Citations

ABSTRACT Endoluminal flow diverters are increasingly used to treat cerebral aneurysms. Despite good aneurysm occlusion efficacy, delayed ischemic complications due to side branch or perforator occlusion remain a serious concern. However, the mechanisms leading to side branch occlusion are poorly understood. To investigate these mechanisms, a combination of animal and computational models was utilized. Flow diverters were deployed in four rabbit superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and studied with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and a previously developed fibrin dynamics model. Subject‐specific vascular models were reconstructed from 3D rotational angiography images and flow conditions were derived from Doppler ultrasound velocity measurements. Flow diverting devices were virtually deployed within the vascular models under guidance from angiography images. Coupled flow and fibrin production, transport, and adhesion simulations were carried out and the effects of fibrin accumulation at the origin of jailed side branches after flow diverter implantation were analyzed. The results of the computational models suggest significant fibrin accumulation across the struts of all flow diverting devices jailing side branches. Larger accumulation was observed at the more distal branches. However, minor flow alterations were produced which were not detectable in angiography sequences. These results were in agreement with experimental observations. On the other hand, fibrin accumulation alone did not explain complete side branch occlusions, which are likely the result of the interaction between initial fibrin accumulation and subsequent cell migration from the peripheral parent artery.

ABSTRACT Incomplete aneurysm occlusion after flow disruption treatment strongly depends on the persistence of strong flow into the aneurysm, which in turn depends on the aneurysm and parent artery geometry as well as the device placement. However, at the time of treatment it remains challenging to predict future outcomes (complete or incomplete occlusion). This paper describes a strategy to evaluate the local hemodynamic environment created immediately after flow‐modifying device deployment to treat cerebral aneurysms and connect it to the subsequent long‐term outcomes. The approach is based on the concept of angiographic signatures that can be extracted from DSA sequences or computational models and represented as images that can be used to compare different aneurysmal environments. The methodology is demonstrated on two small series of four experimental rabbit aneurysms each, treated with either intrasaccular flow disruptors or endoluminal flow diverters. Noticeable differences in the angiographic signatures of completely and incompletely occluded aneurysms at follow‐up were observed. Specifically, larger values of mean transit times and longer time‐to‐peaks were observed deeper into the aneurysms that remained incompletely occluded in both series. The findings suggest that angiographic signatures can be used to assess the underlying hemodynamic environment immediately after device implantation and prognosticate the likelihood of future complete or incomplete occlusion.

ABSTRACT As the number of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverters continues to increase, it is important to understand what factors influence not only thrombus formation within the aneurysm cavity but also fibrin accumulation across the device and its associated disruption and blockage of the inflow stream. Both processes contribute to the eventual occlusion of the aneurysm or its continued patency and incomplete occlusion which may require future re‐treatment. To investigate fibrin accumulation on flow diverters placed across the neck of cerebral aneurysms, a previously developed computational model that couples flow and fibrin dynamics is used in combination with experimental in vitro models of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverters. Fibrin accumulation was previously investigated in four glass models of cerebral aneurysms with varying parent artery geometries placed in a flow loop at different flow rates. Corresponding computational models were constructed and compared with the experimental findings. The computational model based on fibrin production stimulated from flow shear stress and subsequent adhesion to device wires was able to reproduce and explain the fibrin accumulation patterns observed in the experimental aneurysms treated with flow diverters. Specifically, these models indicated that increasing vessel curvature, flow rate, and thrombin concentration induced faster fibrin accumulation and associated aneurysm inflow disruption and blockage. The models described and tested in this paper are valuable to understand the detailed mechanisms leading to aneurysm occlusion and healing or incomplete occlusions after treatment with flow diverting devices.

ABSTRACT The mechanisms leading to aneurysm occlusion after treatment with flow‐diverting devices are not fully understood. Flow modification induces thrombus formation within the aneurysm cavity, but fibrin can simultaneously accumulate and cover the device scaffold, leading to further flow modification. However, the interplay and relative importance of these processes are not clearly understood. A computational model of fibrin accumulation and flow modification after flow diversion treatment of cerebral aneurysms has been developed under the guidance of in vitro experiments and observations. The model is based on the loose coupling of flow and transport‐reaction equations that are solved separately by independent codes. Interaction or reactive terms account for thrombin production from prothrombin stimulated by thrombogenic metallic wires and inhibition by antithrombin as well as fibrin production from fibrinogen stimulated by thrombin and flow shear stress, and fibrin adhesion to device wires and already attached fibrin. The computational model was demonstrated and tested on idealized vessel and aneurysm geometries. The model was able to reproduce the salient features of fibrin accumulation after the deployment of flow‐diverting devices in idealized in vitro models of cerebral aneurysms. Namely, fibrin production in regions of high shear stress, initial accumulation at the inflow zone, and progressive occlusion of the device and corresponding flow attenuation. The computational model linking flow dynamics to fibrin production, transport, and adhesion can be used to investigate and better understand the effects that lead to fibrin accumulation and the resulting aneurysm inflow reduction and intra‐aneurysmal flow modulation.

