Jones, Clarence

Background: Increased arterial stiffness, a marker of cardiovascular disease (CVD), is prevalent among African American (AA) adults and contributes to persistent CVD disparities. The Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) is a validated measure of arterial stiffness and predictor of adverse CVD outcomes. However, its relationship with the novel American Heart Association’s Life’s Essential 8 (LE8) cardiovascular health (CVH) construct has not been examined among AAs. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that increased arterial stiffness would be associated with lower CVH among AA adults. Methods: We analyzed baseline data from AA adults in the Techquity by FAITH! Trial, a 2-arm cluster randomized controlled trial conducted across 18 AA churches in Rochester and Minneapolis–St. Paul, Minnesota. Eligible participants (age ≥18 years with suboptimal diet or physical activity [PA]) completed validated electronic surveys (e.g., PA patterns) and clinical assessments (e.g., blood pressure [BP], lipids). CAVI was summarized as mean and categorized as normal (<8), borderline (8 to <9), or abnormal (≥9). CVH was assessed using the LE8 score (range 0-100 points) and categorized as low (<50), moderate (50-79), or high (≥80). Associations between CAVI and LE8 were assessed using multivariable linear regression adjusted for age, sex, and income (continuous) and Fisher’s exact test (categorical). LE8 components were compared across CAVI categories using Kruskal–Wallis tests. Results: Among 140 participants (mean age 53.0 years [SD 14.6]; 68% female), the mean LE8 score was 62.7 (SD 14.0). Nicotine exposure LE8 score was the highest (84.6 [SD 26.6]) and diet was the lowest (40.7 [SD 13.7]). Mean CAVI was 7.9 (SD 1.5), with 50% of participants classified as normal, 22% borderline, and 28% abnormal. No association between continuous CAVI and LE8 scores was observed after adjustment (unadjusted R 2 = 3.5%). All participants with high LE8 had normal CAVI, while abnormal CAVI was more prevalent among those with low (40%) and moderate (30%) LE8 scores (p<0.001). LE8 scores differed across CAVI categories for BP (median 50 in normal CAVI vs 30 in borderline/abnormal CAVI; p=0.003) and glucose LE8 scores (median 100 vs 60; p=0.014). Conclusions: Greater arterial stiffness was associated with lower CVH categories, with notable component-level differences in BP and glucose. Although not independently associated with overall LE8, integrating CAVI and LE8 categories may improve CVD risk stratification among AAs.

The FAITH! (Fostering African-American Improvement in Total Health) Cardiovascular Health and Wellness Program is more than a decade-long community-based participatory research initiative aimed at addressing cardiovascular health disparities among African-Americans in Minnesota. Founded in 2013, the program employs a culturally tailored, community-driven approach by partnering with African-American faith communities to promote cardiovascular health through education, digital health tools, and multilevel interventions targeting the social determinants of health. Grounded in community-based participatory research principles, FAITH! prioritizes equitable academic-community partnerships, co-learning, community capacity building, and shared ownership in all aspects of research and implementation. The program’s exemplary innovations include the NIH-funded FAITH! Trial, a randomized clinical trial, testing a mobile health intervention (the FAITH! App) co-created with the African-American community, and the Techquity by FAITH! study. Techquity by FAITH! evaluates the effectiveness of a culturally relevant, community-informed mHealth intervention supported by a Digital Health Advocate network to improve overall cardiovascular health and digital health literacy. During its evolution, FAITH! has addressed emergent public health crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic, by adapting programming to provide emergency preparedness resources, health education, and vaccine outreach. Key outcomes include sustainable church-based health ministries, increased research participation, and successful translation of research into practice. The program has also contributed to research workforce development by mentoring and training diverse early-career scholars and community leaders in community-based participatory research and cardiovascular health equity research. Lessons learned highlight the transformative impact of community-based participatory research in building trust, facilitating culturally relevant dissemination, and sustaining health equity initiatives. The FAITH! model demonstrates a scalable, community-led strategy for advancing cardiovascular health in underserved populations and provides a blueprint for future initiatives aiming to reduce racial health disparities.

