Linzer, Mark

Abstract Background and Aims Burnout affects millions of healthcare workers worldwide, from food service and nurses to physicians and leaders, impairing worklives and threatening health system stability. Methods An international collaborative, PREVAIL, was created to reduce burnout globally. Leaders from six continents shared structured insights into the local state of wellness and burnout contributors and mitigators, which were then subjected to a formal thematic (qualitative) analysis to identify common and region-specific themes. Results Across continents, findings showed the global state of well-being was in danger, though threats varied by region: long shifts in Africa, heavy workloads in Asia, austerity-prone environments in Europe and financially driven care in North America. Vulnerable worker groups included women, nurses, and primary care. Mitigators included workload and schedule adjustments (Africa), shift policies with fair pay (Asia), leader support and regular well-being assessments (Australia), improved psychosocial services (Europe), organizational wellness support and career development (North America), and trainee support (South America). Conclusions A proposed “common pathway” framework explains shared drivers of poor workforce well-being and provides actionable steps for promoting compassionate, supportive environments worldwide. Implications/Learning Points Adopting a coordinated international approach may prevent devastating workforce shortages over the comingdecades. Burnout assessment and reduction in the global workforce is a high priority.

Background: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The relationships of race/ethnicity and sex to outcomes and treatment patterns among patients with IHCA remain poorly understood. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2020 to identify adult patients with IHCA and compare in-hospital outcomes stratified by race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic) and sex. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included rates of in-hospital procedures. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders. Results: Among 207,770 patients with IHCA, 26.6% had ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) and 73.4% had pulseless electrical activity (PEA)/asystole. In the VT/VF subgroup, Black males (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.21-1.66), Black females (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.05-1.50), and Hispanic females (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.01-1.66) had higher odds of mortality compared to White males (Figure 1). In the PEA/asystole subgroup, Black males (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11-1.39) and Hispanic males (aOR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.40) had higher odds of mortality, while White females had lower odds (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82-0.94) compared to White males (Figure 2). Black patients were less likely to receive percutaneous coronary intervention (aOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.43-0.66 for males; aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.42-0.69 for females) and coronary artery bypass grafting (aOR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.82 for males; aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27-0.81 for females) compared to White males in VT/VF arrests. Additionally, Black males had the highest adjusted odds of renal replacement therapy in VT/VF arrests (aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.21-1.80), while Hispanic males had the highest adjusted odds in PEA/asystole arrests (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.27-1.74) compared to White males. The remaining outcomes of interest in both VT/VF and PEA/asystole arrests are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2 respectively. Conclusion: Significant racial/ethnic and sex disparities exist in outcomes and treatment patterns among patients with IHCA, with differences observed in both VT/VF and PEA/asystole subgroups. Targeted efforts and further studies are needed to better understand and address these disparities and improve outcomes in these severely ill patients.

Background In‐hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The relationships between race and ethnicity and sex on outcomes and treatment patterns among patients with IHCA remain poorly understood. Methods and Results We conducted a retrospective study using the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2020 to identify adult patients with IHCA and examine the associations between in‐hospital outcomes and race and ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic) and sex. The primary outcome was in‐hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included rates of in‐hospital procedures. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for potential confounders. Among 207 770 patients with IHCA, 26.6% had ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation and 73.4% had pulseless electrical activity/asystole. For ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation arrest, Black men (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.42 [95% CI, 1.21–1.66]), Black women (aOR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.05–1.50]), and Hispanic women (aOR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.01–1.66]) had higher odds of mortality compared with White men (corresponding adjusted risk ratios [aRRs], 1.10 [CI, 1.06–1.14], 1.06 [95% CI, 1.02–1.11], and 1.08 [95% CI, 1.01–1.14], respectively). In the pulseless electrical activity/asystole arrest subgroup, Black men (aOR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.11–1.39]) and Hispanic men (aOR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.07–1.40]) had higher odds of mortality (corresponding aRRs, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02–1.06] and 1.04 [95% CI, 1.01–1.06], respectively). Black patients with IHCA were less likely to receive percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, and mechanical circulatory support compared with White men. Conclusions Significant racial and ethnic and sex disparities exist in outcomes and treatment patterns among patients with IHCA. Targeted efforts and further studies are needed to better understand and address these disparities and improve outcomes.

