Citations

Abstract Background Adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) represent a rapidly expanding population with evolving mortality patterns. Despite improved survival, excess mortality persists. Objective To evaluate the incidence, causes, and predictors of mortality in a contemporary ACHD cohort. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults (≥18 years) first evaluated at Mayo Clinic from 2002–2023. Baseline clinical, imaging, and electrocardiographic data were analyzed. Vital status was determined using institutional records and the Accurint national mortality database. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate mortality and identify independent predictors of mortality Results A total of 7,678 ACHD patients were included, with median age of 36.8 years and median follow-up of 11.4 years. During 78,768 patient-years of follow-up, 1,116 patients died (median age at death 57.2 years), corresponding to an annual mortality rate of 1.4%. The cumulative rate of all-cause mortality at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years was 6.9%, 12.0%, 19.0%, and 26.2%, respectively. When stratified by CHD complexity, the annual death rate in patients with severe CHD (2.4%/year) was twice that of patients with moderate or mild CHD (both 1.2%/year). Older age and ACHD subtypes, specifically, cyanotic heart disease (HR 3.9, 95% CI 2.9–5.3) and Fontan physiology (HR 3.2, 95% CI 2.3–4.4), were strongly associated with increased mortality. Additional independent predictors included male sex, ventricular dysfunction, advanced NYHA class, prior heart failure hospitalization, hypertension, smoking, coronary artery disease, renal dysfunction, and abnormal hemoglobin levels. Cardiovascular causes accounted for 57.7% of deaths with known etiology, predominantly heart failure (48.9%) and sudden cardiac death (21.9%), while non-cardiovascular causes were driven mainly by infection and malignancy. Conclusions In this large contemporary ACHD cohort, mortality was driven by ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, and systemic end-organ involvement in addition to the underlying congenital anatomy. Both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes contributed significantly to mortality. These findings underscore the need for comprehensive multidisciplinary ACHD care focused on early recognition of cardiac functional decline, management of acquired comorbidities, and end-organ dysfunction.

476 Background: Outcomes remain poor for patients with advanced/metastatic CCA treated with first-line gemcitabine-cisplatin +/- anti-PD(L)1. Lirafugratinib is the first highly selective, irreversible FGFR2 inhibitor designed to target oncogenic FGFR2 driver alterations and resistance mutations. ReFocus (NCT04526106) is an open-label, multicenter phase 1/2 study in patients with advanced/metastatic CCA and other solid tumors with FGFRok2 alterations. Methods: Pivotal cohort of patients (n=116) with advanced/metastatic CCA harboring FGFR2 f/r previously treated with ≥1 systemic therapy and FGFR i-naive were treated with oral lirafugratinib 70 mg once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was confirmed ORR per RECIST v1.1 by independent review committee (IRC). Key secondary endpoint was duration of response (DOR); other secondary endpoints: disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and quality of life per EORTC QLC-C30. Results: As of 27SEP2024, the primary efficacy analysis of IRC-assessed data (n=114) and the secondary analysis of investigator-assessed data (n=116) set was done. The primary efficacy analysis excluded 2 patients as not available. Median age 57 years with 61.4% female. IRC-assessed ORR was 47%, and median DOR was 11.8 months (mos) (95% CI, 7.5-13.0), where 76.2% of responses lasted >6 mos. Median PFS was 11.3 mos (95% CI, 9.2, 14.8), with 12-month rate of 49.2%. Median OS was 22.8 mos (95% CI, 17.3-27.2), with 12-month rate of 74.6%. DCR was 96.5%. Common grade ≥3 on-target, off-tumor treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (32.8%) and stomatitis (12.1%). TRAEs led to dose reductions of 75.9%, dose interruption of 82.8%, and treatment discontinuation of 4.3%. QoL was maintained. Conclusions: Lirafugratinib demonstrated clinically meaningful anti-tumor activity (ORR, DOR, and PFS), manageable and tolerable safety in CCA FGFR2 f/r patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04526106 . Best Overall Response, n (%) IRC c Investigator d Complete Response Partial Response Stable Disease Progression Disease Not Evaluable 3 (2.6)50 (43.9)57 (50.0)3 (2.6)1 (0.9) 061 (52.6)51 (44.0)3 (2.6)1 (0.9) ORR a , n (%)95% CI 53 (46.5)37.1, 56.1 61 (52.6)43.1, 61.9 DCR b , n (%)95% CI 110 (96.5)91.3, 99.0 112 (96.6)91.4, 99.1 a ORR defined as proportion achieving confirmed response of complete response or partial response per RECIST v1.1. b DCR defined as proportion with confirmed response of complete response, partial response, or stable disease per RECIST v1.1. c Primary Efficacy Analysis Set. d Secondary Efficacy Analysis Set. Percentages based on number of patients in the analysis set for each treatment arm. Exact Clopper-Pearson used for 95% CI. IRC and investigator assessments are based on different populations and cannot compare directly.

