vs. 4.0 months, p=0.11) ( Figure 1). Conclusions: Intensive therapy for R/R AML after prior frontline less-intensive therapy was associated with an ORR rate of 27% and median OS of 5.8 months in our cohort. This approach may be an appropriate strategy for a subset of pts, particularly those eligible for alloHCT. The relatively small and heterogeneous nature of this cohort limits strong conclusions regarding efficacy. As the use of frontline HMA + Ven continues to expand, further studies with larger sample size are needed to determine which pts would and would not benefit from intensive induction therapy in the R/R setting.

Background: Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) is characterized by the presence of inv(16)/t(16;16) or t(8;21), and is classified as favorable risk by the 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines. High remission rates are observed in the setting of cytarabine- or anthracycline-based induction regimens. The CD33-targeted antibody-drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) is FDA-approved for use in newly-diagnosed CD33+ AML; a meta-analysis of 5 prospective randomized studies investigating intensive chemotherapy (IC) +/- GO demonstrated an improved overall survival (OS) with the addition of GO to IC for favorable-risk AML (Hills et al, Lancet Oncol 2014). The trials included in the meta-analysis did not restrict inclusion criteria to CBF-AML alone and there remains variation amongst IC regimens utilized in CBF-AML treatment. In addition, IC combined with the KIT inhibitor dasatinib has shown remission rates and promising overall survival in prospective studies (Paschka et al, Leukemia 2018; Marcucci et al, Blood Adv 2020). We set out to investigate the outcomes of patients (pts) with CBF-AML treated with IC +/- targeted agents (GO or KIT inhibitor) across 5 institutions that are part of the Consortium on Myeloid Malignancies and Neoplastic Diseases (COMMAND). Methods: Retrospective chart review was done to identify pts who were treated with IC with AML harboring inv(16)/t(16;16) or t(8;21) identified on cytogenetics, from January 2010 through April 2023, and were treated across 5 geographically-diverse academic institutions. Pt clinical characteristics, cytogenetics, molecular mutations, treatment, relapse, and OS data were collected. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and OS were both analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: One-hundred forty-nine consecutive pts with CBF-AML were identified, 76 (51%) with inv(16) and 73 (49%) with t(8;21). Median age of pts was 47 years (yrs) (range 18-80yrs), with 64% male pts, and 106 (71%) pts had an ECOG performance status of 0-1. One-hundred seven (72%) pts identified as non-Hispanic White, 22 (15%) identified as non-Hispanic Black, and 12 (8%) identified as Hispanic. Molecular testing via next-generation sequencing was available for 124 pts (83%); 49 (33%) pts had adverse-risk ELN cytogenetics or mutations when excluding CBF status, and 27 (18%) pts harbored KIT mutations. Other baseline pt characteristics are listed in Table 1A. All pts underwent induction with IC; 44 (30%) pts received IC + GO, 21 (14%) received IC + KIT inhibitor (14 received dasatinib, 7 received midostaurin), and the remaining 84 (56%) received IC without a targeted agent. One-hundred fourteen (77%) pts achieved a complete response (CR) to induction therapy, and 1 pt experienced induction-related mortality. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) data was available in 82 pts at end of induction with 83% achieving FISH negativity. Measurable residual disease (MRD) testing was done by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 62 pts with 76% achieving MRD-negativity. One-hundred forty pts underwent consolidation with a median of 3 cycles of chemotherapy; 21 (15%) pts received GO with consolidation and 17 (12%) received a KIT inhibitor with consolidation. Forty-four (30%) pts underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), with 17 in first CR, and 27 after second-line or beyond therapy. With a median follow-up of 22.5 months, the observed 3-yr RFS was 51% (95% CI: 43-61%) and the 3-yr OS was 69% (95% CI: 61-78%). Pts treated with IC + KIT inhibitor had significantly improved 3-yr RFS of 85% (95% CI: 70-100%) compared to other pts, including those who received IC + GO who had a 3-yr RFS of 51% (95% CI: 37-70%) and those who received IC without targeted therapy who had a 3-yr RFS of 45% (95% CI: 35-58%) ( p = 0.02) ( Figure 1). Full survival statistics are shown in Table 1B and Figure 1. Conclusions: In this multi-center retrospective study of pts with CBF-AML undergoing induction with IC regimens with diverse national treatment practices, we find that the addition of GO to IC is not associated with improved outcomes. Pts treated with IC + KIT inhibitor had significantly improved RFS; of note, pts receiving a KIT inhibitor oftentimes continued on maintenance even after consolidation. These data suggest that there may be a role for targeted therapies other than GO to be explored in randomized prospective studies of intensive induction chemotherapy for CBF-AML.