OBJECTIVE Fibrin deposition represents a key step in aneurysm occlusion, promoting endothelization of implants and connective tissue organization as part of the aneurysm-healing mechanism. In this study, the authors introduce a novel in vitro testing platform for flow diverters based on human fibrinogen. METHODS A flow diverter was deployed in 4 different glass models. The glass models had the same internal parent artery (4 mm) and aneurysm (8 mm) diameters with varying parent artery angulations (paraophthalmic, sidewall, bifurcation, and slightly curved models). The neck size and area were 4 mm and 25 mm 2 , respectively. Human fibrinogen (330 mg/dl) was circulated within the glass models at varying flow rates (0, 3, 4, and 5 ml/sec) with or without heparin, calcium chloride, and thrombin for as long as 6 hours or until complete fibrin coverage of the flow diverter’s neck was achieved. Aneurysm neck coverage was defined as macroscopic fibrin deposition occluding the flow diverters’ pores. Flow characteristics after flow diverter deployment were assessed with computational fluid dynamics analysis. The effects of flow rates, heparin, calcium chloride, and thrombin on fibrin deposition rates were tested using 1-way ANOVA and the Tukey test. RESULTS A total of 84 replicates were performed. Human fibrin did not accumulate on the flow diverter stents under static conditions. The fibrin deposition rate on the aneurysm neck was significantly greater with the 5 ml/sec flow rate as compared to 3 ml/sec for all models. The paraophthalmic model had the highest inflow velocity of 48.7 cm/sec. The bifurcation model had the highest maximum shear stress (SS) and maximum normalized shear stress values at the device cells at 843.3 dyne/cm 2 and 35.1 SS/SS inflow , respectively. The fibrin deposition rates of the paraophthalmic and bifurcation models were significantly higher than those of sidewall and slightly curved models for all additive or flow rate comparisons (p = 0.001 for all comparisons). The incorporation of thrombin significantly increased the fibrin deposition rates across all models (p = 0.001 for all models). CONCLUSIONS Rates of fibrin deposition varied widely across different configurations and additive conditions in this novel in vitro model system. Fibrin accumulation started at the aneurysm inflow zone where flow velocity and shear stress were the highest. The primary factors influencing fibrin deposition included flow velocities, shear stress, and the addition of thrombin at a physiological concentration. Further research is needed to test the clinical utility of fibrinogen-based models for patient-specific aneurysms.

Introduction: Numerous endovascular tools exist for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms with an increased use of flow-diverting devices in recent years. However, the biological mechanisms leading to aneurysm healing or potential complications such as delayed aneurysm ruptures after flow-diverter treatment are not yet well established. We used RNA-sequencing technology to identify genes relevant for biological impact of coils and flow-diverters in elastase-induced saccular aneurysms in rabbits and to identify genes and pathways of potential clinical interest. Methods: Elastase-induced saccular aneurysms were created at the origin of the right common carotid artery. Aneurysms were treated with coils (n=5) or flow-diverters (Pipeline Embolic Device, Covidien, CA) (n=4). Untreated aneurysms (n=6) were used as controls. Messenger RNA and microRNA were isolated from the aneurysms at 4 weeks following treatment. RNA samples were processed using RNA-seq technology. RNA-seq results were analyzed by using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis tool. Results: Using RNA sequencing for coiled versus non-treated aneurysms, 464 genes were found to be differentially expressed with 58 genes down regulated and 406 genes up regulated. Using the same criteria for the flow-diverter treated aneurysms, 177 genes were found to be differentially expressed with 8 genes down regulated and 169 genes up regulated. Comparing coiled versus flow-diverter treated aneurysms, 13 genes were significantly differentially expressed with 8 down regulated and 5 up regulated genes. Genes identified with the highest interest for aneurysms healing were fibroblast growth factor-23, matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-1, Scinderin and Basigin (implicated in MMP-2 and MMP-9 regulation). Pathway analysis associated these genes with inflammatory response, cellular migration, and coagulation, among other functions. Conclusions: RNA-sequencing analysis of rabbit aneurysms revealed differential regulation of some key pathways, including inflammation and cellular migration that could explain the different biological mechanisms implicated in aneurysms healing either after coiling or flow-diverter treatments and could explain potential device-related complications.