Abstract Rationale Exertional dyspnea in children presents a complex diagnostic challenge, often requiring multiple evaluations to uncover underlying etiologies. Exercise testing is the standard for diagnosing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in children but requires significant resources. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), a marker of airway inflammation, has been proposed as an easier alternative to predict the need for exercise testing. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic utility of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) as a non-invasive marker of bronchial hyperreactivity in pediatric patients with exertional dyspnea, by assessing its sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values in comparison to cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), the gold standard for diagnosing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). This study seeks to determine whether FeNO can reliably guide the need for CPET, potentially streamlining the diagnostic process in children with suspected EIB, while also identifying any limitations of FeNO as a standalone diagnostic tool. Methods In this retrospective study, we reviewed pediatric patients up to 18 years of age who presented with unexplained dyspnea and underwent both CPET and FeNO testing from July 2020 to February 2023. A post-exercise decline in FEV1% of ≥10% during CPET defined a positive result for EIB. For FeNO, a threshold of ≥25 parts per billion (ppb) was considered indicative of bronchial hyperreactivity. Diagnostic agreement between FeNO and CPET was analyzed using a 2x2 table, with CPET as the reference standard. Results Among 98 patients who completed CPET, the cohort had a mean age of 14 years (SD ± 2.42), mean BMI of 22.2 kg/m² (SD ± 5.25), and 71% were female. Of these, 40 patients also underwent FeNO testing. Compared to CPET, FeNO exhibited a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 2.6%, a positive predictive value of 5.1%, and a negative predictive value of 100% for identifying bronchial hyperreactivity in this setting. Conclusion FeNO testing shows high sensitivity but limited specificity for detecting bronchial hyperreactivity, effectively ruling out but not confirming it independently of CPET. These findings reinforce the essential role of CPET in diagnosing EIB and suggest that FeNO may serve best as an adjunctive tool, rather than a primary diagnostic measure, in evaluating children with exertional dyspnea. A limitation of this study is the reliance on a single FeNO threshold, which may not account for individual variability in bronchial inflammation responses.

Abstract Rationale Exertional dyspnea in children often necessitates a thorough evaluation to determine potential causes, with bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) being among the most common. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is widely recognized as the gold standard for diagnosing EIB; however, it requires significant patient cooperation and specialized resources. The methacholine challenge test (MCT), a bronchial provocation test, is commonly employed to evaluate baseline airway hyperreactivity. Nonetheless, its reliability in predicting EIB in pediatric patients experiencing exertional dyspnea has not been well established. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MCT compared to CPET in detecting BHR among pediatric patients with unexplained dyspnea. This assessment will help determine the potential of MCT as a complementary diagnostic tool for EIB. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving pediatric patients (up to 18 years of age) who underwent both CPET and MCT as part of their clinical evaluation for exertional dyspnea from July 2020 to February 2023. A reduction of ≥20% in FEV1% was considered a positive result for the methacholine challenge. In the CPET, a decrease of ≥10% in FEV1% post-exercise was indicative of EIB. The results from both tests were compiled in a 2x2 table, using MCT as the reference standard. Results Out of the 98 patients who underwent CPET, 53 also completed a methacholine challenge test. The mean age of participants was 14 years (SD ± 2.42), with a mean BMI of 22.2 kg/m² (SD ± 5.25), and 71% of the patients were female. Using CPET as the reference standard, the MCT demonstrated a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 58%, positive predictive value of 8.7%, and a negative predictive value of 96.7% for identifying BHR in patients with exertional dyspnea. Conclusions MCT exhibited moderate sensitivity and specificity, and a high negative predictive value, indicating its effectiveness in ruling out BHR in children with exertional dyspnea. However, it is less reliable as a standalone diagnostic tool for EIB, and CPET remains essential for an accurate diagnosis of EIB in these patients.