AbstractBackgroundThe higher prevalence and incidence of later life dementia among older Black Americans compared to older White Americans is incompletely understood and understudied. HATS is designed as a companion to the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) with a focus on identification of modifiable cardiovascular contributions to brain health among Black older adults living in urban areas in the upper Midwest.MethodHATS is enrolling 300 U.S. Black Minnesotans from the Twin Cities area aged 55 to 90 years without advanced dementia. Enrollment started 4/2023 and is expected to be complete by the end of 2025. Recruitment is primarily community‐based, led by two community engagement partners, the Linc and the Hue‐MAN Partnership. Electronic health record‐based recruitment will begin in 2024. Data collection includes medical comorbidities, structural and social determinants of health, cardiovascular health, functional status, physical performance, specific and non‐specific blood‐based biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease, and comprehensive assessment of cognitive and neuropsychiatric status. Brain MRIs will be obtained on a subset of participants. A core component of HATS is distribution of meaningful health information back to participants and their community, guided by input from the HATS community engagement partners. The HATS cohort will serve as an initial effort to develop age and education adjusted normative cognitive test data for urban Black older adults in the upper Midwest.ResultAs of January 22 2024, HATS has enrolled 40 participants with a mean age of 70 years (range 51‐90) and mean education of 15 years. Mean informant‐reported Everyday Cognition scale‐12 score is 1.1 (range 1‐1.7), mean Short Test of Mental Status (STMS) score is 31 (range 24‐37), and CDR sum of boxes scores range from 0‐4 consistent with enrollment of participants with normal and mildly impaired cognition.ConclusionHATS is a novel longitudinal cohort study that is well‐positioned to advance understanding of risk factors for dementia among Black Americans living in urban areas in the upper Midwest. Recruitment is ongoing with a focus on enrolling older adults with a wide range of cognitive function. Ongoing community engagement is a central feature of HATS.

Abstract Background African-American (AA) women are less likely to achieve ideal cardiovascular (CV) health compared with women of other racial/ethnic subgroups, primarily due to structural and psychosocial barriers. A potential psychosocial construct relevant to ideal CV health is the superwoman schema (SWS). Purpose We explored whether the SWS was associated with perceived stress, CV risk factors, and overall CV health among AA women. Methods This cross-sectional analysis of the FAITH! Heart Health+ Study was conducted among AA women with high cardiometabolic risk. Pearson correlation evaluated associations between SWS and CV risk factors (e.g., stress, hypertension, diabetes, etc.). The 35-item SWS questionnaire includes five domains. Stress was measured by the 8-item Global Perceived Stress Scale (GPSS). CV health was assessed using the American Heart Association Life’s Simple 7 (LS7) rubric of health behaviors/biometrics. Data acquisition spanned from February to August 2022. Results The 38 women included in the analysis (mean age 54.3 [SD 11.5] years) had a high CV risk factor burden (71.1% hypertension, 76.3% overweight/obesity, 28.9% diabetes, 39.5% hyperlipidemia). Mean GPSS level was 7.7 (SD 5.2), CV health score 6.7 (SD 1.8), and SWS score 60.3 (SD 18.0). Feeling an “obligation to help others” and “obligation to present an image of strength” had strongest correlations with GPSS score among all SWS domains (r = 0.51; p = .002 and r = 0.39; p = .02, respectively). Correlation among the SWS domains and traditional CV risk factors was not statistically significant. Conclusion Our findings suggest that an obligation to help others and to project an image of strength could be contributing to stress among AA women.