Background and Significance: The rare nature and diagnostic difficulty associated with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) has limited the inclusion of patients (pts) with these diseases, other than chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), in relevant clinical trials. This has resulted in the complete lack of approved agents for the treatment of pts with non-CMML MDS/MPN. Moreover, ASTX727 (oral decitabine-cedazuridine) was approved for CMML based on a study of only 16 pts with CMML. A larger study of CMML and non-CMML MDS/MPN is needed. MDS/MPNs appear to be BCL2-dependent (Bogenberger et al., 2015; Jilg et al., 2016), but data for venetoclax combination therapy are derived from retrospective analyses of relapsed/refractory disease (Cortes et al. 2019; Hammond et al., 2020) or single-arm studies not dedicated to MDS/MPN (NCT04655755, Venugopal et al. 2021). Venetoclax exposures are not affected by coadministration of ASTX727 and predict responses similar to historical data (Mannis et al. 2021). Based on these promising early data and the critical need, we proposed a randomized study of ASTX727 alone or in combination with venetoclax for pts with MDS/MPN and >5% blasts. Study Design and Methods: This is a National Cancer Institute-sponsored, multi-center, international, randomized phase 2 study (NCT05600894, NCI 10538) designed to evaluate the efficacy of ASTX727 alone or in combination with venetoclax in pts with newly diagnosed MDS/MPN with >5% marrow blasts. Key eligibility criteria include allowing hydroxyurea cytoreduction to a WBC <10,000/mm 3 for proliferative disease and excluding pts with need for emergent disease-directed therapy as well as prior therapy for myeloid malignancy other than hydroxyurea or thrombopoietic/erythropoietin stimulating agents. Pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive either ASTX727 alone (Days 1-5) or in combination with venetoclax, initially administered with a 3-day dosing ramp-up and given for 14 days per 28-day cycle (Figure 1). Pts are stratified by disease subtype, specifically CMML and non-CMML MDS/MPN. The primary endpoint is the rate of complete remission (adapted from the MDS/MPN-specific response criteria developed by Savona et al. 2015). Secondary endpoints include the overall response rate, overall survival, progression-free survival, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation rate, clonality at time of hematologic remission, number of red cell and platelet transfusions required and toxicity of ASTX727 versus ASTX727 + venetoclax. Pts randomized to the ASTX727 monotherapy arm and without response after 4 cycles of therapy, or with progressive disease after an initial response, cross over to the ASTX727 + venetoclax arm. A futility analysis is planned for each cohort (first 18 and 13 pts in each treatment arm for the CMML and non-CMML cohorts, respectively). We assume that 85% and 90% of pts in the CMML and non-CMML MDS/MPN cohorts, respectively, randomized to the ASTX727 monotherapy arm will not achieve the primary endpoint and will cross over to the ASTX727 + venetoclax combination arm. The estimated accrual time of a total of 70 pts with CMML and 50 pts with non-CMML MDS/MPN will require about 2.9 and 2.1 years, respectively. Planned integrated studies include the use of an apoptosis multiplex immunoassay to evaluate how the addition of a BCL-2 inhibitor will influence the ability of ASTX727 to induce apoptosis and if particular thresholds of apoptosis are predictive of clinical response. Planned exploratory studies include the use of: 1) RNA-seq to evaluate if differences in baseline transcriptional programs appear to be predictive of response to ASTX727 and ASTX727+venetoclax, 2) next generation (Oncomine Comprehensive Assay (OCAv3)/whole exome sequencing to uncover biomarkers predictive of response/outcome, validate risk modeling to stratify these pts and detect/monitor measurable residual disease (MRD) on serial marrow samples that can predict depth of response with translation in improvement in event-based endpoints, and 3) circulating tumor DNA as a non-invasive means (i.e., without need for a marrow evaluation) of prospective MRD detection for prognostic use. This ongoing, randomized study may inform frontline therapeutic options, provide prospective data for venetoclax combination after HMA failure, and generate striking correlative science for pts with “high risk” MDS/MPN.

