Fonkoua, Lionel Aurelien Kankeu

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell therapy has shown clinical successes in B cell hematological malignancies. Two B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CART cell therapies treating multiple myeloma (MM) were approved by FDA but most patients relapse within 1-2 years. Ex vivo-expanded antigen specific T cells as cancer treatment rely on TCR-mediated killing of tumors. We hypothesized that arming ex vivo enriched tumor-specific T cells with CARs targeting a different antigen improves T cell functions. First, we expanded mucin 1 (MUC1)-activated T cells from patients with MM through ex vivo stimulation by MUC1 peptides-loaded autologous PBMCs for 19 days. Then, we engineered MUC1-activated T cells with 4-1BB-co-stimulated BCMA CAR to generate MUC1 TCR+BCMA CAR+ T cells. Baseline T cells without MUC1 stimulation were engineered with BCMA CAR as control. Baseline T cells, MUC1 T cells, baseline BCMA CART cells, or MUC1 BCMA CART cells were cocultured with luc+ RPMI-8226, a MUC1+BCMA+ MM cell line, for 3 days. MUC1 BCMA CART cells showed stronger tumor killing than BCMA CART or MUC1 T cells in all 3 patients (p<0.0001). MUC1 BCMA CART showed improved proliferation than BCMA CART or MUC1 T cells (p=0.0765, p<0.0001, respectively) after a 5-day stimulation by RPMI-8226. To exclude possibility of metabolic alterations by 19-day PBMC incubation leading to better T cell functions in MUC1 BCMA CART, baseline and MUC1-stimulated T cells from 3 healthy donors were processed for the same assays. Day-19 BCMA CART cells showed inferior tumor killing compared to baseline BCMA CART in all 3 donors (p<0.0001). Lower T cell proliferation was also observed in day-19 BCMA CART (p=0.0838). Our data indicate that improved T cell functions in MUC1 BCMA CART were unlikely due to metabolic changes and required stimulation by tumor antigens prior to CAR engineering likely through MUC1 TCR. Additionally, MUC1 T cells, BCMA CART, or MUC1 BCMA CART cells from tested patients were stimulated by RPMI-8226 for bulk RNA sequencing. Both BCMA CART and MUC1 T cells had distinct transcriptomic features from MUC1 BCMA CART cells. Differential gene expression analysis showed upregulation of T cell function-associated genes (RYR2, ITGA1, GNLY, GZMA, etc.) in MUC1 BCMA CART vs BCMA CART. Enrichment of T cell function-associated pathways was also observed in MUC1 BCMA CART. Analysis between MUC1 T cell and MUC1 BCMA CART showed upregulation of T cell function-associated genes (CSF2, CRTAM, IFNG, GZMB, etc.) and enrichment of immune response pathways in MUC1 BCMA CART. Our findings suggest that equipping ex vivo-enriched tumor-specific T cells with CARs targeting a different antigen improves T cell functions in vitro. Importantly, this provides a rationale for a therapeutic regimen where patients receive ex vivo-enriched tumor-induced T cells followed by CAR engineering. Persistence of the engineered T cells is being investigated Citation Format: Kun Yun, R. Leo Sakemura, Ismail Can, Omar Gutierrez Ruiz, Ekene J. Ogbodo, Truc N. Huynh, Claudia Manriquez Roman, Olivia Sirpilla, Carli M. Stewart, Jennifer M. Feigin, Grace E. DeFranco, Sophia Y. Goldberg, Dominic A. Skeele, Mariam Stein, Dara Missan, Latha Pathangey, Long Mai, Hong Xia, Brooke Kimball, Lionel A. Kankeu Fonkoua, Mehrdad Hefazi, Michael W. Ruff, Elizabeth L. Siegler, Leif Bergsagel, Michael Gustafson, Sandra Gendler, Saad S. Kenderian. BCMA CAR engineering arms T cells with superior functions post ex vivo stimulation by MUC1 peptide-loaded autologous PBMCs [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 6103.

