Andrews, Jack R.

192 Background: In the setting of disease progression of metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) on docetaxel, abiraterone acetate (AA) and enzalutamide are two commonly used second line therapies with data demonstrating survival benefits. Less is known about patient specific factors that contribute to success with these therapies. The objective of this study is to improve patient selection for post-docetaxel second generation hormone therapy (AA or enzalutamide) by evaluating whether overall metastatic burden is associated with treatment response in this setting. Methods: By retrospective chart review, patients with mCRPC treated with AA or enzalutamide following docetaxel failure (defined as PSA rise and radiographic progression) were identified. Patients were categorized into low volume and high volume metastatic disease based on the number of pre-treatment metastatic lesions; where low volume disease describes patients with ≤ 5 metastatic lesions (e.g. oligometastatic disease), and high volume disease represents patients with > 5 individual lesions. The primary endpoint was cancer-specific mortality and the secondary endpoint was radiographic progression free survival. Median follow-up time was 29.5 months. Results: 75 patients were identified and included in our analysis: 39 with high volume metastatic disease, and 36 with low volume metastatic disease. Baseline characteristics of age and pre-treatment ECOG were not statistically different between these groups. Pre-treatment high-volume disease burden was significantly associated with increased risk of radiographic disease progression (HR 4.21, 95%CI 1.97-8.99, p < 0.0001) and cancer specific mortality (HR 5.84, 95% CI 1.58-21.53, p = 0.0026) during treatment with second generation androgen deprivation therapy. Conclusions: High volume metastatic disease burden is associated with significantly increased cancer specific mortality and decreased progression free survival for patients on second line therapy with AA or enzalutamide following docetaxel treatment failure.

189 Background: The objective of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of early PSA decline following initiation of second-generation hormone therapy (2nd HT), namely abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide, in the post-chemotherapy setting in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: We retrospectively identified 75 m-CRPC patients treated with 2nd HT following docetaxel failure (defined as PSA rise and radiographic progression). Patients were categorized into two groups based on first PSA within 3 months after initiation of therapy: PSA reduction ≥ 50% (Group A) and PSA reduction < 50% (Group B). The primary endpoint was cancer-specific mortality and the secondary endpoint was radiographic progression free survival. Results: There were 75 patients (52 in group A, 23 in group B) in the analytic cohort. Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics, including median age, primary Gleason score risk group, median pre-treatment PSA, disease burden, site of metastases, and pre-treatment ECOG score were not statistically different between the two groups. PSA reduction ≥50% was significantly associated with decreased risk of radiographic disease progression (HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.21-0.80, p = 0.0113) as well as decreased risk of cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.29, 95%CI 0.09-0.87, p = 0.0325). Conclusions: PSA reduction ≥50% within 3 months of starting 2nd HT for patients with mCRPC who have failed first-line docetaxel is associated with significantly improved 3-year cancer-specific mortality and progression free survival. Our data supports the use of PSA as an early prognosticating marker for patient outcomes on this second line therapy. [Table: see text]

AbstractBackgroundProstatic specific antigen (PSA) has well‐recognized limitations as a marker for treatment response and disease progression. Post hoc analysis of the PREVAIL trial reported 24.5% of chemotherapy naïve metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients on enzalutamide had radiographic progression on conventional imaging with nonrising PSA. In this study, we sought to study the discordance of imaging with PSA kinetics in mCRPC patients on second generation anti‐androgens (SGA) post‐chemotherapy using combined conventional imaging, and new generation imaging in the form of C‐11 choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (C[11] choline PET/CT) scan.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 123 patients with mCRPC treated with SGA (Abiraterone or Enzalutamide) after docetaxel between 2016 and 2019. Patients underwent PSA testing, and C[11] choline PET/CT scan at baseline level before starting treatment with SGA, then every 3–6 months as part of their follow up evaluation. Loss of response to SGA was defined by increase in corrected maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of pretreatment lesions on C‐11 Choline PET/CT, and/or development of new lesions. Suspicious new lesions were confirmed by biopsy and/or conventional imaging.ResultsWe identified 123 mCRPC patients who received SGA (Abiraterone, n = 106; Enzalutamide, n = 17) after docetaxel. Median duration of therapy was 13.9 months (interquartile range: 8.75–21.14). Approximately 43% (n = 53) of subjects in this study exhibited an increase in choline avidity while on SGA. Of this group, 60.4% of patients experienced a parallel rise in PSA (Group‐A), whereas 39.6% displayed a paradoxical response (PR) (Group‐B), defined as increased choline avidity combined with stable or down‐trending PSA. Median PSA at time of increase in choline avidity was 3.1 ng/ml for Group‐A, and 1.3 ng/ml for Group‐B (p = 0.0176). Median SUVmax was similar in both groups (4.9 for Group‐A, 4.6 for Group‐B; p = 0.6072). The median time for increase in choline avidity was 9.5 versus 3.9 months for Group‐A versus Group‐B, respectively (Log‐Rank = 0.0063).ConclusionNearly 40% of mCRPC patients placed on SGA post docetaxel chemotherapy will exhibit paradoxical responses to therapy, therefore, warranting close follow up with imaging. C‐11 choline PET/CT imaging is a useful tool that can help in early predication of disease progression or treatment failure.