AbstractDespite the known benefits of supportive work environments for promoting patient quality and safety and healthcare worker retention, there is no clear mandate for improving work environments within Learning Health Systems (LHS) nor an LHS wellness competency. Striking rises in burnout levels among healthcare workers provide urgency for this topic.MethodsWe brought three experts on moral injury, burnout prevention, and ethics to a recurring, interactive LHS training program “Design Shop” session, harnessing scholars’ ideas prior to the meeting. Generally following SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines, we evaluated the prework and discussion via informal content analysis to develop a set of pathways for developing moral injury and burnout prevention programs. Along these lines, we developed a new competency for moral injury and burnout prevention within LHS training programs.ResultsIn preparation for the session, scholars differentiated moral injury from burnout, highlighted the profound impact of COVID‐19 on moral injury, and proposed testable interventions to reduce injury. Scholar and expert input was then merged into developing the new competency in moral injury and burnout prevention. In particular, the competency focuses on preparing scholars to (1) demonstrate knowledge of moral injury and burnout, (2) measure burnout, moral injury, and their remediable predictors, (3) use methods for improving burnout, (4) structure training programs with supportive work environments, and (5) embed burnout and moral injury prevention into LHS structures.ConclusionsBurnout and moral injury prevention have been largely omitted in LHS training. A competency related to burnout and moral injury reduction can potentially bring sustainable work lives for scholars and their colleagues, better incorporation of their science into clinical practice, and better outcomes for patients.

Introduction: Shared decision-making (SDM) about anticoagulant treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is widely recommended but its effectiveness is unclear. We assessed the extent to which using an SDM tool promotes high-quality SDM. Hypothesis: SDM will improve communication quality, knowledge, and decisional conflict and will translate to improved medication adherence and outcomes. Methods: In this multicentre encounter-randomized trial, we included patients with nonvalvular AF considering starting/reviewing anticoagulation, and their clinicians. We compared usual care with or without ANTICOAGULATION CHOICE, an SDM conversation tool for use during the clinical encounter that presents individualized risk estimates and compares anticoagulation options across patient important issues. Results: We enrolled and video-recorded 922 patient-clinician encounters. So far, our data have shown that participants in both arms reported near-optimal communication quality, knowledge, and decisional conflict (JAMA IM-2020). Patients in intervention-arm estimated their stroke risks more accurately and were more involved in decision-making (JAMA IM-2020), clinicians were more satisfied (JAMA IM-2020), and cost conversation were more common (JAMA NO-2021). Use of the intervention had no effect on treatment decisions, encounter duration (JAMA IM-2020), treatment adherence, clinical outcomes (JAHA-epub) or patient-perceived sense of the care plan (PEC-epub). New analyses have shown that compared to eligible white participants, black participants more frequently did not enrol to the study. Enrolment of Black, indigenous, and people of colour benefited most form including and prioritizing practices most likely to care for them. We found no evidence of contamination (tool use, functional, or learned) between study arms. Conclusions: Use of an SDM tool improved some measures of SDM quality, without affecting treatment decisions and their sensibility, encounter duration, patient adherence, or clinical outcomes. Our results should calibrate expectations as to what could be accomplished by implementing SDM tools about anticoagulation in the care of patients with AF

AbstractIntroductionThe learning health system (LHS) aligns science, informatics, incentives, stakeholders, and culture for continuous improvement and innovation. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute designed a K12 initiative to grow the number of LHS scientists. We describe approaches developed by 11 funded centers of excellence (COEs) to promote partnerships between scholars and health system leaders and to provide mentored research training.MethodsSince 2018, the COEs have enlisted faculty, secured institutional resources, partnered with health systems, developed and implemented curricula, recruited scholars, and provided mentored training. Program directors for each COE provided descriptive data on program context, scholar characteristics, stakeholder engagement, scholar experiences with health system partnerships, roles following program completion, and key training challenges.ResultsTo date, the 11 COEs have partnered with health systems to train 110 scholars. Nine (82%) programs partner with a Veterans Affairs health system and 9 (82%) partner with safety net providers. Clinically trained scholars (n = 87; 79%) include 70 physicians and 17 scholars in other clinical disciplines. Non‐clinicians (n = 29; 26%) represent diverse fields, dominated by population health sciences. Stakeholder engagement helps scholars understand health system and patient/family needs and priorities, enabling opportunities to conduct embedded research, improve outcomes, and grow skills in translating research methods and findings into practice. Challenges include supporting scholars through roadblocks that threaten to derail projects during their limited program time, ranging from delays in access to data to COVID‐19‐related impediments and shifts in organizational priorities.ConclusionsFour years into this novel training program, there is evidence of scholars' accomplishments, both in traditional academic terms and in terms of moving along career trajectories that hold the potential to lead and accelerate transformational health system change. Future LHS training efforts should focus on sustainability, including organizational support for scholar activities.