Introduction: Predicting the course of aneurysms after treatment with flow diverters is important to prognosticate long term outcomes and optimize interventions. Hypothesis: Aneurysm occlusion after flow diversion can be predicted using post-treatment flow information. Methods: Flows in experimental aneurysms in rabbits (n=15) and clinical cases (n=23) were evaluated with computational fluid dynamics. Subject-specific models were created from 3D angiographies. Flow conditions were measured with ultrasound in the rabbits, and derived from measurements in normal subjects in the clinical cases. Models of the devices were virtually deployed into the anatomical models. Experimental aneurysms were assigned to either a “complete” occlusion group if completely occluded at 4 weeks follow up, or to an “incomplete” occlusion group if still open at 8 weeks. Similarly, clinical cases were classified as “complete” occlusions if completely occluded at 3 months, or as “incomplete” occlusions if still patent at 6 months. Flow variables were then statistically compared between these groups for both the experimental and clinical series, and the predictive power of different variables to discriminate between aneurysms in each group was assessed by calculating the area under the receiving operating characteristics curves. Results: In the clinical (experimental) series, the aneurysm inflow rate was 4.02 (3.29) times larger in the incomplete occlusion group than in the completely occluded group, p=0.0210 (0.0239). Similarly, the mean aneurysm velocity was 2.75 (2.29) times larger, p=0.0044 (0.0582), and the shear rate was 1.57 (1.78) times larger, p=0.0210 (0.0722). Inflow rate could discriminate complete and incomplete occlusions with a 77% (90%) accuracy in the clinical (experimental) series. Similarly, mean velocity had a predictive power of 84% (83%) and shear rate of 76% (76%) in the clinical and experimental series. Conclusions: Flow conditions created immediately after treatment, in particular aneurysm inflow rate and mean aneurysm velocity, can prognosticate the future occlusion of aneurysms treated with flow diverters.

Backgound and Purpose: Mechanisms of both healing and complications, including spontaneous aneurysm rupture, remain unclear following flow diverter treatment. The aim of the current study was to compare the gene expression of various key molecules involved in the healing of aneurysms between aneurysms treated with microcoils and flow diverters. Methods: Saccular aneurysms were created in rabbits (n=12). Aneurysms were either treated with coils (n=6) or with flow diverters (n=6). Aneurysm tissue was harvested at four weeks following treatment and used for gene expression and zymography experiments. Genes with a fold change of 1.2 or greater were considered up regulated, whereas those with a fold change of 0.8 or less were considered down regulated. Results: All coil embolized aneurysms were completely occluded at follow up. Two aneurysms were occluded and the remaining four samples were incompletely occluded in the flow diverter treated group. The following genes were expressed at lower levels in the flow diverter group as compared to the coiled aneurysm group: genes encoding proteinases (matrix metalloproteinases -2 and -9), cellular markers (endothelial nitric oxide synthase and smooth muscle actin), and structural proteins (collagens and fibronectin). Genes related to inflammation (tumor necrosis factor-α and monocyte chemoattractant protein -1) were up regulated in flow diverter treated aneurysms compared to coil embolized aneurysms. Notably, the enzymatic activity of active MMP-9 was high in aneurysms treated with flow diverters. Conclusion: As compared to coiled aneurysms, the molecular milieu surrounding aneurysms treated with flow diverters is characterized by higher levels of activated proteases, elevated expression of genes encoding inflammatory proteins, and diminished expression of genes encoding structural proteins. These data may provide improved understanding of rupture risk and healing following aneurysm treatment, and inform development of therapies aimed at lowering rupture risk and accelerating healing.

Abstract Flow diverters have drastically changed the landscape of intracranial aneurysm treatment and are now considered first-line therapy for select lesions. Their mechanism of action relies on intrinsic alteration in hemodynamic parameters, both at the parent artery and within the aneurysm sac. Moreover, the device struts act as a nidus for endothelial cell growth across the aneurysm neck ultimately leading to aneurysm exclusion from the circulation. In silico computational analyses and investigations in preclinical animal models have provided valuable insights into the underlying biological basis for flow diverter therapy. Here, we review the present understanding pertaining to flow diverter biology and mechanisms of action, focusing on stent design, induction of intra-aneurysmal thrombosis, endothelialization, and alterations in hemodynamics.