Dundar, Ayca

Background and Aims: Transient elastography (TE), shear wave elastography, and/or magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), each providing liver stiffness measurement (LSM), are the most studied imaging-based noninvasive liver disease assessment (NILDA) techniques. To support the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidelines on NILDA, we summarized the evidence on the accuracy of these LSM methods to stage liver fibrosis (F). Approach and Results: A comprehensive search for studies assessing LSM by TE, shear wave elastography, or MRE for the identification of significant fibrosis (F2-4), advanced fibrosis (F3-4), or cirrhosis (F4), using histopathology as the standard of reference by liver disease etiology in adults or children from inception to April 2022 was performed. We excluded studies with <50 patients with a single disease entity and mixed liver disease etiologies (with the exception of HCV/HIV coinfection). Out of 9447 studies, 240 with 61,193 patients were included in this systematic review. In adults, sensitivities for the identification of F2-4 ranged from 51% to 95%, for F3-4 from 70% to 100%, and for F4 from 60% to 100% across all techniques/diseases, whereas specificities ranged from 36% to 100%, 74% to 100%, and 67% to 99%, respectively. The largest body of evidence available was for TE; MRE appeared to be the most accurate method. Imaging-based NILDA outperformed blood-based NILDA in most comparisons, particularly for the identification of F3-4/F4. In the pediatric population, imaging-based NILDA is likely as accurate as in adults. Conclusions: LSM from TE, shear wave elastography, and MRE shows acceptable to outstanding accuracy for the detection of liver fibrosis across various liver disease etiologies. Accuracy increased from F2-4 to F3-4 and was the highest for F4. Further research is needed to better standardize the use of imaging-based NILDA, particularly in pediatric liver diseases.

AbstractBackgroundProstatic specific antigen (PSA) has well‐recognized limitations as a marker for treatment response and disease progression. Post hoc analysis of the PREVAIL trial reported 24.5% of chemotherapy naïve metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients on enzalutamide had radiographic progression on conventional imaging with nonrising PSA. In this study, we sought to study the discordance of imaging with PSA kinetics in mCRPC patients on second generation anti‐androgens (SGA) post‐chemotherapy using combined conventional imaging, and new generation imaging in the form of C‐11 choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (C[11] choline PET/CT) scan.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 123 patients with mCRPC treated with SGA (Abiraterone or Enzalutamide) after docetaxel between 2016 and 2019. Patients underwent PSA testing, and C[11] choline PET/CT scan at baseline level before starting treatment with SGA, then every 3–6 months as part of their follow up evaluation. Loss of response to SGA was defined by increase in corrected maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of pretreatment lesions on C‐11 Choline PET/CT, and/or development of new lesions. Suspicious new lesions were confirmed by biopsy and/or conventional imaging.ResultsWe identified 123 mCRPC patients who received SGA (Abiraterone, n = 106; Enzalutamide, n = 17) after docetaxel. Median duration of therapy was 13.9 months (interquartile range: 8.75–21.14). Approximately 43% (n = 53) of subjects in this study exhibited an increase in choline avidity while on SGA. Of this group, 60.4% of patients experienced a parallel rise in PSA (Group‐A), whereas 39.6% displayed a paradoxical response (PR) (Group‐B), defined as increased choline avidity combined with stable or down‐trending PSA. Median PSA at time of increase in choline avidity was 3.1 ng/ml for Group‐A, and 1.3 ng/ml for Group‐B (p = 0.0176). Median SUVmax was similar in both groups (4.9 for Group‐A, 4.6 for Group‐B; p = 0.6072). The median time for increase in choline avidity was 9.5 versus 3.9 months for Group‐A versus Group‐B, respectively (Log‐Rank = 0.0063).ConclusionNearly 40% of mCRPC patients placed on SGA post docetaxel chemotherapy will exhibit paradoxical responses to therapy, therefore, warranting close follow up with imaging. C‐11 choline PET/CT imaging is a useful tool that can help in early predication of disease progression or treatment failure.

