Markovic, Svetomir

e23269 Background: Most cases of malignant melanoma are cutaneous, with ≈50% having a BRAF driver mutation that predicts response to MAPK pathway inhibitors. A small minority of melanoma cases harbor an activating KIT mutation, most notably in mucosal and acral melanomas (15-20%) and occasionally in those arising from chronic sun-damaged skin (2-3%). Only about a third of KIT mutated melanomas respond to targeted therapy with Imatinib, yet data is scarce and limited, especially in older patients. We sought to characterize the efficacy and toxicity of Imatinib in KIT-mutated melanoma patients over 65. Methods: We identified electronic medical records of patients over 65 that were treated with Imatinib for KIT mutated melanoma at our institution over the years 2017-2023. Data was retrospectively collected including demographics, disease characteristics, response patterns and toxicity. Results: 10 patients were identified, 50% were males. The median age at treatment initiation was 75 years (71-100). 3 patients had cutaneous primary, 3 had Vulvar/vaginal primary, 3 had acral primary and 1 had anal canal primary. All patients had normal Lactate dehydrogenase at treatment initiation and ECOG performance status was 0-2 (median 0). 9 patients received Imatinib for stage IV disease with an overall response rate (ORR) of 55% (44% partial response, 11% complete response). Median duration of response was 4 months. Responses were seen in acral melanoma (67%), vulvar/vaginal melanoma (67%) and cutaneous melanoma (33%). Median Progression free survival was 4.3 months (1.8-44), median overall survival from treatment initiation was 22.6 months (4-64). 6 patients were treated as 2nd line with an ORR of 67% and 3 were treated as 3rd line with an ORR of 33%. There was one patient with M1d disease who did not respond to treatment either systematically or intracranially. 6 patients had Exon 11 mutations (V560D/G/E, N564S and L576P) of which 4 responded (67%). 2 had Exon 17 mutations (N822C/K) of which 1 responded (50%) and the 2 others had an Exon 14 (F681I) and Exon 13 (K642E) mutation that did not respond to treatment at all. Toxicity was moderate with 90% of patients experiencing any grade AE, yet only 1 experienced toxicity requiring dose interruption with two Grade 3 toxicities - Pneumonitis and decreased neutrophil count, leading to temporary treatment interruption, dose reduction and a course of corticosteroids. The rest of the patients experienced only Grade 1-2 toxicity. 4 patients needed dose reductions, there were no treatment discontinuations due to toxicity. Conclusions: Treatment with Imatinib for elderly KIT mutated melanoma patients is safe and well tolerated with no treatment discontinuations recorded. The response rate is encouraging yet seems to vary according to the KIT mutation present as previously reported. The duration of response is usually short-lived and alternative/combination treatments are still needed for this patient population.

Abstract Oncologic viruses (OV) can induce tumor death through both direct oncolysis and immune-mediated destruction. Our study investigates the use of a novel OV with a Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV) vector modified to express interferon-beta (IFN-b) and Tyrosinase Related Protein 1 (TYRP1) (VSV-IFNb-TYRP1). VSV is an attractive vector since humans are not naturally infected with VSV; thus, pre-existing immunity is minimal. IFN-b leads to increased T-cell responses and tumor cell apoptosis, while TYRP1, a melanocyte differentiation antigen, increases immunogenicity of the therapy. We conducted a Phase 1 clinical trial with a 3+3 design in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. VSV-IFNb-TYRP1 was injected into a liver metastasis under image guidance, then administered on the same day as a single intravenous (IV) infusion. IV doses started at dose level (DL) 1 1 × 1010 TCID50, then escalated to DL2 3 × 10 10, DL3 1 × 1011, and DL4 3 × 1011. The dose delivered intratumorally (IT) varied based on the IV dose. The primary endpoints were safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Efficacy was a secondary endpoint. Correlative studies focused on understanding viral pharmacokinetics (PK) and immunological responses induced by VSV-IFNb-TYRP1 therapy. Twelve patients with previously treated metastatic uveal melanoma were enrolled. Median follow up was 19.1 months. Four DLs were evaluated with one patient at DL4 experiencing dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), including decreased platelet count (grade 3), increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Non-DLTs at DL4 were fatigue, fever, CRS, hematological toxicities (decreased platelets and lymphocytes), and AST elevation. Four patients had stable disease (SD) and 8 had progressive disease (PD) as their best response. ELIspot data show that three of the four patients with response to TYRP1 also had a response to gp100, suggesting possible epitope spreading. These four patients received immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment as the next line of therapy, which led to clinical benefit for two patients. Our study evaluated VSV-IFNb-TYRP1 administered via IT and IV routes in a previously treated population of metastatic uveal melanoma patients and found no major safety events. Although there were no clear objective responses to VSV-IFNb-TYRP1, dose-dependent immunogenicity to melanoma antigens was seen. While OV response alone is not sufficient for clinical benefit, the evidence of epitope spreading is encouraging. Future studies of VSV-IFNb-TYRP1 will evaluate combinations with other therapies. Citation Format: Katherine E. Smith, Adam Weisbrod, Carrie Strand, Jacob Allerd, Jose S. Pulido, Alysha Newsom, Lianwen Zhang, Nandakumar Packiriswamy, Heather Montane, Lisa Kottschade, Anastasios Dimou, Yiyi Yan, Markovic Svetomir, Kah Whye Peng, Richard G. Vile, Matthew S. Block, Roxana S. Dronca. Phase I trial of vesicular stomatitis virus expressing human interferon beta and tyrosinase related protein 1 (VSV-IFNb-TYRP1) in metastatic ocular melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT207.

