Citations

Background. Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at heightened risk for cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related complications, particularly infection, because of chronic immunosuppression and comorbidities. Although leadless pacemakers (LPs) reduce infection risk by eliminating transvenous leads and generator pockets, adoption in SOTRs has remained limited, largely because earlier systems were restricted to single-chamber ventricular pacing and lacked physiologic atrioventricular synchrony. The helix-fixation Aveir LP platform enables atrial, ventricular, and dual-chamber leadless pacing, but clinical experience in transplant recipients remains limited. Methods. We conducted a retrospective, multisite analysis across an integrated health system, identifying all adult SOTRs who underwent Aveir LP implantation between January 2022 and October 2025. Clinical characteristics, transplant details, pacing indications, device configuration, procedural outcomes, and follow-up data were collected. Primary outcomes included procedural success, complications, and device-related infection. Secondary outcomes included pacing performance, need for system revision or upgrade, and early device durability. Results. Thirteen SOTRs (mean age 64 ± 15 y; 15% female) underwent Aveir LP implantation, including atrial (n = 4), ventricular (n = 5), and dual-chamber (n = 4) systems. Transplanted organs included heart (46%), lung (31%), kidney (38%), and liver (15%), with 31% having multiple organ transplants. Over half of patients were critically ill at implantation, and 46% were dialysis-dependent, representing a high-risk cohort. All procedures were acutely successful with no intraprocedural complications. During a median follow-up of 258 d (interquartile range, 216–641 d), no device-related infections occurred. Electrical performance remained stable, with 1 atrial device replacement at 2.5 y for elevated capture thresholds. Conclusions. In a high-risk population of SOTRs, atrial and atrioventricular synchronous leadless pacing using the Aveir platform was feasible, achieved high acute procedural success, and demonstrated favorable early safety signals, including absence of device-related infection over available follow-up. Larger studies with longer-term follow-up are needed to define durability and long-term outcomes.

Abstract Aims Pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension (PHTN), typically due to intrinsic pulmonary pathology, requires right heart catheterization (RHC) for diagnosis. ePLAR, the echocardiographic pulmonary to left atrial ratio [calculated: tricuspid regurgitation maximum velocity (TRVmax) divided by mitral valve E to e′ wave ratio (E/e′)], has been demonstrated as a promising non-invasive surrogate for characterization of pre-capillary PHTN. As such, this study aimed to further evaluate the diagnostic utility of ePLAR in a large cohort of patients with PHTN. Methods and results All RHCs between 2018 and 2023 across three tertiary centres were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with PHTN were characterized as pre-capillary or post-capillary (isolated or combined). Concurrent ePLAR was calculated. ROC analysis evaluated the accuracy of ePLAR in detecting pre-capillary PHTN. Overall, 2235 patients had PHTN by RHC, mean age 63.5 ± 14.7 years, 53.5% male. Of these, 43.3% had pre-capillary PHTN. ROC analysis demonstrated ePLAR to have good accuracy in detection of pre-capillary PHTN (AUC 0.760), with a cutoff of 0.20 m/s demonstrating a sensitivity and specificity of 77% and 60% respectively. This persisted on sensitivity analysis for contemporaneous investigations and for right ventricular function. Conclusion In this large cohort, ePLAR was validated as an accurate tool for identifying patients with pre-capillary PHTN. This widely available, non-invasive, and reproducible parameter can have an important role in the work up of PHTN and may guide the need for invasive testing.

