Alsakarneh, Saqr G

ABSTRACT Background Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) are rare, chronic cholestatic liver diseases with heterogeneous progression and limited biomarkers of disease biology. Epigenetic age acceleration has been demonstrated in PSC and PBC, suggesting accelerated biological aging. DNA methylation–derived telomere length (DNAmTL) reflects replicative aging and cellular turnover, but its role in PSC and PBC remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate DNAmTL in PSC and PBC and its association with disease severity. Methods We analysed and compared DNAmTL and age‐adjusted DNAmTL among patients with PSC ( n = 474) versus PSC controls ( n = 484) and patients with PBC ( n = 291) versus PBC controls ( n = 291). Associations with clinical outcomes were assessed using nonparametric tests and multivariable logistic regression models. Correlations with primary sclerosing cholangitis Risk Estimate Tool (PREsTO) score and epigenetic age acceleration (AgeAccelGrim) were evaluated using linear regression. Results Patients with PSC demonstrated significantly shorter age‐adjusted DNAmTL compared with controls (median −0.036 vs. 0.016, p < 0.001). Patients with PBC also exhibited reduced DNAmTL relative to controls (median 6.814 vs. 6.885, p < 0.001). Within PSC, shorter DNAmTL was associated with cirrhosis (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06–0.69, p = 0.013) and advanced disease (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.06–0.67, p = 0.009). Shorter DNAmTL was also observed in hepatic decompensation and hepatobiliary malignancy, including cholangiocarcinoma. DNAmTL inversely correlated with PReSTO score ( p < 0.001). DNAmTL was strongly inversely correlated with AgeAccelGrim in both PSC and PBC ( p < 0.001). Conclusion Cholestatic liver diseases are associated with shortened DNAmTL, which independently correlates with disease severity in PSC. Together with epigenetic age acceleration, these findings support a model of accelerated biological aging in PSC and PBC characterized by converging signatures of accelerated biological aging that may contribute to progressive biliary injury and fibrosis.

ABSTRACT Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) enhance anti‐tumour immunity by modulating immune pathways but can also trigger immune‐related adverse events. We aimed to evaluate the risk of developing coeliac disease (CeD) among patients with malignancy treated with ICIs. Methods Using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, we identified adults (≥ 18 years) diagnosed with malignancies for which ICIs are routinely used between January 2010 and December 2024 and stratified them by exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, tremelimumab, or avelumab). Patients with pre‐existing celiac disease (CeD) were excluded. Cohorts were propensity score matched for demographics and autoimmune comorbidities. The primary outcome was incident CeD occurring ≥ 90 days after the index event. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were calculated, with subgroup analyses by age and sex. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Results After propensity score matching, 158,208 patients were included in each cohort. CeD was diagnosed more frequently among patients exposed to ICIs than among matched controls (0.152% vs. 0.071%; aHR 3.95, 95% CI 3.11–5.03; p < 0.001), corresponding to a number needed to harm (NNH) of 1235. The increased risk persisted across sex and age subgroups, including females (aHR 3.43, 95% CI 2.55–4.62), males (aHR 5.36, 95% CI 3.53–8.12), with the risk being highest among patients older than 60 years (0.14% vs. 0.06%; aHR 4.24, 95% CI 3.17–5.67; p < 0.001). Conclusion In this large real‐world cohort, ICI exposure was associated with nearly a fourfold increase in the risk of being diagnosed with CeD compared with matched controls.

ABSTRACTBackground and ObjectiveSeladelpar is an oral, once‐daily medication that improves cholestasis through its selective peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor (PPAR‐δ) agonism. It shows promising efficacy in treating primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients.MethodsA systematic review and meta‐analysis synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) obtained from PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and WOS until July 19th, 2025. Dichotomous outcomes were reported using risk ratio (RR) and continuous outcomes using mean difference (MD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsThree RCTs with 499 patients were included. Seladelpar was significantly associated with an increased ALP normalization (RR: 21.12 with 95% CI [4.14, 107.58], p < 0.01), biochemical response (RR: 3.06 with 95% CI [2.00, 4.70], p < 0.01), and decreased pruritus NRS score change (MD: −1.47 with 95% CI [−2.73, −0.21], p = 0.02). Seladelpar was also significantly associated with a decreased incidence of pruritus (RR: 0.54 with 95% CI [0.31, 0.94], p = 0.03) but with an increased incidence of headache (RR: 3.37 with 95% CI [1.11, 10.23], p = 0.03). However, there was no significant difference between seladelpar and placebo regarding the incidence of any adverse events (RR: 0.96 with 95% CI [0.87, 1.06], p = 0.43).ConclusionSeladelpar improved liver biomarkers of cholestasis and reduced pruritus in patients with PBC without significantly increasing the adverse effects. This makes seladelpar a promising addition to the treatments available for PBC.Trial Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42024521208

ABSTRACT Introduction Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and concomitant inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the risk of CRC in patients with PSC without IBD remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the risk of CRC in patients with PSC without a history of IBD using a large national database. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX database to identify patients ≥ 18 years with PSC. Patients were then divided into two groups, PSC with IBD (PSC‐IBD cohort) and PSC without IBD (PSC non‐IBD cohort), and were matched with patients without a history of PSC or IBD (non‐PSC/non‐IBD group) by using 1:1 propensity score matching. The primary outcome was the risk of first diagnosis of CRC. With censoring applied, Kaplan–Meier analysis with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs was used to compare time‐to‐event rates at daily time intervals. Results PSC patients without IBD were at increased risk of CRC compared to the non‐PSC/IBD cohort (aHR = 2.91; 95% CI: 1.6–6.0). Patients with PSC and IBD exhibited a higher risk of CRC (aHR = 6.5; 95% CI: 3.78–11.2), especially among the UC cohort (aHR = 6.3; 95% CI: 3.2–12.4). Patients with PSC were at increased risk of various gastrointestinal malignancies (aHR = 10.5; 95% CI: 7.3–15; p < 0.0001), including hepatobiliary cancers, pancreatic cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Discussion Our findings provide real‐world evidence that PSC is an independent risk factor for colorectal cancer, even in the absence of concomitant IBD. These results support the need for further research to determine whether patients with isolated PSC may benefit from tailored CRC surveillance strategies.

