Cheng, Chao

Background: Rare, functionally deleterious genetic variants have been implicated as having substantially larger effect sizes than common variants, potentially accounting for much of the missing heritability in lung cancer (LC). Over 25 years, the Genetic Epidemiology of LC Consortium (GELCC) has curated an invaluable resource of specimens and data from individuals with a strong family history of LC. Methods: Whole-genome and exome sequencing data were analyzed in 129 high-risk familial LC (FLC) families, defined as having two first-degree relatives or three or more second-degree relatives affected by LC (177 affected FLC and 309 unaffected relatives). The discovery focused on rare (allele frequency < 1% in gnomAD global population) and deleterious variations (missense, stop-gained, frameshift) enriched in FLC. Promising candidates were further external validated in 2,408 sporadic lung cancer (SLC) cases and 885 population controls from the International Lung Cancer Consortium. Results: We identified 168 variants with moderate-to-large effects on FLC risk, 100 of which were validated for SLC risk (Table 1 Table 1. Top 20 candidates Gene Rare (MAF < 1%), deleterious variants No. of variant carrier counts Odds Ratio, LC vs Control FLC | Relative | SLC | Control FLC+SLC SLC Oncogene ERBB3 / HER3 p.A1131T 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 35 15 JAK p.V651M 2 | 3 | 7 | 0 62 51 NOTCH3 p.R1560P 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 48 29 ROS1 p.N785X 6 | 4 | 10 | 0 110 74 USP6 p.R522 fs del 3 | 6 | 6 | 0 62 45 Tumor suppressor gene ATM p.L2332P 3 | 2 | 8 | 0 76 59 LZTS2 p.K458R 4 | 4 | 18 | 0 152 133 NPIPB13 p.V270 fs del 13 | 14 | 10 | 0 159 74 PARK2 / PRKN p.P153R 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 76 59 RB1 p.A525G 3 | 0 | 6 | 0 62 45 SLX4 p.S1716T 3 | 2 | 9 | 0 83 66 SYNE1 p.M6566I 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 62 52 TGFBRAP1 p.T301R 5 | 0 | 11 | 0 110 82 WNK1 p.K583 fs del 4 | 0 | 23 | 0 187 171 Other cancer-associated gene CFTR p.R74W 4 | 2 | 4 | 0 55 30 FLG p.R3404 fs del 7 | 2 | 4 | 0 69 30 LTN1 p.R349H 6 | 1 | 10 | 0 110 74 MLNR p.Q334 fs del 3 | 2 | 19 | 0 152 134 SLC39A11 p.R38Q 4 | 2 | 13 | 0 117 96 TTYH2 p.R493C 5 | 4 | 14 | 0 131 104 Dose effect of the top candidates No. candidates 0 variant allele 67 | 194 | 1911 | 834 reference reference 1 variant allele 50 | 66 | 363 | 50 3.5 (2.6 - 4.7) 3.2 (2.3 - 4.3) 2 variant alleles 15 | 18 | 62 | 1 32 (4.5 - 230) 27 (3.8 - 195) 3+ variant alleles 45 | 31 | 72 | 0 98 (6 - 1506) 62 (3.9 -1012) lists 20 top hits). Among these, 15 variants mapped to our previously identified lung cancer linkage locus at 6q23-25 (ROS1, PARK2, SYNE1). Others were enriched in oncogenes (ERBB3, JAK1, MET), tumor suppressor genes (ATM, BRCA2, RB1), and genes involved in the extracellular matrix (COL6A3, FLG, MUC5B). Importantly, individuals carrying more than two combinations of these variants exhibited exceptionally strong dose effects, with odds ratios (OR) exceeding 27. Conclusion: Our findings underscore the significant role of rare, high-penetrance variants in FLC etiology and highlight promising targets for early detection and personalized treatment. Future in-depth mechanistic studies are planned to evaluate the pathogenic effects of these specific alleles. Citation Format: Yanhong Liu, Claudio Pikielny, Xiangjun Xiao, Bo Peng, Yafang Li, Jinyoung Byun, Chao Cheng, Dakai Zhu, Spiridon Tsavachidis, Colette Gaba, Elena Kupert, Ellen L. Goode, Erin L. Crawford, Kristen Purrington, Marshall Anderson, Michael Cole, Paul Brennan, Geoffrey Liu, James McKay, John K. Field, Rayjean J. Hung, David C. Christiani, Diptasri Mandal, James C. Willey, Ann Schwartz, Joan Bailey-Wilson, Susan M. Pinney, Christopher I. Amos. High-penetrance rare variants underlying familial lung cancer risk: Insights from the Genetic Epidemiology of Lung Cancer Consortium [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 3815.

