Gayther, Simon A.

Thymidylate synthase (TYMS) is a crucial enzyme for DNA synthesis. TYMS expression is regulated by its antisense mRNA, ENOSF1. Disrupted regulation may promote uncontrolled DNA synthesis and tumor growth. We sought to replicate our previously reported association between rs495139 in the TYMS-ENOSF1 3′ gene region and increased risk of mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) in an independent sample. Genotypes from 24,351 controls to 15,000 women with invasive OC, including 665 MOC, were available. We estimated per-allele odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using unconditional logistic regression, and meta-analysis when combining these data with our previous report. The association between rs495139 and MOC was not significant in the independent sample (OR = 1.09; 95% CI = 0.97–1.22; p = 0.15; N = 665 cases). Meta-analysis suggested a weak association (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.03–1.24; p = 0.01; N = 1019 cases). No significant association with risk of other OC histologic types was observed (p = 0.05 for tumor heterogeneity). In expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis, the rs495139 allele was positively associated with ENOSF1 mRNA expression in normal tissues of the gastrointestinal system, particularly esophageal mucosa (r = 0.51, p = 1.7 × 10−28), and nonsignificantly in five MOC tumors. The association results, along with inconclusive tumor eQTL findings, suggest that a true effect of rs495139 might be small.

AbstractWe aimed to validate the prognostic association of p16 expression in ovarian high‐grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) and to explore it in other ovarian carcinoma histotypes. p16 protein expression was assessed by clinical‐grade immunohistochemistry in 6525 ovarian carcinomas including 4334 HGSC using tissue microarrays from 24 studies participating in the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. p16 expression patterns were interpreted as abnormal (either overexpression referred to as block expression or absence) or normal (heterogeneous). CDKN2A (which encodes p16) mRNA expression was also analyzed in a subset (n = 2280) mostly representing HGSC (n = 2010). Association of p16 expression with overall survival (OS) was determined within histotypes as was CDKN2A expression for HGSC only. p16 block expression was most frequent in HGSC (56%) but neither protein nor mRNA expression was associated with OS. However, relative to heterogeneous expression, block expression was associated with shorter OS in endometriosis‐associated carcinomas, clear cell [hazard ratio (HR): 2.02, 95% confidence (CI) 1.47–2.77, p < 0.001] and endometrioid (HR: 1.88, 95% CI 1.30–2.75, p = 0.004), while absence was associated with shorter OS in low‐grade serous carcinomas (HR: 2.95, 95% CI 1.61–5.38, p = 0.001). Absence was most frequent in mucinous carcinoma (50%), and was not associated with OS in this histotype. The prognostic value of p16 expression is histotype‐specific and pattern dependent. We provide definitive evidence against an association of p16 expression with survival in ovarian HGSC as previously suggested. Block expression of p16 in clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma should be further validated as a prognostic marker, and absence in low‐grade serous carcinoma justifies CDK4 inhibition.

Abstract Large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified approximately 35 loci associated with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk. The majority of GWAS-identified disease susceptibility variants are located in noncoding regions, and causal genes underlying these associations remain largely unknown. Here, we performed a transcriptome-wide association study to search for novel genetic loci and plausible causal genes at known GWAS loci. We used RNA sequencing data (68 normal ovarian tissue samples from 68 individuals and 6,124 cross-tissue samples from 369 individuals) and high-density genotyping data from European descendants of the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx V6) project to build ovarian and cross-tissue models of genetically regulated expression using elastic net methods. We evaluated 17,121 genes for their cis-predicted gene expression in relation to EOC risk using summary statistics data from GWAS of 97,898 women, including 29,396 EOC cases. With a Bonferroni-corrected significance level of P &lt; 2.2 × 10−6, we identified 35 genes, including FZD4 at 11q14.2 (Z = 5.08, P = 3.83 × 10−7, the cross-tissue model; 1 Mb away from any GWAS-identified EOC risk variant), a potential novel locus for EOC risk. All other 34 significantly associated genes were located within 1 Mb of known GWAS-identified loci, including 23 genes at 6 loci not previously linked to EOC risk. Upon conditioning on nearby known EOC GWAS-identified variants, the associations for 31 genes disappeared and three genes remained (P &lt; 1.47 × 10−3). These data identify one novel locus (FZD4) and 34 genes at 13 known EOC risk loci associated with EOC risk, providing new insights into EOC carcinogenesis. Significance: Transcriptomic analysis of a large cohort confirms earlier GWAS loci and reveals FZD4 as a novel locus associated with EOC risk. Cancer Res; 78(18); 5419–30. ©2018 AACR.