ABSTRACTIL‐17 inhibitors effectively treat psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis but may increase the risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We assessed their association with IBD compared to apremilast. Utilising the TriNetX database, we analysed patients with psoriasis or ankylosing spondylitis initiating IL‐17 inhibitors or apremilast. We used propensity score matching and Cox models to estimate IBD risk. Among 13,216 matched patients per group, 142 developed IBD with IL‐17 inhibitors versus 60 with apremilast (aHR = 2.50, 95% CI: 1.85–3.39). IL‐17 inhibitors increase IBD risk, necessitating careful patient selection and monitoring.

INTRODUCTION: Inadequate bowel preparation (IBP) before colonoscopy remains a common problem. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the risk factors associated with IBP. METHODS: We searched multiple databases for studies that assessed risk factors for IBP after adjustment and reported the data as adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model, and pooled adjusted odds ratios for risk factors reported in ≥ 3 studies were constructed. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-four studies with 358,257 participants were included. We analyzed 48 unique risk factors. Sociodemographic predictors of IBP were Medicaid insurance, obesity, current tobacco use, age ≥ 65 years, Black race, low education level, male sex, and unmarried status. Comorbidity-related predictors of IBP were any psychiatric disease, cirrhosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class ≥ 3, poor functional status, constipation, diabetes, previous abdominopelvic surgery, and hematochezia. Medication-related predictors of IBP were tricyclic antidepressants, antidepressants, opioids, nontricyclic antidepressants, and calcium channel blockers. Preparation/procedure-related predictors of IBP were brown liquid rectal effluent, any incomplete bowel preparation (BP) intake, lack of split-dose BP, increased BP-to-defecation interval, any nonadherence to dietary instructions, increased BP-to-colonoscopy interval, any BP intolerance, previous IBP, and inpatient status. Although afternoon colonoscopy was a predictor of IBP, subgroup analysis of prospective studies revealed no significant association. DISCUSSION: Our meta-analysis focused on adjusted risk factors to provide precise estimates of the most important risk factors for IBP. Our findings could help develop a validated prediction model to identify high-risk patients for IBP, improve colonoscopy outcomes, reduce the need for repeat colonoscopies, and reduce associated healthcare costs.

Background: Targeting interleukin-23 (IL-23) represents a significant therapeutic avenue for treating ulcerative colitis (UC). Study Question: What are the effectiveness and safety of selective inhibitors targeting IL-23p19 and IL-12/23p40 in individuals with moderate-to-severe UC? Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. Study Design: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases till January 15, 2024, to identify randomized controlled trials comparing IL-23p19 and IL-12/23p40 inhibitors against placebo or active comparators in UC patients. The primary outcome was clinical remission, with secondary outcomes including clinical response, endoscopic remission, and safety profiles during induction and maintenance phases. Using a fixed-effect model, we pooled dichotomous data with risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for analysis. Results: In 5 trials involving 1120 patients with moderate to severe UC, targeting IL-23 showed significant superiority in inducing clinical remission [RR: 2.08, 95% CI, (1.66–2.61)], endoscopic remission [RR: 1.73, 95% CI, (1.39–2.16)], and histologic remission [RR: 1.88, 95% CI, (1.34–2.64)]. Additionally, individuals treated with IL-12/23p40 or IL-23p19 antagonists maintained clinical remission [RR: 1.85, 95% CI, (1.53–2.23)], endoscopic remission [RR: 2.03, 95% CI, (1.60–2.57)], and histologic remission [RR: 1.66, 95% CI, (1.11–2.48)]. Targeting IL-23 was linked with a reduced risk of any adverse events (AE) during both induction [RR: 0.94, 95% CI, (0.86–1.02)] and maintenance phases [RR: 0.93, 95% CI, (0.86–0.99)], any serious AE during the induction phase [RR: 0.53, 95% CI, (0.36–0.78)], and withdrawal due to AEs compared to patients receiving placebo during induction [RR: 0.24, 95% CI (0.14, 0.43)]. Conclusion: Targeting IL-23 demonstrates efficacy and safety for inducing and maintaining clinical and endoscopic remission in moderate-to-severe UC patients.

INTRODUCTION: The risk of small bowel cancer (SBC) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is unclear. We compared the recent trends of SBC in patients with IBD and stratified them based on disease type. METHODS: We used TriNetX database to access the electronic health records for patients with IBD, ulcerative colitis (UC), and Crohn's disease (CD) from 2005 to 2024. We used propensity score matching to compare the rate of SBC in patients with IBD, UC, and CD compared with the general population. We adjusted for all known confounders. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2024, there was an increasing trend of diagnosed SBC in patients with IBD, with an average annual percentage change of 3.2% ( P < 0.001). Patients with CD (adjusted hazard ratio = 4.83; 95% confidence interval: 3.58–6.53; P < 0.0001) had an increased risk of SBC compared with the general population without IBD, as well as patients with UC (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.28; 95% confidence interval: 1.65–3.14; P < 0.0001). The ileum was the most common location across all subgroups. DISCUSSION: Both patients with CD and, interestingly, UC had an elevated risk of developing SBC compared with the general population.