Abstract Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) have a median survival of 15 months despite aggressive treatment. Immunosuppressive monocytes are heavily infiltrated in these tumors and in patients’ circulation. Treatment-related pseudo-progression confounds outcome assessment by MRI. Thus, there is a need for additional non-invasive methods to assess treatment response. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) contain tumor-specific microRNA (miRNA) cargo that could serve as a liquid biopsy to distinguish true progression from treatment-related pseudo-progression. We had found significant differences in plasma EVs molecular profile (i.e. miRNA signatures) between GBM patients and healthy donors. Our overall hypothesis is that these differences reflect the EVs cell of origin. Our goal in this project was to develop a fluorescent staining paradigm by flow cytometry to distinguish EVs from different cells in vitro and determine differences in EV miRNA expression profile between GBM and monocytic cell-derived EVs. Gleolan (5-ALA) is an FDA-approved orally available agent for fluorescence-guided resection of GBM tumors. It is metabolized to protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) in GBM cells but not in non-neoplastic cells and has been reported to aid in the detection of GBM-derived EVs by flow cytometry. However, distinguishing between GBM-derived EVs and EVs from other cells of origin has not been described. We co-cultured human GBM cells (dBT114 or dBT116) and CD14+ monocytes for 72 hours in the presence or absence of 5-ALA. EVs were isolated by ultracentrifugation and stained for CD11b (myeloid cell marker). ImageStream Imaging Flow Cytometry was performed showing clear differentiation between PpIX+ EVs from GBM cells and CD11b+ EVs from monocytes. Interestingly, a small number of double-positive EVs (presumably representing monocyte-derived EVs that had taken up PpIX after phagocytizing GBM cells) were also present. Taken together, we were able to optimize a technique to distinguish EVs originating from GBM and monocytes for further characterization by short non-coding RNA sequencing.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and lethal primary brain tumor, and novel therapeutic strategies that make a substantial impact on outcomes are sorely needed. Immunotherapies have shown great promise in the treatment of a number of cancers in recent year, and a concerted effort is being made to apply these treatment paradigms to GBM. However, many GBM patients exhibit profound immunosuppression, likely limiting the efficacy of such approaches. The mechanisms of this immunosuppression are poorly understood, but tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs), may play a role. We demonstrate that GBM-derived EVs induce the development of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and non-classical monocytes (NCMs). We further demonstrate that these EV-induced monocytic cells are immunosuppressive, resulting in impaired T cell proliferation upon co-culture. We found that the immunosuppressive effects of tumor-derived EVs appear to be driven by the induction of these immunosuppressive monocytes, as EV treatment of T cells did not significantly impact T cell proliferation. Further, we sought to characterize the important of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in the induction of these immunosuppressive monocyte populations. We found PD-L1 to be expressed in the EVs from GBM cell lines, and that modulation in PD-L1 expression via either constitutive overexpression or shRNA-mediated knockdown resulted in concordant changes in expression in tumor-derived EVs. We demonstrate that PD-L1 is important for the induction of NCM but not for MDSCs. Taken together, these findings point to a significant role for tumor-derived EVs in the induction of immunosuppressive monocytes in GBM, and that these cells may be a driving force of systemic immunosuppression. PD-L1 is one factor expressed in EVs that has immunomodulatory properties, but additional EV cargo likely plays a major role in the induction of immunosuppressive cells.