608 Background: Tinengotinib, a spectrum-selective multi-kinase inhibitor with unique binding properties to FGFR , potently inhibited FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement and acquired resistant/gatekeeper mutations in pre-clinical models and exhibited antitumor activity in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients (pts) in phase 1/2 trials. Here we present the overall survival (OS) data and biomarker correlative analysis from a phase 2 clinical trial of tinengotinib in CCA. Methods: Eligible pts with advanced/metastatic CCA who had received ≥ 1 prior systemic chemotherapy with ECOG PS 0-1 were treated with tinengotinib 10 mg QD across four Cohorts: A1: FGFR2 fusion(s) with primary progression on previous FGFR inhibitor ( FGFR i); A2: FGFR2 fusion(s) with progression after prior response to FGFR i; B: FGFR alteration(s) without FGFR2 fusion(s); C: FGFR wild-type. Efficacy was evaluated per RECIST v1.1 and safety was assessed by CTCAE v5.0. Genomic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were assessed by Foundation Medicine NGS panel at baseline, C3D1 and EOT. Planned correlative analyses of response (PR+SD>6 months) and PFS in pt subgroups based on ctDNA mutational status were performed. Results: 55 eligible pts were enrolled (18 in A1, 11 in A2, 13 in B, 13 in C) with median age 61.0 [range 24-81] years, ECOG PS 0 in 50.9% pts, 56.4% female, and 60.0% with ≥ 3 lines of prior therapy. Among 42 pts with FGFR alterations, 78.4% had ≥ 1 prior FGFR i, and 97.6% had prior chemotherapy. Median follow up time was 8.6 months (0.4-30.5). The median OS (months) was 17.1 (95%CI 7.5-19.5) in A1; not reached (95%CI 9.6, -) in A2; 18.0 (95%CI 9.6, -) in A1+A2; not reached (95%CI 8.0, -) in B; 6.5 (95%CI 4.8-16.4) in C. The OS rate in A, B and C was 100%, 91.7% and 75% at month 3; 83.7%, 83.3% and 66.7% at month 6, and 65.8%, 55.6% and 23.8% at month 12. Partial response was observed in 26% (10/39) of evaluable FGFR-altered pts (A1+A2+B). The safety profile was consistent with previous reports. The most common any-grade treatment-related AEs were hypertension (63.6%) and diarrhea (47.3%). Baseline ctDNA results were available in 46 pts, 35 in cohorts A+B and 11 in C. A positive correlation was shown in MED12 mutation vs response (P=0.03476). BCOR and ARID1A mutation were found to be negatively associated with PFS (P=0.01366 and P=0.0437). Acquired/secondary mutations at baseline were observed in cohort A, including V564F/I (3/24 and 5/24) and N549K/H (5/24 and 5/24); favorable anti-tumor activity was noted despite these resistant mutations, consistent with preclinical data. Conclusions: Tinengotinib has shown promising anti-tumor efficacy in CCA pts with FGFR fusion after prior FGFR i and in those with primary FGFR mutations. An ongoing randomized phase III study will investigate tinengotinib vs. chemotherapy in FGFR inhibitor refractory CCA (NCT05948475). Clinical trial information: NCT04919642 .