AbstractBackgroundWe sought to assess the prognostic utility of 11C‐choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) undergoing primary docetaxel chemotherapy.MethodsWe performed a single institution retrospective analysis of 77 mCRPC patients who were treated with 6 cycles of docetaxel chemotherapy, and who also underwent 11C‐choline PET/CT scans at baseline (before chemotherapy), mid‐course (after 3 cycles), and posttherapy (after 6 cycles). We evaluated treatment response based on percent change in blood pool‐corrected maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the target lesion on PET/CT, as well as percent change in serum prostate specific antigen (PSA). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with complete treatment response. Progression free survival (PFS) analysis was performed using log‐rank test and shown on Kaplan–Meier plot.ResultsPercent change in blood pool‐corrected SUVmax on mid‐course scan was a significant predictor of complete response (odds ratio [OR]: 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96–0.99, p = .0003), whereas percent change in PSA was not (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.99–1.01, p = .6025). 57 of 77 patients (74%) achieved ≥20% reduction in blood pool‐corrected SUVmax on mid‐course; these patients were 3.6 times more likely to achieve complete response after full 6 cycles of docetaxel chemotherapy, compared to patients with <20% reduction in blood pool‐corrected SUVmax (OR: 3.56, 95% CI: 1.04–16.52, p = .0420). Median PFS in the complete response group was 35.1 months (95% CI: 26.0–52.7 months), compared to 9.4 months (95% CI: 6.9–13.0 months) in the incomplete response group (p = .0005).ConclusionsOur study showed that mid‐course and posttherapy 11C‐choline PET/CT evaluation for mCRPC patients undergoing primary docetaxel chemotherapy can predict full course treatment response and PFS, respectively. 11C‐choline PET/CT imaging may provide valuable prognostic information to guide treatment choices for patients with mCRPC.

Objective To describe the natural history, reconstructive solutions, and functional outcomes of those men undergoing pubectomy and urinary reconstruction after prostate cancer treatment. Patients and Methods This study retrospectively identified 25 patients with a diagnosis of urosymphyseal fistula (UF) following prostate cancer therapy who were treated with urinary reconstruction with pubectomy. This study describes the natural history, reconstructive solutions, and functional outcomes of this cohort. Results All 25 patients had a history of pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time from prostate cancer treatment to diagnosis of UF was 11 (6, 16.5) years. The vast majority of men (24/25; 96%) presented with debilitating groin pain during ambulation. Posterior urethral stenosis was common (20/25; 80%), with 60% having repetitive endoscopic treatments. Culture of pubic bone specimens demonstrated active infection in 80%. Discordance between preoperative urine and intraoperative bone cultures was common, 21/22 (95.5%). After surgery, major 90‐day complications (Clavien–Dindo Grade III and IV) occurred in eight (32%) patients. Pain was significantly improved, with resolution of pain (24/25; 96%) and restoration of function, the median (IQR) preoperative Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) was 3 (2, 3) vs median postoperative ECOG PS score of 0 (0, 1). Conclusion Endoscopic urethral manipulation after radiation for prostate cancer is a risk factor for UF. Conservative management will not provide symptom resolution. Fistula decompression, bone resection, and urinary reconstruction effectively treats chronic infection, improves pain and ECOG PS scores.

AbstractBackgroundThe clinical course in metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) can be complicated when patients have disease progression after prior treatment with second generation hormone therapy (second HT), such as enzalutamide or abiraterone. Currently, limited data exist regarding the optimal choice of chemotherapy for mCRPC after failing second generation hormone therapy. We sought to evaluate three common chemotherapy regimens in this setting.MethodsWe retrospectively identified 150 mCRPC patients with disease progression on enzalutamide or abiraterone. Of these 150 patients, 92 patients were chemo‐naïve while 58 patients had previously received docetaxel chemotherapy before being started on second HT. After failing second HT, 90 patients were assigned for docetaxel‐alone (group A), 33 patients received carboplatin plus docetaxel (group B), while 27 patients received cabazitaxel‐alone (Group C). A favorable response was defined by more than or equal to 50% reduction in prostate‐specific antigen from the baseline level after a complete course of chemotherapy. Survival outcomes were assessed for 30‐month overall survival.ResultsPatients in group (B) were 2.6 times as likely to have a favorable response compared to patients in group (A) (OR = 2.625, 95%CI: 1.15‐5.99) and almost three times compared to patients in group (C) (OR = 2.975, 95%CI: 1.04–8.54) (P = .0442). 30‐month overall survival was 70.7%, 38.9% and 30.3% for group (B), (A), and (C), respectively (P = .008). We report a Hazard Ratio of 3.1 (95% CI, 1.31‐7.35; P = .0037) between patients in group (A) versus those in group (B) and a Hazard Ratio of 4.18 (95% CI, 1.58‐11.06; P = .0037) between patients in group (C) compared to those in group (B)ConclusionThis data demonstrates improved response and overall survival in treatment‐refractory mCRPC with a chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel plus carboplatin when compared to docetaxel alone or cabazitaxel alone. Further investigations are required.

