Cremer, Paul

Introduction: The magnitude of pericardial delayed hyperenhancement (DHE) by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) illustrates the severity of inflammation in pericarditis. We report exploratory CMR data from an open-label Phase 2 study of rilonacept (IL-1α/IL-1β inhibitor) in recurrent pericarditis (RP). Methods: Patients (pts) with idiopathic RP or post-pericardiotomy syndrome (PPS) enrolled in the study. A subset had CMR at baseline (BL) and final visit (FV, 6 mo). Pain (NRS) and inflammation (CRP) were also collected. CMR images were graded (none, mild, moderate, or severe DHE) by a central core lab blinded to clinical data. Results: Of 25 study pts, 11 had CMR at BL and FV; 6 active idiopathic RP, and 5 corticosteroid (CS)-dependent non-active RP (4 idiopathic, 1 PPS). At BL, DHE was severe (3), moderate (2), and none (1) in active RP pts and moderate (1) or mild/none (4) in CS-dependent pts (Figure 1). At FV, DHE was improved (2), resolved (2; one pt example in Figure C/D), or unchanged (2) in active RP pts and was improved (1), resolved (1), unchanged (2) or worsened from none to mild (1) in CS-dependent pts. DHE improvements were associated with decreased pain and CRP and occurred despite discontinuation of CS or reduction in dose level. One pt with severe DHE at baseline and mild DHE at FV experienced a recurrence ~8 weeks after rilonacept discontinuation and enrolled a second time with severe DHE; the patient had reduced CRP and pain NRS during both enrollments and ended the second enrollment with moderate DHE. Conclusions: Serial CMR demonstrated improvement in pericardial DHE after 6 mo of rilonacept treatment, consistent with clinical improvement, while corticosteroids were tapered/discontinued. Recurrence in one pt with incompletely resolved DHE after 6 months of rilonacept treatment could indicate that a longer treatment duration is warranted in patients with unresolved DHE. These preliminary results may inform future CMR-guided treatment studies in RP.

Abstract Background: Impact of recurrent pericarditis (RP) on patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was evaluated through qualitative patient interviews and as an exploratory endpoint in a Phase 2 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilonacept (IL-1α/IL-1β blocker) to treat RP.Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted with ten adults with RP to understand symptoms and HRQoL impacts, and the 10-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health (PROMIS Global) v1.2 was evaluated to determine questionnaire coverage of patient experience. The Phase 2 trial enrolled participants with active symptomatic RP (A-RP, n=16) and corticosteroid-dependent participants with no active recurrence at baseline (CSD-RP, n=9). All participants received rilonacept weekly for 6 weeks during a base treatment period (TP) plus an optional 18-week extension period (EP). Concomitant medications, including corticosteroids (CS), were tapered, if possible, during EP. HRQoL was assessed using the PROMIS Global, and patient-reported pain and blood levels of c-reactive protein (CRP) were also collected at Baseline and follow-up periods. Results: Information from qualitative interviews demonstrated that PROMIS GH concepts are relevant to adults with RP. From the Phase 2 trial, both participant groups showed impacted HRQoL at Baseline [mean PROMIS Global Physical Health (GPH) and Global Mental Health (GMH), were lower than population norm average]. In A-RP, GPH/MPH improved by end of base TP and were sustained through EP (similar trends were observed for pain and CRP). Similarly, in CSD-RP, GPH/MPH improved by end of TP and further improved at EP, during CS tapering or discontinuation, without disease recurrence (low pain scores and CRP levels continued during the TP and EP). Conclusion: This is the first study demonstrating impaired HRQoL in RP. Rilonacept treatment was associated with HRQoL improvements using PROMIS GH scores. Maintained/improved HRQoL during tapering/withdrawal of CS without recurrence suggests that rilonacept may provide an alternative to corticosteroids. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov; NCT03980522; 5 June 2019, retrospectively registered; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03980522

Cardiac sarcoidosis is a component of an often multiorgan granulomatous disease of still uncertain cause. It is being recognized with increasing frequency, mainly as the result of heightened awareness and new diagnostic tests, specifically cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans. The purpose of this case-based review is to highlight the potentially life-saving importance of making the early diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis using these new tools and to provide a framework for the optimal care of patients with this disease. We will review disease mechanisms as currently understood, associated arrhythmias including conduction abnormalities, and atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias, guideline-directed diagnostic criteria, screening of patients with extracardiac sarcoidosis, and the use of pacemakers and defibrillators in this setting. Treatment options, including those related to heart failure, and those which may help clarify disease mechanisms are included.

