Citations

ABSTRACT Background Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) are rare, chronic cholestatic liver diseases with heterogeneous progression and limited biomarkers of disease biology. Epigenetic age acceleration has been demonstrated in PSC and PBC, suggesting accelerated biological aging. DNA methylation–derived telomere length (DNAmTL) reflects replicative aging and cellular turnover, but its role in PSC and PBC remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate DNAmTL in PSC and PBC and its association with disease severity. Methods We analysed and compared DNAmTL and age‐adjusted DNAmTL among patients with PSC ( n = 474) versus PSC controls ( n = 484) and patients with PBC ( n = 291) versus PBC controls ( n = 291). Associations with clinical outcomes were assessed using nonparametric tests and multivariable logistic regression models. Correlations with primary sclerosing cholangitis Risk Estimate Tool (PREsTO) score and epigenetic age acceleration (AgeAccelGrim) were evaluated using linear regression. Results Patients with PSC demonstrated significantly shorter age‐adjusted DNAmTL compared with controls (median −0.036 vs. 0.016, p < 0.001). Patients with PBC also exhibited reduced DNAmTL relative to controls (median 6.814 vs. 6.885, p < 0.001). Within PSC, shorter DNAmTL was associated with cirrhosis (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06–0.69, p = 0.013) and advanced disease (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.06–0.67, p = 0.009). Shorter DNAmTL was also observed in hepatic decompensation and hepatobiliary malignancy, including cholangiocarcinoma. DNAmTL inversely correlated with PReSTO score ( p < 0.001). DNAmTL was strongly inversely correlated with AgeAccelGrim in both PSC and PBC ( p < 0.001). Conclusion Cholestatic liver diseases are associated with shortened DNAmTL, which independently correlates with disease severity in PSC. Together with epigenetic age acceleration, these findings support a model of accelerated biological aging in PSC and PBC characterized by converging signatures of accelerated biological aging that may contribute to progressive biliary injury and fibrosis.

ABSTRACT Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) enhance anti‐tumour immunity by modulating immune pathways but can also trigger immune‐related adverse events. We aimed to evaluate the risk of developing coeliac disease (CeD) among patients with malignancy treated with ICIs. Methods Using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, we identified adults (≥ 18 years) diagnosed with malignancies for which ICIs are routinely used between January 2010 and December 2024 and stratified them by exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, tremelimumab, or avelumab). Patients with pre‐existing celiac disease (CeD) were excluded. Cohorts were propensity score matched for demographics and autoimmune comorbidities. The primary outcome was incident CeD occurring ≥ 90 days after the index event. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were calculated, with subgroup analyses by age and sex. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Results After propensity score matching, 158,208 patients were included in each cohort. CeD was diagnosed more frequently among patients exposed to ICIs than among matched controls (0.152% vs. 0.071%; aHR 3.95, 95% CI 3.11–5.03; p < 0.001), corresponding to a number needed to harm (NNH) of 1235. The increased risk persisted across sex and age subgroups, including females (aHR 3.43, 95% CI 2.55–4.62), males (aHR 5.36, 95% CI 3.53–8.12), with the risk being highest among patients older than 60 years (0.14% vs. 0.06%; aHR 4.24, 95% CI 3.17–5.67; p < 0.001). Conclusion In this large real‐world cohort, ICI exposure was associated with nearly a fourfold increase in the risk of being diagnosed with CeD compared with matched controls.

Atezolizumab-bevacizumab and durvalumab-tremelimumab have established immunotherapy as a first-line standard of care in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Yet, objective response rates (ORRs) remain confined to approximately 15-20%, and no validated predictive biomarker exists for patient selection. Unlike melanoma and lung cancer, conventional markers, including programmed death-ligand 1, microsatellite instability-high status, and tumor mutational burden, have not demonstrated reliable predictive value in HCC. Prior narrative reviews comprehensively catalogued the biomarker landscape through 2022 but predate a wave of clinically significant publications. This narrative review synthesizes evidence published between 2020 and 2026, with particular emphasis on 2023–2026 data, within a unified clinical framework not provided by prior reviews. We critically evaluate tissue-based biomarkers, including the AI-derived Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab Response Signature-Pathology model, spatial multiplex immunohistochemistry, and β-catenin mutational profiling; blood-based biomarkers encompassing circulating tumor DNA for minimal residual disease detection and peripheral immune phenotyping; and serum indices including the CRAFITY score and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Hepatitis B virus etiology and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis are discussed as biological modifiers of biomarker performance. We propose an original biomarker-guided clinical algorithm, a comparative clinical readiness table, and a disease-continuum biomarker timeline as practical tools for clinicians and trialists. Prospective biomarker-enrichment trials represent the most critical next step toward clinical translation.

ABSTRACT Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) share chronic inflammation and immune dysregulation. Aim We evaluated the incidence of MPNs among patients with IBD and clinical outcomes of IBD–MPN coexistence. Methods Two retrospective cohort analyses were conducted using the TriNetX database. First, adults with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) were compared with matched non‐IBD controls to estimate incident MPN risk. A coexistence second analysis included patients with UC or CD who developed MPNs and then were matched to IBD without MPN controls to assess 5‐year outcomes, including IBD‐related complications, surgical interventions, colorectal cancer (CRC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Medication subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate associations with MPN risk. Results After matching, 3873 patients with UC–MPN and 3474 patients with CD–MPN were included. Compared with matched non‐IBD controls, incident MPN risk was higher in UC (HR 1.60, p = 0.01) and CD (HR 1.56, p < 0.001). In CD, MPN coexistence was associated with higher risks of CRC (HR 1.52, p = 0.012), intestinal fistula (HR 2.84, p < 0.001), obstruction (HR 2.05, p < 0.001), perforation (HR 2.37, p < 0.001), small bowel resection (HR 3.69, p < 0.001) and colectomy (HR 2.10, p < 0.001). In UC, MPN coexistence was associated with higher risks of CRC (HR 1.50, p = 0.001), PSC (HR 1.75, p = 0.03) and pouchitis (HR 1.68, p = 0.003). Exposure to thiopurines (HR 1.28, p < 0.001) was associated with increased MPN risk, whereas TNF, IL‐23 and JAK inhibitors were not. Conclusions IBD is associated with increased MPN risk, and IBD–MPNs coexistence is associated with worse IBD‐related complications and malignancy risk.