Abstract Cardiac involvement in AL amyloidosis significantly impacts both short and long-term survival. Achieving cardiac complete response (CarCR) is linked to excellent survival, comparable to that of the general population. We undertook this study to characterize patients with AL amyloidosis who achieved CarCR. Methods: A single-center retrospective study of patients diagnosed with cardiac AL amyloidosis between 2004 and 2023 and achieved a documented CarCR for at least 12 months. Patients were included if they had evidence of cardiac involvement confirmed by cardiac imaging (transthoracic echocardiogram or cardiac magnetic resonance) and Congo red–positive tissue (non-cardiac or heart biopsy), and were evaluable for cardiac response based on baseline NT-proBNP > 650 pg/mL or BNP > 150 pg/mL. CarCR was defined as a reduction in NT-proBNP to less than 350 pg/mL (or BNP less than 80 pg/mL). Heart transplant patients were excluded. Results: Sixty-three patients were included, representing 4.6% of the cardiac evaluable population in the study period. This proportion increased in the second period compared to the first period (7.5% vs 3.2%, P<0.001). The median age at diagnosis of 57 years (ranging from 29 to 79); 63% were male. Lambda light chain disease was evident in 63% of patients. The median difference between the involved and uninvolved light chain (dFLC) at baseline was 429 mg/L (interquartile range [IQR] 143-708). While all patients had cardiac involvement, 63% also presented with extra-cardiac involvement [kidneys (52%), liver (16%), autonomic nerves (14%), luminal gastrointestinal tract (11%), and peripheral nerves (10%)]. The median baseline NT-proBNP for the entire cohort was 1977 pg/mL (IQR 1393-3026). The median troponin T (n=43) was 0.02 ng/mL (IQR <0.01-0.05) and the median high-sensitivity troponin T (n=19) was 49 ng/L (IQR 38-79 ng/L). Cardiac stage distribution, according to the European modification of the Mayo 2004 staging model, was as follows: 59% stage II, 39% stage IIIa, and 2% stage IIIb. At baseline, echocardiogram features included a median left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction of 63%, a median intraventricular septum thickness of 14 mm, and a median average LV longitudinal strain of -12%. The most common first-line therapies were autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT; with or without induction, 54%), bortezomib-containing therapy (22%), and daratumumab-containing therapy (13%). Hematological complete response rates at 3-month, 6-month, and best response prior to CarCR were 32%, 49% and 76%, respectively. At CarCR, the median NT-proBNP was 265 pg/mL (IQR 220-307) with a median time from treatment onset to CarCR achievement of 20.6 months. At CarCR, 33% of patients were on loop diuretics. The CarCR rate at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months from treatment onset was 10%, 39%, 81%, 90%, 95% and 96%, respectively. Temporary increase of NT-proBNP above 350 pg/mL with return to CarCR was documented in 46% of patients. Echocardiogram parameters also improved significantly at the time of CarCR, with average left ventricular longitudinal strain showing the greatest median improvement in relation to baseline (from -12% to -17%, p<0.001). However, echocardiographic parameters did not fully normalize in all patients. Cardiac progression was seen in 14% of patients, at a median of 7.6 years from the initial time of CarCR. In addition, subsequent clone-directed therapy was given in 44% of patients at a median of 4.6 years from the initial treatment. With a median follow-up of 9.5 years, eight patients (13%) died, 4 due to causes unrelated to AL. We compared the survival of patients who achieved CarCR to the general U.S. population, matching for age, sex, and the year treatment. The observed survival of CarCR patients was similar to that of the general population (p=0.35). Conclusion: Patients with persistent CarCR >12 months in AL amyloidosis are uncommon and demonstrate excellent outcomes. The achievement of hematological CR was required in 3 out of 4 patients reaching a CarCR. Echocardiographic changes of amyloid infiltration may still persist in this highly favorable cohort, indicating that “complete” response refers primarily to functional and prognostic improvement, not necessarily a full restoration to pre-disease cardiac morphology and function. Achieving CarCR is associated with a low risk of cardiac progression, but the need for subsequent clone-directed therapy remains elevated.

Background Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR‐CM) has a specific pathophysiology, with myocardial stiffening and systolic dysfunction only in advanced stages. We aimed to investigate the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in ATTR‐CM compared with heart failure. Methods In this multicenter, observational study, patients with ATTR‐CM receiving CRT (n=101) were matched to patients without amyloid cardiomyopathy by sex, age, and implantation type (CRT with versus without defibrillator versus conduction system pacing, upgrade versus first implant). We evaluated changes in QRS duration and echocardiographic parameters following CRT implantation and at the most recent available assessments. The study end points were all‐cause death alone or combined with heart failure hospitalization. Results Patients with ATTR‐CM (median age, 76 [interquartile range, 72–83] years, 98% men, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction 30% [26–33]) showed greater QRS shortening after CRT implantation ( P =0.012), but not after a median of around 1 year ( P =0.152). There were no significant differences in the absolute LV ejection fraction changes immediately after implantation (+7 [+2/+10] versus +3 [0/+9] units; P =0.124), or to the last echo ( P =0.796), which was performed after 1.3 years in patients with ATTR‐CM and 2.9 years in patients without amyloid cardiomyopathy. Patients with ATTR‐CM had a shorter survival than controls ( P <0.001 for both end points). Patients with ATTR‐CM experiencing an early improvement in LV ejection fraction had a longer survival (log‐rank, 4.3; P =0.038). Conclusions Following CRT implantation, patients with ATTR‐CM show QRS narrowing and improvement in LV ejection fraction, not different from patients without amyloid cardiomyopathy. Early favorable LV remodeling seems to be associated with a lower risk of all‐cause death.