Abstract Background: Endometrioid carcinoma (EC) and clear cell carcinoma (CC) histotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer are understudied compared with the more common high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC). We therefore sought to characterize EC and CC transcriptomes in relation to HGSC. Methods: Following bioinformatics processing and gene abundance normalization, differential expression analysis of RNA sequence data collected on fresh-frozen tumors was completed with nonparametric statistical analysis methods (55 ECs, 19 CCs, 112 HGSCs). Association of gene expression with progression-free survival (PFS) was completed with Cox proportional hazards models. Eight additional multi-histotype expression array datasets (N = 852 patients) were used for replication. Results: In the discovery set, tumors generally clustered together by histotype. Thirty-two protein-coding genes were differentially expressed across histotype (P &lt; 1 × 10−10) and showed similar associations in replication datasets, including MAP2K6, KIAA1324, CDH1, ENTPD5, LAMB1, and DRAM1. Nine genes associated with PFS (P &lt; 0.0001) showed similar associations in replication datasets. In particular, we observed shorter PFS time for CC and EC patients with high gene expression for CCNB2, CORO2A, CSNK1G1, FRMD8, LIN54, LINC00664, PDK1, and PEX6, whereas, the converse was observed for HGSC patients. Conclusions: The results suggest important histotype differences that may aid in the development of treatment options, particularly those for patients with EC or CC. Impact: We present replicated findings on transcriptomic differences and how they relate to clinical outcome for two of the rarer ovarian cancer histotypes of EC and CC, along with comparison with the common histotype of HGSC. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 27(9); 1101–9. ©2018 AACR.

ABSTRACTX‐chromosome inactivation (XCI) epigenetically silences transcription of an X chromosome in females; patterns of XCI are thought to be aberrant in women's cancers, but are understudied due to statistical challenges. We develop a two‐stage statistical framework to assess skewed XCI and evaluate gene‐level patterns of XCI for an individual sample by integration of RNA sequence, copy number alteration, and genotype data. Our method relies on allele‐specific expression (ASE) to directly measure XCI and does not rely on male samples or paired normal tissue for comparison. We model ASE using a two‐component mixture of beta distributions, allowing estimation for a given sample of the degree of skewness (based on a composite likelihood ratio test) and the posterior probability that a given gene escapes XCI (using a Bayesian beta‐binomial mixture model). To illustrate the utility of our approach, we applied these methods to data from tumors of ovarian cancer patients. Among 99 patients, 45 tumors were informative for analysis and showed evidence of XCI skewed toward a particular parental chromosome. For 397 X‐linked genes, we observed tumor XCI patterns largely consistent with previously identified consensus states based on multiple normal tissue types. However, 37 genes differed in XCI state between ovarian tumors and the consensus state; 17 genes aberrantly escaped XCI in ovarian tumors (including many oncogenes), whereas 20 genes were unexpectedly inactivated in ovarian tumors (including many tumor suppressor genes). These results provide evidence of the importance of XCI in ovarian cancer and demonstrate the utility of our two‐stage analysis.

Abstract Background: Comorbidities can affect survival of ovarian cancer patients by influencing treatment efficacy. However, little evidence exists on the association between individual concurrent comorbidities and prognosis in ovarian cancer patients. Methods: Among patients diagnosed with invasive ovarian carcinoma who participated in 23 studies included in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, we explored associations between histories of endometriosis; asthma; depression; osteoporosis; and autoimmune, gallbladder, kidney, liver, and neurological diseases and overall and progression-free survival. Using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for age at diagnosis, stage of disease, histology, and study site, we estimated pooled HRs and 95% confidence intervals to assess associations between each comorbidity and ovarian cancer outcomes. Results: None of the comorbidities were associated with ovarian cancer outcome in the overall sample nor in strata defined by histologic subtype, weight status, age at diagnosis, or stage of disease (local/regional vs. advanced). Conclusions: Histories of endometriosis; asthma; depression; osteoporosis; and autoimmune, gallbladder, kidney, liver, or neurologic diseases were not associated with ovarian cancer overall or progression-free survival. Impact: These previously diagnosed chronic diseases do not appear to affect ovarian cancer prognosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(9); 1470–3. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract Introduction: In females, X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) epigenetically silences transcription of one copy of the X chromosome. Which chromosome is silenced is randomly selected, and is tissue- and cell-specific. While some genes are known to escape XCI under normal conditions, aberrant XCI patterns are thought to occur in female-specific cancers, although the role of XCI in ovarian tumorigenesis and progression is largely unknown. The process of XCI is complex, and integration of gene expression, DNA methylation, and copy number data can inform the XCI status of individual genes and chromosome-wide XCI patterns for individual patients. Methods: We evaluated gene- and chromosome-level patterns of XCI by integrating RNA sequence, copy number alteration, genotype, and DNA methylation data to study XCI escape patterns in tumor samples from 99 ovarian cancer patients. We measured allele-specific expression (ASE) for 397 X-linked genes to identify the active alleles for each tumor. Combining ASE data with knowledge of copy number status, we used a Bayesian beta-binomial mixture model to estimate which genes escaped XCI for each patient, and validated our findings using DNA methylation data. To assess global XCI patterns, we performed cluster analyses on the ASE and methylation data, after adjusting for loss of heterozygosity. We examined the relationship between the clusters and clinical factors, including overall survival and time to recurrence. Results: DNA promoter methylation demonstrated inverse regional correlations with ASE. Cluster analyses using ASE and methylation data demonstrated evidence of two tumor clusters, representing normal XCI and global XCI dysregulation. The dysregulated XCI cluster (N=52) was associated with lower X-inactive specific transcript expression as expected (p&lt;0.01). Patients with XCI dysregulated tumors were higher grade, stage, serous histology and were sub-optimally debulked (p&lt;0.05). These patients also had shorter overall survival time (HR=1.87, p=0.02) and time to recurrence (HR=2.34, p&lt;0.01), although associations were attenuated after covariate adjustment. In 45 tumor samples with sufficient data, we observed escape patterns largely consistent with previous reports of multiple tissue types. When comparing tumor to normal ovarian tissue, eight genes (CXorf23, CXorf36, BRWD3, ELF4, SLITRK4, GABRE, CLCN4, SH3BGRL) showed putative escape in the tumor and two genes (RBBP7, OFD1) showed discrepant tumor inactivation. Conclusions: We identified discrepant gene-level XCI tumor classifications compared to normal tissue and identified a group of patients with chromosome-wide XCI dysregulation associated with worse clinical prognosis. This provides evidence of the role of XCI in ovarian cancer and highlights the need to integrate multiple genomic data types to study XCI. Citation Format: Stacey J. Winham, Nicholas B. Larson, Sebastian M. Armasu, Zachary C. Fogarty, Melissa C. Larson, Kimberly R. Kalli, Kate Lawrenson, Simon Gayther, Brooke L. Fridley, Ellen L. Goode. Integrative analyses of gene expression, DNA methylation, genotype and copy number alterations characterize X-chromosome inactivation in ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2420. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-2420

