Citations

ABSTRACT Background Driving supports independence and quality of life in later life but is vulnerable to age‐related and/or disease‐related decline. While cognitive impairment is a well‐recognized risk for unsafe mobility, the contribution of sensorimotor function is less understood. Methods We studied 374 cognitively normal older adults (Clinical Dementia Rating = 0 at baseline) enrolled in the DRIVES Project. A SensoryMotor Impairment Index (SMI) was constructed from six domains (grip strength, gait speed, reaction time, hearing, vision, olfaction) and categorized as 0, 1, 2, or ≥ 3 impairments. Naturalistic driving was continuously monitored using in‐vehicle GPS dataloggers between 2019 and 2025. Linear mixed‐effects models tested whether longitudinal driving trajectories differed by baseline SMI, adjusting for age, sex, race, education, body mass index, and cognition (Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite). Results At baseline, participants with higher SMI burden were older and had lower cognitive scores (both p < 0.01). Over time, greater sensorymotor impairment was associated with faster declines in driving exposure and spatial range. Compared with SMI = 0, participants with SMI ≥ 3 showed steeper reductions in nighttime trips (−0.050 vs. −0.037 trips/month), long‐distance trips (> 20 miles; p < 0.001), and maximum trip distance ( p = 0.009), and greater contraction of driving space (entropy and radius of gyration; p < 0.001). Self‐reported driving behaviors showed that participants with higher SMI drove fewer days per‐week and were more likely to avoid night driving ( p < 0.01). Rates of self‐reported adverse driving events (e.g., crashes or citations) did not differ significantly across SMI groups, consistent with compensatory self‐regulatory behaviors. Conclusion Greater sensorymotor impairment predicts accelerated decline in naturalistic driving among cognitively normal older adults, independent of cognition. A composite SMI may provide a feasible, low‐cost approach to identify older drivers at risk for declining mobility and support timely interventions to prolong safe driving.

Abstract Objective To measure the relative levels of signal and noise in expert diagnosis of epilepsy. Methods Twenty multinational epileptologists independently reviewed 50 vignettes of adult and pediatric patients presenting with suspected seizure(s) on two separate occasions with a ≥30‐day washout period. Experts provided a diagnosis of epilepsy or non‐epilepsy based on clinical information and, if requested, routine EEG and neuroimaging data. Cases had an established clinical diagnosis of epilepsy or non‐epilepsy based on capture of habitual paroxysmal events on video‐EEG or long‐term clinical follow‐up. Experts' judgments were analyzed to decompose variability into different sources: signal (objective differences between cases), level noise (experts' bias toward over/under‐diagnosis), pattern noise (experts' idiosyncratic reactions to specific case features), and occasion noise (inconsistency across occasions). Results The probability of an expert making a different diagnosis for a given case on two different occasions was 16%. The probability of two different experts making a different diagnosis for the same case was 26%. Signal (case “difficulty”) accounted for 66–69% of total variation, with 31–34% attributable to noise. Level noise was the largest contributor in the absence of EEG/neuroimaging results (23%), while pattern noise dominated when test results were available (24%). Occasion noise contributed relatively little (1%) but was still sufficient to cause diagnostic reversals in 16–22% between occasions. Significance The degree of noise in expert diagnosis of epilepsy is substantial, stemming primarily from physicians' idiosyncratic interpretations of case features and variable dispositions toward over‐ or under‐diagnosis. Strategies to improve reliability are needed, including standardized data collection protocols and structured decision algorithms. For “difficult cases,” where expert reliability and accuracy are lowest, our findings support current clinical practice which favors early referral for video‐EEG monitoring over reliance on diagnostic anchoring. This diagnostic pathway may become more accessible with advances in EEG technology (e.g., wearable devices) and artificial intelligence.

OBJECTIVE The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) requires a low C-peptide level for insulin pump coverage unless the individual is β-cell autoantibody positive, which precludes coverage of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems for many people with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In the Randomized Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Control-IQ+ Technology in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Using Basal-Bolus Insulin Therapy study evaluating the t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ+ technology, adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes were categorized into high C-peptide (n = 195) and low C-peptide (n = 59) groups based on CMS criteria. RESULTS In the AID group, mean HbA1c decreased from baseline by 0.8%, which was significantly greater than in the control group with both high (P &lt; 0.001) and low (P = 0.02) C-peptide levels. Results were similar in participants ≥65 years old. CONCLUSIONS The benefit of AID is present with high and low C-peptide levels. Thus, requiring a low C-peptide level as a prerequisite for AID therapy is not warranted.

Background In epidemiologic studies, obesity has been associated with reduced natriuretic peptide ( NP ) concentrations. Reduced NP production could impair the ability of obese individuals to respond to salt loads, increasing the risk of hypertension and other disorders. We hypothesized that weight loss enhances NP production before and after salt loading. Methods and Results We enrolled 15 obese individuals (mean BMI 45±5.4 kg/m 2 ) undergoing gastric bypass surgery. Before and 6 months after surgery, subjects were admitted to the clinical research center and administered a large‐volume intravenous saline challenge. Echocardiography and serial blood sampling were performed. From the pre‐operative visit to 6 months after surgery, subjects had a mean BMI decrease of 27%. At the 6‐month visit, N‐terminal pro‐atrial NP (Nt‐pro ANP ) levels were 40% higher before, during, and after the saline infusion, compared with levels measured at the same time points during the pre‐operative visit ( P <0.001). The rise in Nt‐pro‐ ANP induced by the saline infusion (≈50%) was similar both before and after surgery (saline, P <0.001; interaction, P =0.2). Similar results were obtained for BNP and Nt‐pro BNP ; resting concentrations increased by 50% and 31%, respectively, after gastric bypass surgery. The increase in NP concentrations after surgery was accompanied by significant decreases in mean arterial pressure ( P =0.004) and heart rate ( P <0.001), and an increase in mitral annular diastolic velocity ( P =0.02). Conclusion In obese individuals, weight loss is associated with a substantial increase in the “setpoint” of circulating NP concentrations. Higher NP concentrations could contribute to an enhanced ability to handle salt loads after weight loss.