Sun, Caixia

608 Background: Tinengotinib, a spectrum-selective multi-kinase inhibitor with unique binding properties to FGFR , potently inhibited FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement and acquired resistant/gatekeeper mutations in pre-clinical models and exhibited antitumor activity in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients (pts) in phase 1/2 trials. Here we present the overall survival (OS) data and biomarker correlative analysis from a phase 2 clinical trial of tinengotinib in CCA. Methods: Eligible pts with advanced/metastatic CCA who had received ≥ 1 prior systemic chemotherapy with ECOG PS 0-1 were treated with tinengotinib 10 mg QD across four Cohorts: A1: FGFR2 fusion(s) with primary progression on previous FGFR inhibitor ( FGFR i); A2: FGFR2 fusion(s) with progression after prior response to FGFR i; B: FGFR alteration(s) without FGFR2 fusion(s); C: FGFR wild-type. Efficacy was evaluated per RECIST v1.1 and safety was assessed by CTCAE v5.0. Genomic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were assessed by Foundation Medicine NGS panel at baseline, C3D1 and EOT. Planned correlative analyses of response (PR+SD>6 months) and PFS in pt subgroups based on ctDNA mutational status were performed. Results: 55 eligible pts were enrolled (18 in A1, 11 in A2, 13 in B, 13 in C) with median age 61.0 [range 24-81] years, ECOG PS 0 in 50.9% pts, 56.4% female, and 60.0% with ≥ 3 lines of prior therapy. Among 42 pts with FGFR alterations, 78.4% had ≥ 1 prior FGFR i, and 97.6% had prior chemotherapy. Median follow up time was 8.6 months (0.4-30.5). The median OS (months) was 17.1 (95%CI 7.5-19.5) in A1; not reached (95%CI 9.6, -) in A2; 18.0 (95%CI 9.6, -) in A1+A2; not reached (95%CI 8.0, -) in B; 6.5 (95%CI 4.8-16.4) in C. The OS rate in A, B and C was 100%, 91.7% and 75% at month 3; 83.7%, 83.3% and 66.7% at month 6, and 65.8%, 55.6% and 23.8% at month 12. Partial response was observed in 26% (10/39) of evaluable FGFR-altered pts (A1+A2+B). The safety profile was consistent with previous reports. The most common any-grade treatment-related AEs were hypertension (63.6%) and diarrhea (47.3%). Baseline ctDNA results were available in 46 pts, 35 in cohorts A+B and 11 in C. A positive correlation was shown in MED12 mutation vs response (P=0.03476). BCOR and ARID1A mutation were found to be negatively associated with PFS (P=0.01366 and P=0.0437). Acquired/secondary mutations at baseline were observed in cohort A, including V564F/I (3/24 and 5/24) and N549K/H (5/24 and 5/24); favorable anti-tumor activity was noted despite these resistant mutations, consistent with preclinical data. Conclusions: Tinengotinib has shown promising anti-tumor efficacy in CCA pts with FGFR fusion after prior FGFR i and in those with primary FGFR mutations. An ongoing randomized phase III study will investigate tinengotinib vs. chemotherapy in FGFR inhibitor refractory CCA (NCT05948475). Clinical trial information: NCT04919642 .