Introduction: MDS are primarily diseases of the elderly, with median age at diagnosis of 72 years. Focused data on clinical and molecular characteristics, as well as outcomes, in younger pts under age 60 years are limited. We conducted this multicenter retrospective study to describe pt characteristics, cytogenetic and molecular profiles, treatment modalities, and outcomes in younger pts with MDS, including adolescent and young adults (AYA). Methods: The study included pts diagnosed with MDS between 2002-2023 at 7 academic centers. We compared baseline characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of AYA (18-39 years) and younger adult (YA) pts (40-59 years). Responses were assessed using the modified IWG 2006 response criteria which included complete remission (CR), marrow CR (mCR), and hematologic improvement (HI). Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher's exact (and Chi-square) test were used to compare pt and disease characteristics for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. Results: A total of 173 pts were identified (AYA, N=50; YA, N=123). Median age at diagnosis was 50 years (range, 18-59), with 51% females. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Therapy-related MDS (t-MDS) was observed in 40 pts (23%) with the remaining classified as de novo MDS (N=133; 77%). Inherited bone marrow failure syndromes were documented in 15 pts (9%), with Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome (N=4) and Fanconi anemia (N=4) being the most frequent. Using the WHO 2016 classification, the most common subtypes of MDS in both the AYA and YA cohorts were MDS with multilineage dysplasia (38% vs 19%), MDS with excess blasts-2 (MDS-EB) (24% vs 29%), and MDS-EB-1 (16% vs 20%). Similarly, using the WHO 2022 classification, the most common subtypes were MDS with low blasts (50% vs 21%), MDS with increased blasts-2 (MDS-IB-2) (24% vs 24%), and MDS-IB-1 (16% vs 18%). Stratifying pts using the IPSS-R cytogenetic (CG) risk group, the most common CG risk category identified was good CG (34% vs 52%, p=0.012). Poor/very poor CG were present in 34% and 37% of the AYA and YA groups, respectively. STAG2 and NRAS mutations occurred more frequently in the AYA pts compared to the YA group, while the YA cohort was enriched for the following mutations: TP53, DNMT3A, SF3B1, SRSF2, and TET2 (Figure 1). In the AYA population, 18 pts (38%) had very low/low, 10 (21%) intermediate, and 20 pts (42%) had high/very high risk MDS using IPSS-R. In the YA population, 32 pts (26%) had very low/low, 32 (26%) intermediate, and 57 pts (47%) had high/very high risk MDS using IPSS-R. Twenty-seven percent of pts with very low to intermediate-risk MDS using IPSS-R were upstaged to moderate high to very high-risk MDS using IPSS-M. The majority of pts (AYA: 75%; YA: 63%, p=0.5) were transfusion independent at baseline. Single-agent hypomethylating agents were the most frequently used frontline therapy, used in 17 AYA pts (34%) and 58 YA pts (48%), with more AYA pts receiving upfront allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) compared to YA pts (28% vs 5%). After frontline therapy (Table 1), an additional 14 AYA (28%) and 52 YA (42%) pts received Allo-SCT. In pts with IPSS-R intermediate to very high-risk, response rates (HI+CR+mCR+mCR with HI) to frontline therapies were 46% and 54.5% in the AYA and YA groups, respectively. After median follow-up of 24 months [range, 1-218], median OS was numerically longer in the AYA versus YA group (155 vs 53 months, p=0.2). AML transformation occurred in 24% and 20% of the pts in the AYA and YA groups, respectively. Median OS was significantly longer in de novo compared to t-MDS pts (56 vs 27 months, p=0.03). Median OS among Allo-SCT compared to non-SCT pts were not reached vs 155 months ( p=0.9) in the AYA group and 53 vs 54 months ( p=0.4) in the YA group. IPSS-R (very low+low vs intermediate vs high+very high) was able to distinguish differences in OS in the YA (133 vs 53 vs 17 months, p=0.0002) and AYA (155 vs not reached vs 18 months, p=0.006) pts, with the exception of the intermediate-risk group in the AYA cohort. Conclusions: In this study, d e novoMDS was seen in the majority of younger pts with MDS (both AYA and YA). Mutations in STAG2 and NRAS were more common in the AYA pts, while YA pts had MDS more enriched for TP53, DNMT3A, TET2 and splicing mutations. This study is still ongoing with a plan to compare the abovementioned groups to older pts (≥60 years) with MDS.

