Berenguer, Marina

Background. Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is increasingly recognized as a significant indication for liver transplantation (LT) in North America. Yet data on its impact in other countries, such as Spain, remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and trajectory of MASLD-related LT in Spain and compare these findings with broader national data and international data sets. Methods. Multicenter retrospective cohort study including adults (18 y and older) undergoing LT for MASLD between 2010 and 2023 in 5 large Spanish centers. Additional data were obtained from the Spanish Transplant Registry (Organización Nacional de Trasplantes) and high-prevalence LT centers in the United States (n = 7) and Canada (n = 1). Results. Among 3448 LTs performed in the 5 Spanish centers, 3.4% (n = 117) were MASLD-related. An increasing trajectory of MASLD-related LT was observed, with predictions suggesting a rise to 5.4%–10.8% of LTs for MASLD by 2028. These trends were consistent with Organización Nacional de Trasplantes data. Compared with North American data, the growth trajectory in Spain showed a less steep increase. Hepatocellular carcinoma rates were higher in the Spanish MASLD-LT recipients, yet metabolic comorbidities were frequent in all populations. Conclusions. The burden of MASLD-related LT in Spain is growing, yet at a less pronounced rate than in the United States/Canada. Whether this slower increase will persist or decline in the future as newer antiobesity and MASLD-related drugs are increasingly used is still unknown. In the meantime, our results highlight the need for tailored approaches to management and prevention in the Spanish population and underscore the importance of continued monitoring and research into the evolving impact of MASLD on LT in Spain and beyond.

Background. When a partial liver graft is unable to meet the demands of the recipient, a clinical phenomenon, small-for-size syndrome (SFSS), may ensue. Clear definition, diagnosis, and management are needed to optimize transplant outcomes. Methods. A Consensus Scientific committee (106 members from 21 countries) performed an extensive literature review on specific aspects of SFSS, recommendations underwent blinded review by an independent panel, and discussion/voting on the recommendations occurred at the Consensus Conference. Results. The ideal graft-to-recipient weight ratio of ≥0.8% (or graft volume standard liver volume ratio of ≥40%) is recommended. It is also recommended to measure portal pressure or portal blood flow during living donor liver transplantation and maintain a postreperfusion portal pressure of <15 mm Hg and/or portal blood flow of <250 mL/min/100 g graft weight to optimize outcomes. The typical time point to diagnose SFSS is the postoperative day 7 to facilitate treatment and intervention. An objective 3-grade stratification of severity for protocolized management of SFSS is proposed. Conclusions. The proposed grading system based on clinical and biochemical factors will help clinicians in the early identification of patients at risk of developing SFSS and institute timely therapeutic measures. The validity of this newly created grading system should be evaluated in future prospective studies.

Background. During the perioperative period of living donor liver transplantation, anesthesiologists and intensivists may encounter patients in receipt of small grafts that puts them at risk of developing small for size syndrome (SFSS). Methods. A scientific committee (106 members from 21 countries) performed an extensive literature review on aspects of SFSS with proposed recommendations. Recommendations underwent a blinded review by an independent expert panel and discussion/voting on the recommendations occurred at a consensus conference organized by the International Liver Transplantation Society, International Living Donor Liver Transplantation Group, and Liver Transplantation Society of India. Results. It was determined that centers with experience in living donor liver transplantation should utilize potential small for size grafts. Higher risk recipients with sarcopenia, cardiopulmonary, and renal dysfunction should receive small for size grafts with caution. In the intraoperative phase, a restrictive fluid strategy should be considered along with routine use of cardiac output monitoring, as well as use of pharmacologic portal flow modulation when appropriate. Postoperatively, these patients can be considered for enhanced recovery and should receive proactive monitoring for SFSS, nutrition optimization, infection prevention, and consideration for early renal replacement therapy for avoidance of graft congestion. Conclusions. Our recommendations provide a framework for the optimal anesthetic and critical care management in the perioperative period for patients with grafts that put them at risk of developing SFSS. There is a significant limitation in the level of evidence for most recommendations. This statement aims to provide guidance for future research in the perioperative management of SFSS.

Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is a well-recognized complication following liver transplantation (LT), with up to 20% developing this following living donor LT (LDLT). Preventing SFSS involves consideration of factors before the surgical procedure, including donor and recipient selection, and factors during the surgical procedure, including adequate outflow reconstruction, graft portal inflow modulation, and management of portosystemic shunts. International Liver Transplantation Society, International Living Donor Liver Transplantation Group, and Liver Transplant Society of India Consensus Conference was convened in January 2023 to develop recommendations for the prediction and management of SFSS in LDLT. The format of the conference was based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. International experts in this field were allocated to 4 working groups (diagnosis, prevention, anesthesia, and critical care considerations, and management of established SFSS). The working groups prepared evidence-based recommendations to answer-specific questions considering the currently available literature. The working group members, independent panel, and conference attendees served as jury to edit and confirm the final recommendations presented at the end of the conference by each working group separately. This report presents the final statements and evidence-based recommendations provided by working group 2 that can be implemented to prevent SFSS in LDLT patients.

Background. The International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS) has placed a strong focus on achieving gender equality and equity in liver transplant (LT). We aimed to understand gender distribution in leadership positions among LT physicians around the world and within ILTS. Methods. In 2019, the ILTS Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion Committee distributed a survey to obtain granular data on gender and characteristics of transplant physicians as well as those in leadership positions in each center. Additionally, data were collected on the gender composition of the ILTS membership, council, chairpersons, and committees and from the United Network for Organ Sharing. Results. Data were collected from 243 transplant centers. Thirty-two (13.2%) had at least 1 woman as the director of LT, chief of transplant surgery, or chief of transplant hepatology. Of the 243 centers, 133 reported the age and gender of the leadership personnel. Women physicians comprised 152 of the 833 transplant surgeons (18.2%) and 298 of the 935 hepatologists (31.9%). Among the 1331 ILTS physician members, 588 (44.2%) provided gender information in their member profiles, and 155 (26.3%) identified themselves as women. Of the 26 ILTS leadership positions, 7 (26.9%) were held by women. Conclusions. This analysis of worldwide gender distribution in the LT physician workforce showed notable gender disparity in LT leadership around the globe and within the ILTS. These data provide a launching point for promoting and achieving gender equality and equity in LT.

The International Liver Transplantation Society and the Spanish Society of Liver Transplantation consensus conference on extrahepatic cancer and liver transplantation (LT) was held on January 28–30, 2021. Working groups were organized to focus on one topic and develop evidence-based recommendations specifically addressing (a) nonhepatic cancer in LT candidates, (b) de novo malignancies after LT, (c) prevention and management of donor-derived malignancies after LT, and (d) nonhepatic cancer in the pediatric population. All consensus conference attendees voted on the recommendations proposed as well as the quality of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.

Transplant oncology defines any application of transplant medicine and surgery aimed at improving cancer patients’ survival and/or quality of life. In practice, liver transplantation for selected hepato-biliary cancers is the only solid organ transplant with demonstrated efficacy in curing cancer. Four are the proposed future contributions of transplant oncology in hepato-biliary cancer (4-e). (1) evolutionary approach to cancer care that includes liver transplantation; (2) elucidation of self and non-self recognition systems, by linking tumor and transplant immunology; (3) exploration of innovative endpoints both in clinical and experimental settings taking advantage from the access to the entire liver explant; (4) extension of surgical limitation in the multidisciplinary approach to hepato-biliary oncology. The aim of this review is to define the principles of transplant oncology that may be applied to hepato-biliary cancer treatment and research, attempting to balance current evidences with future opportunities.

AbstractBackgroundStudies have suggested transplantation using older donor livers results in similar short‐term outcomes as younger donor livers; however, little data exist on long‐term patient/graft outcomes of the octogenarian liver recipient.MethodsRetrospective data were collected from 2 centers, (Valencia, Spain and Rochester, MN, USA) of all recipients of octogenarian donor liver allografts from 2000 to 2011 with follow‐up to 2016. The aim was to compare long‐term patient/graft survival as well as metabolic outcomes of the recipient with the octogenarian liver vs younger than 60 years donor.Results78 recipients of older liver allografts were compared to 78 matched controls. No difference in 10‐year patient mortality was demonstrated (P = 0.074). Octogenarian livers were associated with 3‐fold higher likelihood of graft failure (P = 0.002) but no increase in the risk of post‐LT cardiovascular disease (P = 0.60), hypertension (P = 0.33), vascular complications (P = 0.53), or malignancy (P = 0.14). In multivariate analysis, elder livers remained a significant factor associated with rejection (P = 0.034) with a trend not reaching statistical significance for graft failure (P = 0.052).ConclusionsFor appropriately selected recipients, receiving an octogenarian liver does not clearly influence patient survival but does impact early graft survival with a notable increase in early posttransplant rejection rates and re‐transplantation. Over 1.5 decades, older allografts have not adversely affected metabolic outcomes.