Abstract Background Despite advances in cardiovascular (CV) care, African American adults experience worse CV disease (CVD) outcomes than White adults, warranting the investigation of CVD prediction biomarkers. Plasma ceramides are bioactive lipids that are biomarkers of adverse cardiovascular risk for both primary and secondary prevention. However, racial/ethnic differences in ceramide levels and their link to CV health (CVH) in African American adults remain underexplored. Purpose This study aimed to: 1) assess the association between ceramide scores and CVH and atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) risk among African American adults and 2) compare ceramide scores between African American and White adults. Methods Health surveys and ceramides measurements were conducted for African American and White adults, both recruited from population-based observational study cohorts. Ten-year pooled cohort risk ASCVD scores were calculated based on American College of Cardiology guidelines. CVH was assessed using Life’s Essential 8 (LE8) scores, as per American Heart Association rubrics. CV risk factors in the two cohorts were compared using Chi-squared tests. Linear regression and Pearson correlation assessed the association between ceramide, LE8, and ASCVD risk scores. Linear regression, adjusted for age and sex, compared ASCVD risk and ceramide scores between the two cohorts. Results In total, 58 African American (mean age [SD] 54.5 [11.9] years, 67.9% women) and 1103 White (mean age [SD] 64.5 [11.9] years, 52.1% women) adults were included (Table 1). Compared to White adults, African American adults had a higher prevalence of overweight/obesity (92.9% vs 33.6%; p&lt;0.001), hypertension (69.6% vs 42.5%; p&lt;0.001), diabetes (30.4% vs 12.2%; p&lt;0.001), and hyperlipidaemia (42.9% vs 30.0%; p=0.03). No difference in mean ASCVD risk was observed between the African American (12.8% [SD 10.4]) and White (12.6% [SD 11.1]) cohorts (p= 0.91). African American adults had lower 18:0 (0.08 [0.03] vs 0.10 [0.04] μmol/L) and 24:1 (0.91 [0.31] vs 1.17 [0.33] μmol/L) ceramides compared to White adults (p&lt;0.001). Ceramide scores among African American adults were not associated with LE8 scores (p=0.077) or ASCVD risk scores (r=-0.12, p=0.428). Adjusting for age and sex, African American adults had lower ceramide scores compared to White adults (mean [SD] 1.90 [1.97] vs 3.48 [2.88], p=0.006). Conclusions In our study comparing African American and White adults in the community, the association observed between ceramide scores and CVH or ASCVD risk scores in the African American cohort did not reach statistical significance. Interestingly, despite a more suboptimal cardiometabolic profile, African American adults had lower ceramide scores compared to White adults. Our findings suggest that ceramide profiles may not accurately reflect cardiovascular risk in African American adults, warranting further exploration of alternative sphingolipid biomarkers of risk for this population.

Background: Physical inactivity and poor adherence to healthy eating guidelines impact cardiovascular health (CVH) outcomes in African American (AAs). Our randomized controlled trial (RCT) testing the FAITH! App, an mHealth lifestyle intervention, showed efficacy in promoting ideal CVH, particularly diet and physical activity (PA) among AAs, warranting exploration of underlying factors. Psychosocial factors (e.g., self-regulation, self-efficacy, social support) are key to healthy behavior adoption. Hypothesis: The intervention group would have greater improvements in diet and PA-related psychosocial factors than the control group after using the FAITH! App. Methods: A 2-arm cluster RCT was conducted among AAs from 16 churches in Minnesota comparing the FAITH! App intervention to a delayed intervention control group. The FAITH! App included culturally relevant, CVH-focused education modules, diet/PA self-monitoring and a sharing board. The outcomes were change in diet and PA self-regulation and self-efficacy (primary) and social support and barriers (secondary) at 6 months post-intervention. The intervention effect was assessed using linear regression. Results: Sixty-eight participants were included (71% female; mean age [SD]: 54.7 [12.6] years) ( Table 1 ). The intervention group showed a significantly greater increase in diet self-regulation [planning/tracking nutrition] (+0.66, p<.03) and PA self-regulation [step count strategies] (+0.47, p=.003) than the control group. Within groups, the intervention group demonstrated significant improvements across diet and PA self-regulation measures, while the control group showed an improvement only in fruit/vegetable and grain intake. No effect was observed in self-efficacy, social support, or barriers. Conclusions: Our culturally tailored mHealth lifestyle intervention was associated with notable increases in diet and PA self-regulation, suggesting a potential mechanism by which the FAITH! App improves healthy eating and PA among AAs.