Abstract Introduction Infection remains a persistent complication of penile prosthesis (PP) surgery. Despite popularity of Mulcahy’s PP washout protocol, Betadine has known tissue toxicity. Aim We evaluated PP infection rate based on the type of intraoperative irrigation used, ½ strength Betadine vs vancomycin/gentamicin. Methods We reviewed a prospective database of men undergoing primary, revision, and salvage PPs. No other changes to operative or perioperative techniques occurred after the change in irrigation solution. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate differences in infection rate with use of Betadine vs vancomycin/gentamicin irrigation. Potential confounders were reviewed. Main Outcome Measure The primary outcome was rate of PP infection before and after change of intraoperative irrigation. Results From 2014 to 2018, 217 patients underwent PP placement at our institution by a single surgeon; of whom, 21 (9.7%) experienced an infection (primary = 10 [7.1%], revision = 11 [17.19%], salvage = 0 [0%]). Overall, 152 (70%) received irrigation with Betadine and 65 (30%) with Vancomycin/Gentamicin. Univariate analysis demonstrated significantly increased infection rates with Betadine irrigation (odds ratio [OR]: 4.64, P = .006) and with revision surgery (OR: 2.68, P = .02). Significance of increased infection rate with Betadine was maintained (OR: 9.3; P = .025) after controlling for age, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, smoking, diabetes, primary vs revision/salvage, prior penile surgery, use of ectopic reservoir, and adjunctive glanulopexy. Conclusions Changing from intraoperative Betadine to vancomycin/gentamicin solution dramatically reduced infection rates among men undergoing PP placement in both primary and revision cases. We hypothesize that differences in infection rate may relate to the relative toxicity or non-sterile nature of Betadine. Manka MG, Yang D, Andrews J, et al. Intraoperative Use of Betadine Irrigation is Associated With a 9-Fold Increased Likelihood of Penile Prosthesis Infection: Results From a Retrospective Case-Control Study. Sex Med 2020;8:422–427.

e17540 Background: The clinical course in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) can be complicated when patients have disease progression after treatment with 2nd generation hormone therapy (2nd-HT), such as enzalutamide or abiraterone. Currently, limited data exist regarding the optimal choice of chemotherapy for mCRPC after failing 2nd-HT. We sought to evaluate three common chemotherapy regimens in this setting. Methods: We retrospectively identified 150 patients with mCRPC with disease progression on enzalutamide or abiraterone. 92 patients were chemo-naïve, while 58 patients had previously received docetaxel chemotherapy prior to 2nd-HT. After failing 2nd-HT, 90 patients received docetaxel-alone (group A), 33 patients received carboplatin plus docetaxel (group B), while 27 patients received cabazitaxel-alone (Group C). Favorable response was defined by ≥50% reduction in PSA level from baseline after a complete course of chemotherapy. Survival outcome was assessed for 30-month overall survival. Results: Mean (SD) age was 71.2 (8.28), 69.5(8.38) and 67.2 (8.36) for group (A), (B) and (C), respectively. Mean (SD) pre-chemotherapy PSA was 63.8 (138.18), 58.5 (118.15) and 53.7 (88.15) for group (A), (B) and (C), respectively. Mean (SD) Gleason score was 7.9 (1.1), 8.4 (0.88) and 8.1 (1.06) for group (A), (B) and (C), respectively. Patients in group (B) were 2.6 times more likely to have a favorable response compared to group (A) (OR = 2.625, 95%CI: 1.15 - 5.99) and almost 3 times compared to patients in group (C) (OR = 2.975, 95%CI: 1.04 – 8.54) (p-value = 0.0442). We report a Hazard Ratio (HR) of 3.1 (95% CI 1.31-7.35; p = 0.0037) between patients in group (A) versus group (B), and a HR of 4.18 (95% CI 1.58-11.06; p = 0.0037) between patients in group (C) versus group (B). Thirty-month overall survival was 70.7%, 38.9%, and 30.3% for group (B), (A), and (C) respectively (p-value = 0.008). Conclusions: Our data demonstrate improved response and cancer-specific survival in patients with treatment-refractory mCRPC on docetaxel plus carboplatin compared to docetaxel or cabazitaxel alone. Selection bias is inherent in any retrospective study; however, our finding suggests that clinicians may consider docetaxel plus carboplatin in mCRPC patients who fail 2nd-HT. Further prospective studies are warranted.