Diasio, Robert B.

4075 Background: EAC recurrence after surgery with curative intent is believed to carry a uniformly dismal prognosis that may discourage further therapy. To date, the post-recurrence survival of patients has not been examined in EAC. Our aim was to examine site of recurrence in relation to outcome in EAC patients after surgery. Methods: Among EAC patients (N = 796) rendered margin-free at surgery performed at Mayo Clinic, most were T3-4 and lymph node (LN)-positive; none received neoadjuvant therapy. The patient subset who had documented disease recurrence (N = 401) formed the current study population. Cox models were used to examine overall survival (OS) post-recurrence. Results: Among patients with recurrence, median time to recurrence (TTR) was 11 months. Site of recurrence included loco-regional (regional LNs, esophagogastric, anastomosis), chest, abdomen, or distant sites in 97 (27%), 144 (40%), 181 (50%), and 88 (24%) patients, respectively. Most recurrences (66%) were limited to one site. Chest-involved recurrence was significantly associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, P = .047), even after adjusting for TTR, number of recurrence sites, tumor pathology, and palliative chemotherapy. This result was confirmed when multivariate analysis was restricted to patients who had only 1 recurrence site (Table) or who had biopsy-proven recurrence (P = .080). In separate models, abdomen-involved (HR = 1.3, P = .016) or bone-involved (HR = 1.6, P= .008) recurrences were independently associated with worse OS. Conclusions: Chest-involved recurrence of EAC independently predicts for improved survival, whereas abdominal and bony sites of recurrence predict for worse outcome. Primary tumor grade and node number were durable prognosticators after recurrence. These novel data provide useful prognostic information and have the potential to influence clinical decision-making. [Table: see text]

4009 Background: HER2 expression in upper digestive cancer is reported to be heterogeneous, which substantially affects interpretation of HER2 positivity in the clinic. Yet the frequency and prognostic impact of HER2 genetic heterogeneity and polysomy 17 (poly17) are unknown in EAC. Methods: HER2 amplification (fluorescence in situ hybridization) and protein expression were examined in untreated surgical EAC specimens (N = 661) at Mayo Clinic. HER2 genetic heterogeneity was defined per ASCO/CAP as amplification (HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥ 2) in 5-50% of cancer cells; poly17 refers to ≥ 3 copies of chromosome 17. Most tumors were T3-4 (68%) or lymph node (LN)-positive (73%). Cox models were used to assess disease-specific (DSS) and overall survival (OS). Results: HER2 amplification was detected in 117 of 661 EACs (18%), of which 20 (17%) showed HER2 heterogeneity. HER2 heterogeneous tumors had a significantly higher frequency of poly17 and high tumor grade. HER2 heterogeneity by amplification vs expression were correlated. Since heterogeneity was limited to HER2-amplified tumors, survival analysis was stratified by amplification status. In multivariable analysis, only HER2 heterogeneity and metastatic LN number were prognostic (Table). Conclusions: Among HER2 amplified EACs, 17% show HER2 heterogeneity, which is associated with increased poly17 and independently predicts 2-fold higher risk of cancer-specific death. Among HER2-nonamplified cases, poly17 is independently associated with worse survival. These novel findings demonstrate aggressive subgroups in HER2-amplified and -nonamplified EACs that have important implications for HER2 analysis and evaluation of benefit from HER2 targeted therapy. [Table: see text]

3564 Background: Lethal-7 (let-7) microRNA has been shown to inhibit colon cancer cell proliferation by inducing KRAS downregulation after binding to specific sites in the 3’- UTR. Recent studies identified a KRAS 3’-UTR polymorphism in the let-7 complimentary site (LCS6) that has been shown to weaken let-7 binding and alter KRAS expression. Carriers of the LCS6 G-allele showed worse survival in metastatic colorectal cancer from prior studies of limited sample size. In the current study, we evaluated the LCS6 variant in 2,834 Stage III colon cancer patients and its association with disease-free survival (DFS), KRAS mutation status, and other clinicopathological features. Methods: In the NCCTG phase III trial (N0147), the LCS6 variant was assayed in germline DNA extracted from whole blood using RT-PCR. Extracted tumor DNA was analyzed for KRAS exon 2 mutations. Chi-squared and two-sample t test were used to compare baseline factors and KRAS mutation status between patients defined by LCS6 variant status. Log-rank tests and multivariate Cox models assessed the unadjusted and adjusted associations between LCS6 status and DFS, respectively. Results: We identified 432 (15.2%) patients heterozygous or homozygous for the LCS6 G-allele and 2402 (84.8%) patients homozygous for the LCS6 T-allele. G-allele carriers were significantly more frequent in Caucasians than other races (Chi-Squared Test, p<0.0001). No associations were found between the LCS6 genotype and T stage, positive lymph node number, tumor differentiation, or primary tumor location (all p>0.2). Moreover, the LCS6 genotype was not associated with DFS (hazard ratio = 0.93, p=0.49) even after combining LCS6 genotype with KRAS mutation status. Conclusions: We report the largest association study investigating the LCS6 polymorphism and colon cancer outcome. There is no significant evidence that the germline LCS6 genotype was associated with DFS in stage III colon cancer patients. Additional studies are needed to determine if LCS6 genotype differs between tumor and germline DNA which may further clarify its prognostic value.