AbstractIntroductionAlthough prior studies indicate that a QTc > 500 ms on a single baseline 12‐lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is associated with significantly increased risk of arrhythmic events in long QT syndrome (LQTS), less is known about the risk of persistent QT prolongation. We sought to determine QTc persistence and its prognostic effect on breakthrough cardiac events (BCEs) among pediatric patients treated for LQTS.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 433 patients with LQTS evaluated, risk‐stratified, and undergoing active guideline‐based LQTS treatment between 1999 and 2019. BCEs were defined as arrhythmogenic syncope/seizure, sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), appropriate VF‐terminating ICD shock, and sudden cardiac death (SCD).ResultsDuring the median follow‐up of 5.5 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 3–9), 32 (7%) patients experienced a total of 129 BCEs. A maximum QTc threshold of 520 ms and median QTc threshold of 490 ms were determined to be strong predictors for BCEs. A landmark analysis controlling for age, sex, genotype, and symptomatic status demonstrated models utilizing both the median QTc and maximum QTc demonstrated the highest discriminatory value (c‐statistic = 0.93–0.95). Patients in the high‐risk group (median QTc > 490 ms and maximum QTc > 520 ms) had a significantly lower BCE free survival (70%–81%) when compared to patients in both medium‐risk (93%–97%) and low‐risk (98%–99%) groups.ConclusionsThe risk of BCE among patients treated for LQTS increases not only based upon their maximum QTc, but also their median QTc (persistence of QTc prolongation). Patients with a maximum QTc > 520 ms and median QTc > 490 ms over serial 12‐lead ECGs are at the highest risk of BCE while on guideline‐directed medical therapy.

Background Symptomatic limitations in apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy may occur because of diastolic dysfunction with resultant elevated left ventricular filling pressures, cardiac output limitation to exercise, pulmonary hypertension (PH), valvular abnormalities, and/or arrhythmias. In this study, the authors aimed to describe invasive cardiac hemodynamics in a cohort of patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Methods and Results Patients presenting to a comprehensive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy center with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were identified (n=542) and those who underwent invasive hemodynamic catheterization (n=47) were included in the study. Of these, 10 were excluded due to postmyectomy status or incomplete hemodynamic data. The mean age was 56±18 years, 16 (43%) were women, and ejection fraction was preserved (≥50%) in 32 (91%) patients. The most common indication for catheterization was dyspnea (48%) followed by suspected PH (13%), and preheart transplant evaluation (10%). Elevated left ventricular filling pressures at rest or exercise were present in 32 (86%) patients. PH was present in 30 (81%) patients, with 6 (20%) also having right‐sided heart failure. Cardiac index was available in 25 (86%) patients with elevated resting filling pressures. Of these, 19 (76%) had reduced cardiac index and all 6 with right‐sided heart failure had reduced cardiac index. Resting hemodynamics were normal in 8 of 37 (22%) patients, with 5 during exercise; 3 of 5 (60%) patients had exercise‐induced elevation in left ventricular filling pressures. Conclusions In patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy undergoing invasive hemodynamic cardiac catheterization, 86% had elevated left ventricular filling pressures at rest or with exercise, 81% had PH, and 20% of those with PH had concomitant right‐sided heart failure.

Background: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the United States is high, with at least 63 million unvaccinated individuals to date. Socioeconomically disadvantaged populations experience lower COVID-19 vaccination rates despite facing a disproportionate COVID-19 burden. Objective: To assess the factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among under-resourced, adult patients. Methods: Participants were patients receiving care at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in St. Paul, Minnesota. Data were collected via multiple modes over 2 phases in 2020 (self-administered electronic survey) and 2021 (study team-administered survey by telephone, self-administered written survey) to promote diversity and inclusion for study participation. The primary outcome was COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Using logistic regression analysis, associations between vaccine acceptance and factors including risk perception, concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine, social determinants of health (SDOH), co-morbidities, pandemic-induced hardships, and stress were assessed by adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: One hundred sixty-eight patients (62.5% female; mean age [SD]: 49.9 [17.4] years; 32% <$20 000 annual household income; 69% <college education) were included in the study. Sixty-one percent of the patients received or were willing to receive the vaccine. Risk perception was positively associated with vaccine acceptance (AOR: 5.3; 95% CI: 2.5, 11.5, P < .001), while concerns about the vaccine (eg, safety, side effects, rapid development of the vaccine, etc.) were negatively associated with vaccine acceptance (all P < .001). SDOH, co-morbidities, pandemic-induced hardships were not associated with vaccine acceptance. Conclusions: Our study in a socioeconomically disadvantaged population suggests that risk perception is associated with an increased likelihood of vaccine acceptance, while concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine are associated with a lower likelihood of vaccine acceptance. As these factors could impact vaccine uptake, consistent, innovative, and context-specific risk communication strategies may improve vaccine coverage in this population.