Abstract Background: Large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified ~35 loci associated with epithelial ovarian cancer risk. However, these genetic loci together explain only a small portion of the heritability of this malignancy. The large majority of the GWAS-identified variants are located in non-coding regions, thus possible causal genes in these loci remain largely unknown. We performed a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) to search for novel genetic loci for ovarian cancer risk and plausible causal genes at GWAS-identified loci. Method: Transcriptome data from normal ovarian tissue samples (n=68) and all tissue samples (n = 369), along with their high-density genotyping data, obtained from only European descendants included in the Genotype-Tissue Expression Project (GTEx), were used to build ovarian linear prediction models and cross-tissue models (to increase statistical power) using the elastic net method. Based on model performance, we evaluated 17,121 genes for their cis-predicted gene expressions in relation to ovarian cancer risk using summary statistics data generated in GWAS of ovarian cancer from 25,509 cases and 40,941 controls. MetaXcan was used to integrate gene expression prediction model with summary statistics. Results: We identified 35 genes with predicted expression levels associated with ovarian cancer risk at P value &lt; 2.2 × 10-6, the Bonferroni corrected significance level for multiple comparisons. Of these, 12 genes at 4 genetic loci are located ≥500kb away from risk SNPs previously reported in GWAS, representing potential novel genetic loci for ovarian cancer risk. The remaining 23 genes at 12 loci are located within known ovarian cancer risk loci. Fifteen of these genes at the 12 loci have not been reported in previous studies. Analyses by ovarian cancer histological subtypes showed that the majority of these 35 genes are associated with serous invasive carcinoma. Several new associations were identified in histological subtype analyses. Conclusion: In this TWAS we identified multiple genes with predicted expressions related to ovarian cancer risk and provide substantial new information to enhance the understanding of ovarian cancer biology and genetics. Citation Format: Yingchang Lu, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Thomas A. Sellers, Lang Wu, Xingyi Guo, Bingshan Li, Y. Ann Chen, Jennifer B. Doherty, Simon Gayther, Ellen L. Goode, Hae Kyung Im, Siddhartha Kar, Kate Lawrenson, Ani W. Manichaikul, Jennifer B. Permuth, Brett M. Reid, Jamie K. Teer, Paul Pharoah, Wei Zheng, Jirong Long. Transcriptome-wide association study among 66,450 women to identify candidate susceptible genes for ovarian cancer risk [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1308. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1308

Abstract In this review, we summarize current progress in the genetic epidemiology of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), focusing exclusively on elucidating the role of common germline genetic variation in conferring susceptibility to EOC. We provide an overview of the more than 30 EOC risk loci identified to date by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and describe the contribution of large-scale, cross-cancer type, custom genotyping projects, such as the OncoArray and the Collaborative Oncological Gene-Environment Study, to locus discovery and replication. We discuss the histotype-specific nature of these EOC risk loci, pleiotropy, or overlapping genetic effects between EOC and other hormone-related cancer types, and the application of findings to polygenic risk prediction for EOC. The second part of the article offers a concise review of primarily laboratory-based studies that have led to the identification of several putative EOC susceptibility genes using common variants at the known EOC risk loci as starting points. More global biological insights emerging from network- and pathway-based analyses of GWAS for EOC susceptibility are also highlighted. Finally, we delve into potential future directions, including the need to identify EOC risk loci in non-European populations and the next generation of GWAS functional studies that are likely to involve genome editing to establish the cell type–specific carcinogenic effects of EOC risk variants Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 27(4); 395–404. ©2018 AACR. See all articles in this CEBP Focus section, “Genome-Wide Association Studies in Cancer.”