Background: Among cardiac amyloidosis subtypes, transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR) has gained increased recognition with the development of disease-specific therapies. Tafamidis, a selective oral stabilizer of the transthyretin tetramer, has emerged as an effective treatment. In the broader heart failure landscape, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have become cornerstone therapies across the ejection fraction spectrum, improving survival and reducing hospitalizations in both HFrEF and HFpEF. However, the clinical benefit of combining Tafamidis with SGLT2i in ATTR remains largely unknown. Hypothesis: Combination therapy with Tafamidis and SGLT2i provides added clinical benefits in patients with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adults with confirmed ATTR cardiac amyloidosis diagnosed via 99mTc-pyrophosphate scintigraphy and treated with Tafamidis alone or with an SGLT2i across three academic centers from January 2019 to February 2025. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were collected from medical records. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling were used, adjusting for age, sex, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, ejection fraction (EF), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Results: Among the 1,211 patients included in the 3-year follow-up analysis,946 received Tafamidis monotherapy and 265 received a combination of Tafamidis and an SGLT2i. The mean age of the cohort was 71.9 years (SD ±9.4), and 87.3% were male. A total of 142 mortality events occurred, with a higher cumulative mortality rate observed in the tafamidis-only group (16.3%) compared to the combination group (9.4%) (log-rank p = 0.042). In the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, combination therapy with Tafamidis and an SGLT2i was independently associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality (adjusted HR =0.576, 95% CI:0.334–0.992, p =0.04). Additionally, increasing age (HR =1.049, 95% CI:1.024–1.074, p < 0.001) was associated with higher mortality, while EF(HR =0.971, 95% CI:0.958–0.984, p< 0.001) and GFR (HR =0.975, 95% CI:0.965-0.985, p< 0.001) were with lower mortality. Conclusion: Combination therapy with Tafamidis and SGLT2i was associated with improved survival compared to Tafamidis alone in ATTR cardiac amyloidosis. Further prospective trials are needed to validate these findings and guide therapy optimization.

Introduction: Sex-based differences in outcomes among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) remain underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate sex-specific differences in cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HFrEF receiving SGLT2 inhibitors alongside guidelinedirected medical therapy (GDMT). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX global research network. Adults with HFrEF treated with SGLT2is and GDMT were stratified by sex. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline demographics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory data. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and acute heart failure (HF) events; secondary outcomes included hospitalizations, arrhythmias, renal outcomes, and advanced therapies. Results: After PSM, 17,408 male and 17,408 female patients were analyzed. Male patients had lower odds of acute HF events (aOR: 0.949; 95% CI: 0.909–0.991), all-cause hospitalizations (aOR: 0.933; 95% CI: 0.895–0.973), and renal failure (aOR: 0.915; 95% CI: 0.870–0.962). No significant differences were observed in all-cause mortality (aOR: 1.003; 95% CI: 0.926–1.087) or heart transplantation, although LVAD use was more frequent in males (aOR: 1.416; 95% CI: 1.053–1.905). Discussion: The findings highlighted potential sex-based disparities in outcomes for patients with HFrEF on SGLT2is. Differential prescribing patterns, comorbidity burden, or timing of therapy initiation may contribute to observed differences. Conclusion: Among HFrEF patients treated with SGLT2is, males experienced lower risks of HF events, hospitalizations, and renal failure compared to females, despite similar mortality. Further research is needed to understand and address sex-specific disparities in HFrEF management.