Background Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) is a measure of arterial stiffness associated with cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality. African American (AA) adults have a higher prevalence of CV risk factors (RFs) and adverse social determinants of health (SDOH) leading to a higher CV mortality risk than White adults. These disparities may be associated with arterial stiffness, however limited research exists on the association of CV RFs, SDOH, and CAVI among AAs. Hypotheses We hypothesized that CV RFs (eg, diabetes) and SDOH (eg, income) would be associated with CAVI among AA adults. Our secondary hypothesis was that AA adults would have a higher prevalence of abnormal CAVI scores (≥8.0) than White adults. Methods In the FAITH! HH+ study, CAVI measurements, CV RFs, and SDOH surveys were obtained. We collected CAVI readings and CV RFs from a secondary cohort of White adults (n=600), referred for echocardiography and without structural cardiac disease. The association of CV RFs, SDOH and CAVI scores among AAs was assessed via ANOVA and univariable linear regression. We compared CV RFs among both cohorts using Chi-squared tests and ANOVA, followed by comparing CAVI scores between cohorts using a multivariable linear regression model. Results In total, 48 AAs were included from the FAITH! HH+ cohort (mean age [SD]: 54.2 [11.5] years, 67.4% women). There was no significant association between CV RFs or SDOH with CAVI scores. In the 600 White adults assessed, mean age was 59.5 [14.7] years and 45.7% were women. Compared to White adults, AA participants had a lower burden of hyperlipidemia (43.5% vs 61.4%; p=0.017), but a higher burden of hypertension (73.9% vs 57.7%; p=0.031), diabetes (28.3% vs 9.3%; p<0.001), and obesity (71.7% obese vs 36.0%; p<0.001). There was no significant difference in CAVI scores between groups when adjusted for age, sex, and CV RFs (AA cohort: mean: 8.0 [1.4] vs White cohort: 8.4 [1.5]; p=0.790). Conclusions In this pilot study, SDOH and CV RFs were not associated with CAVI scores among AAs. There was no significant difference in CAVI scores between AA and White adults, despite a significantly higher burden of CV RFs in the AA cohort. Further studies are warranted to identify factors linked with onset and progression of arterial stiffness among AAs.

Background: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the United States is high, with at least 63 million unvaccinated individuals to date. Socioeconomically disadvantaged populations experience lower COVID-19 vaccination rates despite facing a disproportionate COVID-19 burden. Objective: To assess the factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among under-resourced, adult patients. Methods: Participants were patients receiving care at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in St. Paul, Minnesota. Data were collected via multiple modes over 2 phases in 2020 (self-administered electronic survey) and 2021 (study team-administered survey by telephone, self-administered written survey) to promote diversity and inclusion for study participation. The primary outcome was COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Using logistic regression analysis, associations between vaccine acceptance and factors including risk perception, concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine, social determinants of health (SDOH), co-morbidities, pandemic-induced hardships, and stress were assessed by adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: One hundred sixty-eight patients (62.5% female; mean age [SD]: 49.9 [17.4] years; 32% <$20 000 annual household income; 69% <college education) were included in the study. Sixty-one percent of the patients received or were willing to receive the vaccine. Risk perception was positively associated with vaccine acceptance (AOR: 5.3; 95% CI: 2.5, 11.5, P < .001), while concerns about the vaccine (eg, safety, side effects, rapid development of the vaccine, etc.) were negatively associated with vaccine acceptance (all P < .001). SDOH, co-morbidities, pandemic-induced hardships were not associated with vaccine acceptance. Conclusions: Our study in a socioeconomically disadvantaged population suggests that risk perception is associated with an increased likelihood of vaccine acceptance, while concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine are associated with a lower likelihood of vaccine acceptance. As these factors could impact vaccine uptake, consistent, innovative, and context-specific risk communication strategies may improve vaccine coverage in this population.