4606 Background: Preclinical studies have indicated that TP is one of the most useful markers of tumor response to capecitabine; with elevated TP expression resulting in higher intratumor levels of 5-FU. TP level in the tumor may be associated directly with survival and may be up-regulated by XRT. Methods: Twenty patients (pts) who had newly diagnosed locally advanced pancreatic cancer, age ≥ 19 years, ECOG PS 0–2, and adequate organ function received 50.4 Gy XRT with capecitabine 1,600 mg/m2 M-F x 6 wks determined from our phase I study (JCO, Dec 2005). Following capecitabine-XRT, stable and responding pts received capecitabine 2,000mg/m2 x 14 days every 3 wks till progression. Restaging was performed every 9 wks. Tumor specimens were procured with EUS-FNA prior and week 2 after starting capecitabine-XRT to evaluate TP mRNA levels by RT-PCR. Results: TP levels were elevated post-XRT when compared to pre-XRT TP (p= 0.01). Each of the 20 pts had at least one observation of TP. Mean TP level of each pt was obtained by averaging the pre-XRT and post-XRT TP levels. If one value was missing, then the other value was used for the mean TP level. Mean TP level was significantly associated with survival using the Cox proportional hazards model (p= 0.0072). Pts were separated into two groups - those with high baseline TP level and those with lower TP level with a cut off value of 213.85 using median of mean TP level. It was observed that group with higher TP levels had better survival as compared to the group with lower TP levels. However, the survival curves of these two groups crossed over after 18 months. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the higher the TP level in tumor post-XRT, the better the survival. This is most probably due to a higher accumulation of 5-FU in tumor due to up-regulation of TP. Possible explanation for the two groups crossing over after 18 months may include heterogeneity in TP due to a difference in pharmacogenomics or idiosyncratic drug toxicity profile of capecitabine. Further studies of long-term effects of treatment with a larger number of pts are needed to study exact effects of capecitabine and XRT, and to evaluate the differential role of TP with survival. [Table: see text]

2557 Background: Irreversible inhibition of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) by EU blocks 5-FU catabolism allowing for oral 5-FU administration with complete bioavailability. Unfortunately, phase III trials with co-administered EU/5-FU showed inferiority vs. 5-FU/leucovorin, and were discontinued. We recently reported that competitive inhibition of human uridine phosphorylase (UP) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) 5-FU-anabolic enzymes by EU is an important mechanism potentially responsible for clinical failure of the combined EU/5- FU regimen. We hypothesize that EU inhibition of UP and TP is transient, while that of DPD is prolonged, allowing for novel schedule dependent optimization of EU/5-FU dosing regimens with improved efficacy. Methods: In this phase I study, five patients received a single oral dose (2 mg, 5 mg or 10 mg) of EU 12–14 hours prior to scheduled resection of primary/metastatic colorectal cancer. Dosage was as follows: Two patients received the 2 mg dose, one patient received the 5 mg dose and two patients received the 10 mg dose. Matched normal and tumor tissue biopsies were immediately snap frozen and subsequently UP, TP and DPD activity was measured in vitro via HPLC detection of [6- 14C]-5-FU catabolites/anabolites. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) DPD activity was determined at baseline prior to EU administration, 30 min prior to surgery (Day 1), and on Days 2, 5 and 14 following EU administration. Results: At 12–14 hours following EU administration, there was an absence of inhibition of UP and TP, while DPD was significantly inhibited in matched tumor and normal tissue. Importantly, PBMC DPD activity was significantly inhibited by EU on Day 1 (12–14 hours after EU administration) and Day 2 (36 hours after EU administration) at 0 ± 0% and 17 ± 11% (mean ± SD) of baseline, respectively. Conclusions: These data demonstrate a differential recovery time of EU mediated inhibition of UP and TP compared to DPD, which permits future schedule dependent optimization of EU/5-FU therapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2551 Background: The UraBT is currently in