727 Background: PARP inhibition (PARPi) is a standard maintenance therapy for patients (pts) with germline BRCA1/2 mutations in pancreatic cancer. Combination of PARPi therapy and immunotherapy has potential to increase efficacy and may offer benefit beyond germline BRCA1/2 . Methods: We performed a multisite single-arm phase 2 study using the highly potent PARPi niraparib with anti-PD1 drug dostarlimab in pts with germline or somatic HRD mutations in BRCA1/2, PALB2, RAD51C/D, or BARD1 . Pts were required to have metastasis, progressed on ≥1 regimen, and prior platinum-exposure unless refused/intolerant. Pts were treated with niraparib 200 mg orally once daily continuously. Dostarlimab 500 mg was administered IV every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, then 1000 mg IV every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR) at 12 weeks (DCR12) using iRECIST criteria. At least 8 pts with DCR12 in the first 19 eligible pts (41%) would be considered promising for further trials. Results: 22 pts were enrolled from Dec 2020 to Oct 2023. Two pts withdrew prior to receiving therapy, and 2 were later found to be ineligible, leaving 18 eligible pts for final analyses. Median age was 63.0 yrs, 39% male, 94% non-Hispanic white, 1 black (6%). 17 pts were platinum exposed, 7 were platinum-refractory, and 5 had previously progressed on PARPi maintenance. Mutation distribution was: BRCA2 13/18 (72%), BRCA1 4/18 (22%), BARD1 2/18 (11%). One pt had both BRCA1 (somatic) and BRCA2 (germline) mutations. Germline mutations were identified in 14/18 (78%). DCR12 was achieved in 5/18 (27.8%), so the primary endpoint (>41%) was not met. Pts received a median 2 cycles (range 1-8) of niraparib + dostarlimab. No clinical factors were significantly associated with improved DCR12 (all p > 0.05) in subgroup analyses, but we did observe the following statistically nonsignificant associations. Pts who were platinum-refractory had a lower DCR12 compared to those not (14.3% vs. 36.4%). Counterintuitively, PARPi exposed/refractory pts had a higher DCR12 than non-exposed/non-refractory (50 vs 17% exposed/nonexposed and 40% vs 23% refractory/nonrefractory). Pts with germline mutations had a higher DCR12 compared to those without (38.5% vs. 0%). Non- BRCA2 mutations had a higher DCR12 than those with BRCA2 mutations (50% vs.17%), with highest DCR12 rates among BRCA1 patients (67%). Tolerability was in line with similar combinations, with 60% non-hematologic Gr3 or higher, including fatigue (15%), AST increase (10%), nausea/vomiting (10%), sepsis (10%). Two grade 5 events were not attributed to treatment. Conclusions: PARPi plus anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibition was not sufficiently active as later line therapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer for the majority of patients with HRD mutations. Additional molecular analyses to elucidate predictive markers of sensitivity/resistance are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04493060 .

Abstract Background Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A/B) received FDA approval as the first-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 2020. However, optimal subsequent treatment options are unclear. Here, we describe clinical outcomes of advanced HCC patients following first-line treatment with A/B. Patients and Methods We conducted a multi-site analysis of patients with HCC treated with first-line A/B between January 2018 and December 2022 at Mayo Clinic. This study cohort included all patients receiving second-line systemic therapy after A/B. Median overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Child Pugh (CP) scores are also described at diagnosis, prior to first line, and prior to second-line therapy. Results Of the 342 patients who received A/B, 107 (31.3%) received second-line treatments including anti-VEGF therapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and were included in the final analysis. Median OS for all patients was 11.1 months from initiation of second-line therapy. Median OS was 10.7 months (95% CI: 7.2-12.8) and 15.7 months (95%CI: 6.8-NE) for those receiving anti-VEGF inhibitors and ICI ( P = .50). Median TTD for second-line therapies was 2.4 months (95% CI: 1.7-3.3) and 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.5-5.1) for anti-VEGF inhibitors and ICI, respectively (P = .87). In multivariate analyses, CP was significantly associated with survival. Conclusion Following first-line A/B treatment, there is no statistically significant difference in survival between ICI and anti-VEGF therapy, nor in time to treatment discontinuation. CP score remains an important prognostic tool.