Background: Liver transplantation (LT) remains the definitive treatment for end-stage liver disease; however, post-LT outcomes may differ depending on underlying disease etiology. Our study aimed to compare post-LT outcomes between alcoholic and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-related liver transplant recipients in the United States. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX Research Network. Adult liver transplant recipients (≥18 years) were categorized into two mutually exclusive cohorts: alcoholic liver disease and NASH-related liver disease. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to balance baseline characteristics. Clinical outcomes were assessed. Comparative analyses included risk ratios, risk differences, odds ratios, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and hazard ratios with log-rank testing. Results: Compared with NASH recipients, alcoholic LT recipients had a significantly higher risk of rejection (14.5% vs. 12.1%; RR 1.195, 95% CI 1.076–1.327; p = 0.001) and hepatic encephalopathy (14.3% vs. 8.3%; RR 1.720, 95% CI 1.526–1.938; p < 0.001). Acute kidney injury was also more frequent in the alcoholic cohort (47.3% vs. 43.6%; RR 1.084, 95% CI 1.036–1.133; p < 0.001). In contrast, sepsis (15.6% vs. 18.0%; RR 0.869, 95% CI 0.794–0.952; p = 0.003) and CKD (46.1% vs. 51.1%; RR 0.901, 95% CI 0.863–0.939; p < 0.001) occurred less frequently in alcoholic LT patients. No significant differences were observed for liver transplant failure or ascites. Kaplan–Meier analyses demonstrated significantly lower rejection-free survival (HR 1.241, p < 0.001), higher hepatic encephalopathy (HR 1.808, p < 0.001), increased AKI risk (HR 1.150, p < 0.001) and higher all-cause mortality in the alcoholic cohort (HR 1.106, p = 0.031). Conclusions: In this large real-world matched cohort study, alcoholic LT recipients demonstrated higher risks of complications and all-cause mortality compared with NASH LT recipients.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is responsible for a high cancer burden and a high number of deaths all over the world, although effective screening can make it preventable to a significant extent. Stool-based tests, such as the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) testing, are gaining considerable popularity as non-invasive procedures that can be a replacement for colonoscopies for people at an average risk for colon cancer. Despite evidence from several randomized controlled trials supporting the use of these tests for colorectal cancer screening, their external validity in a real-world setting is influenced by many factors such as adherence, timely follow-up post testing, the healthcare cost burden, accessibility and the capacity of the health system. In this article, we have performed an extensive narrative literature review of research published between 2020 and 2025 comparing FIT and the mt-sDNA test with reference to diagnostic accuracy, cost-effectiveness, adherence and outcomes of implementation. We discuss the issues of sensitivity and specificity, look at post-test requirements for colonoscopy and check if there is any discrimination in healthcare. These findings suggest that FIT and mt-sDNA tests should not be considered competing technologies but rather complementary screening methods, with their overall effectiveness contingent upon appropriate patient selection and widespread system-level implementation. It is crucial to combine strategic test selection with a robust follow-up infrastructure to ensure that the entire population benefits from the CRC prevention program.

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are reshaping the therapeutic approach to advanced gastrointestinal cancers by integrating tumor-specific monoclonal antibodies with potent cytotoxic payloads to improve targeted tumor cell destruction while minimizing systemic exposure. Compared to traditional chemotherapy, trastuzumab deruxtecan has significantly improved objective response rates and overall survival in HER2-positive gastric and gastroesophageal junction tumors after trastuzumab-based therapy. This supports its role as an important second-line or later treatment option. The ongoing advancement of ADCs targeting CLDN18.2, TROP2, and CEACAM5 indicates that this therapeutic category will continue to expand across gastrointestinal neoplasms. Nonetheless, these advancements are accompanied by a specific and clinically significant toxicity profile. Hematologic suppression, gastrointestinal side effects, hepatotoxicity, and notably interstitial lung disease (ILD) are essential consequences that may need inpatient assessment and care. Interstitial lung disease (ILD), although uncommon, may be severe or lethal if not identified immediately and treated swiftly with medication cessation and corticosteroids. In hospitalized patients, distinguishing ADC-related toxicity from infection or disease progression is often difficult owing to overlapping clinical manifestations, requiring meticulous evaluation and interdisciplinary cooperation. As ADCs are integrated into earlier treatment lines and across a broader patient population, hospital systems must evolve to ensure prompt identification, consistent management protocols, and efficient collaboration between oncology and inpatient teams. This study analyzes the mechanisms, clinical effectiveness, and safety profile of ADCs in gastrointestinal oncology, pointing out the importance of institutional preparedness to safely incorporate these medicines into standard clinical practice. These features also align ADC therapy with personalized medicine by emphasizing biomarker-guided patient selection and individualized toxicity monitoring.