434 Background: Tinengotinib is a spectrum-selective multi-kinase inhibitor with unique binding properties to FGFR, potently inhibited FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement and acquired resistant mutations in pre-clinical models and in phase I trials that included cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients (pts). Here we present the efficacy and safety of tinengotinib in a phase II clinical trial. Methods: Eligible pts with advanced/metastatic CCA who had received ≥ 1 prior systemic chemotherapy therapy and ECOG PS 0 or 1 were treated with tinengotinib 10 mg QD. Four cohorts included: Cohort A1: FGFR2 fusion(s) with primary progression on previous FGFR inhibitor ( FGFRi), A2: FGFR2 fusion(s) with progression after prior response to FGFRi (acquired resistance); B: non-fusion FGFR alteration(s): C: FGFR wild-type ( FGFRwt). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. CTCAE V5.0 was used for safety assessments. Results: As of 7Aug2023, 48 pts with CCA were enrolled, 13 in Cohort A1, 10 in A2, 12 in B, 13 in C. Median age 61.5 [range 25-81] years old, 41.7% male, 58.3% had ≥ 3 lines of prior therapy. ECOG PS 0 in 47.9% pts. Among 35 pts with FGFR alterations, 80.0% had ≥ 1 prior FGFRi therapy, and 97.1% had prior chemotherapy. Forty (40) pts were efficacy evaluable. In A1, 1 out of 11 pts (9.1%) achieved PR with tumor reduction of 31.8%. In A2, 3 out of 8 pts (37.5%) achieved PR with tumor reduction of 40.7%, 47.0% and 54.6%. In B, 3 out of 9 pts (33.3%) achieved PR with tumor reduction of 36.5%, 48.6%, and 60.6%. No PR was observed in C. Overall DCR was 94.7% (18/19) in FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement pts (A1+A2), 88.9% (8/9) in other FGFR alterations pts (B), and 75% (9/12) in FGFRwt pts (C). Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.26 months (95%CI, 2.86-9.10) in A1+A2, 5.98 months (95%CI, 1.87-NA) in B and 3.84 months (95% CI, 1.84-4.80) in C. Among 48 treated pts, treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 45 (93.8%) pts, 14 (29.2%) in G1-2, 29 (60.4%) in G3 and 2 (4.2%) in G4. The most common G3 TRAEs were hypertension in 12 (25%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome in 3 (6.3%), diarrhea in 3 (6.3%) and stomatitis in 3 (6.3%). One subject had G4 increased TSH and G4 increased lipase, and another subject had G4 posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. No G5 TRAE was observed. Conclusions: Tinengotinib has promising clinical benefit for FGFR2 fusion CCA after prior FGFRi and for non-fusion FGFR alterations. Tinengotinib-related toxicities were manageable. An ongoing randomized, controlled phase III study will evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and pharmacodynamic effect of Tinengotinib vs Physicians’ choice in subjects with FGFR2-altered refractory/relapsed CCA after prior chemotherapy and FGFRi therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04919642 .

539 Background: Tinengotinib is a spectrum-selective multi-kinase inhibitor with a unique FGFR-binding mechanism. It potently inhibits FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement and acquired resistant mutations in pre-clinical models and early clinical studies in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Here we present the preliminary efficacy and safety of tinengotinib (TT-00420) in a phase II trial TT420C1206 (NCT04919642). Methods: Eligible patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic CCA exhausting standard treatment options received tinengotinib 10 mg QD. Pts were enrolled into four cohorts using historical FGFR alteration status: FGFR2 fusion(s) with primary progression on previous FGFR inhibitor (FGFRi) (A1) or progression after prior response to FGFRi (acquired resistance) (A2); non-fusion FGFR alteration(s) (B); or FGFR wild-type (FGFRwt, C). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST version 1.1. Safety, PK parameters, and biomarker profile were evaluated and reviewed jointly with the efficacy outcomes. Adverse events (AEs) were graded per CTCAE version 5.0. Results: As of Sep 13, 2022, 25 pts with CCA were enrolled and dosed; 7 in A1, 6 in A2, 2 in B and 10 in C. Median age 61 [range 24-82] years old, 64% female, 93.3% had ≥ 3 prior treatment lines. 13 patients with ECOG 0 and 12 patients with ECOG 1 at baseline. Among 15 patients with historical FGFR alterations (13 fusions/rearrangement and 2 mutations), 93.3% had ≥ 1 prior FGFRi, and 3 pts (20.0%) had 2 prior FGFRi treatments. Eighteen pts were evaluable for tumor assessment at data cutoff date, including 4 in A1, 6 in A2, 1 in B and 7 in C. The median follow up was 15 weeks. In A2, 2 out of 6 pts (33%) achieved PR with tumor reductions of 34% and 54%. Overall DCR (CR or PR+SD) was 90% (9/10) in FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement pts; 100% in FGFR primary mutation pt (1/1); and 71% (5/7) in FGFRwt pts. One PR and 5 SDs lasted for more than 16 weeks. Among 25 treated pts, drug-related AEs occurred in 20 (80%) pts, including 7 (28%) with Grade (G) 1-2 AEs, 12 (48%) with G3 AEs, and 1 (4%) with G4 AE. Most frequently occurred G3/4 AEs were hypertension in 6 (24%) pts, including 5 (20%) with G3 and 1 (4%) with G4, G3 fatigue in 2 (8%) and G3 neutrophil count decreased in 2 (8%) pts. No drug-related G5 was observed. The efficacy and safety results observed were consistent with the previous reported data ( NCT03654547 ) in CCA pts. The preliminary biomarker analysis suggests loss of resistant FGFR mutation on liquid biopsy post tinengotinib therapy. Further biomarker analysis will be updated at the presentation. Conclusions: Tinengotinib may result in promising clinical benefit for CCA pts in the setting of FGFRi-resistance. Tinengotinib-related toxicities were manageable. An ongoing phase II study will further provide safety, efficacy and biomarker evaluations for both FGFR resistant and FGFRwt CCA. Clinical trial information: NCT04919642 .