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematological malignancies. However, CAR T-cell therapy still has low durable response rates and common associated toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS). We recently reported that sequential therapy with the CD19 monoclonal antibody tafasitamab and CD19-directed CAR T (CART19, 41BBζ costimulated) cells significantly ameliorated CAR T-cell apoptosis and tumor cell pyroptosis, improving CAR T safety and efficacy (PMID: 37879074). Building on these findings, we hypothesized that controlling massive initial CAR T-cell stimulation by diminishing extensive tumor cell pyroptosis is critical to improve CAR T safety and durability. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated several caspase (Casp) inhibitors, including Casp1, Casp3, Casp7, and Casp11, in combination with CAR T cells. We found that the Casp1 inhibitor VX765 did not inhibit CAR T antigen-specific cytotoxicity and thus focused on VX765 in subsequent assays. We first assessed CAR T proliferation upon stimulation with the CD19+ JeKo-1 mantle cell lymphoma cell line in the presence of VX765. CAR T with vehicle control showed greater proliferation at day 3, but CAR T with VX765 showed higher proliferation at day 5 (p=0.03, absolute CD3+ counts by flow cytometry). We then co-cultured CAR T and JeKo-1 for 24 hours and observed a significant reduction in apoptotic CAR T (Annexin V+ and 7-AAD- via flow cytometry) in VX765-treated conditions (p=0.05). Additionally, there was significantly reduced pyroptosis (Annexin V+ 7-AAD+) (p=0.02) but higher apoptosis (Annexin V+ 7-AAD-) in JeKo-1 in VX765-treated conditions (p=0.04). VX765-treated CAR T showed higher Bcl2 expression via flow cytometry (p=0.03). We also studied tumor cell pyroptosis by measuring the level of HMGB-1. CART19, JeKo-1, and VX765 or vehicle control were co-cultured for 24 hours, and the level of HMGB-1 was found to be significantly reduced in VX765-treated conditions, indicating reduced tumor pyroptosis (p=0.006). We then assessed the impact of Casp1 inhibition in our in vitro model of CAR T exhaustion. We stimulated CAR T with CD19+ JeKo-1 every other day for 2 weeks and then assessed CCR7 and CD45RA expression on CAR T. VX765-treated CAR T showed higher central memory (p=0.08) and naïve (p=0.02) and lower terminally differentiated effector memory phenotypes (p=0.03). We next studied the effect of Casp1 inhibition with VX765 in vivo. To recapitulate CAR T-cell toxicities, including CRS, we utilized an immunocompetent mouse model. First, we generated murine CART19 (mCART19, CD28ζ costimulated) cells. Recipient mice were then engrafted with luciferase+ murine CD19+ TBL12 cells, a murine lymphoma cell line. Mice were treated 12 days later with cyclophosphamide (300 mg/kg, ip) and 24 hours after mice were imaged and randomized to receive 1 x 107, 1) untransduced T cell control (UTD), 2) mCART19 + vehicle control, or 3) mCART19 + VX765 (25 mg/kg). VX765 was given immediately before the CART19 injection and on day 2 post-CAR T injection. Mice were serially monitored and weighed to assess CAR T-cell toxicity. Tumor burden was assessed via weekly bioluminescent imaging. Mice treated with vehicle control showed a significant reduction in weight compared to the UTD control (p=0.02), while mice treated with VX765 maintained their weight and remained active without signs of CRS, including motor weakness and hunched body. UTD mice reached humane endpoints within 3 weeks after T-cell injection. Three satellite mice from each group were euthanized and spleens were harvested. Flow cytometric analysis showed a significant reduction in apoptotic CAR T (p=) and pyroptotic tumor cells in mice treated with VX765 (p=0.03). Western blot showed lower cleaved GSDME and GSDMD in mice treated with VX765. VX765-treated mice demonstrated prolonged CAR T persistence with durable anti-tumor activity. In summary, Casp1 inhibition with VX765 significantly reduced CAR T apoptosis, improved memory phenotype, and increased delayed CAR T proliferation. VX765 also reduced tumor cell pyroptosis and CRS incidence without impacting CAR T anti-tumor activity in vivo. Given the favorable preclinical outcomes and existing clinical data on VX765, this approach holds substantial translational potential for enhancing the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with large B-cell lymphoma.

CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T (CART19) cell therapy has shown outstanding clinical success. However, patients can develop CART-induced toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. Studies have found that activation of myeloid cells by granulocyte monocyte-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) can contribute to toxicity development. GM-CSF depletion leads to reduced myeloid activation, prevention of CART-induced toxicities, and improved CART efficacy. CART cells upregulate cytokine receptors upon activation, and our results indicate that CART19 cells significantly upregulate GMCSFR upon antigen-specific stimulation (<10% vs >30%, p<0.01). This led us to hypothesize that GMCSFR signaling contributes to CART cell activity. To understand the role of GM-CSFR upregulation on CART cell functions, we compared the impacts of neutralizing GM-CSF or blocking GM-CSF receptor alpha (GM-CSFRα) on CART19. First, 4-1BB-costimulated CART19 cells generated from healthy donors were stimulated with CD3/CD28 beads at a 1:3 ratio for 6 days. CART cells were maintained at 1 x 106/mL throughout the culture and supplemented with IgG isotype control, GM-CSF neutralizing antibody, or GM-CSFRα blockade at 10 μg/mL, 20 μg/mL, or 100 μg/mL. On day 6, cells were debeaded and rested for 2 days. Then, CART cells were cocultured with NALM6, a CD19+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line, at a ratio of 1:1 for 3 days. The cocultures were supplemented with the same doses of antibodies listed above. Antigen-specific proliferation of CART cells was measured by flow cytometry. Our data suggested that CART19 proliferated is not impacted by GM-CSF neutralization but is inhibited by GM-CSFRα blockade (IgG isotype vs 10 μg/mL GM-CSFRα blockade, p<0.0001; IgG isotype vs 20 μg/mL GM-CSFRα blockade, p<0.0001; IgG isotype vs 100 μg/mL GM-CSFRα blockade, p=0.009). CART cells were assessed in a cytotoxicity assay with NALM6 luciferase+ cells as well, which did not show significant impacts from GM-CSF neutralization or GM-CSFRα blockade. To evaluate the impacts of GM-CSF neutralization and GM-CSFRα blockade in a mouse model, we engrafted NSG mice with 1 million NALM6 luciferase+ cells intravenously. Mice were then treated with 1.4 million CART19 plus 10 mg/kg IgG isotype control, GM-CSF neutralizing antibody, or GM-CSFRα blockade intraperitoneally. GM-CSFRα blockade drastically suppressed antitumor activities of CART (CART19+GM-CSFRα blockade vs CART19+IgG isotype control, p<0.0001; CART19+GM-CSFRα blockade vs CART19+GM-CSF neutralizing antibody, p<0.0001; CART19+ GM-CSFRα blockade vs untransduced T cell, n.s.). Serum cytokines were analyzed 2 days after CART treatment, showing that mice with GM-CSFRα blockade had significantly lower levels of human IFNγ (p=0.0189) and IL-2 (p=0.0121) compared to IgG isotype control group, while GM-CSF neutralization did not show significant impacts. Mice treated with CART plus IgG isotype control or GM-CSF neutralizing antibody showed prolonged survival compared to mice treated with GM-CSFRα blockade or untransduced T cells (p=0.0285). To unravel the mechanisms behind functional differences between GM-CSFRα blockade and GM-CSF neutralization, CART cells (n = 3 biological replicates) were cocultured with NALM6 at a 1:1 ratio supplemented with 10 μg/mL GM-CSF neutralizing antibody, GM-CSFRα blockade, or IgG isotype control overnight, followed by T cell isolation, bulk RNA isolation, and RNA sequencing (RNAseq) analysis. Our RNAseq data indicated significant upregulation (Log2FC>0.5, padj. <0.05) of T cell exhaustion- and dysfunction-associated genes (RGS16, PDCD1, CTLA4, NR4A3, CD101, LAG3) as well as negative regulators of T cell functions (G0S2, PIK3IP1, LGALS3) in the GM-CSFRα blockade group compared to GM-CSF neutralizing antibody or IgG isotype control groups. T cell activation-associated pathways were enriched in the GM-CSFRα blockade group. Overall, our data show that GM-CSFRα blockade impacts CART functions differently from GM-CSF neutralization. Specifically, GM-CSFRα blockade inhibits CART proliferation in vitro and antitumor activity in vivo. Interestingly, GM-CSFRα blockade leads to enrichment of T cell exhaustion- and dysfunction-associated genes in CART19, which is worth further investigation. These findings may be applicable to other cytokine receptors upregulated on activated CART cells.