Objectives: The medical complexity and critical care needs of patients admitted to cardiac ICUs are increasing, and prospective studies examining the underlying cardiac and noncardiac diagnoses, the management strategies, and the prognosis of cardiac ICU patients with respiratory failure are needed. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is a research collaborative of cardiac ICUs across the United States and Canada. Patients: We included all medical cardiac ICU admissions at 25 cardiac ICUs during two consecutive months annually at each center from 2017 to 2019. Measurements: We evaluated the use of advanced respiratory therapies including invasive mechanical ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, and high-flow nasal cannula versus no advanced respiratory support across admission diagnoses and the association with in-hospital mortality. Main Results: Of 8,240 cardiac ICU admissions, 1,935 (23.5%) were treated with invasive mechanical ventilation, 573 (7.0%) with noninvasive ventilation, and 281 (3.4%) with high-flow nasal cannula. Admitting diagnoses among those with advanced respiratory support were diverse including general medical problems in patients with heart disease as well as primary cardiac problems. In-hospital mortality was higher in patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation (38.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.53; 2.02–3.16) and noninvasive ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula (8.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.25; 1.73–2.93) compared with patients without advanced respiratory support (4.6%). Reintubation rate was 7.6%. The most common variables associated with respiratory insufficiency included heart failure, infection, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and pulmonary vascular disease. Conclusions: One-third of cardiac ICU admissions receive respiratory support with associated increased mortality. These data provide benchmarks for quality improvement ventures in the cardiac ICU, inform cardiac critical care training and staffing patterns, and serve as foundation for future studies aimed at improving outcomes.

Background: Recurrent pericarditis (RP) episodes and conventional treatments result in morbidity, but the impact on patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has not been quantified. The Phase 2 trial NCT03980522 of rilonacept (IL-1α/IL-1β inhibitor) evaluated HRQoL. Methods: Patients with active RP who were symptomatic at Baseline (A-RP, n=16) and RP patients who were not currently experiencing a recurrence but were corticosteroid-dependent at Baseline (CSD-RP, n=9) were enrolled. All received rilonacept weekly for 6 weeks to end of base treatment period (TP) plus an optional 18-week extension treatment period (EP). Corticosteroid tapering occurred in the EP. Physical and mental HRQoL (PROMIS Global Health v1.2 Physical and Mental Component Scores [PCS/MCS]) were assessed at baseline and follow-up. Results: Figure 1 presents the PROMIS PCS/MCS and pain scale scores (both patient-reported) as well as C-reactive protein levels over time. Mean PCS/MCS scores at baseline were 39.9/44.5 and 43.3/46.5 for A-RP and CSD-RP groups respectively (versus the norm mean of 50). In A-RP, PCS/MCS scores improved by 11.4/5.6 points by end of base TP, and this improvement was sustained throughout the EP (increase of 11.4/6.0 points from baseline at end of EP). In CSD-RP, PCS/MCS scores increased by 1.8/1.4 points by end of TP and improved by 3.5/4.2 points at end of study, after tapering or discontinuation of corticosteroid without disease recurrence. Conclusion: Impaired baseline HRQoL suggests negative impact of RP. For A-RP, rilonacept rapidly improved pericarditis signs and symptoms which was associated with HRQoL improvements. For CSD-RP, rilonacept supported tapering/withdrawal of corticosteroids without recurrence, with maintained/improved HRQoL. These results suggest rilonacept can improve RP patient HRQoL while providing an alternative to corticosteroids.

Background: Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices provide hemodynamic assistance for shock refractory to pharmacological treatment. Most registries have focused on single devices or specific etiologies of shock, limiting data regarding overall practice patterns with temporary MCS in cardiac intensive care units. Methods: The CCCTN (Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network) is a multicenter network of tertiary CICUs in North America. Between September 2017 and September 2018, each center (n=16) contributed a 2-month snapshot of consecutive medical CICU admissions. Results: Of the 270 admissions using temporary MCS, 33% had acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (CS), 31% had CS not related to acute myocardial infarction, 11% had mixed shock, and 22% had an indication other than shock. Among all 585 admissions with CS or mixed shock, 34% used temporary MCS during the CICU stay with substantial variation between centers (range: 17%–50%). The most common temporary MCS devices were intraaortic balloon pumps (72%), Impella (17%), and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (11%), although intraaortic balloon pump use also varied between centers (range: 40%–100%). Patients managed with intraaortic balloon pump versus other forms of MCS (advanced MCS) had lower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and less severe metabolic derangements. Illness severity was similar at high- versus low-MCS utilizing centers and at centers with more advanced MCS use. Conclusions: There is wide variation in the use of temporary MCS among patients with shock in tertiary CICUs. While hospital-level variation in temporary MCS device selection is not explained by differences in illness severity, patient-level variation appears to be related, at least in part, to illness severity.