Background With the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based therapy the outcome of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph +) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has significantly improved. Moreover, patients (pts) who achieved undetectable (u) BCR::ABL1 at 3 months (mo) from the time of initiating therapy, tend to have improved outcomes (Short et al. Blood 2016; 128 [4];504-507). We conducted a retrospective multicenter study to analyze the predictors of achieving uBCR::ABL1 in adult (> 18 years) Ph + ALL pts. Methods A total of 458 adult Ph + ALL pts from 10 US academic institutions, who were diagnosed between May 2003 and April 2023, were evaluated to assess the rates of uBCR::ABL1 at 3 mo after initiating therapy and factors that predict the achievement of molecular response. Continuous variables were summarized as median (range), while categorical variables were reported as frequency (percentage). Unadjusted comparisons of patient/ treatment related characteristics and molecular response were made using a non-parametric test (continuous variables) or Fisher's exact test (categorical variables). Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between molecular responses via the log-rank test. Results Baseline characteristics The median age of the pts was 53 years (range [R] 19-85), median white blood cell count (WBC) was 17.6 (10 9/L) (R, 1.2-571), 249 (55%) pts had additional cytogenetic (CG) abnormalities, 98 (22%) pts had p210 fusion protein, and 35 (8%) pts had CNS disease at diagnosis. A higher proportion of pts received TKI in combination with intensive chemotherapy (IC) (69%), than TKI + steroids (15%), TKI + low intensity chemotherapy (LC; combination of vincristine, steroids +/- rituximab) (9%), TKI + blinatumomab (3%) and IC without TKI (4%) during induction. During induction, the highest proportion of pts received 2 nd generation TKI combinations (67%; majority dasatinib 98%), compared to imatinib (19%) or ponatinib (10%): 4% of pts did not receive TKI with induction. The complete remission (CR) rate was 94%; measurable residual disease (MRD) negative by flow cytometry 51% (181/352 evaluable pts) and 58.5% (209/354 evaluable pts) of pts had uBCR::ABL1 by PCR at 3 mo from induction. A total of 212 (46%) pts received allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in CR1, among them 61% of pts received TKI maintenance post allo-HCT. Predictors of uBCR::ABL1 at 3 months Predictors for uBCR::ABL1 at 3 mo are summarized in Table 1. The proportion of pts with WBC > 100 (45% vs 60%, p= 0.04), p210 fusion protein (35% vs 85%, p= <0.001), additional CG abnormality with monosomy 7 (40% vs 61%, p= 0.03), additional somatic myeloid co-mutation (39% vs 61%, p= 0.09; 94 pts evaluable), received induction with steroid plus TKI (41% vs 63%, p= 0.002) or received imatinib based induction (47% vs 61%,p= 0.07) had inferior uBCR::ABL1 rates at 3 mo. Conversely pts who received ponatinib based induction had significantly better uBCR::ABL1 rates (79% vs 57%, p= 0.009). Survival The median relapse free survival (RFS) was 72.3 mo (95% CI; 50.1-94.4), RFS was numerically higher among pts who achieved uBCR::ABL1 at 3 mo but not statistically significant (84.2 mo vs 62.9 mo, p= 0.20). The median overall survival (OS) was 129.2 mo (95% CI; 81.2-177.2), OS was not significantly different among pts who achieved uBCR::ABL1 at 3 mo (129.2) versus no uBCR::ABL1 (not reached; 50% alive at 94 mo), p= 0.47. In sub-set analysis, among non-transplanted pts, RFS was not statistically significant between those who achieved uBCR::ABL1 vs those who did not (38.9 vs 22.0 mo, respectively p= 0.24). However, the median OS was significantly higher in pts who achieved uBCR::ABL1 at 3 mo compared to pts who did not achieve uBCR::ABL1 at 3 mo: 149.3 vs 77.5 mo, p= 0.04 ( Figure 1). Conclusion In this large multicenter study, we observed significantly inferior uBCR::ABL1 rates among pts with WBC > 100, p210 fusion protein, monosomy 7 CG abnormality, pts receiving induction with steroid plus TKI or imatinib based induction. Conversely, uBCR::ABL1 rates were significantly better in pts receiving ponatinib based induction therapy. Overall, we did not see significant impact of uBCR::ABL1 at 3 mo, on RFS or OS. It is likely subsequent therapies and allo-HCT abrogates the negative impact of not achieving uBCR::ABL1 at 3 mo. However, among non-transplanted pts achievement of uBCR::ABL1 at 3 mo showed a significantly improved OS.