TPS2675 Background: Checkpoint inhibitor therapy is the standard first-line treatment for advanced/recurrent HCC, but there is a significant unmet therapeutic need for patients (pts) who progress after first-line treatment. Adoptive cellular immunotherapy may provide a novel treatment option. Glypican-3 (GPC3), a heparan sulfate proteoglycan, is overexpressed by tumor cells in HCC and virtually absent in healthy tissues, making it an ideal target for CAR-T therapy. AZD5851 is an autologous CAR-T product that expresses a CAR specific for GPC3 and a dominant negative (dn)TGFβRII as an armoring strategy. Expression of dnTGFβRII can block TGFβ signaling, protecting CAR T-cells from the immunosuppressive effects of this cytokine. Early clinical data with C-CAR031, a CAR-T product with the same GPC3-specific CAR and dnTGFβRII-armoring transgene as AZD5851, showed promising tolerability and antitumor activity in pts with HCC [1]. ATHENA (NCT06084884) is a first-in-human, single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase 1/2 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of AZD5851 in pts with GPC3+ advanced/recurrent HCC, for whom ≥1 prior line of standard therapy failed or was not tolerable. Methods: Eligible pts are aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed advanced/recurrent or metastatic and/or unresectable HCC, GPC3+ tumor sample as determined by immunohistochemistry, ≥1 prior line of standard systemic therapy, ≥1 measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1, Child-Pugh A, ECOG PS 0/1, and adequate organ and bone marrow function. Approximately 24 pts will be enrolled in Part A (Phase I, dose escalation) and 50 in Part B (Phase II dose expansion). Pts will undergo apheresis to collect peripheral blood mononuclear cells for AZD5851 production, after which they may receive approved bridging therapy for disease control. Upon successful generation of AZD5851 product, pts will undergo lymphodepletion before receiving a single dose of IV AZD5851. Subsequent follow-up is divided into 3 stages: Stage 1, active follow-up of all pts through 6 months post AZD5851 infusion; Stage 2, further evaluation of pts who have not progressed or started a new anticancer regimen during Stage 1; Stage 3, long-term follow-up for all pts who have received AZD5851. The primary endpoints are to assess the safety/tolerability of AZD5851 (both study parts), and to determine the recommended dose(s) of AZD5851 for expansion and phase 2 trials (Part A). Secondary endpoints include efficacy (objective response rate, best overall response, duration of response, disease control rate, durable response rate, time to response, progression-free survival, and overall survival) and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory endpoints include pharmacodynamic biomarkers and immunogenicity. Enrollment began Nov 2023. 1. Zhang et al. AACR 2023. Abstract CT097. Clinical trial information: NCT06084884 .