development as a phenotypic test to screen for DPD deficiency. Following an oral dose of 2-13C-uracil, the UraBT shows a significant relationship between breath 13CO2 metabolite formation and plasma 2-13C-uracil and 2-13C-dihydrouracil pharmacokinetics. We herein describe a novel, potentially more clinically relevant test in which a small oral dose of 2-13C-5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is administered, followed by assessment of breath 13CO2 metabolite formation as previously described for the UraBT. We hypothesize that the FUBT can rapidly assess interindividual variability in 5-FU catabolism and predisposition to 5-FU toxicity. Methods: Over two sessions separated by a seven day washout, a single dose (6mg/kg, p.o.) of 2-13C-uracil or 2-13C-5-FU was administered to patients with stage III-IV colorectal cancer (n = 4). Subsequent to drug administration, in each session, 13CO2 catabolite formation was quantified in the breath over eight hours. In a separate investigation over two sessions separated by a seven day washout, a single dose (3mg/kg, p.o.) of 2-13C-uracil or 213C-5-FU was administered to colorectal cancer patients with previously documented severe (n=2) or moderate (n=2) 5-FU dose-related hematological/gastrointestinal toxicity. Following drug administration 13CO2 catabolite formation was quantified over eight hours. 13CO2 concentration was expressed as Delta Over Baseline (DOB) in all sessions. Results: Compared to the UraBT, the FUBT showed an increased Cmax (50.7 ± 6.6 DOB/mg vs. 36.8 ± 7.8 DOB/mg; mean ± SD) and decreased Tmax (25 ± 4 min vs. 45 ± 6 min) for 13CO2 formation (p<0.05). The FUBT was able to distinguish patients with previously reported severe and moderate 5- FU toxicity, with 13CO2 Cmax values of 35.5 ± 9.5 DOB/mg (mean ± SD) and 59.8 ± 7.3 DOB/mg, respectively. Importantly, FUBT Cmax values positively correlated with DPD activity (rs=1.00, p<0.01). Conclusions: These data lend support to further development of the FUBT as a rapid and informative test to assess DPD activity and to predict susceptibility to severe dose-related 5-FU toxicity. [CA116964] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

AbstractBackgroundThe addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy improved outcomes for patients with metastatic colon cancer. E5204 was designed to test whether the addition of bevacizumab to mFOLFOX6, following neoadjuvant chemoradiation and definitive surgery, could improve overall survival (OS) in patients with stage II/III adenocarcinoma of the rectum.Subjects, Materials, and MethodsPatients with stage II/III rectal cancer who had completed neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based chemoradiation and had undergone complete resection were enrolled. Patients were randomized to mFOLFOX6 (Arm A) or mFOLFOX6 with bevacizumab (Arm B) administered every 2 weeks for 12 cycles.ResultsE5204 registered only 355 patients (17% of planned accrual goal) as it was terminated prematurely owing to poor accrual. At a median follow-up of 72 months, there was no difference in 5-year overall survival (88.3% vs. 83.7%) or 5-year disease-free survival (71.2% vs. 76.5%) between the two arms. The rate of treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) was 68.8% on Arm A and 70.7% on Arm B. Arm B had a higher proportion of patients who discontinued therapy early as a result of AEs and patient withdrawal than did Arm A (32.4% vs. 21.5%, p = .029).The most common grade 3–4 treatment-related AEs were neutropenia, leukopenia, neuropathy, diarrhea (without prior colostomy), and fatigue.ConclusionAt 17% of its planned accrual, E5204 did not meet its primary endpoint. The addition of bevacizumab to FOLFOX6 in the adjuvant setting did not significantly improve OS in patients with stage II/III rectal cancer.Implications for PracticeAt 17% of its planned accrual, E5204 was terminated early owing to poor accrual. At a median follow-up of 72 months, there was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (88.3% vs. 83.7%) or in 5-year disease-free survival (71.2% vs. 76.5%) between the two arms. Despite significant advances in the treatment of rectal cancer, especially in improving local control rates, the risk of distant metastases and the need to further improve quality of life remain a challenge. Strategies combining novel agents with chemoradiation to improve both distant and local control are needed.