Abstract Background: Clinical, molecular, and genetic epidemiology studies displayed remarkable differences between ever- and never-smoking lung cancer. Methods: We conducted a stratified multi-population (European, East Asian, and African descent) association study on 44,823 ever-smokers and 20,074 never-smokers to identify novel variants that were missed in the non-stratified analysis. Functional analysis including expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) colocalization and DNA damage assays, and annotation studies were conducted to evaluate the functional roles of the variants. We further evaluated the impact of smoking quantity on lung cancer risk for the variants associated with ever-smoking lung cancer. Results: Five novel independent loci, GABRA4, intergenic region 12q24.33, LRRC4C, LINC01088, and LCNL1 were identified with the association at two or three populations (P < 5 × 10−8). Further functional analysis provided multiple lines of evidence suggesting the variants affect lung cancer risk through excessive DNA damage (GABRA4) or cis-regulation of gene expression (LCNL1). The risk of variants from 12 independent regions, including the well-known CHRNA5, associated with ever-smoking lung cancer was evaluated for never-smokers, light-smokers (packyear ≤ 20), and moderate-to-heavy-smokers (packyear > 20). Different risk patterns were observed for the variants among the different groups by smoking behavior. Conclusions: We identified novel variants associated with lung cancer in only ever- or never-smoking groups that were missed by prior main-effect association studies. Impact: Our study highlights the genetic heterogeneity between ever- and never-smoking lung cancer and provides etiologic insights into the complicated genetic architecture of this deadly cancer.

Abstract Differences by sex in lung cancer incidence and mortality have been reported which cannot be fully explained by sex differences in smoking behavior, implying existence of genetic and molecular basis for sex disparity in lung cancer development. However, the information about sex dimorphism in lung cancer risk is quite limited despite the great success in lung cancer association studies. By adopting a stringent two-stage analysis strategy, we performed a genome-wide gene–sex interaction analysis using genotypes from a lung cancer cohort including ~ 47 000 individuals with European ancestry. Three low-frequency variants (minor allele frequency < 0.05), rs17662871 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.71, P = 4.29×10−8); rs79942605 (OR = 2.17, P = 2.81×10−8) and rs208908 (OR = 0.70, P = 4.54×10−8) were identified with different risk effect of lung cancer between men and women. Further expression quantitative trait loci and functional annotation analysis suggested rs208908 affects lung cancer risk through differential regulation of Coxsackie virus and adenovirus receptor gene expression in lung tissues between men and women. Our study is one of the first studies to provide novel insights about the genetic and molecular basis for sex disparity in lung cancer development.

Abstract There is growing evidence showing that sex disparity in lung cancer risk cannot be fully explained by sex differences in smoking behavior, implying existence of genetic and molecular basis for sex disparity in lung cancer development. However, the information about sex dimorphism in lung cancer risk is quite limited despite the great success in lung cancer association studies. By adopting a stringent two-stage analysis strategy, we performed a genome-wide gene-sex interaction analysis using genotype from a lung cancer cohort including ~ 47,000 individuals with European ancestry. Three low-frequency variants (minor allele frequency < 0.05), rs17662871 (OR=0.71, p=4.29x10-8); rs79942605 (OR=2.17, p=2.81x10-8); and rs208908 (OR=0.70, p=4.54x10-8), were identified with different risk effect of lung cancer between men and women. Further eQTL and functional annotation analysis suggested rs208908 affect lung cancer risk through differential regulation of CXADR (Coxsackie Virus And Adenovirus Receptor) gene expression in lung tissues between men and women. Our study is one of the first studies to provide novel insights about the genetic and molecular basis for sex disparity in lung cancer development.

Abstract Purpose: We hypothesized that integrated analysis of cancer types from different lineages would reveal novel molecularly defined subgroups with unique therapeutic vulnerabilities. On the basis of the molecular similarities between subgroups of breast and ovarian cancers, we analyzed these cancers as a single cohort to test our hypothesis. Experimental Design: Identification of transcriptional subgroups of cancers and drug sensitivity analyses were performed using mined data. Cell line sensitivity to Hsp90 inhibitors (Hsp90i) was tested in vitro. The ability of a transcriptional signature to predict Hsp90i sensitivity was validated using cell lines, and cell line- and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Mechanisms of Hsp90i sensitivity were uncovered using immunoblot and RNAi. Results: Transcriptomic analyses of breast and ovarian cancer cell lines uncovered two mixed subgroups comprised primarily of triple-negative breast and multiple ovarian cancer subtypes. Drug sensitivity analyses revealed that cells of one mixed subgroup are significantly more sensitive to Hsp90i compared with cells from all other cancer lineages evaluated. A gene expression classifier was generated that predicted Hsp90i sensitivity in vitro, and in cell line- and PDXs. Cells from the Hsp90i-sensitive subgroup underwent apoptosis mediated by Hsp90i-induced upregulation of the proapoptotic proteins Bim and PUMA. Conclusions: Our findings identify Hsp90i as a potential therapeutic strategy for a transcriptionally defined subgroup of ovarian and breast cancers. This study demonstrates that gene expression profiles may be useful to identify therapeutic vulnerabilities in tumor types with limited targetable genetic alterations, and to identify molecularly definable cancer subgroups that transcend lineage.