4017 Background: Combined MEK inhibition (MEKi) and PD-L1 blockade significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus PD-L1 monotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) following first-line chemotherapy (NCT03201458). Further study has shown MEKi enhances tumor immunogenicity but impairs host T cell activation/priming. The addition of immune agonists, e.g. a CD27 agonist, can rescue T cell function in the setting of systemic MEKi in vivo and may be an effective strategy to optimize MEKi’s immunomodulatory potential when used in combination with checkpoint blockade. Methods: We conducted a randomized ph 2 trial (NCT04941287) evaluating Atezolizumab in combination with the CD27 immune agonist (CDX-1127 [Varlilumab]) with or without the addition of a MEKi (Cobimetinib) in patients with unresectable, previously treated, BTC. Adults with pathologically-confirmed BTC, s/p at least 1 prior line (no more than 2) of systemic therapy, measurable disease, and ECOG PS ≤1 were enrolled. Patients who had received previous PD-[L]1 were eligible. The study was planned for 64 evaluable subjects randomized in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by BTC site, to either AV (Atezolizumab [840mg IV days 1,15])+ Varlilumab [3mg/kg IV days 1, 15]) or CAV (Cobimetinib [60mg oral daily days 1-21, off 22-28] + Atezolizumab + Varlilumab). Overall response rate (ORR) and PFS were co-primary endpoints. The primary correlative outcome was treatment-related changes in CD8+ infiltrating T cells. Results: A preplanned interim analysis based on objective response rates did not meet the threshold for continuance in either treatment arm, so the trial was closed early for futility. In total, 57 patients were enrolled (n = 29 [CAV], n = 28 [AV], 67% had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 33% had received previous PD-[L]1. Both CAV and AV regimens were well-tolerated without new safety signals. Adding CDX-1127 did not appear to meaningful increase immunotoxicity beyond established PD-L1 toxicity profiles. ORR was 0% (CAV) and 4% (AV). With a median follow up time of 6.2 months, median PFS was 2.2 (CAV) and 1.8 (AV) months (HR 0.71 [0.40,1.25]). In PD[L]1-experienced patients, median PFS was 3.6 (CAV) and 1.7 (AV) months (HR 0.44 [0.14,1.33]). Median OS was 10.2 (CAV) and 6.1 (AV) months (HR 0.76 [0.37,1.55]). In PD[L]1-experienced patients, median OS was 6.4 (CAV) and 4.4 (AV) months for CAV and AV (HR 0.68 [0.19,2.42]). Primary correlative endpoint and updated survival will be reported at time of meeting. Conclusions: The combination of Atezolizumab and Varlilumab with or without Cobimetinib was safe but did not improve clinical outcomes in advanced stage BTC patients treated in later lines. Though not statistically significant, treatment with CAV demonstrated numerically favorable PFS/OS compared AV among immunotherapy-experienced patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03201458 .

e15146 Background: Wnt/ß-catenin signaling dysregulation is found in approximately 25% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. The impact of B-catenin activation on HCC overall survival has remained controversial. Prior studies suggest activating CTNNB1 mutations may predict for immunotherapy (IO) resistance while others did not corroborate this finding. Here we describe the clinical outcomes of advanced HCC patients (pts) with CTNNB1 (+) and without CTNNB1 (-) mutations treated with novel first line IO/anti-VEGF therapies. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of pts with HCC who had molecular analysis performed between 2019 and 2023 at Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida. The study was reviewed and approved by the IRB. Clinical and molecular features were compared descriptively. The primary outcomes were time to treatment failure (TTF), defined as time from first-line treatment initiation to off treatment or death, and overall survival (OS), defined as time from first-line treatment initiation to death, compared between the two cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We identified 29 CTNNB1+ and 62 CTNNB1- (wt) pts with HCC. Median age at diagnosis was 66 (range 30-86), 80 (88%) were Caucasian, 68 (75%) were male gender, and 22 (24%) had etiology as hepatitis B/hepatitis C, 82 (90%) were Child-Pugh A and 77 (85%) were Barcelona Clinic Liver Clinic (BCLC)=C at diagnosis. Eighteen (90%, n=20) CTNNB 1+ pts received first-line IO (Atezolizumab/bevacizumab [AB]) vs 39 (72%, n=54) in CTNNB1- pts. All pts were microsatellite stable (MSS). CTNNB1+ had a similar median tumor mutational burden (TMB), higher rate of TERT co-mutation, and lower rate of TP53 co-mutation (table) compared to CTNNB-. Of 57 AB pts, 5 (27%) of CTNNB1 + had an objective response, compared to 6 (16.7%) CTNNB1- pts. Time to treatment failure with first-line AB and overall survival were similar between the two cohorts (Table). Conclusions: Our study suggests CTNNB1 status is not prognostic in HCC pts receiving IO based therapy. Prospective study is warranted to further investigate predictive biomarkers for HCC sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors and VEGF-targeted therapy. [Table: see text]