Aims Novel therapies are needed for recurrent pericarditis, particularly when corticosteroid dependent and colchicine resistant. Based on limited data, interleukin-1 blockade with anakinra may be beneficial. The aim of this multicentre registry was to evaluate the broader effectiveness and safety of anakinra in a ‘real world’ population. Methods and results This registry enrolled consecutive patients with recurrent pericarditis who were corticosteroid dependent and colchicine resistant and treated with anakinra. The primary outcome was the pericarditis recurrence rate after treatment. Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits, hospitalisations, corticosteroid use and adverse events. Among 224 patients (46 ± 14 years old, 63% women, 75% idiopathic), the median duration of disease was 17 months (interquartile range 9–33). Most patients had elevated C-reactive protein (91%) and pericardial effusion (88%). After a median treatment of 6 months (3–12), pericarditis recurrences were reduced six-fold (2.33–0.39 per patient per year), emergency department admissions were reduced 11-fold (1.08–0.10 per patient per year), hospitalisations were reduced seven-fold (0.99–0.13 per patient per year). Corticosteroid use was decreased by anakinra (respectively from 80% to 27%; P < 0.001). No serious adverse events occurred; adverse events consisted mostly of transient skin reactions (38%) at the injection site. Adverse events led to discontinuation in 3%. A full-dose treatment duration of over 3 months followed by a tapering period of over 3 months were the therapeutic schemes associated with a lower risk of recurrence. Conclusion In patients with recurrent pericarditis, anakinra appears efficacious and safe in reducing recurrences, emergency department admissions and hospitalisations.

Background Clinical investigations of shock in cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) have primarily focused on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS). Few studies have evaluated the full spectrum of shock in contemporary CICUs. Methods and Results The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is a multicenter network of advanced CICUs in North America. Anytime between September 2017 and September 2018, each center (n=16) contributed a 2-month snap-shot of all consecutive medical admissions to the CICU. Data were submitted to the central coordinating center (TIMI Study Group, Boston, MA). Shock was defined as sustained systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg with end-organ dysfunction ascribed to the hypotension. Shock type was classified by site investigators as cardiogenic, distributive, hypovolemic, or mixed. Among 3049 CICU admissions, 677 (22%) met clinical criteria for shock. Shock type was varied, with 66% assessed as cardiogenic shock (CS), 7% as distributive, 3% as hypovolemic, 20% as mixed, and 4% as unknown. Among patients with CS (n=450), 30% had AMICS, 18% had ischemic cardiomyopathy without AMI, 28% had nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and 17% had a cardiac cause other than primary myocardial dysfunction. Patients with mixed shock had cardiovascular comorbidities similar to patients with CS. The median CICU stay was 4.0 days (interquartile range [IQR], 2.5–8.1 days) for AMICS, 4.3 days (IQR, 2.1–8.5 days) for CS not related to AMI, and 5.8 days (IQR, 2.9–10.0 days) for mixed shock versus 1.9 days (IQR, 1.0–3.6) for patients without shock ( P <0.01 for each). Median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were higher in patients with mixed shock (10; IQR, 6–13) versus AMICS (8; IQR, 5–11) or CS without AMI (7; IQR, 5–11; each P <0.01). In-hospital mortality rates were 36% (95% CI, 28%–45%), 31% (95% CI, 26%–36%), and 39% (95% CI, 31%–48%) in AMICS, CS without AMI, and mixed shock, respectively. Conclusions The epidemiology of shock in contemporary advanced CICUs is varied, and AMICS now represents less than one-third of all CS. Despite advanced therapies, mortality in CS and mixed shock remains high. Investigation of management strategies and new therapies to treat shock in the CICU should take this epidemiology into account.