Abstract Abstract 3678 The JAK/STAT pathway is becoming a relevant target for lymphoma therapy and inhibitors of the pathway are now in clinical trial. It would be ideal to identify patients for trial by assessment of pathway activation. We analyzed the primary tumors from 50 patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) using antibody against phosphorylated tyrosine signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) revealed that 52% (21/40) of DLBCL tumors express tyrosine phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3). There are several potential mechanisms of activation of the JAK/STAT pathway. Protein tyrosine phosphatases such as SHP1 are key negative regulators of this pathway. SHP-1 is also considered a tumor suppressor gene because of its ability to antagonize the action of tyrosine kinases. Persistent activation of STAT3 seems to play a critical role in the pathogenesis of several malignancies. In an attempt to determine mechanism of STAT3 phosphorylation, we analyzed SHP1 expression and its correlation to STAT3 phosphorylation in DLBCL tumors. We analyzed SHP1 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a tissue microarray composed of 27 DLBCL tumor samples. SHP1 was found silenced in 33% (7/27) of DLBCL cases. To confirm our IHC data SHP1 mRNA expression was also analyzed in DLBCL patients (n=7) and CD19+ normal B cells (n=3) using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). SHP1 expression was found silenced in 57% (4/7) of cases, however normal B cells expressed a significant amount of SHP1 mRNA transcripts. We next sought to determine the mechanism of SHP1 silencing in these patients. DNA methylation is the most common mechanism of gene silencing and gene inactivation in human cancers and methylation of a cluster of CPG sites near the proximal SHP1 promoter 2 has been shown in myeloma and T cell lymphoma cells. We analyzed the frequency of SHP1 DNA methylation in 40 DLBCL patients and in DLBCL cell lines by analyzing the proximal promoter regions for SHP1 with methylation specific (MSP) and unmethylation specific (UMSP) PCR primers. We found SHP1 methylation in 2.5% (1/40) DLBCL tumors and none of the DLBCL cell lines tested (OCILy3, OCILy10, SUDHL2, SUDHL6, OCILy19 and OCILy1) were positive for methylation. Furthermore, bisulphite sequencing of the MSP product confirmed methylated cytosines in the one MSP-positive DLBCL patient sample and in the positive control (methylated DNA). We next confirmed our MSP methylation results in the 40 DLBCL tumors DNA with a high resolution melting (HRM) methylation array for accurate detection of changes in the CpG methylation. The primers were designed to flank CpG islands, not to specifically amplify (converted) methylated or unmethylated DNA (as in MSP PCR). Data were normalized to an unmethylated control. Based on the melting profile, there was no methylation in the controls but detectable methylation (>5%) in the SHP1 promoter region was found in 10% (4/40) of DLBCL samples. The one sample that was positive with MSP PCR was also >50% methylated by HRM. Next we analyzed whether there is any correlation between SHP1 expression and tyrosine phoshorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3). In the 27 cases of DLBCL studied, 16 were pSTAT3 negative and 11 were pSTAT3 positive by IHC. 50% (8/16) of the pSTAT3 negative cases had very high expression of SHP1. Similarly, 45 % (5/11) of pSTAT3 positive cases were SHP1 negative consistent with loss of SHP1 gene expression. These data suggest that loss of SHP1 expression is one of several potential mechanisms that can contribute to increased tyrosine STAT3 activation in DLBCL. In addition, these data suggest that CPG island promoter hypermethylation in the SHP1 promoter is not associated with SHP1 gene silencing in DLBCL tumors. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 2655 Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has been classified into two distinct molecular subtypes: germinal center B cell–like (GCB), non-germinal centre-like (non-GCB). To improve outcomes for DLBCL patients, it is necessary to identify additional novel targets within GCB and non-GCB classifications to further stratify patients for prognosis and assist in choosing therapy for the individual patient. We have recently demonstrated that STAT3 activation is frequent in the DLBCL tumors, however the exact molecular mechanism(s) of STAT3 activation in DLBCL tumors are not known. Molecular mechanisms such as epigenetic silencing of negative regulators of the STAT3 pathway such as protein tyrosine phosphatase 6 (PTPN6) may contribute to STAT3 activation. We aimed to learn whether PTPN6 was expressed in GCB and non-GCB DLBCL, and if so, how that expression correlated with STAT3 activation and prognosis. We first performed epigenetic studies of PTPN6 in 38 DLBCL tumors and 6 DLBCL cell lines by methylation specific (MSP) PCR and high resolution melting array (HRM) methods. Surprisingly, PTPN6 promoter hypermethylation (0/38) was not detected in patient sample and cell lines by both the methods. Since the MSP PCR technique yields qualitative rather than quantitative data, we next performed pyrosequencing on the 38 DLBCL samples, and found results consistent with the MSP PCR analysis. Our data conclusively demonstrate that PTPN6 hypermethylation is absent in DLBCL tumors. We next sequenced the 600 bp upstream of the transcription initiation site of PTPN6 promoter 2 and 1 in 10 DLBCL tumors. We did not detect any point mutations in the promoter 2 and 1 core regions. Since PTPN6 promoter hypermethylation and mutations were absent in DLBCL tumors, we determined the expression level of the PTPN6 protein in 40 DLBCL tumors by molecular subtype. Formalin fixed paraffin-embedded DLBCL tumor samples were stained by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the determination of molecular subtype using the Hans algorithm and the detection of PTPN6 expression. Using a threshold of ≥30%, 75% (30/40) of cases were PTPN6 positive with various levels of expression: 11 cases had 30–80% of tumor cells staining positive and 19 had >80% of cells PTPN6 positive. PTPN6 expression by IHC was only correlated with higher IPI scores and a trend towards a shorter event free survival (EFS) (p=0.07). Within the 29 GCB tumors 69% (20/29) were PTPN6 positive; 100% (10/10) of non-GCB cases were PTPN6 positive. These data clearly suggest that PTPN6 expression is found in both GCB and non-GCB with the latter being uniformly positive (p=0.03) and PTPN6 negative cases being uniformly GCB. PTPN6 mRNA and protein was detected in all three ABC lines (LY3, Ly10, DHL2). Within the GCB lines (DHL6, Ly1 and Ly19) DHL6 was weakly positive and Ly1 and Ly19 were negative for PTPN6 mRNA and protein. Furthermore, within the GCB group PTPN6 positive cases had inferior EFS as compared to PTPN6 negative cases. In the non-GCB group all cases were PTPN6 positive with an EFS similar to PTPN6 positive GCB cases. The role of PTPN6 in the persistent activation of the STAT3 pathway in DLBCL patients has not been investigated. We hypothesized that tumors with activated STAT3 would have loss of PTPN6. Interestingly, this hypothesis was disproven. Within the 15-pSTAT3 positive cases 12 (80%) were PTPN6 positive. Conversely, 26% (6/23) of the pSTAT3 negative cases were PTPN6 negative. The distribution of pSTAT3 and PTPN6 by IHC in samples was evaluated in both GCB and non-GCB groups. Within the PTPN6+/pSTAT3+ group out of the 12 cases most were non-GCB (8/12; 66%). However, within the PTPN6-/pSTAT3- group all the 5 cases were GCB (5/5; 100%). Survival analysis revealed that the groups with the best EFS were those with PTPN6-/pSTAT3- tumors (n=5); those with PTPN6+/pSTAT3+ group (n=12) had the shortest EFS; and those with PTPN6+/pSTAT3- tumors (n=17) being intermediate between the other groups. In summary, we have demonstrated for the first time that PTPN6 is highly expressed in DLBCL tumors, and a common abnormality in non-GCB subtypes, which is positively correlated with activated STAT3. PTPN6 expression in the DLBCLs is not regulated through SHP1 promoter hypermethylation or point mutations. The finding that SHP1 loss was found only in GCB cases and was especially favorable should be explored further and may provide an important new stratification factor for future DLBCL studies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.