AbstractBackgroundWe sought to assess the prognostic utility of 11C‐choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) undergoing primary docetaxel chemotherapy.MethodsWe performed a single institution retrospective analysis of 77 mCRPC patients who were treated with 6 cycles of docetaxel chemotherapy, and who also underwent 11C‐choline PET/CT scans at baseline (before chemotherapy), mid‐course (after 3 cycles), and posttherapy (after 6 cycles). We evaluated treatment response based on percent change in blood pool‐corrected maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the target lesion on PET/CT, as well as percent change in serum prostate specific antigen (PSA). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with complete treatment response. Progression free survival (PFS) analysis was performed using log‐rank test and shown on Kaplan–Meier plot.ResultsPercent change in blood pool‐corrected SUVmax on mid‐course scan was a significant predictor of complete response (odds ratio [OR]: 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96–0.99, p = .0003), whereas percent change in PSA was not (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.99–1.01, p = .6025). 57 of 77 patients (74%) achieved ≥20% reduction in blood pool‐corrected SUVmax on mid‐course; these patients were 3.6 times more likely to achieve complete response after full 6 cycles of docetaxel chemotherapy, compared to patients with <20% reduction in blood pool‐corrected SUVmax (OR: 3.56, 95% CI: 1.04–16.52, p = .0420). Median PFS in the complete response group was 35.1 months (95% CI: 26.0–52.7 months), compared to 9.4 months (95% CI: 6.9–13.0 months) in the incomplete response group (p = .0005).ConclusionsOur study showed that mid‐course and posttherapy 11C‐choline PET/CT evaluation for mCRPC patients undergoing primary docetaxel chemotherapy can predict full course treatment response and PFS, respectively. 11C‐choline PET/CT imaging may provide valuable prognostic information to guide treatment choices for patients with mCRPC.

5577 Background: Prostate specific antigen (PSA) has well-recognized limitations as a marker for treatment response and disease progression. A post hoc analysis of the PREVAIL trial reported 24.5% of chemotherapy naïve mCRPC patients on enzalutamide had radiographic progression on conventional imaging with non-rising PSA. In this study, we sought to retrospectively compare PSA levels with C-11 choline positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (PET/CT) images in patients with m-CRPC on 2nd-HT with prior use of chemotherapy. Methods: We identified 123 patients with mCRPC on 2nd-HT following prior use of docetaxel chemotherapy (Abiraterone, n = 106; Enzalutamide, n = 17). Patients underwent serial PSA testing and C-11 choline PET/ CTs every 3–6 months. Disease progression was defined by the increase in blood pool corrected maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the index lesion on C-11 choline PET/CT scan. Suspicious lesions were confirmed by biopsy and/or conventional imaging. Results: Approximately 43% (n = 53) of patients had radiographic disease progression while on 2nd-HT. At time of radiographic progression, 60.4% of patients showed a parallel rise in PSA (Group-A), while 39.6% showed a paradoxical response; defined as radiographic progression with stable or down-trending PSA (Group-B). Median PSA at time of progression was 3.1 ng/ml for Group-A, and 1.3 ng/ml for Group-B (p-value = 0.0176). Median SUVmax was the same (4.9 Group-A, 4.6 Group-B; p-value = 0.6072). Bone-predominance progression was more significant in Group-B (90%) versus Group-A (65%) (p-value = 0.0309). The median time for radiographic progression was 9.5 months versus 3.9 months for Group-A and Group-B, respectively (Log-Rank = 0.0063). Conclusions: Metabolic imaging is a useful tool that should complement PSA in the evaluation of treatment response and disease progression in mCRPC patients on 2nd-HT, especially considering the paradoxical response observed in our data.

144 Background: Despite having well-recognized limitations, urologists often rely on serial PSA testing as a marker for treatment response or disease progression. To determine if PSA was indeed a reliable marker for treatment response or disease progression, we compared PSA levels against C-11 choline PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with advanced prostate cancer treated with second generation hormonal therapy (2nd-HT). Methods: We retrospectively identified 239 patients who were undergoing treatment with 2nd-HT (enzalutamide or abiraterone) for advanced prostate cancer. While on treatment, patients underwent serial PSA testing and C-11 choline PET/ CTs every 3 – 6 months. Paradoxical response was defined as increasing blood pool-corrected SUVmax of known choline-avid lesions and/or identification of new choline-avid lesions, despite stable or down-trending PSA. Results: Median (IQR) age was 70.4(64.3 – 75.7) years and median (IQR) primary Gleason Score was 8 (7 – 9). In our study, 19% of patients (n = 46/239) who were receiving 2nd-HT exhibited paradoxical response. Median (IQR) PSA and corrected SUVmax at baseline evaluation were 1.3 ng/mL (0.3 – 12.8 ng/mL) and 3.5 (1.8 – 5.8), respectively. Median (IQR) PSA and corrected SUVmax at the time of paradoxical response were 0.4 ng/mL (0.1 – 5.4 ng/mL) and 4.5 (2.8 – 6.8), respectively. The median duration of 2nd-HT treatment prior to detection of paradoxical response was 4.8 months (2.9 – 10.1 months). No significant difference was noted between patients receiving enzalutamide versus abiraterone (p = 0.35). Independent predictors of paradoxical response were prior primary systemic treatment (i.e. hormonal/chemo-hormonal therapy versus local therapy) and patient’s age at time of 2nd-HT initiation on univariate and multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Our retrospective review demonstrated prostate cancer disease progression discordant with PSA down-trending in 19% of patients receiving 2nd-HT. We conclude that in this subset of patients with advanced prostate cancer, PSA may not be a reliable marker of treatment response of disease progression, and routine radiographic evaluation in these patients is warranted.