African American (AA) churches are valuable partners in implementing health promotion programming (HPP) to combat health disparities. The study purpose was to evaluate AA church characteristics associated with enrollment into the FAITH! (Fostering African American Improvement in Total Health) Trial, a community-based, cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a mobile health intervention for cardiovascular health promotion among AA churches. Churches located in Minneapolis-St. Paul and Rochester, Minnesota were invited to complete an electronic screening survey and follow-up telephone interview including the PREACH (Predicting Readiness to Engage African American Churches in Health) tool to assess church characteristics and infrastructure for HPP. The primary outcome was church enrollment in the FAITH! Trial. Key predictors included overall PREACH scores and its subscales (Personnel, Physical Structure, Faith-based Approach, Funding), congregation size, and mean congregation member age. Of the 26 churches screened, 16 (61.5%) enrolled in the trial. The enrolled churches had higher overall mean PREACH scores (36.1 vs. 30.2) and subscales for Personnel (8.8 vs. 5.6), Faith-based Approach (11.0 vs. 9.6), and Funding (7.3 vs. 4.8) compared with non-enrolled churches; all differences were not statistically significant due to small sample size. Twelve (75.0%) of the enrolled churches had >75 members versus six (60.0%) of the non-enrolled churches. Twelve (80.0%) of the enrolled churches had an average congregation member age ≤54 years versus six (67.0%) of the non-enrolled churches. AA churches enrolling into a community-based RCT reported greater infrastructure for HPP, larger congregations, and members of younger age. These characteristics may be helpful to consider among researchers partnering with AA churches for HPP studies.

Background: African Americans continue to have suboptimal cardiovascular health (CVH) based on the American Heart Association Life’s Simple 7 (LS7), 7 health-promoting behaviors and biological risk factors (eg, physical activity, blood pressure). Innovative, community-level interventions in partnership with trusted institutions such as African American churches are potential means to improve CVH in this population. Methods: Using a community-based participatory research approach, the FAITH! Trial (Fostering African American Improvement in Total Health) rigorously assessed the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a refined, community-informed, mobile health intervention (FAITH! App) for promoting CVH among African Americans in faith communities using a cluster randomized controlled trial. Participants from 16 churches in Rochester and Minneapolis-St Paul, MN, were randomized to receive the FAITH! App (immediate intervention) or were assigned to a delayed intervention comparator group. The 10-week intervention core features included culturally relevant and LS7-focused education modules, diet/physical activity self-monitoring, and a group sharing board. Data were collected via electronic surveys and health assessments. Primary outcomes were average change in mean LS7 score (continuous measure of CVH ranging from poor to ideal [0–14 points]) from baseline to 6 months post-intervention (using generalized estimating equations) and app engagement/usability (by the Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale; range, 0–5). Results: Of 85 enrolled participants (randomized to immediate [N=41] and delayed [control] intervention [N=44] groups), 76 and 68 completed surveys/health assessments at baseline and 6 months post-intervention, respectively (80% retention rate with assessments at both baseline and 6-month time points); immediate intervention [N=30] and control [N=38] groups). At baseline, the majority of participants (mean age [SD], 54.2 [12.3] years, 71% female) had <4-year college education level (39/66, 59%) and poor CVH (44% in poor category; mean LS7 score [SD], 6.8 [1.9]). The mean LS7 score of the intervention group increased by 1.9 (SD 1.9) points compared with 0.7 (SD 1.7) point in the control group (both P <0.0001) at 6 months. The estimated difference of this increase between the groups was 1.1 (95% CI, 0.6–1.7; P <0.0001). App engagement/usability was overall high (100% connection to app; >75% completed weekly diet/physical activity tracking; Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale, mean [SD], 4.2 [0.7]). Conclusions: On the basis of preliminary findings, the refined FAITH! App appears to be an efficacious mobile health tool to promote ideal CVH among African Americans. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03777709.