Abstract Background: Trial recruitment of Black, indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) is key for interventions that interact with socioeconomic factors and cultural norms, preferences, and values. We report on our experience enrolling BIPOC participants into a multicenter trial of a shared decision-making intervention about anticoagulation to prevent strokes, in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: We enrolled patients with AF and their clinicians in 5 healthcare systems (three academic medical centers, an urban/suburban community medical center, and a safety-net inner-city medical center) located in three states (Minnesota, Alabama, and Mississippi) in the United States. Clinical encounters were randomized to usual care with or without a shared decision-making tool about anticoagulation. Analysis: We analyzed BIPOC patient enrollment by site, categorized reasons for non-enrollment, and examined how enrollment of BIPOC patients was promoted across sites.Results: Of 2247 patients assessed, 922 were enrolled of which 147 (16%) were BIPOC patients. In comparison to trial-eligible White participants, eligible Black participants more frequently did not enroll (102 (11%) vs. 185 (15%); p <.001). The rate of BIPOC patients enrollment varied substantially by site and was generally reflective of the population served at each participating site. Enrollment of BIPOC patients benefited most from including and prioritizing practices most likely to care for BIPOC patients, with lower yield from specific efforts to reach BIPOC clinic attendees and enrolling BIPOC patients first when possible. Conclusions: Enrollment from practices that have implemented policies that favor the care of BIPOC patients can contribute to generate trustworthy estimates of the effect of these interventions in clinical practice that are applicable to BIPOC populations. Best practices to optimize the enrollment of BIPOC participants into trials that examined complex and culturally sensitive interventions remain to be developed.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02905032)

Objectives Determine whether there are different longitudinal patterns of treatment burden in people living with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) and, if so, explore predictors that might reveal potential routes of intervention. Methods We analyzed data from a prospective mailed survey study of 396 adults living with MCC in southeastern Minnesota, USA. Participants completed a measure of treatment burden, the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS), and valid measures of health-related and psycho-social concepts at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months. Latent class growth mixture modeling (LCGM) determined trajectories of treatment burden in two summary index scores of the PETS: Workload and Impact. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify independent predictors of the trajectories. Results LCGM supported a 2-class model for PETS Workload, including a group of consistently high workload ( N = 69) and a group of consistently low workload ( N = 311) over time. A 3-class model was supported for PETS Impact, including groups of consistently high impact ( N = 62), consistently low impact ( N = 278), and increasing impact ( N = 51) over time. Logistic regression analyses showed that the following factors were associated with patterns of consistently high or increasing treatment burden over time: lower health literacy, lower self-efficacy, more interpersonal challenges with others, and worse subjective reports of physical and mental health (all p < .05). Conclusions Different longitudinal patterns of treatment burden exist among people with MCC. Raising health literacy, enhancing self-efficacy, and lessening the effects of negative social interactions might help reduce treatment burden.

Background Guidelines promote shared decision‐making (SDM) for anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. We recently showed that adding a within‐encounter SDM tool to usual care (UC) increases patient involvement in decision‐making and clinician satisfaction, without affecting encounter length. We aimed to estimate the extent to which use of an SDM tool changed adherence to the decided care plan and clinical safety end points. Methods and Results We conducted a multicenter, encounter‐level, randomized trial assessing the efficacy of UC with versus without an SDM conversation tool for use during the clinical encounter (Anticoagulation Choice) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation considering starting or reviewing anticoagulation treatment. We conducted a chart and pharmacy review, blinded to randomization status, at 10 months after enrollment to assess primary adherence (proportion of patients who were prescribed an anticoagulant who filled their first prescription) and secondary adherence (estimated using the proportion of days for which treatment was supplied and filled for direct oral anticoagulant, and as time in therapeutic range for warfarin). We also noted any strokes, transient ischemic attacks, major bleeding, or deaths as safety end points. We enrolled 922 evaluable patient encounters (Anticoagulation Choice=463, and UC=459), of which 814 (88%) had pharmacy and clinical follow‐up. We found no differences between arms in either primary adherence (78% of patients in the SDM arm filled their first prescription versus 81% in UC arm) or secondary adherence to anticoagulation (percentage days covered of the direct oral anticoagulant was 74.1% in SDM versus 71.6% in UC; time in therapeutic range for warfarin was 66.6% in SDM versus 64.4% in UC). Safety outcomes, mostly bleeds, occurred in 13% of participants in the SDM arm and 14% in the UC arm. Conclusions In this large, randomized trial comparing UC with a tool to promote SDM against UC alone, we found no significant differences between arms in primary or secondary adherence to anticoagulation or in clinical safety outcomes. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02905032.