Background TP53-mutated (m) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an adverse risk disease, which continues to have dismal outcome in the contemporary era of novel therapies. Venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMA; azacitidine or decitabine) have shown to improve complete remission (CR) rates compared to HMA alone, however no significant differences in overall survival (OS) have been observed. Methods We conducted a retrospective study through the COMMAND consortium (a collaboration of acute leukemia experts from 10 US academic institutions) to analyze the impact on survival outcomes of HMA plus (+) VEN compared to HMA-based therapies in adult (≥18 years) pts with TP53m AML. The AML Database of 381 pts with TP53m AML diagnosed between 2012-2022 was queried and 154 (40%) (HMA [n=50] and HMA +VEN [n=104]) pts were identified eligible for this analysis. Continuous variables were summarized as median (range) while categorical variables were reported as frequency (percentage). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS, defined as time from diagnosis to death or last follow-up. Logistic regression models were used to determine the univariate and multivariate of OS. Multivariable models included all significant univariate predictors. All tests were two-sided with a p value <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results Baseline characteristics and responses The median age (years [yrs]) was 74 (range [R], 38-87) and 71 (R,29-88) yrs in the HMAand HMA + VEN groups (gps) (p= 0.23), respectively ( Table 1). Thirty-four (68%) and 57 (55%) patients (pts) were ≥ 70 yrs in the HMA and HMA + VEN gps, respectively (p= 0.16). Twenty-six percent vs 31% ( p=0.57), 86% vs 90% ( p=0.58) and 68% vs 73% ( p=0.56) of pts had secondary AML, had complex cytogenetics (CG), and had multi-hit TP53m in the HMA and HMA + VEN gps, respectively. The proportion of pts with most frequently occurring (> 5%) myeloid co-mutations ( RUNX1, ASXL1, TET2, DNMT3A, RAS, PTPN11 and JAK2) were not significantly (NS) different between the HMA and HMA + VEN gps, as shown in Table 1. The early treatment related mortality in first 30 days of induction was higher in the HMA+VEN gp (25%) when compared with the HMA gp (6%), p=0.004. The complete remission rates (CR/CRi) were higher in the HMA + VEN gp compared to the HMA gp (35% vs 18%, p=0.05). Similarly, the proportion of pts receiving allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) after induction was higher in the HMA + VEN gp when compared with the HMA gp (13% vs 4%; p=0.14). Duration of response and overall survival The median follow up was 9.8 months (mo) (R, 1-56) and 5.80 mo (R, 1-30.4) in the HMA and HMA + VEN gps, respectively ( p=0.12). The median duration of response (DOR) was higher in the HMA +VEN gp (15.6 mo) when compared with the HMA gp (7.93 mo), but NS ( p=0.26). The median OS was NS different when comparing the HMA and HMA + VEN gps (9.23 vs 7.3 mo, p=0.80 [ Figure 1]). Multivariable analysis for duration of response and overall survival We did multivariable analysis (MVA) for DOR and OS using baseline variables ( Table 1) that showed significance/trend towards significance in univariate analysis ( p<0.1). Allo-HCT (HR; 0.11, 95% CI: 0.02-0.52, p=0.005) retained significance for better DOR, whereas age ≥ 70 yrs (HR; 1.7, 95% CI: 0.63-4.65, p=0.28) and complex CG (HR; 3.05, 95% CI: 0.79-11.73, p=0.10) did not retain significance in MVA. In MVA for OS, achievement of CR/CRi (HR; 0.35, 95% CI; 0.20-0.59, p=<0.001) and allo-HCT after induction (HR; 0.06, 95% CI; 0.09-0.46, p=0.007) retained favorable significance for OS, whereas complex CG (HR; 2.36, 95% CI: 1.11-4.99, p=0.02) retained significance for shorter OS. PTPN11m (HR; 1.57, 95%CI: 0.75-3.28, p=0.23) and TET2m (HR; 1.02, 95% CI: 0.56-1.87, p= 0.92) did not retain significance in MVA. Conclusion In this multi-center real-world study, while HMA+VEN led to improvement in CR rates and a higher proportion of pts were bridged to allo-HCT, it did not associate with an improvement in OS when compared with HMA monotherapy. More effective treatment strategies are warranted to improve outcome of pts with TP53m AML.