AbstractBackgroundThe prognosis in patients with advanced cardiac amyloidosis (CA) remains poor.ObjectivesWe sought to describe survival post heart transplantation (HT) in amyloid compared with non‐amyloid recipients, highlight waitlist times within the new allocation system across three Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) regions, and describe multiorgan transplantation (MOT) in hereditary amyloidosis.MethodsThis is a retrospective review of end‐stage CA patients who underwent HT at Mayo Clinic from January 2007 to December 2020. Wait time was compared in the new versus old OPTN allocation era starting December 18, 2018 by Wilcoxon rank sum test. All‐cause mortality for those with and without CA was compared using Kaplan–Meier estimates with log rank analysis, censoring December 16, 2022.ResultsFifty‐five patients with CA underwent HT between 2007 and 2020, 8 light chain amyloidosis (AL) (14.5%), 28 hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) (50.9%), 17 wildtype transthyretin (ATTRwt) (30.9%), and 2 hereditary apolipoprotein A1 (AApoA1) amyloidosis patients (3.6%). No significant difference in overall survival post‐transplant was seen in amyloid compared with non‐amyloid (p = 0.816). Median time to HT was shorter in the new system, 45 days (IQR 24, 78) versus 174 days (IQR 76.5, 483.5), p = 0.006. There was a decline in MOT in hereditary amyloidosis over time with the concomitant rise in disease‐targeted therapies.ConclusionsHT survival in CA patients was similar to non‐amyloid patients. The new allocation system benefits this cohort with shorter wait times. There is less MOT in hereditary amyloidosis with increased utilization of disease‐targeted therapy.

Background: Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare and understudied plasma cell disorder. It is caused by abnormal misfolding of monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains, leading to extracellular deposition of amyloid, ultimately resulting in organ dysfunction and death. Since AL amyloidosis is uncommon, therapies are adapted from the more common plasma cell disorders like multiple myeloma. Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, was first tested in several prospective and retrospective studies in AL patients with relapsed refractory disease. The ANDROMEDA study (Kastritis E et al, NEJM 2021) established daratumumab in combination with CyBorD (Cyclophosphamide-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone) followed by daratumumab maintenance as the new standard of care compared to CyBorD alone for newly diagnosed patients. Consequently, daratumumab maintenance has become universally offered to all newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients. Notably, there was no second randomization before the initiation of maintenance therapy in ANDROMEDA. Hence, a critical question that remains is whether the superior efficacy observed in the investigational arm of the ANDROMEDA trial is solely a result of the addition of daratumumab during the induction phase or if the maintenance phase contributed to the favorable outcomes in the investigational arm. We hypothesize that a shorter duration of maintenance would prove non-inferior to the standard duration of daratumumab maintenance in patients with AL amyloidosis that have responded to Daratumumab-CyBorD induction. To answer this question we are conducting a pragmatic phase 2 randomized trial assessing the optimal duration of daratumumab maintenance in patients with AL amyloidosis who have responded to Daratumumab-CyBorD induction. Study Design, Patients and Methods: We use broadened eligibility criteria consistent with pragmatic trial design. The estimated total enrollment is up to 96 patients. The main eligibility criteria are patients with biopsy-proven AL Amyloidosis who have completed 6 cycles of Dara-CyBorD-based induction treatment and achieved an adequate response to induction (defined as hematological complete response (CR), hematological very good partial response (VGPR), or hematological partial response (PR) with at least one organ response). Patients in whom bortezomib and/or cyclophosphamide were omitted from induction due to toxicity concerns or adverse effects are allowed. The major exclusion criteria are patients who were concomitantly diagnosed with multiple myeloma based on International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. This phase II, open-label, multicenter trial (NCT05898646) randomizes patients who have attained an adequate response to 6 cycles of Dara-CyBorD-based induction in a 1:1 ratio, using a dynamic allocation procedure that balances the marginal distributions of the stratification factors (age, cardiac stage, and t(11;14) status). Randomization is to either single-agent daratumumab maintenance of 6 cycles duration (experimental arm) or 18 cycles of daratumumab maintenance (control arm) (cycle = 28 days). Treatment is allowed to be given at a local facility After completing maintenance treatment, patients will follow up every 3 months for up to 36 months from registration. The primary endpoint of the trial is to evaluate the non-inferiority of a shorter (6 cycles) daratumumab maintenance measured by event-free survival (EFS) compared to the standard maintenance of 18 cycles in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis who receive 6 cycles of daratumumab-CyBorD based induction. EFS in this study is defined as time from registration to any of the following events: hematological progression, organ progression, subsequent anti-plasma cell therapy in the absence of hematological progression but with persistent organ dysfunction or death, whichever occurs first. Secondary endpoints are depth of hematological and organ response, bone marrow measurable residual disease negativity rate, duration of response, quality of life, and survival. By investigating whether a shorter duration of maintenance is non-inferior to the standard duration, we aim to inform clinical practice and potentially reduce the toxicities associated with prolonged maintenance therapy, including hypogammaglobulinemia, recurrent infections, the need for intravenous gammaglobulin replacement, and financial toxicity.