Introduction: Shared decision-making (SDM) about anticoagulant treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is widely recommended but its effectiveness is unclear. We assessed the extent to which using an SDM tool promotes high-quality SDM. Hypothesis: SDM will improve communication quality, knowledge, and decisional conflict and will translate to improved medication adherence and outcomes. Methods: In this multicentre encounter-randomized trial, we included patients with nonvalvular AF considering starting/reviewing anticoagulation, and their clinicians. We compared usual care with or without ANTICOAGULATION CHOICE, an SDM conversation tool for use during the clinical encounter that presents individualized risk estimates and compares anticoagulation options across patient important issues. Results: We enrolled and video-recorded 922 patient-clinician encounters. So far, our data have shown that participants in both arms reported near-optimal communication quality, knowledge, and decisional conflict (JAMA IM-2020). Patients in intervention-arm estimated their stroke risks more accurately and were more involved in decision-making (JAMA IM-2020), clinicians were more satisfied (JAMA IM-2020), and cost conversation were more common (JAMA NO-2021). Use of the intervention had no effect on treatment decisions, encounter duration (JAMA IM-2020), treatment adherence, clinical outcomes (JAHA-epub) or patient-perceived sense of the care plan (PEC-epub). New analyses have shown that compared to eligible white participants, black participants more frequently did not enrol to the study. Enrolment of Black, indigenous, and people of colour benefited most form including and prioritizing practices most likely to care for them. We found no evidence of contamination (tool use, functional, or learned) between study arms. Conclusions: Use of an SDM tool improved some measures of SDM quality, without affecting treatment decisions and their sensibility, encounter duration, patient adherence, or clinical outcomes. Our results should calibrate expectations as to what could be accomplished by implementing SDM tools about anticoagulation in the care of patients with AF

Abstract OBJECTIVES Low forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-Pro-BNP) have been individually associated with poor outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We hypothesized a combination of the 2 would provide prognostic indication after TAVR. METHODS We categorized 871 patients who received TAVR from 2008 to 2018 into 4 groups according to baseline FEV1 (&lt;60% or ≥60% predicted) and NT-Pro-BNP (&lt;1601 or ≥1601 pg/ml): group A (n = 312, high FEV1, low NT-Pro-BNP), group B (n = 275, high FEV1, high NT-Pro-BNP), group C (n = 123 low FEV1, low NT-Pro-BNP) and group D (n = 161, low FEV1, high NT-Pro-BNP). The primary end point was survival at 1 and 5 years. RESULTS Patients in group A had more severe aortic stenosis and achieved the best long-term survival at 1 [93% (95% CI: 90–96)] and 5 [45.3% (95% CI: 35.4–58)] years. Low FEV1 and high NT-Pro-BNP (group D) patients had more severe symptoms, higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of operative mortality, lower ejection fraction and aortic valve gradient at baseline. Patients in group D had the worst survival at 1 [76% (95% CI: 69–83)] and 5 years [13.1% (95% CI: 7–25)], hazard ratio compared to group A: 2.29 (95% CI: 1.6–3.2, P &lt; 0.001) with 25.7% of patients in New York Heart Association class III–IV. Patients in groups B and C had intermediate outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The combination of FEV1 and NT-Pro-BNP stratifies patients into 4 groups with distinct risk profiles and clinical outcomes. Patients with low FEV1 and high NT-Pro-BNP have increased comorbidities, poor functional outcomes and decreased long-term survival after TAVR.